20 research outputs found

    Mechanical Properties and Fracture Dynamics of Silicene Membranes

    Get PDF
    As graphene became one of the most important materials today, there is a renewed interest on others similar structures. One example is silicene, the silicon analogue of graphene. It share some the remarkable graphene properties, such as the Dirac cone, but presents some distinct ones, such as a pronounced structural buckling. We have investigated, through density functional based tight-binding (DFTB), as well as reactive molecular dynamics (using ReaxFF), the mechanical properties of suspended single-layer silicene. We calculated the elastic constants, analyzed the fracture patterns and edge reconstructions. We also addressed the stress distributions, unbuckling mechanisms and the fracture dependence on the temperature. We analysed the differences due to distinct edge morphologies, namely zigzag and armchair

    Mechanical properties and fracture patterns of graphene (graphitic) nanowiggles

    Get PDF
    publisher: Elsevier articletitle: Mechanical properties and fracture patterns of graphene (graphitic) nanowiggles journaltitle: Carbon articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.018 content_type: article copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.publisher: Elsevier articletitle: Mechanical properties and fracture patterns of graphene (graphitic) nanowiggles journaltitle: Carbon articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.018 content_type: article copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.This work was supported in part by the Brazilian Agencies CNPq, CAPES and FAPESP. The authors would like to thank the Center for Computational Engineering and Sciences at Unicamp for financial support through the FAPESP/CEPID Grant 2013/08293-7. N.M.P. is supported by the European Research Council PoC 2015 “Silkene” No. 693670, by the European Commission H2020 under the Graphene Flagship Core 1 No. 696656 (WP14 “Polymer Nanocomposites”) and under the Fet Proactive “Neurofibres” No. 732344

    Mechanical properties of graphene nanowiggles

    No full text
    CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPESFUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESPIn this work we have investigated the mechanical properties and fracture patterns of some graphene nanowiggles (GNWs). Graphene nanoribbons are finite graphene segments with a large aspect ratio, while GNWs are nonaligned periodic repetitions of graphene nanoribbons. We have carried out fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations using a reactive force field (ReaxFF), as implemented in the LAMPPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) code. Our results showed that the GNW fracture patterns are strongly dependent on the nanoribbon topology and present an interesting behavior, since some narrow sheets have larger ultimate failure strain values. This can be explained by the fact that narrow nanoribbons have more angular freedom when compared to wider ones, which can create a more efficient way to accumulate and to dissipate strain/stress. We have also observed the formation of linear atomic chains (LACs) and some structural defect reconstructions during the material rupture. The reported graphene failure patterns, where zigzag/armchair edge terminated graphene structures are fractured along armchair/zigzag lines, were not observed in the GNW analyzed cases.16581418CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPESFUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESPCONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPESFUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESPSem informaçãoSem informação2013/08293-7Symposium RR - Large-Area Graphene and Other 2D-Layered Materials - Synthesis, Properties and Applications1 a 6 de Dezembro de 2013Boston, MA, Estados UnidosThis work was supported in part by the Brazilian Agencies CNPq, CAPES and FAPESP. The authors would like to thank the Center for Computational Engineering and Sciences at Unicamp for financial support through the FAPESP/CEPID Grant 2013/08293-7

    Mechanical Properties And Fracture Dynamics Of Silicene Membranes

    No full text
    The advent of graphene created a new era in materials science. Graphene is a two-dimensional planar honeycomb array of carbon atoms in sp2-hybridized states. A natural question is whether other elements of the IV-group of the periodic table (such as silicon and germanium), could also form graphene-like structures. Structurally, the silicon equivalent to graphene is called silicene. Silicene was theoretically predicted in 1994 and recently experimentally realized by different groups. Similarly to graphene, silicene exhibits electronic and mechanical properties that can be exploited to nanoelectronics applications. In this work we have investigated, through fully atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the mechanical properties of single-layer silicene under mechanical strain. These simulations were carried out using a reactive force field (ReaxFF), as implemented in the LAMMPS code. We have calculated the elastic properties and the fracture patterns. Our results show that the dynamics of the whole fracturing processes of silicene present some similarities with that of graphene as well as some unique features.1549299107Harris, P.J.F., (2009) Carbon Nanotube Science, , Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBaughman, R., Eckhardt, H., Kertesz, M., (1987) J. Chem. Phys., 87, p. 6687Coluci, V.R., Braga, S.F., Legoas, S.B., Galvao, D.S., Baughman, R.H., (2003) Phys. Rev. B, 68, p. 035430Coluci, V.R., Braga, S.F., Legoas, S.B., Galvao, D.S., Baughman, R.H., (2004) Nanotechnology, 15, p. S142Novoselov, K.S., (2004) Science, 306, p. 666Cheng, S.H., (2010) Phys. Rev. B, 81, p. 205435Withers, F., Duboist, M., Savchenko, A.K., (2010) Phys. Rev. B, 82, p. 073403Takeda, K., Shiraishi, K., (1994) Phys. Rev. B, 50, p. 14916Cahangirov, S., Topsakal, M., Akturk, E., Sahin, H., Ciraci, S., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, p. 236804Nakano, H., (2006) Angew. Chem., 118, p. 6451Lalmi, B., (2010) Appl. Phys. Lett., 97, p. 223109Psofogiannakis, G.M., Froudakis, G.E., (2012) J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, p. 19211Aufray, B., (2010) Appl. Phys. Lett., 96, p. 183101De Padova, P., (2010) Appl. Phys. Lett., 96, p. 261905Vogt, P., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, p. 155201Bianco, E., (2013) Nano Lett., 7, p. 4414Friedlein, R., Fleurence, A., Ozaki, T., Yamada-Takamura, Y., SPIE Newsroom, , in pressVan Duin, A.C.T., Dasgupta, S., Lorant, F., Goddard, W.A., III, (2001) J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, p. 9396Plimpton, S., (1995) J. Comp. Phys., 117, p. 1. , http://lammps.sandia.govPaupitz, R., (2013) Nanotechnology, 24, p. 035706Yang, Y., Xu, X., (2012) Comp. Mater. Sci., 61, p. 83Pei, Q.X., Zhang, Y.W., Shenoy, V.B., (2010) Carbon, 48, p. 898Kim, K., (2011) Nano Lett., 12, p. 293Koskinen, (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, p. 115502Koskinen, (2009) Phys. Rev. B, 80, p. 07340
    corecore