No difference in implant survival between 28-mm M2a RingLoc metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty : results from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s).Background and purpose — Long-term outcome of small head (28 mm) metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is available mainly for Metasul devices (Sulzer Medica, Winterthur, Switzerland). Biomet MoM THA was frequently used in Finland. Therefore, we assessed long-term survivorship of the M2a 28-mm RingLoc MoM THA (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) and compared it with the metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) RingLoc THA from the same manufacturer. Patients and methods — We conducted a register study based on THAs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register performed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. 290 28-mm head M2a MoM THAs and 1,647 28-mm head MoP THAs (reference group) were included. The endpoint was revision for any reason, or revision for aseptic loosening, osteolysis, liner wear, or metallosis as one group. Kaplan– Meier survival estimates were calculated, and revision risks were assessed using a Cox multiple regression model, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results — No difference was found in the 15-year Kaplan–Meier survivorship between the 28-mm head M2a RingLoc MoM THA and the reference group for any reason for revision (87.7% [82.9–92.1] and 83.3% [81.0–85.3], respectively). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for any reason for revision for the MoM THA group compared with the reference group was at least equal or better (0.70 [0.48–1.02]). Both groups presented similar survival for revision for aseptic loosening of the cup, osteolysis, liner wear, or metallosis, at 96.2% (92.7–98.0) and 95.4% (93.9–96.5), respectively. Interpretation — In the long-term survival there was no difference between the M2a 28-mm RingLoc MoM THA and 28-mm MoP THA. Further follow-up regimens for M2a 28-mm RingLoc THA patients may be unnecessary, but long-term metal ion and radiological data is needed before any formal suggestions.Peer reviewe

Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections following total hip arthroplasty based on 33,337 hips in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2018

Background and purpose - Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication and more information on risk factors for PJI is required to find measures to prevent infections. Therefore, we assessed risk factors for PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a large patient cohort. Patients and methods - We analyzed 33,337 primary THAs performed between May 2014 and January 2018 based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for first PJI revision operation using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates. Results - 350 primary THAs were revised for the first time due to PJI during the study period. The hazard ratios for PJI revision in multivariable analysis were 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.2) for ASA class II and 3.2 (2.0-5.1) for ASA class III-IV compared with ASA class I, 1.4 (1.1-1.7) for bleeding > 500 mL compared with 120 minutes compared with 45-59 minutes, and 2.6 (1.4-4.9) for simultaneous bilateral operation. In the univariable analysis, hazard ratios for PJI revision were 2.3 (1.7-3.3) for BMI of 31-35 and 5.0 (3.5-7.1) for BMI of > 35 compared with patients with BMI of 21-25. Interpretation - We found several modifiable risk factors associated with increased PJI revision risk after THA to which special attention should be paid preoperatively. In particular, high BMI may be an even more prominent risk factor for PJI than previously assessed.Peer reviewe

Optical dipole traps and atomic waveguides based on Bessel light beams

We theoretically investigate the use of Bessel light beams generated using axicons for creating optical dipole traps for cold atoms and atomic waveguiding. Zeroth-order Bessel beams can be used to produce highly elongated dipole traps allowing for the study of one-dimensional trapped gases and realization of a Tonks gas of impentrable bosons. First-order Bessel beams are shown to be able to produce tight confined atomic waveguides over centimeter distances.Comment: 20 pages, 5 figures, to appear in Phys. Rev.

Spontaneous emission in a planar Fabry-Perot microcavity

Published versio

Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections following total hip arthroplasty based on 33,337 hips in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2018

Background and purpose - Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication and more information on risk factors for PJI is required to find measures to prevent infections. Therefore, we assessed risk factors for PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a large patient cohort.Patients and methods - We analyzed 33,337 primary THAs performed between May 2014 and January 2018 based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for first PJI revision operation using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates.Results - 350 primary THAs were revised for the first time due to PJI during the study period. The hazard ratios for PJI revision in multivariable analysis were 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.2) for ASA class II and 3.2 (2.0-5.1) for ASA class III-IV compared with ASA class I, 1.4 (1.1-1.7) for bleeding > 500 mL compared with 120 minutes compared with 45-59 minutes, and 2.6 (1.4-4.9) for simultaneous bilateral operation. In the univariable analysis, hazard ratios for PJI revision were 2.3 (1.7-3.3) for BMI of 31-35 and 5.0 (3.5-7.1) for BMI of > 35 compared with patients with BMI of 21-25.Interpretation - We found several modifiable risk factors associated with increased PJI revision risk after THA to which special attention should be paid preoperatively. In particular, high BMI may be an even more prominent risk factor for PJI than previously assessed.</p

Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles

Hulme, Charlotte H. & Wilson, Emma L. - Equal contributorsBackground Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be used in the treatment of focal cartilage injuries to prevent the onset of osteoarthritis (OA). However, we are yet to understand fully why some individuals do not respond well to this intervention. Identification of a reliable and accurate biomarker panel that can predict which patients are likely to respond well to ACI is needed in order to assign the patient to the most appropriate therapy. This study aimed to compare the baseline and mid-treatment proteomic profiles of synovial fluids (SFs) obtained from responders and non-responders to ACI. Methods SFs were derived from 14 ACI responders (mean Lysholm improvement of 33 (17–54)) and 13 non-responders (mean Lysholm decrease of 14 (4–46)) at the two stages of surgery (cartilage harvest and chondrocyte implantation). Label-free proteome profiling of dynamically compressed SFs was used to identify predictive markers of ACI success or failure and to investigate the biological pathways involved in the clinical response to ACI. Results Only 1 protein displayed a ≥2.0-fold differential abundance in the preclinical SF of ACI responders versus non-responders. However, there is a marked difference between these two groups with regard to their proteome shift in response to cartilage harvest, with 24 and 92 proteins showing ≥2.0-fold differential abundance between Stages I and II in responders and non-responders, respectively. Proteomic data has been uploaded to ProteomeXchange (identifier: PXD005220). We have validated two biologically relevant protein changes associated with this response, demonstrating that matrix metalloproteinase 1 was prominently elevated and S100 calcium binding protein A13 was reduced in response to cartilage harvest in non-responders. Conclusions The differential proteomic response to cartilage harvest noted in responders versus non-responders is completely novel. Our analyses suggest several pathways which appear to be altered in non-responders that are worthy of further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms of ACI failure. These protein changes highlight many putative biomarkers that may have potential for prediction of ACI treatment success

Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease and a major cause of disability. The knee is the large joint most affected. While chronological age is the single most important risk factor of osteoarthritis, the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis in the young patient is predominantly related to an unfavorable biomechanical environment at the joint. This results in mechanical demand that exceeds the ability of a joint to repair and maintain itself, predisposing the articular cartilage to premature degeneration. This review examines the available basic science, preclinical and clinical evidence regarding several such unfavorable biomechanical conditions about the knee: malalignment, loss of meniscal tissue, cartilage defects and joint instability or laxity

Generating Bessel beams with broad depth-of-field by using phase-only acoustic holograms

