Cabbage and fermented vegetables : From death rate heterogeneity in countries to candidates for mitigation strategies of severe COVID-19

Large differences in COVID-19 death rates exist between countries and between regions of the same country. Some very low death rate countries such as Eastern Asia, Central Europe, or the Balkans have a common feature of eating large quantities of fermented foods. Although biases exist when examining ecological studies, fermented vegetables or cabbage have been associated with low death rates in European countries. SARS-CoV-2 binds to its receptor, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). As a result of SARS-CoV-2 binding, ACE2 downregulation enhances the angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT(1)R) axis associated with oxidative stress. This leads to insulin resistance as well as lung and endothelial damage, two severe outcomes of COVID-19. The nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) is the most potent antioxidant in humans and can block in particular the AT(1)R axis. Cabbage contains precursors of sulforaphane, the most active natural activator of Nrf2. Fermented vegetables contain many lactobacilli, which are also potent Nrf2 activators. Three examples are: kimchi in Korea, westernized foods, and the slum paradox. It is proposed that fermented cabbage is a proof-of-concept of dietary manipulations that may enhance Nrf2-associated antioxidant effects, helpful in mitigating COVID-19 severity.Peer reviewe

Nrf2-interacting nutrients and COVID-19 : time for research to develop adaptation strategies

There are large between- and within-country variations in COVID-19 death rates. Some very low death rate settings such as Eastern Asia, Central Europe, the Balkans and Africa have a common feature of eating large quantities of fermented foods whose intake is associated with the activation of the Nrf2 (Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2) anti-oxidant transcription factor. There are many Nrf2-interacting nutrients (berberine, curcumin, epigallocatechin gallate, genistein, quercetin, resveratrol, sulforaphane) that all act similarly to reduce insulin resistance, endothelial damage, lung injury and cytokine storm. They also act on the same mechanisms (mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin, PPAR gamma:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, NF kappa B: Nuclear factor kappa B, ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinases and eIF2 alpha:Elongation initiation factor 2 alpha). They may as a result be important in mitigating the severity of COVID-19, acting through the endoplasmic reticulum stress or ACE-Angiotensin-II-AT(1)R axis (AT(1)R) pathway. Many Nrf2-interacting nutrients are also interacting with TRPA1 and/or TRPV1. Interestingly, geographical areas with very low COVID-19 mortality are those with the lowest prevalence of obesity (Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia). It is tempting to propose that Nrf2-interacting foods and nutrients can re-balance insulin resistance and have a significant effect on COVID-19 severity. It is therefore possible that the intake of these foods may restore an optimal natural balance for the Nrf2 pathway and may be of interest in the mitigation of COVID-19 severity

Comparative Analysis of the APOL1 Variants in the Genetic Landscape of Renal Carcinoma Cells

Although the relative risk of renal cell carcinoma associated with chronic kidney injury is particularly high among sub-Saharan African ancestry populations, it is unclear yet whether the APOL1 gene risk variants (RV) for kidney disease additionally elevate this risk. APOL1 G1 and G2 RV contribute to increased risk for kidney disease in black populations, although the disease mechanism has still not been fully deciphered. While high expression levels of all three APOL1 allelic variants, G0 (the wild type allele), G1, and G2 are injurious to normal human cells, renal carcinoma cells (RCC) naturally tolerate inherent high expression levels of APOL1. We utilized CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate isogenic RCC clones expressing APOL1 G1 or G2 risk variants on a similar genetic background, thus enabling a reliable comparison between the phenotypes elicited in RCC by each of the APOL1 variants. Here, we demonstrate that knocking in the G1 or G2 APOL1 alleles, or complete elimination of APOL1 expression, has major effects on proliferation capacity, mitochondrial morphology, cell metabolism, autophagy levels, and the tumorigenic potential of RCC cells. The most striking effect of the APOL1 RV effect was demonstrated in vivo by the complete abolishment of tumor growth in immunodeficient mice. Our findings suggest that, in contrast to the WT APOL1 variant, APOL1 RV are toxic for RCC cells and may act to suppress cancer cell growth. We conclude that the inherent expression of non-risk APOL1 G0 is required for RCC tumorigenicity. RCC cancer cells can hardly tolerate increased APOL1 risk variants expression levels as opposed to APOL1 G0

Impact of teamwork and communication training interventions on safety culture and patient safety in emergency departments: a systematic review

© 2020 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Journal of Patient Safety, available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000782.Objectives: To narratively summaries literature reporting on the effect of teamwork and communication training interventions on culture and patient safety in emergency department (ED) settings. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Psych Info CINAHL, Cochrane, Science Citation Inc, Web of Science, and Educational Resources Information Centre for peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 1, 1988, until June 8, 2018 that assessed teamwork and communication interventions focusing on how they influence patient safety in the ED were selected. One additional search update was performed in July 2019. Results: Sixteen studies were included from 8,700 screened publications. The studies’ design, interventions, and evaluation methods varied widely. The most impactful ED training interventions were End-of-Course Critique, TeamSTEPPS, and crisis resource management (CRM)-based training. CRM and TeamSTEPPS CRM-based training curriculum were used in most of the studies. Multiple tools, including the Kirkpatrick (KP) evaluation model, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and the Communication and Teamwork Skills Assessment were used to assess the impact of such interventions. Improvements in one of the domains of safety culture and related domains were found in all studies. Four empirical studies established improvements in patient health outcomes that occurred following simulation CRM training (KP4), but there was no effect on mortality. Conclusion: Overall, teamwork and communication training interventions improve the safety culture in ED settings and may positively affect patient outcome. The implementation of safety culture programs may be considered to reduce incidence of medical errors and adverse events.Peer reviewe

