Classificação de risco em pronto-socorro: concordância entre um protocolo institucional Brasileiro e Manchester

The aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between an institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol for the risk assessment of patients attended in an emergency room of a public hospital in Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil. This is a descriptive and comparative study, in which 382 patients' reports were evaluated and the risk was classified, using the institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol. Rates were calculated through weighted and unweighted kappa, in order to determine the level of agreement between the protocols. The results showed that the correlation between the protocols is average when considering that classification errors occurred between neighboring colors (kappa=0.48), and good when considering that classification errors occurred between extreme colors (kappa=0.61). The Manchester protocol increased the patients' level of priority of patients and has been considered more inclusive.Este estudio tuvo por objetivo verificar el grado de concordancia entre un protocolo institucional y el protocolo de Manchester para la clasificación de riesgo de pacientes atendidos en primeros auxilios de un hospital público de Belo Horizonte - MG - Brasil. Se trata de estudio descriptivo comparativo en el cual 382 fichas fueron evaluadas y, realizada la clasificación de riesgo utilizando los protocolos mencionados encima, a partir del registro realizado por los enfermeros. Índices kappa ponderado y no ponderado fueron calculados para determinar el grado de concordancia entre los protocolos. Los resultados mostraron que la concordancia entre los protocolos es media, cuando considerados los errores de clasificación ocurridos entre colores vecinos (kappa=0,48) y buena, cuando considerados los errores de clasificación ocurridos entre colores extremos (kappa=0,61). Se concluye que el protocolo de Manchester aumentó el nivel de prioridad de los pacientes, demostrando ser un protocolo que incluye más.Este estudo teve por objetivo verificar o grau de concordância entre um protocolo institucional e o protocolo de Manchester, para a classificação de risco de pacientes atendidos no pronto-socorro de um hospital público de Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. Trata-se de estudo descritivo comparativo, no qual 382 prontuários foram avaliados e realizada a classificação de risco, utilizando os protocolos mencionados acima, a partir do registro realizado pelos enfermeiros. Índices Kappa ponderado e não ponderado foram calculados para determinar o grau de concordância entre os protocolos. Os resultados mostraram que a concordância entre os protocolos é média, quando considerados os erros de classificação, ocorridos entre cores vizinhas (Kappa=0,48) e boa, quando considerados os erros de classificação, ocorridos entre cores extremas (Kappa=0,61). Conclui-se que o protocolo de Manchester aumentou o nível de prioridade dos pacientes, demonstrando ser protocolo mais inclusivo

Risk classification in an emergency room: agreement level between a Brazilian institutional and the Manchester Protocol

The aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between an institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol for the risk assessment of patients attended in an emergency room of a public hospital in Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil. This is a descriptive and comparative study, in which 382 patients' reports were evaluated and the risk was classified, using the institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol. Rates were calculated through weighted and unweighted kappa, in order to determine the level of agreement between the protocols. The results showed that the correlation between the protocols is average when considering that classification errors occurred between neighboring colors (kappa=0.48), and good when considering that classification errors occurred between extreme colors (kappa=0.61). The Manchester protocol increased the patients' level of priority of patients and has been considered more inclusive.Este estudio tuvo por objetivo verificar el grado de concordancia entre un protocolo institucional y el protocolo de Manchester para la clasificación de riesgo de pacientes atendidos en primeros auxilios de un hospital público de Belo Horizonte - MG - Brasil. Se trata de estudio descriptivo comparativo en el cual 382 fichas fueron evaluadas y, realizada la clasificación de riesgo utilizando los protocolos mencionados encima, a partir del registro realizado por los enfermeros. Índices kappa ponderado y no ponderado fueron calculados para determinar el grado de concordancia entre los protocolos. Los resultados mostraron que la concordancia entre los protocolos es media, cuando considerados los errores de clasificación ocurridos entre colores vecinos (kappa=0,48) y buena, cuando considerados los errores de clasificación ocurridos entre colores extremos (kappa=0,61). Se concluye que el protocolo de Manchester aumentó el nivel de prioridad de los pacientes, demostrando ser un protocolo que incluye más.Este estudo teve por objetivo verificar o grau de concordância entre um protocolo institucional e o protocolo de Manchester, para a classificação de risco de pacientes atendidos no pronto-socorro de um hospital público de Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. Trata-se de estudo descritivo comparativo, no qual 382 prontuários foram avaliados e realizada a classificação de risco, utilizando os protocolos mencionados acima, a partir do registro realizado pelos enfermeiros. Índices Kappa ponderado e não ponderado foram calculados para determinar o grau de concordância entre os protocolos. Os resultados mostraram que a concordância entre os protocolos é média, quando considerados os erros de classificação, ocorridos entre cores vizinhas (Kappa=0,48) e boa, quando considerados os erros de classificação, ocorridos entre cores extremas (Kappa=0,61). Conclui-se que o protocolo de Manchester aumentou o nível de prioridade dos pacientes, demonstrando ser protocolo mais inclusivo