[EN] We report zero-th and high-order acoustic Bessel beams with broad depth-of-field generated using acoustic holograms. While the transverse field distribution of Bessel beams generated using traditional passive methods is correctly described by a Bessel function, these methods present a common drawback: the axial distribution of the field is not constant, as required for ideal Bessel beams. In this work, we experimentally, numerically and theoretically report acoustic truncated Bessel beams of flat-intensity along their axis in the ultrasound regime using phase-only holograms. In particular, the beams present a uniform field distribution showing an elongated focal length of about 40 wavelengths, while the transverse width of the beam remains smaller than 0.7 wavelengths. The proposed acoustic holograms were compared with 3D-printed fraxicons, a blazed version of axicons. The performance of both phase-only holograms and fraxicons is studied and we found that both lenses produce Bessel beams in a wide range of frequencies. In addition, high-order Bessel beam were generated. We report first order Bessel beams that show a clear phase dislocation along their axis and a vortex with single topological charge. The proposed method may have potential applications in ultrasonic imaging, biomedical ultrasound and particle manipulation applications using passive lenses.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation (MINECO) through Project TEC2016-80976-R. NJ and SJ acknowledge financial support from Generalitat Valenciana through grants APOSTD/2017/042, ACIF/2017/045 and GV/2018/11. FC acknowledges financial support from Agencia Valenciana de la Innovacio through grant INNCON00/18/9 and European Regional Development Fund (IDIFEDER/2018/022).Jiménez-Gambín, S.; Jimenez, N.; Benlloch Baviera, JM.; Camarena Femenia, F. (2019). Generating Bessel beams with broad depth-of-field by using phase-only acoustic holograms. Scientific Reports. 9:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56369-zS1139Durnin, J. Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. i. the scalar theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 651 (1987).Durnin, J., Miceli, J. Jr & Eberly, J. Diffraction-free beams. Physical review letters 58, 1499 (1987).Chu, X. Analytical study on the self-healing property of Bessel beam. Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 259 (2012).McLeod, E., Hopkins, A. B. & Arnold, C. B. Multiscale Bessel beams generated by a tunable acoustic gradient index of refraction lens. Opt. Lett. 31, 3155 (2006).Li, Z., Alici, K. B., Caglayan, H. & Ozbay, E. Generation of an axially asymmetric Bessel-like beam from a metallic subwavelength aperture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 143901 (2009).Fahrbach, F. & Rohrbach, A. Propagation stability of self-reconstructing Bessel beams enables contrast-enhanced imaging in thick media. Nat. Commun. 3, 632 (2011).Lu, J.-y, Zou, H. & Greenleaf, J. F. Biomedical ultrasound beam forming. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 20, 403–428 (1994).Marston, P. L. Scattering of a Bessel beam by a sphere. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 121, 753 (2007).Marston, P. L. Scattering of a Bessel beam by a sphere: Ii. helicoidal case and spherical shell example. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 2905–2910 (2008).Lu, J. & Greenleaf, F. Ultrasonic nondiffracting transducer for medical imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr. 37, 438 (1990).Lu, J.-Y. & Greenleaf, J. F. Pulse-echo imaging using a nondiffracting beam transducer. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 17, 265–281 (1991).Lu, J.-y, Song, T.-K., Kinnick, R. R. & Greenleaf, J. F. In vitro and in vivo real-time imaging with ultrasonic limited diffraction beams. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 12, 819–829 (1993).Lu, J.-y, Xu, X.-L., Zou, H. & Greenleaf, J. F. Application of Bessel beam for doppler velocity estimation. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control 42, 649–662 (1995).Nabavizadeh, A., Greenleaf, J. F., Fatemi, M. & Urban, M. W. Optimized shear wave generation using hybrid beamforming methods. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 40, 188–199 (2014).Marston, P. L. Axial radiation force of a Bessel beam on a sphere and direction reversal of the force. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120, 3518–3524 (2006).Marston, P. L. Negative axial radiation forces on solid spheres and shells in a Bessel beam. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 3162–3165 (2007).Marston, P. L. Radiation force of a helicoidal Bessel beam on a sphere. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 3539–3547 (2009).Thomas, J.-L. & Marchiano, R. Pseudo angular momentum and topological charge conservation for nonlinear acoustical vortices. Physical review letters 91, 244302 (2003).Volke-Sepúlveda, K., Santillán, A. O. & Boullosa, R. R. Transfer of angular momentum to matter from acoustical vortices in free space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 024302 (2008).Zhang, L. & Marston, P. L. Geometrical interpretation of negative radiation forces of acoustical Bessel beams on spheres. Physical Review E 84, 035601 (2011).Courtney, C. R. et al. Dexterous manipulation of microparticles using Bessel-function acoustic pressure fields. Applied Physics Letters 102, 123508 (2013).Hong, Z., Zhang, J. & Drinkwater, B. W. Observation of orbital angular momentum transfer from Bessel-shaped acoustic vortices to diphasic liquid-microparticle mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 214301 (2015).Baresch, D., Thomas, J.