10 research outputs found

    Mechanistic Insights Into the Therapeutic Use of High-Dose Allopurinol in Angina Pectoris

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of high-dose allopurinol on vascular oxidative stress (OS) and endothelial function in subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundAllopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, prolongs the time to chest pain during exercise in angina. We sought to ascertain whether allopurinol also improves endothelial dysfunction in optimally treated CAD patients, because such an effect might be of value to reduce future cardiovascular mortality. The mechanism of the anti-ischemic effect of allopurinol could be related to its reducing xanthine oxidase-induced OS, and our second aim was to see whether allopurinol really does reduce vascular tissue OS in CAD patients.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 80 patients with CAD, comparing allopurinol (600 mg/day) with placebo. Endothelial function was assessed by forearm venous occlusion plethysmography, flow-mediated dilation, and pulse wave analysis. Vascular OS was assessed by intra-arterial co-infusion of vitamin C and acetylcholine.ResultsCompared with placebo, allopurinol significantly improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation, by both forearm venous occlusion plethysmography (93 ± 67% vs. 145 ± 106%, p = 0.006) and flow-mediated dilation (4.2 ± 1.8% vs. 5.4 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001). Vascular oxidative stress was completely abolished by allopurinol. Central augmentation index improved significantly with allopurinol (2.6 ± 7.0%, p < 0.001) but not with placebo.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that, in optimally treated CAD patients, high-dose allopurinol profoundly reduces vascular tissue OS and improves 3 different measures of vascular/endothelial dysfunction. The former effect on OS might underpin the anti-ischemic effect of allopurinol in CAD. Both effects (on OS and endothelial dysfunction) increase the likelihood that high-dose allopurinol might reduce future cardiovascular mortality in CAD, over and above existing optimum therapy. (Exploring the therapeutic potential of xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol in angina; ISRCTN15253766

    Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction

    No full text
    Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men, between 40 and 70 years of age. In the first major trial of sildenafil in ED, at 24 weeks, improved erections were reported by 77 and 84% of men taking sildenafil 50 and 100 mg, respectively. Subsequently, sildenafil has been reported to be effective in men with ED associated with diabetes and prostate cancer, and in psychogenic ED. Sildenafil is safe in men with coronary artery disease, provided it is not used with the nitrates (a contraindication). The most commonly reported adverse effects with sildenafil are headache, flushing and dyspepsia. Vardenafil is more potent and more selective than sildenafil at inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5. Vardenafil is similarly effective to sildenafil in the treatment of ED. The only advantage that vardenafil has over sildenafil is that it does not inhibit phosphodiesterase-6 to alter colour perception, a rare side effect which sometimes occurs with sildenafil. Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Tadalafil is similarly effective as sildenafil in the treatment of ED. In comparison studies, tadalafil is preferred to sildenafil (50/100 mg) by men with ED, possibly because of its longer duration of action. of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors, tadalafil may displace sildenafil as the drug of choice among men with ED
    corecore