250 research outputs found

    Statistical Criteria for Selecting the Optimal Number of Untreated Subjects Matched to Each Treated Subject When Using Many-to-One Matching on the Propensity Score

    Get PDF
    Propensity-score matching is increasingly being used to estimate the effects of treatments using observational data. In many-to-one (M:1) matching on the propensity score, M untreated subjects are matched to each treated subject using the propensity score. The authors used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the effect of the choice of M on the statistical performance of matched estimators. They considered matching 1–5 untreated subjects to each treated subject using both nearest-neighbor matching and caliper matching in 96 different scenarios. Increasing the number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject tended to increase the bias in the estimated treatment effect; conversely, increasing the number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject decreased the sampling variability of the estimated treatment effect. Using nearest-neighbor matching, the mean squared error of the estimated treatment effect was minimized in 67.7% of the scenarios when 1:1 matching was used. Using nearest-neighbor matching or caliper matching, the mean squared error was minimized in approximately 84% of the scenarios when, at most, 2 untreated subjects were matched to each treated subject. The authors recommend that, in most settings, researchers match either 1 or 2 untreated subjects to each treated subject when using propensity-score matching

    The Influence of the Brain‐Derived Neurotropic Factor Val66Met ‐Genotype and HMG‐CoA Reductase Inhibitors on Insulin Resistance in the Schizophrenia and Bipolar Populations

    Full text link
    Introduction: The brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met variant and HMG‐COA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been implicated in insulin resistance with a possible increased risk of diabetes. We sought to determine the effect of the BDNF Met variant and statin medication use on insulin resistance in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). Methods: A cross‐sectional design was used and patients with diabetes or on any medications affecting glucose regulation were ‐excluded. Associations between insulin resistance and genotype were then analyzed by ANOVA and regression analysis. Subjects were grouped by BDNF genotype as well as presence of statin. Results: Two hundred fifty‐two subjects with a mean age of 44 years were included. The group was 53% male and 41% had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder; 78% and 19% were receiving atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) and statin medications, respectively. Analysis showed schizophrenia subjects with the BDNF met allele as well as schizophrenia subjects with both the BDNF met allele and were receiving a statin had significantly higher HOMA‐IR values compared to the other groups ( p = 0.046 and p = 0.016, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest that in the metabolically high‐risk population of schizophrenia the BDNF met allele alone and in combination with statin medications is associated with higher insulin resistance values. This was not seen in the bipolar population. Further validation of these associations remains necessary. Clin Trans Sci 2012; Volume 5: 486–490Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95082/1/cts.12001.pd

    «КОНТИНЕНТНАЯ» РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ

    Get PDF
    Objective: to evaluate the impact of dissection of the dorsal venous complex without pre-ligation, suturing, or coagulation during radical prostatectomy (RPE) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) on the quality of surgery and the function of urinary retention.Subjects and methods. The data of 42 patients who had undergone posterior and anterior anatomical repair and vesicourethral anastomosis using a V-lock suture after prostatectomy were analyzed. All the patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients in whom the dorsal venous complex was closed using a 3-0 vicryl suture before urethral dissection. Group 2 included 20 patients in whom the urethra was dissected without suturing the venous complex.Results. In group 1, complete urinary retention after catheter removal was noted in 9 (40.9 %) and 15 (68 %) patients within 24 hours and after 3 months, respectively. Following 12 months, two (9 %) patients were observed to have partial mild urinary incontinence (as many as 2 pads per day). Group 2 patients showed complete urinary retention in 17 (85 %) cases on the first day after catheter removal; all the patients retained urine 3 months later.Conclusion. In patients with localized PC, dissection of the dorsal venous complex without presuturing during laparoscopic RPE exerts a considerable impact on the preservation of urinary retention, namely 45% more of the patients reported complete urinary retention in early periods and 10 % more did this in later periods. At the same time, there was no statistically significant increase in intraoperative blood loss (p > 0.05), the number of positive edges, or biochemical recurrences.Цель исследования – оценка влияния пересечения венозно-дорсального комплекса без предварительной перевязки, прошивания либо коагуляции при выполнении радикальной простатэктомии (РПЭ) у больных с локализованными формами рака предстательной железы (РПЖ) на качество выполнения операции и функцию удержания мочи.Материалы и методы. Проведен анализ данных 42 больных после удаления предстательной железы, которым выполнили заднюю и переднюю анатомическую реконструкцию и формирование везикоуретрального анастомоза с использованием нити V-lock. Все пациенты были разделены на 2 группы: в 1-й (n = 22) пациентам перед пересечением уретры проводили прошивание венозно-дорсального комплекса викриловой нитью 3-0; во 2-й (n = 20) пересечение уретры проводили без предварительного прошивания венозного комплекса.Результаты. В 1-й группе полное удержание мочи на 1-е сутки после удаления катетера отмечено у 9 (40,9 %) больных, через 3 мес – у 15 (68 %). Через 12 мес у 2 (9 %) пациентов отмечается частичное недержание мочи легкой степени тяжести (до 2 прокладок в день). У пациентов 2-й группы полное удержание мочи в 1-й день после удаления катетера отмечено в 17 (85 %) случаях, через 3 мес все больные удерживали мочу.Выводы. Пересечение венозно-дорсального комплекса без предварительного прошивания при выполнении лапароскопической РПЭ у больных локализованными формами РПЖ оказывает существенное влияние на сохранение функции удержания мочи, а именно: на 45 % больше пациентов отмечают полное удержание мочи в ранние сроки, а в поздние сроки на 10 % больше полностью удерживающих мочу. При этом нами не отмечено статистически достоверного увеличения интраоперационной кровопотери (p > 0,05), количества позитивных краев и биохимических рецидивов

