73 research outputs found
MR-proADM as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction - DANAMI-3 (a Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With STEMI) Substudy
Background
Midregional proadrenomedullin (
MR
âpro
ADM
) has demonstrated prognostic potential after myocardial infarction (
MI
). Yet, the prognostic value of
MR
âpro
ADM
at admission has not been examined in patients with STâsegmentâelevation
MI
(
STEMI
).
Methods and Results
The aim of this substudy, DANAMIâ3 (The Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with
ST
âsegmentâelevation myocardial infarction), was to examine the associations of admission concentrations of
MR
âpro
ADM
with shortâ and longâterm mortality and hospital admission for heart failure in patients with
ST
âsegmentâelevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models and area under the curve using receiver operating characteristics. In total, 1122 patients were included. The median concentration of
MR
âpro
ADM
was 0.64Â nmol/L (25thâ75th percentiles, 0.53â0.79). Within 30Â days 23 patients (2.0%) died and during a 3âyear followâup 80 (7.1%) died and 38 (3.4%) were admitted for heart failure. A doubling of
MR
âpro
ADM
was, in adjusted models, associated with an increased risk of 30âday mortality (hazard ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.01â7.11;
P
=0.049), longâterm mortality (hazard ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.97â5.29;
P
<0.0001), and heart failure (hazard ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.32â5.58;
P
=0.007). For 30âday and 3âyear mortality, the area under the curve for
MR
âpro
ADM
was 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. For 3âyear mortality, area under the curve (0.84) of the adjusted model marginally changed (0.85;
P
=0.02) after addition of
MR
âpro
ADM
.
Conclusions
Elevation of admission
MR
âpro
ADM
was associated with longâterm mortality and heart failure, whereas the association with shortâterm mortality was borderline significant.
MR
âpro
ADM
may be a marker of prognosis after STâsegmentâelevation myocardial infarction but does not seem to add substantial prognostic information to established clinical models.
Clinical Trial Registration
URL
:
http:/www.ClinicalTrials.gov
/. Unique identifiers:
NCT
01435408 and
NCT
01960933.
</jats:sec
Causes, Timing, and Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruption for Surgery (From the PARIS Registry)
Temporary interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is not infrequently required in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to describe the procedures and outcomes associated with DAPT interruption in patients treated with DAPT following successful PCI from the Patterns of non-adherence to anti-platelet regimens in stented patients registry (nâ=â5018). DAPT interruption was prespecified as physician recommended cessation forcohort, 490 patients (9.8%) experienced 594 DAPT interruptions over 2 years following PCI. Only 1 antiplatelet agent was interrupted in 57.2% cases and interruption was frequently recommended by noncardiologists (51.3%). Where type of surgery was reported, majority of DAPT interruptions occurred for minor surgery (68.4% vs 31.6%) and a similar cessation pattern of single versus dual antiplatelet cessation was observed regardless of minor or major surgery. Subsequent to DAPT interruption, 12 patients (2.4%) experienced 1 thrombotic event each, of which 5 (1.0%) occurred during the interruption period. All events occurred in patients who either stopped both agents (8 of 12) or clopidogrel-only (4 of 12), with no events occurring due to aspirin cessation alone. In conclusion, in the Patterns of Non-adherence to Anti-platelet Regiments in Stented Patients registry, 1 in 10 patients were recommended DAPT interruption for surgery within 2 years of PCI. Interruption was more common for a single agent rather than both antiplatelet agents regardless of severity of surgery, and was frequently recommended by noncardiologists. Only 1% of patients with DAPT interruption experienced a subsequent thrombotic event during the interruption period, which mainly occurred in patients stopping both antiplatelet agents
High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can ensure quick and effective treatment but only 20% of adults with emergency admissions for chest pain have an AMI. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays may allow rapid rule-out of AMI and avoidance of unnecessary hospital admissions and anxiety.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hs-cTn assays for the early (within 4 hours of presentation) rule-out of AMI in adults with acute chest pain.
METHODS: Sixteen databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, research registers and conference proceedings, were searched to October 2013. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies, otherwise random-effects logistic regression was used. The health-economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with different troponin (Tn) testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and Markov model. A lifetime time horizon (60 years) was used.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the clinical effectiveness review. The optimum strategy, based on the Roche assay, used a limit of blank (LoB) threshold in a presentation sample to rule out AMI [negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.18]. Patients testing positive could then have a further test at 2 hours; a result above the 99th centile on either sample and a delta (Î) of âĽâ20% has some potential for ruling in an AMI [positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 8.42, 95% CI 6.11 to 11.60], whereas a result below the 99th centile on both samples and a Î of <â20% can be used to rule out an AMI (LR- 0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.10). The optimum strategy, based on the Abbott assay, used a limit of detection (LoD) threshold in a presentation sample to rule out AMI (LR- 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.08). Patients testing positive could then have a further test at 3 hours; a result above the 99th centile on this sample has some potential for ruling in an AMI (LR+ 10.16, 95% CI 8.38 to 12.31), whereas a result below the 99th centile can be used to rule out an AMI (LR- 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.05). In the base-case analysis, standard Tn testing was both most effective and most costly. Strategies considered cost-effective depending upon incremental cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds were Abbott 99th centile (thresholds of <âÂŁ6597), Beckman 99th centile (thresholds between ÂŁ6597 and ÂŁ30,042), Abbott optimal strategy (LoD threshold at presentation, followed by 99th centile threshold at 3 hours) (thresholds between ÂŁ30,042 and ÂŁ103,194) and the standard Tn test (thresholds over ÂŁ103,194). The Roche 99th centile and the Roche optimal strategy [LoB threshold at presentation followed by 99th centile threshold and/or Î20% (compared with presentation test) at 1-3 hours] were extendedly dominated in this analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence to suggest that hs-CTn testing may provide an effective and cost-effective approach to early rule-out of AMI. Further research is needed to clarify optimal diagnostic thresholds and testing strategies.
STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005939. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme
- âŚ