-L. &Marchiano, R. Observation of a single-beam gradient force acoustical trap for elastic particles: Acoustical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016).Marzo, A., Caleap, M. & Drinkwater, B. W. Acoustic virtual vortices with tunable orbital angular momentum for trapping of mie particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 044301 (2018).Li, Y. et al. Acoustic radiation torque of an acoustic-vortex spanner exerted on axisymmetric objects. Applied Physics Letters 112, 254101 (2018).Riaud, A., Baudoin, M., Thomas, J.-L. & Matar, O. B. Cyclones and attractive streaming generated by acoustical vortices. Physical Review E 90, 013008 (2014).Shi, C., Dubois, M., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. High-speed acoustic communication by multiplexing orbital angular momentum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 7250–7253 (2017).Jiang, X., Liang, B., Cheng, J.-C. & Qiu, C.-W. Twisted acoustics: metasurface-enabled multiplexing and demultiplexing. Advanced Materials 30, 1800257 (2018).Hsu, D., Margetan, F. & Thompson, D. O. Bessel beam ultrasonic transducer: fabrication method and experimental results. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2066 (1989).Campbell, J. A. & Soloway, S. Generation of a nondiffracting beam with frequency-independent beamwidth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88, 2467–2477 (1990).Masuyama, H., Yokoyama, T., Nagai, K. & Mizutani, K. Generation of Bessel beam from equiamplitude-driven annular transducer array consisting of a few elements. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 3080 (1999).Fjield, T., Fan, X. & Hynynen, K. A parametric study of the concentric-ring transducer design for mri guided ultrasound surgery. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1220 (1996).Chillara, V. K., Pantea, C. & Sinha, D. N. Low-frequency ultrasonic Bessel-like collimated beam generation from radial modes of piezoelectric transducers. Applied Physics Letters 110, 064101 (2017).Burckhardt, C., Hoffmann, H. & Grandchamp, P.-A. Ultrasound axicon: A device for focusing over a large depth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 1628–1630 (1973).Foster, F., Patterson, M., Arditi, M. & Hunt, J. The conical scanner: a two transducer ultrasound scatter imaging technique. Ultrasonic imaging 3, 62–82 (1981).McLeod, J. H. The axicon: A new type of optical element. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 592 (1954).Arlt, J. & Dholakia, K. Generation of high-order Bessel beams by use of an axicon. Optics Communications 177, 297–301 (2000).Golub, I. Fresnel axicon. Optics letters 31, 1890–1892 (2006).Lirette, R. & Mobley, J. Broadband wave packet dynamics of minimally diffractive ultrasonic fields from axicon and stepped fraxicon lenses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146, 103–108 (2019).Jiménez, N. et al. Acoustic Bessel-like beam formation by an axisymmetric grating. Europhys. Lett. 106, 24005 (2014).Xu, Z., Xu, W., Qian, M., Cheng, Q. & Liu, X. A flat acoustic lens to generate a Bessel-like beam. Ultrasonics 80, 66–71 (2017).Li, Y., Liang, B., Gu, Z.-M., Zou, X.-Y. & Cheng, J.-C. Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. Scientific Reports 3, 2546 (2013).Nye, J. & Berry, M. Dislocations in wave trains. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 336, 165–190 (1974).Jiménez, N. et al. Formation of high-order acoustic Bessel beams by spiral diffraction gratings. Physical Review E 94, 053004 (2016).Wang, T. et al. Particle manipulation with acoustic vortex beam induced by a brass plate with spiral shape structure. Applied Physics Letters 109, 123506 (2016).Jia, Y.-R., Wei, Q., Wu, D.-J., Xu, Z. & Liu, X.-J. Generation of fractional acoustic vortex with a discrete archimedean spiral structure plate. Applied Physics Letters 112, 173501 (2018).Jiménez, N., Romero-Garca, V., Garca-Raffi, L. M., Camarena, F. & Staliunas, K. Sharp acoustic vortex focusing by fresnel-spiral zone plates. Applied Physics Letters 112, 204101 (2018).Baudoin, M. et al. Folding a focalized acoustical vortex on a flat holographic transducer: miniaturized selective acoustical tweezers. Science advances 5, eaav1967 (2019).Muelas-Hurtado, R. D., Ealo, J. L., Pazos-Ospina, J. F. & Volke-Sepúlveda, K. Acoustic analysis of a broadband spiral source for the simultaneous generation of multiple Bessel vortices in air. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144, 3252–3261 (2018).Muelas-Hurtado, R. D., Ealo, J. L., Pazos-Ospina, J. F. & Volke-Sepúlveda, K. Generation of multiple vortex beam by means of active diffraction gratings. Applied Physics Letters 112, 084101 (2018).Wunenburger, R., Lozano, J. I. V. & Brasselet, E. Acoustic orbital angular momentum transfer to matter by chiral scattering. New Journal of Physics 17, 103022 (2015).Terzi, M., Tsysar, S., Yuldashev, P., Karzova, M. & Sapozhnikov, O. Generation of a vortex ultrasonic beam with a phase plate with an angular dependence of the thickness. Moscow University Physics Bulletin 72, 61–67 (2017).Hefner, B. T. & Marston, P. L. An acoustical helicoidal wave transducer with applications for the alignment of ultrasonic and underwater systems. Jour. Acous. Soc. Am. 106, 3313–3316 (1999).Ealo, J. L., Prieto, J. C. & Seco, F. Airborne ultrasonic vortex generation using flexible ferroelectrets. