4 research outputs found

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Mi patio es divertido

    No full text
    Incorpora anexo con material elaboradoCon el proyecto se organiza el tiempo y el espacio de recreo basĂĄndose en el juego como elemento educativo. Los objetivos son aumentar las posibilidades educativas del espacio de recreo y distribuir el espacio en zonas de juego con actividades distintas; adaptar el espacio exterior segĂșn los deseos y necesidades de los niños; y equipar el patio con objetos y materiales que estimulen el desarrollo de la personalidad. Los profesores preparan el espacio y material de cada rincĂłn, diseñan las actividades, establecen normas bĂĄsicas sobre su utilizaciĂłn, explican las distintas zonas y estimulan su uso, reparten y recogen el material, se ocupan de la rotaciĂłn de los grupos, y observan cĂłmo se desenvuelven los niños. Se crean la zona de arena y agua, zona de juegos mĂłviles, zona de juego por equipos y la zona de juego libre. La evaluaciĂłn, con carĂĄcter global, formativo y continuo, se basa en la observaciĂłn, autoevaluaciĂłn en asambleas, y encuestas. Se valora la utilizaciĂłn de cada zona, los materiales empleados, la actitud de profesores y el grado de consecuciĂłn de objetivos. Se incluye en el proyecto curricular de infantil.Madrid (Comunidad AutĂłnoma). ConsejerĂ­a de EducaciĂłnMadridMadrid (Comunidad AutĂłnoma). SubdirecciĂłn General de FormaciĂłn del Profesorado. CRIF Las Acacias; General Ricardos 179 - 28025 Madrid; Tel. + 34915250893ES

    Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries

    No full text
    Background: Pancreatic surgery remains associated with high morbidity rates. Although postoperative mortality appears to have improved with specialization, the outcomes reported in the literature reflect the activity of highly specialized centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following pancreatic surgery worldwide.Methods: This was an international, prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional snapshot study of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic operations worldwide in a 3-month interval in 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality within 90 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore relationships with Human Development Index (HDI) and other parameters.Results: A total of 4223 patients from 67 countries were analysed. A complication of any severity was detected in 68.7 percent of patients (2901 of 4223). Major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa) were 24, 18, and 27 percent, and mortality rates were 10, 5, and 5 per cent in low-to-middle-, high-, and very high-HDI countries respectively. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate was 5.4 per cent (229 of 4223) overall, but was significantly higher in the low-to-middle-HDI group (adjusted OR 2.88, 95 per cent c.i. 1.80 to 4.48). The overall failure-to-rescue rate was 21 percent; however, it was 41 per cent in low-to-middle-compared with 19 per cent in very high-HDI countries.Conclusion: Excess mortality in low-to-middle-HDI countries could be attributable to failure to rescue of patients from severe complications. The authors call for a collaborative response from international and regional associations of pancreatic surgeons to address management related to death from postoperative complications to tackle the global disparities in the outcomes of pancreatic surgery (NCT04652271; ISRCTN95140761)

    Characteristics and predictors of death among 4035 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain

    No full text
    corecore