PREVALÊNCIA DE COMPLICAÇÕES RESPIRATÓRIAS NA UNIDADE DE TERAPIA INTENSIVA ADULTO

Introduction: Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are subject to a high demand for invasive mechanisms that increase the chances of developing complications. Objectives: to identify the main respiratory complications in the adult ICU. Materials and Methods: 104 medical records of patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed. The following programs were used for data accounting: Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 25®, Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney test. Results: There was an average predominance of 51.9% women and 48.1% men, with a mean age of 65.22 ± 20.83 years. The average length of stay in the ICU is 14.23±12.89. The total length of stay 21.45±18.05. The duration of use of mechanical ventilation was 40% for a period of 1 to 7 days, 21.7% for more than 20 days, 16.7% for a period of 10 to 15 days, 15% for a period of 7 to 10 days, 6.7% from 15 to 20 days. Where 49.5% had respiratory complications (n ​​= 50), among the most prevalent complications in the analyzed sample are pneumonia in 18.8%, sepsis or septic shock in 16.7%. Conclusion: It was found that the most prevalent respiratory complication was pneumonia, which may be related to the use of mechanical ventilation, a fact that demonstrates the need for increased care to prevent this complication. Based on the results, prospective studies with more robust samples are needed to confirm such trends.Introdução: Os pacientes internados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) estão sujeitos à alta demanda de mecanismos invasivos que aumentam as chances de desenvolverem complicações. Objetivos: identificar as principais complicações respiratórias na UTI adulto. Materiais e Métodos: Foram analisados 104 prontuários de pacientes que foram internados na UTI. Foram utilizados os seguintes programas para a contabilização dos dados: software Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS), versão 25®, teste de Shapiro-Wilk, teste de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Evidenciou-se a predominância média de mulheres 51,9% e homens de 48,1%, sendo a média da idade de 65,22 ± 20,83 anos. O tempo médio de internação na UTI é de 14,23±12,89. O tempo total de internação 21,45±18,05. O tempo de utilização da ventilação mecânica foi de 40% pelo período de 1 a 7 dias, 21,7% acima de 20 dias, 16,7% pelo período de 10 a 15 dias, 15% pelo período de 7 a 10 dias, 6,7% de 15 a 20 dias. Onde 49,5% apresentaram complicações respiratórias (n = 50), dentre as complicações de maior prevalência na amostra analisada estão a pneumonia em 18,8%, sepse ou choque séptico 16,7%. Conclusão: Foi verificado que a complicação respiratória mais prevalente foi à pneumonia, podendo estar relacionada ao uso de ventilação mecânica, fato que demonstra necessidade de aumento de cuidados para prevenção de tal complicação. A partir dos resultados tornam-se necessárias pesquisas prospectivas e com amostras mais robustas para confirmação de tais tendências

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Risk classification in an emergency room: agreement level between a Brazilian institutional and the Manchester Protocol

The aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between an institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol for the risk assessment of patients attended in an emergency room of a public hospital in Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil. This is a descriptive and comparative study, in which 382 patients' reports were evaluated and the risk was classified, using the institutional protocol and the Manchester protocol. Rates were calculated through weighted and unweighted kappa, in order to determine the level of agreement between the protocols. The results showed that the correlation between the protocols is average when considering that classification errors occurred between neighboring colors (kappa=0.48), and good when considering that classification errors occurred between extreme colors (kappa=0.61). The Manchester protocol increased the patients' level of priority of patients and has been considered more inclusive

Tracheocutaneous fistula as a complication of laryngotracheal separation surgery.

To evaluate the relationship between the occurrence of tracheocutaneous fistula of the proximal tracheal stump regarding the indication (therapeutic or prophylactic) of laryngotracheal separation surgery (LTS) and regarding the presence of a current or previous tracheostomy when LTS was performed. Retrospective analysis of 66 patients submitted to LTS. The tracheocutaneous fistula occurred in 14 (21.2%) patients. Twelve (33.3%) of 36 patients whose indication was therapeutic and in two (6.7%) of 30 patients whose indication was prophylactic (p = 0.019). It occurred in 8 (57.1%) of 14 patients who had undergone tracheostomy prior to completion of LTS, while occurred in 6 (11.5%) patients who had not previously undergone tracheostomy (n = 52) (p = 0.0009). The incidence of tracheocutaneous fistula as a postoperative complication of laryngotracheal separation is high and occurs mainly in patients whose indication is therapeutic and for those with a current or previous tracheostomy