Human pancreatic islet transplantation : literature review and Establishment of a pancreatic islet isolation laboratory

O diabetes melito tipo 1 (DM1) está associado ao desenvolvimento de complicações crônicas de elevada morbi-mortalidade em indivíduos jovens em idade produtiva. A terapia intensiva com insulina comprovadamente diminui o aparecimento das complicações crônicas da doença. Entretanto, essa terapia ainda está associada ao aumento da incidência de hipoglicemia. Em pacientes com “DM1 lábil”, os quais apresentam hipoglicemias graves sem sintomas de alerta, o transplante de ilhotas pancreáticas humanas é uma das melhores alternativas para restaurar a secreção de insulina e a percepção da hipoglicemia. Cerca de 80% dos pacientes que receberam transplante de ilhotas de mais de um doador, submetidos ao tratamento imunossupressor do protocolo de Edmonton, adquiriram independência de insulina após 1 ano do transplante. Porém, apenas 10% destes pacientes permaneceram livres de insulina após 5 anos. Entretanto, mesmo aqueles pacientes que necessitaram utilizar novamente insulina tiveram a normalização da homeostase glicêmica e da percepção da hipoglicemia, com prevenção da hipoglicemia grave. Sendo assim, o transplante de ilhotas é capaz de diminuir os níveis de glicose plasmática e HbA1c, reduzir a ocorrência de hipoglicemias graves e melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O objetivo deste artigo foi fazer uma breve revisão da literatura sobre o isolamento e transplante de ilhotas pancreáticas humanas e relatar a implantação de um laboratório de isolamento de ilhotas humanas no Serviço de Endocrinologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) is associated with chronic complications of high morbidity and mortality in young adults in a productive age. Insulin therapy has proved to reduce the chronic complications of diabetes. However, this therapy is still associated to an increased incidence of hypoglycemia. In patients with “brittle DM1”, who have severe hypoglycemia without any symptoms (hypoglycemia unawareness), the pancreatic islet transplantation is one of the best alternatives for restoring insulin secretion and hypoglycemia perception. About 80% of the patients who received islet transplantation from more than one donor, on immunosuppressive treatment with the Edmonton’s protocol, maintained insulin independence 1 year after transplantation. Nevertheless, only 10% of these patients remained free of insulin after 5 years post-transplantation. However, even those patients who returned to insulin treatment had a normalization of the glucose homeostasis and hypoglycemia perception. Therefore, islet transplantation is able to diminish plasmatic glucose and HbA1c levels, to reduce the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia, and to improve the quality of life of the patients. The purpose of this paper is to briefly review islet isolation and transplantation process, and report the establishing of a human islet isolation laboratory in the Endocrine Service at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Background Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common type of chronic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has been shown to improve the histological features of NASH. Here we report results from a planned interim analysis of an ongoing, phase 3 study of obeticholic acid for NASH. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adult patients with definite NASH,non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score of at least 4, and fibrosis stages F2–F3, or F1 with at least oneaccompanying comorbidity, were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive oral placebo, obeticholic acid 10 mg, or obeticholic acid 25 mg daily. Patients were excluded if cirrhosis, other chronic liver disease, elevated alcohol consumption, or confounding conditions were present. The primary endpointsfor the month-18 interim analysis were fibrosis improvement (≥1 stage) with no worsening of NASH, or NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, with the study considered successful if either primary endpoint was met. Primary analyses were done by intention to treat, in patients with fibrosis stage F2–F3 who received at least one dose of treatment and reached, or would have reached, the month 18 visit by the prespecified interim analysis cutoff date. The study also evaluated other histological and biochemical markers of NASH and fibrosis, and safety. This study is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02548351, and EudraCT, 20150-025601-6. Findings Between Dec 9, 2015, and Oct 26, 2018, 1968 patients with stage F1–F3 fibrosis were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment; 931 patients with stage F2–F3 fibrosis were included in the primary analysis (311 in the placebo group, 312 in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 308 in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). The fibrosis improvement endpoint was achieved by 37 (12%) patients in the placebo group, 55 (18%) in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group (p=0·045), and 71 (23%) in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group (p=0·0002). The NASH resolution endpoint was not met (25 [8%] patients in the placebo group, 35 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group [p=0·18], and 36 [12%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group [p=0·13]). In the safety population (1968 patients with fibrosis stages F1–F3), the most common adverse event was pruritus (123 [19%] in the placebo group, 183 [28%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 336 [51%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group); incidence was generally mild to moderate in severity. The overall safety profile was similar to that in previous studies, and incidence of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups (75 [11%] patients in the placebo group, 72 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 93 [14%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). Interpretation Obeticholic acid 25 mg significantly improved fibrosis and key components of NASH disease activity among patients with NASH. The results from this planned interim analysis show clinically significant histological improvement that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. This study is ongoing to assess clinical outcomes

Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30–50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515. Findings: Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68–0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (<1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (<1%) deaths in the albiglutide group. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline

Design and baseline characteristics of the finerenone in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in diabetic kidney disease trial

Background: Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials. Patients and Methods: The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >= 30 to <= 5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level alpha = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049

Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and prevalent heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure. Methods: The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597. Findings: Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64-0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59-0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66-1·00 for all-cause death; all pinteraction&gt;0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58-1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51-0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52-1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype. Interpretation: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group. Funding: Novo Nordisk

Human pancreatic islet transplantation : literature review and Establishment of a pancreatic islet isolation laboratory

O diabetes melito tipo 1 (DM1) está associado ao desenvolvimento de complicações crônicas de elevada morbi-mortalidade em indivíduos jovens em idade produtiva. A terapia intensiva com insulina comprovadamente diminui o aparecimento das complicações crônicas da doença. Entretanto, essa terapia ainda está associada ao aumento da incidência de hipoglicemia. Em pacientes com “DM1 lábil”, os quais apresentam hipoglicemias graves sem sintomas de alerta, o transplante de ilhotas pancreáticas humanas é uma das melhores alternativas para restaurar a secreção de insulina e a percepção da hipoglicemia. Cerca de 80% dos pacientes que receberam transplante de ilhotas de mais de um doador, submetidos ao tratamento imunossupressor do protocolo de Edmonton, adquiriram independência de insulina após 1 ano do transplante. Porém, apenas 10% destes pacientes permaneceram livres de insulina após 5 anos. Entretanto, mesmo aqueles pacientes que necessitaram utilizar novamente insulina tiveram a normalização da homeostase glicêmica e da percepção da hipoglicemia, com prevenção da hipoglicemia grave. Sendo assim, o transplante de ilhotas é capaz de diminuir os níveis de glicose plasmática e HbA1c, reduzir a ocorrência de hipoglicemias graves e melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O objetivo deste artigo foi fazer uma breve revisão da literatura sobre o isolamento e transplante de ilhotas pancreáticas humanas e relatar a implantação de um laboratório de isolamento de ilhotas humanas no Serviço de Endocrinologia do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) is associated with chronic complications of high morbidity and mortality in young adults in a productive age. Insulin therapy has proved to reduce the chronic complications of diabetes. However, this therapy is still associated to an increased incidence of hypoglycemia. In patients with “brittle DM1”, who have severe hypoglycemia without any symptoms (hypoglycemia unawareness), the pancreatic islet transplantation is one of the best alternatives for restoring insulin secretion and hypoglycemia perception. About 80% of the patients who received islet transplantation from more than one donor, on immunosuppressive treatment with the Edmonton’s protocol, maintained insulin independence 1 year after transplantation. Nevertheless, only 10% of these patients remained free of insulin after 5 years post-transplantation. However, even those patients who returned to insulin treatment had a normalization of the glucose homeostasis and hypoglycemia perception. Therefore, islet transplantation is able to diminish plasmatic glucose and HbA1c levels, to reduce the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia, and to improve the quality of life of the patients. The purpose of this paper is to briefly review islet isolation and transplantation process, and report the establishing of a human islet isolation laboratory in the Endocrine Service at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre