25 research outputs found

    Systematic Identification of Independent Functional Non-coding RNA Genes in Oxytricha trifallax

    Get PDF
    Functional noncoding RNAs participate in a variety of biological processes: for example, modulating translation, catalyzing biochemical reactions, sensing environments etc. Independent of conventional approaches such as transcriptomics and computational comparative analysis, we took advantage of the unusual genomic organization of the ciliated unicellular protozoan Oxytricha trifallax to screen for eukaryotic independent functional noncoding RNA genes. The Oxytricha macronuclear genome consists of thousands of gene-sized nanochromosomes , each of which usually contains only a single gene. Using a draft Oxytricha trifallax genome assembly and a custom-written noncoding nanochromosome classifier, we identified a subset of nanochromosomes that lack any detectable protein coding gene, thereby strongly enriching for nanochromosomes that carry noncoding RNA genes. Surprisingly, we found only a small proportion of noncoding nanochromosomes, suggesting that Oxytricha has few independent functional noncoding RNA genes besides homologs of already known noncoding RNAs. Other than new members of known noncoding RNA classes including C/D and H/ACA snoRNAs, our screen identified a single novel family of small RNA genes, named the Arisong RNAs, which share some of the features of small nuclear RNAs. The small number of novel independent functional noncoding RNA genes identified in this screen contrasts to numerous recent reports of a large number of noncoding RNAs in a variety of eukaryotes. We think the difficulty of distinguishing functional noncoding RNA genes from other sources of putative noncoding RNAs has been underestimated

    BRD2 compartmentalizes the accessible genome.

    No full text
    Mammalian chromosomes are organized into megabase-sized compartments that are further subdivided into topologically associating domains (TADs). While the formation of TADs is dependent on cohesin, the mechanism behind compartmentalization remains enigmatic. Here, we show that the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) family scaffold protein BRD2 promotes spatial mixing and compartmentalization of active chromatin after cohesin loss. This activity is independent of transcription but requires BRD2 to recognize acetylated targets through its double bromodomain and interact with binding partners with its low-complexity domain. Notably, genome compartmentalization mediated by BRD2 is antagonized on the one hand by cohesin and on the other hand by the BET homolog protein BRD4, both of which inhibit BRD2 binding to chromatin. Polymer simulation of our data supports a BRD2-cohesin interplay model of nuclear topology, in which genome compartmentalization results from a competition between loop extrusion and chromatin-state-specific affinity interactions

    The Energetics and Physiological Impact of Cohesin Extrusion.

    No full text
    Cohesin extrusion is thought to play a central role in establishing the architecture of mammalian genomes. However, extrusion has not been visualized in vivo, and thus, its functional impact and energetics are unknown. Using ultra-deep Hi-C, we show that loop domains form by a process that requires cohesin ATPases. Once formed, however, loops and compartments are maintained for hours without energy input. Strikingly, without ATP, we observe the emergence of hundreds of CTCF-independent loops that link regulatory DNA. We also identify architectural stripes, where a loop anchor interacts with entire domains at high frequency. Stripes often tether super-enhancers to cognate promoters, and in B cells, they facilitate Igh transcription and recombination. Stripe anchors represent major hotspots for topoisomerase-mediated lesions, which promote chromosomal translocations and cancer. In plasmacytomas, stripes can deregulate Igh-translocated oncogenes. We propose that higher organisms have coopted cohesin extrusion to enhance transcription and recombination, with implications for tumor development. Cell 2018 May 17; 173(5):1165-1178.e20
    corecore