    Do higher primary care practice performance scores predict lower rates of emergency admissions for persons with serious mental illness? : An analysis of secondary panel data

    Get PDF
    Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) is a set of chronic enduring conditions including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. SMIs are associated with poor outcomes, high costs and high levels of disease burden. Primary care plays a central role in the care of people with a SMI in the English NHS. Good-quality primary care has the potential to reduce emergency hospital admissions, but also to increase elective admissions if physical health problems are identified by regular health screening of people with SMIs. Better-quality primary care may reduce length of stay (LOS) by enabling quicker discharge, and it may also reduce NHS expenditure. Objectives: We tested whether or not better-quality primary care, as assessed by the SMI quality indicators measured routinely in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in English general practice, is associated with lower rates of emergency hospital admissions for people with SMIs, for both mental and physical conditions and with higher rates of elective admissions for physical conditions in people with a SMI. We also tested the impact of SMI QOF indicators on LOS and costs. Data: We linked administrative data from around 8500 general practitioner (GP) practices and from Hospital Episode Statistics for the study period 2006/7 to 2010/11. We identified SMI admissions by a main International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnosis of F20–F31. We included information on GP practice and patient population characteristics, area deprivation and other potential confounders such as access to care. Analyses were carried out at a GP practice level for admissions, but at a patient level for LOS and cost analyses. Methods: We ran mixed-effects count data and linear models taking account of the nested structure of the data. All models included year indicators for temporal trends. Results: Contrary to expectation, we found a positive association between QOF achievement and admissions, for emergency admissions for both mental and physical health. An additional 10% in QOF achievement was associated with an increase in the practice emergency SMI admission rate of approximately 1.9%. There was no significant association of QOF achievement with either LOS or cost. All results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Possible explanations for our findings are (1) higher quality of primary care, as measured by QOF may not effectively prevent the need for secondary care; (2) patients may receive their QOF checks post discharge, rather than prior to admission; (3) people with more severe SMIs, at a greater risk of admission, may select into practices that are better organised to provide their care and which have better QOF performance; (4) better-quality primary care may be picking up unmet need for secondary care; and (5) QOF measures may not accurately reflect quality of primary care. Patient-level data on quality of care in general practice is required to determine the reasons for the positive association of QOF quality and admissions. Future research should also aim to identify the non-QOF measures of primary care quality that may reduce unplanned admissions more effectively and could potentially be incentivised. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme

    Predictors of metabolic monitoring among schizophrenia patients with a new episode of second-generation antipsychotic use in the Veterans Health Administration