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control 58, 1651–1657 (2011).Naify, C. J. et al. Generation of topologically diverse acoustic vortex beams using a compact metamaterial aperture. Applied Physics Letters 108, 223503 (2016).Ye, L. et al. Making sound vortices by metasurfaces. AIP Advances 6, 085007 (2016).Jiang, X., Li, Y., Liang, B., Cheng, J.-C. & Zhang, L. Convert acoustic resonances to orbital angular momentum. Physical review letters 117, 034301 (2016).Esfahlani, H., Lissek, H. & Mosig, J. R. Generation of acoustic helical wavefronts using metasurfaces. Physical Review B 95, 024312 (2017).Jiménez-Gambn, S., Jiménez, N., Benlloch, J. M. & Camarena, F. Holograms to focus arbitrary ultrasonic fields through the skull. Physical Review Applied 12, 014016 (2019).Maimbourg, G., Houdouin, A., Deffieux, T., Tanter, M. & Aubry, J.-F. 3d-printed adaptive acoustic lens as a disruptive technology for transcranial ultrasound therapy using single-element transducers. Physics in Medicine & Biology 63, 025026 (2018).Ferri, M. et al. On the evaluation of the suitability of the materials used to 3d print holographic acoustic lenses to correct transcranial focused ultrasound aberrations. Polymers 11, 1521 (2019).Melde, K., Mark, A. G., Qiu, T. & Fischer, P. Holograms for acoustics. Nature 537, 518 (2016).Brown, M. D., Cox, B. T. & Treeby, B. E. Design of multi-frequency acoustic kinoforms. Applied Physics Letters 111, 244101 (2017).Brown, M., Nikitichev, D., Treeby, B. & Cox, B. Generating arbitrary ultrasound fields with tailored optoacoustic surface profiles. Applied Physics Letters 110, 094102 (2017).Zhu, Y. et al. Fine manipulation of sound via lossy metamaterials with independent and arbitrary reflection amplitude and phase. Nature communications 9, 1632 (2018).Brown, M. D. Phase and amplitude modulation with acoustic holograms. Applied Physics Letters 115, 053701 (2019).Jiménez, N., Romero-Garca, V., Pagneux, V. & Groby, J.-P. Quasiperfect absorption by subwavelength acoustic panels in transmission using accumulation of resonances due to slow sound. Physical Review B 95, 014205 (2017).Tsang, P. W. M. & Poon, T.-C. Novel method for converting digital fresnel hologram to phase-only hologram based on bidirectional error diffusion. Optics Express 21, 23680–23686 (2013).Soret, J. Ueber die durch kreisgitter erzeugten diffractionsphänomene. Annalen der Physik 232, 99–113 (1875).Turunen, J., Vasara, A. & Friberg, A. T. Holographic generation of diffraction-free beams. Applied Optics 27, 3959–3962 (1988).Vasara, A., Turunen, J. & Friberg, A. T. Realization of general nondiffracting beams with computer-generated holograms. JOSA A 6, 1748–1754 (1989).Cunningham, K. B. & Hamilton, M. F. Bessel beams of finite amplitude in absorbing fluids. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 108, 519 (2000).Ding, D. & Y. Lu, J. Higher-order harmonics of limited diffraction Bessel beams. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 107, 1212 (2000).Skeldon, K., Wilson, C., Edgar, M. & Padgett, M. An acoustic spanner and its associated rotational Doppler shift. New J. Phys. 10, 013018 (2008).Wu, J. Acoustical tweezers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2140–2143 (1991).Zhang, L. & Marston, P. L. Angular momentum flux of nonparaxial acoustic vortex beams and torques on axisymmetric objects. Physical Review E 84, 065601 (2011).Yoon, C., Kang, B. J., Lee, C., Kim, H. H. & Shung, K. K. Multi-particle trapping and manipulation by a high-frequency array transducer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 214103 (2014).Marzo, A. et al. Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015).Blackstock, D. T. Fundamentals of physical acoustics (John Wiley & Sons, 2000).Treeby, B. E. & Cox, B. Modeling power law absorption and dispersion for acoustic propagation using the fractional laplacian. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 2741–2748 (2010).Treeby, B. E., Jaros, J., Rendell, A. P. & Cox, B. Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 4324–4336 (2012).Jiménez, N. et al. Time-domain simulation of ultrasound propagation in a tissue-like medium based on the resolution of the nonlinear acoustic constitutive relations. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 102, 876–892 (2016)

Ultrafast laser micro-nano structuring of transparent materials with high aspect ratio

Ultrafast lasers are ideal tools to process transparent materials because they spatially confine the deposition of laser energy within the material's bulk via nonlinear photoionization processes. Nonlinear propagation and filamentation were initially regarded as deleterious effects. But in the last decade, they turned out to be benefits to control energy deposition over long distances. These effects create very high aspect ratio structures which have found a number of important applications, particularly for glass separation with non-ablative techniques. This chapter reviews the developments of in-volume ultrafast laser processing of transparent materials. We discuss the basic physics of the processes, characterization means, filamentation of Gaussian and Bessel beams and provide an overview of present applications