Mobile technology offers novel insights into the control and treatment of allergic rhinitis: The MASK study

Background: Mobile health can be used to generate innovative insights into optimizing treatment to improve allergic rhinitis (AR)control. Objectives: A cross-sectional real-world observational study was undertaken in 22 countries to complement a pilot study and provide novel information on medication use, disease control, and work productivity in the everyday life of patients with AR. Methods: A mobile phone app (Allergy Diary, which is freely available on Google Play and Apple stores)was used to collect the data of daily visual analogue scale (VAS)scores for (1)overall allergic symptoms; (2)nasal, ocular, and asthma symptoms; (3)work; and (4)medication use by using a treatment scroll list including all allergy medications (prescribed and over-the-counter)customized for 22 countries. The 4 most common intranasal medications containing intranasal corticosteroids and 8 oral H 1 -antihistamines were studied. Results: Nine thousand one hundred twenty-two users filled in 112,054 days of VASs in 2016 and 2017. Assessment of days was informative. Control of days with rhinitis differed between no (best control), single (good control for intranasal corticosteroid–treated days), or multiple (worst control)treatments. Users with the worst control increased the range of treatments being used. The same trend was found for asthma, eye symptoms, and work productivity. Differences between oral H 1 -antihistamines were found. Conclusions: This study confirms the usefulness of the Allergy Diary in accessing and assessing behavior in patients with AR. This observational study using a very simple assessment tool (VAS)on a mobile phone had the potential to answer questions previously thought infeasible

Mobile technology offers novel insights into the control and treatment of allergic rhinitis: The MASK study

BACKGROUND: Mobile health can be used to generate innovative insights into optimizing treatment to improve allergic rhinitis (AR) control. OBJECTIVES: A cross-sectional real-world observational study was undertaken in 22 countries to complement a pilot study and provide novel information on medication use, disease control, and work productivity in the everyday life of patients with AR. METHODS: A mobile phone app (Allergy Diary, which is freely available on Google Play and Apple stores) was used to collect the data of daily visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for (1) overall allergic symptoms; (2) nasal, ocular, and asthma symptoms; (3) work; and (4) medication use by using a treatment scroll list including all allergy medications (prescribed and over-the-counter) customized for 22 countries. The 4 most common intranasal medications containing intranasal corticosteroids and 8 oral H1-antihistamines were studied. RESULTS: Nine thousand one hundred twenty-two users filled in 112,054 days of VASs in 2016 and 2017. Assessment of days was informative. Control of days with rhinitis differed between no (best control), single (good control for intranasal corticosteroid-treated days), or multiple (worst control) treatments. Users with the worst control increased the range of treatments being used. The same trend was found for asthma, eye symptoms, and work productivity. Differences between oral H1-antihistamines were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the usefulness of the Allergy Diary in accessing and assessing behavior in patients with AR. This observational study using a very simple assessment tool (VAS) on a mobile phone had the potential to answer questions previously thought infeasible.status: publishe

Mobile technology offers novel insights into the control and treatment of allergic rhinitis: The MASK study

Background: Mobile health can be used to generate innovative insights into optimizing treatment to improve allergic rhinitis (AR) control. Objectives: A cross-sectional real-world observational study was undertaken in 22 countries to complement a pilot study and provide novel information on medication use, disease control, and work productivity in the everyday life of patients with AR. Methods: A mobile phone app (Allergy Diary, which is freely available on Google Play and Apple stores) was used to collect the data of daily visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for (1) overall allergic symptoms; (2) nasal, ocular, and asthma symptoms; (3) work; and (4) medication use by using a treatment scroll list including all allergy medications (prescribed and over-the-counter) customized for 22 countries. The 4 most common intranasal medications containing intranasal corticosteroids and 8 oral H-1-antihistamines were studied. Results: Nine thousand one hundred twenty-two users filled in 112,054 days of VASs in 2016 and 2017. Assessment of days was informative. Control of days with rhinitis differed between no (best control), single (good control for intranasal corticosteroid-treated days), or multiple (worst control) treatments. Users with the worst control increased the range of treatments being used. The same trend was found for asthma, eye symptoms, and work productivity. Differences between oral H-1-antihistamines were found. Conclusions: This study confirms the usefulness of the Allergy Diary in accessing and assessing behavior in patients with AR. This observational study using a very simple assessment tool (VAS) on a mobile phone had the potential to answer questions previously thought infeasible