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To examine the baseline metabolic monitoring (MetMon) for second generation antipsychotics (SGA) among patients with schizophrenia in the Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 16 of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>VISN16 electronic medical records for 10/2002-08/2005 were used to identify patients with schizophrenia who received a new episode of SGA treatment after 10/2003, in which the VISN 16 baseline MetMon program was implemented. Patients who underwent MetMon (MetMon+: either blood glucose or lipid testing records) were compared with patients who did not (MetMon-), on patient characteristics and resource utilization in the year prior to index treatment episode. A parsimonious logistic regression was used to identify predictors for MetMon+ with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Out of 4,709 patients, 3,568 (75.8%) underwent the baseline MetMon. Compared with the MetMon- group, the MetMon+ patients were found more likely to have baseline diagnoses or mediations for diabetes (OR [CI]: 2.336 [1.846-2.955]), dyslipidemia (2.439 [2.029-2.932]), and hypertension (1.497 [1.287-1.743]), substance use disorders (1.460 [1.257-1.696]), or to be recorded as obesity (2.052 [1.724-2.443]). Increased likelihood for monitoring were positively associated with number of antipsychotics during the previous year (FGA: 1.434 [1.129-1.821]; SGA: 1.503 [1.290-1.751]). Other significant predictors for monitoring were more augmentation episodes (1.580 [1.145-2.179]), more outpatient visits (1.007 [1.002-1.013])), hospitalization days (1.011 [1.007-1.015]), and longer duration of antipsychotic use (1.001 [1.001-1.001]). Among the MetMon+ group, approximately 38.9% patient had metabolic syndrome.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This wide time window of 180 days, although congruent with the VHA guidelines for the baseline MetMon process, needs to be re-evaluated and narrowed down, so that optimally the monitoring event occurs at the time of receiving a new episode of SGA treatment. Future research will examine whether or not patients prescribed an SGA are assessed for metabolic syndrome following the index episode of antipsychotic therapy, and whether or not such baseline and follow-up monitoring programs in routine care are cost-effective.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The baseline MetMon has been performed for a majority of the VISN 16 patients with schizophrenia prior to index SGA over the study period. Compared with MetMon- group, MetMon+ patients were more likely to be obese and manifest a more severe illness profile.</p

    Costs of treating patients with schizophrenia who have illness-related crisis events

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Relatively little is known about the relationship between psychosocial crises and treatment costs for persons with schizophrenia. This naturalistic prospective study assessed the association of recent crises with mental health treatment costs among persons receiving treatment for schizophrenia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were drawn from a large multi-site, non-interventional study of schizophrenia patients in the United States, conducted between 1997 and 2003. Participants were treated at mental health treatment systems, including the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, community mental health centers, community and state hospitals, and university health care service systems. Total costs over a 1-year period for mental health services and component costs (psychiatric hospitalizations, antipsychotic medications, other psychotropic medications, day treatment, emergency psychiatric services, psychosocial/rehabilitation group therapy, individual therapy, medication management, and case management) were calculated for 1557 patients with complete medical information. Direct mental health treatment costs for patients who had experienced 1 or more of 5 recent crisis events were compared to propensity-matched samples of persons who had not experienced a crisis event. The 5 non-mutually exclusive crisis event subgroups were: suicide attempt in the past 4 weeks (n = 18), psychiatric hospitalization in the past 6 months (n = 240), arrest in the past 6 months (n = 56), violent behaviors in the past 4 weeks (n = 62), and diagnosis of a co-occurring substance use disorder (n = 413).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Across all 5 categories of crisis events, patients who had a recent crisis had higher average annual mental health treatment costs than patients in propensity-score matched comparison samples. Average annual mental health treatment costs were significantly higher for persons who attempted suicide (46,024),followedbypersonswithpsychiatrichospitalizationinthepast6months(46,024), followed by persons with psychiatric hospitalization in the past 6 months (37,329), persons with prior arrests (31,081),andpersonswithviolentbehaviors(31,081), and persons with violent behaviors (18,778). Total cost was not significantly higher for those with co-occurring substance use disorder ($19,034).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Recent crises, particularly suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations, and criminal arrests, are predictive of higher mental health treatment costs in schizophrenia patients.</p

    Relapse according to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenic patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Objective</p> <p>To compare the rate of relapse as a function of antipsychotic treatment (monotherapy vs. polypharmacy) in schizophrenic patients over a 2-year period.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using data from a multicenter cohort study conducted in France, we performed a propensity-adjusted analysis to examine the association between the rate of relapse over a 2-year period and antipsychotic treatment (monotherapy vs. polypharmacy).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our sample consisted in 183 patients; 50 patients (27.3%) had at least one period of relapse and 133 had no relapse (72.7%). Thirty-eight (37.7) percent of the patients received polypharmacy. The most severely ill patients were given polypharmacy: the age at onset of illness was lower in the polypharmacy group (p = 0.03). Patients that received polypharmacy also presented a higher general psychopathology PANSS subscore (p = 0.04) but no statistically significant difference was found in the PANSS total score or the PANSS positive or negative subscales. These patients were more likely to be given prescriptions for sedative drugs (p < 0.01) and antidepressant medications (p = 0.03). Relapse was found in 23.7% of patients given monotherapy and 33.3% given polypharmacy (p = 0.16). After stratification according to quintiles of the propensity score, which eliminated all significant differences for baseline characteristics, antipsychotic polypharmacy was not statistically associated with an increase of relapse: HR = 1.686 (0.812; 2.505).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>After propensity score adjustment, antipsychotic polypharmacy is not statistically associated to an increase of relapse. Future randomised studies are needed to assess the impact of antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia.</p

    Predictors of switching antipsychotic medications in the treatment of schizophrenia

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To identify patient characteristics and early changes in patients' clinical status that best predict subsequent switching of antipsychotic agents in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This post-hoc analysis used data from a one-year randomized, open-label, multisite study of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. The study protocol permitted switching of antipsychotics when clinically warranted after the first eight weeks. Baseline patient characteristics were assessed using standard psychiatric measures and reviews of medical records. The prediction model included baseline sociodemographics, comorbid psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions, body weight, clinical and functional variables, as well as change scores on standard efficacy and tolerability measures during the first two weeks of treatment. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify the best predictors of switching from the initially assigned antipsychotic medication.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>About one-third of patients (29.5%, 191/648) switched antipsychotics before the end of the one-year study. There were six variables identified as the best predictors of switching: lack of antipsychotic use in the prior year, pre-existing depression, female gender, lack of substance use disorder, worsening of akathisia (as measured by the Barnes Akathisia Scale), and worsening of symptoms of depression/anxiety (subscale score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) during the first two weeks of antipsychotic therapy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Switching antipsychotics appears to be prevalent in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia and can be predicted by a small and distinct set of variables. Interestingly, worsening of anxiety and depressive symptoms and of akathisia following two weeks of treatment were among the more robust predictors of subsequent switching of antipsychotics.</p

    Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: a study protocol

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is widespread interest in measuring organizational readiness to implement evidence-based practices in clinical care. However, there are a number of challenges to validating organizational measures, including inferential bias arising from the halo effect and method bias - two threats to validity that, while well-documented by organizational scholars, are often ignored in health services research. We describe a protocol to comprehensively assess the psychometric properties of a previously developed survey, the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment.</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Our objective is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the psychometric properties of the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment incorporating methods specifically to address threats from halo effect and method bias.</p> <p>Methods and Design</p> <p>We will conduct three sets of analyses using longitudinal, secondary data from four partner projects, each testing interventions to improve the implementation of an evidence-based clinical practice. Partner projects field the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment at baseline (n = 208 respondents; 53 facilities), and prospectively assesses the degree to which the evidence-based practice is implemented. We will conduct predictive and concurrent validities using hierarchical linear modeling and multivariate regression, respectively. For predictive validity, the outcome is the change from baseline to follow-up in the use of the evidence-based practice. We will use intra-class correlations derived from hierarchical linear models to assess inter-rater reliability. Two partner projects will also field measures of job satisfaction for convergent and discriminant validity analyses, and will field Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment measures at follow-up for concurrent validity (n = 158 respondents; 33 facilities). Convergent and discriminant validities will test associations between organizational readiness and different aspects of job satisfaction: satisfaction with leadership, which should be highly correlated with readiness, versus satisfaction with salary, which should be less correlated with readiness. Content validity will be assessed using an expert panel and modified Delphi technique.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>We propose a comprehensive protocol for validating a survey instrument for assessing organizational readiness to change that specifically addresses key threats of bias related to halo effect, method bias and questions of construct validity that often go unexplored in research using measures of organizational constructs.</p
    corecore