11 research outputs found

    Effects of chronic aminodarone therapy on ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed ventricular stimulation

    Full text link
    Several studies have reported upon the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) during chronic amiodarone therapy; however, few studies have systematically described and compared the morphology, duration, and cycle length of VT induced by PVS before and after amiodarone. In this study, 26 patients with symptomatic VT or ventricular fibrillation were evaluated by PVS by means of one to three extrastimuli (ES) before treatment and after 2 months of amiodarone therapy. Before amiodarone, sustained unimorphic VT was induced in 21 patients (group A) and symptomatic, nonsustained VT was induced in five patients (group B). After 65 +/- 8 days of amiodarone (total dose 64.5 +/- 8.9 gm, mean +/- S.D.), 15 of 21 patients (71%) in group A had sustained VT, five patients (24%) had nonsustained VT, and one patient had no VT induced. Four of five patients (80%) in group B had sustained VT and one patient had no VT induced. VT was induced by the same or by fewer number of ES in 79% of cases. When the morphologies of the VT induced before and after amiodarone were compared, the morphology of VT induced after amiodarone was the same in only 8 of 24 patients (33%), unimorphic but different in 14 patients (58%), and polymorphic in the remaining two patients. No correlation was found between the serum concentrations of amiodarone, desethylamiodarone, tetraiodothyronine, triiodothyronine, or reverse triiodothyroinine, and similarities or differences in VT morphology, VT cycle length, or the relative number of ES required to induce VT after treatment with amiodarone. Although VT is ofter still inducible after 2 months of amiodarone therapy, the VT induced is different from the baseline VT in the vast majority of patients.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26864/1/0000429.pd

    The hemodynamic effects of ventricular pacing with and without atrioventricular synchrony in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function

    Full text link
    The relative hemodynamic effects of heart rate, inotropic state, and atrioventricular (AV) synchrony during ventricular pacing were evaluated in 10 patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (0.66 +/- 0.07, mean S.D.) and in eight patients with a diminished LVEF (0.34 +/- 0.18). Hemodynamics were measured at AV intervals of 130, 0, and -130 msec during ventricular pacing at a baseline rate that was 10 pulses/min greater than the resting heart rate, at 130 pulses/min alone, and at 130 pulses/min during continuous intravenous infusion of dobutamine. During baseline ventricular pacing and during ventricular pacing at 130 pulses/min with and without dobutamine, both groups of patients had a significant decrease in cardiac index, stroke volume index, and stroke work index when the AV pacing interval was decreased from 130 to 0 msec. The observed decrease in these three hemodynamic variables was similar when patients with diminished LVEF were compared to patients with normal LVEF. No further significant decrease in cardiac index, stroke volume index, and stroke work index occurred in either group when the AV interval was changed from 0 to -130 msec during baseline ventricular pacing or during ventricular pacing at 130 with and without dobutamine. Beneficial hemodynamic effects occur during ventricular pacing when AV synchrony is maintained at resting heart rates and during increases in heart rate and inotropic state in patients with normal and diminished LVEF.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26988/1/0000555.pd

    Why Can't Rodents Vomit? A Comparative Behavioral, Anatomical, and Physiological Study

    Get PDF
    The vomiting (emetic) reflex is documented in numerous mammalian species, including primates and carnivores, yet laboratory rats and mice appear to lack this response. It is unclear whether these rodents do not vomit because of anatomical constraints (e.g., a relatively long abdominal esophagus) or lack of key neural circuits. Moreover, it is unknown whether laboratory rodents are representative of Rodentia with regards to this reflex. Here we conducted behavioral testing of members of all three major groups of Rodentia; mouse-related (rat, mouse, vole, beaver), Ctenohystrica (guinea pig, nutria), and squirrel-related (mountain beaver) species. Prototypical emetic agents, apomorphine (sc), veratrine (sc), and copper sulfate (ig), failed to produce either retching or vomiting in these species (although other behavioral effects, e.g., locomotion, were noted). These rodents also had anatomical constraints, which could limit the efficiency of vomiting should it be attempted, including reduced muscularity of the diaphragm and stomach geometry that is not well structured for moving contents towards the esophagus compared to species that can vomit (cat, ferret, and musk shrew). Lastly, an in situ brainstem preparation was used to make sensitive measures of mouth, esophagus, and shoulder muscular movements, and phrenic nerve activity-key features of emetic episodes. Laboratory mice and rats failed to display any of the common coordinated actions of these indices after typical emetic stimulation (resiniferatoxin and vagal afferent stimulation) compared to musk shrews. Overall the results suggest that the inability to vomit is a general property of Rodentia and that an absent brainstem neurological component is the most likely cause. The implications of these findings for the utility of rodents as models in the area of emesis research are discussed. © 2013 Horn et al

    Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there remains a need to understand the adverse effects of surgery and define appropriate levels of perioperative care. METHODS: We designed a prospective international 7-day cohort study of outcomes following elective adult inpatient surgery in 27 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes were death following a complication (failure to rescue) and death in hospital. Process measures were admission to critical care immediately after surgery or to treat a complication and duration of hospital stay. A single definition of critical care was used for all countries. RESULTS: A total of 474 hospitals in 19 high-, 7 middle- and 1 low-income country were included in the primary analysis. Data included 44 814 patients with a median hospital stay of 4 (range 2-7) days. A total of 7508 patients (16.8%) developed one or more postoperative complication and 207 died (0.5%). The overall mortality among patients who developed complications was 2.8%. Mortality following complications ranged from 2.4% for pulmonary embolism to 43.9% for cardiac arrest. A total of 4360 (9.7%) patients were admitted to a critical care unit as routine immediately after surgery, of whom 2198 (50.4%) developed a complication, with 105 (2.4%) deaths. A total of 1233 patients (16.4%) were admitted to a critical care unit to treat complications, with 119 (9.7%) deaths. Despite lower baseline risk, outcomes were similar in low- and middle-income compared with high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Poor patient outcomes are common after inpatient surgery. Global initiatives to increase access to surgical treatments should also address the need for safe perioperative care. STUDY REGISTRATION: ISRCTN5181700

    Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery

    Get PDF
    This was an investigator-initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by R.P. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London

    Kuluttajabarometri maakunnittain 2000, 2. neljännes

    Get PDF
    Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT

    Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

    Get PDF
    Background The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. Results A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). Conclusion Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally

    The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    © 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine
    corecore