Selection of alternative central-station technologies for the Satellite Power System (SPS) comparative assessment

An important effort is the Satellite Power System (SPS) comparative Assessment is the selection and characterization of alternative technologies to be compared with the SPS concept. The ground rules, criteria, and screening procedure applied in the selection of those alternative technologies are summarized. The final set of central station alternatives selected for comparison with the SPS concept includes: (1) light water reactor with improved fuel utilization, (2) conventional coal combustion with improved environmental controls, (3) open cycle gas turbine with integral low Btu gasifier, (4) terrestrial photovoltaic, (5) liquid metal fast breeder reactor, and (6) magnetic confinement fusion

SPS and alternative technologies cost and performance evaluations

Cost estimates for production of the electrical energy needed in the early twenty-first century are provided. Costs and performance of the Satellite Power System are compared with alternative methods of producing electrical energy

Creating Image : Studi Tentang Pembentukan Citra Ade Kartika dalam Konstelasi Pemilihan Umum Daerah 2019

Studi ini akan memaparkan proses creating image atau dalam hal ini pembentukan citra calon kandidat dewan dalam konstelasi Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Daerah Tahun 2019. Fokus studi ini akan melihat bagaimana ketua tim sukses membentuk Ade Kartika sehingga bisa melekat identitas keterwakilan perempuan yang dihadirkan olehnya. Peran dan fungsi PR Politik yang dalam hal ini adalah ketua tim sukses Ade Kartika akan menjadi penting untuk dilihat karena bagaimanapun dalam politik proses pembentukan citra adalah salah satu elemen yang terpenting. Metode Penelitian mengguanakan studi kasus, dengan melihat bagaimana pergerakan tim sukses dalam pemenangan Ade Kartika. Hasilnya bahwa ternyata tahapan pembentukan image branding melibatkan banyak faktor yang diantaranya telah teruarai

Development and Improvement of Services of the Charleston Community Day Care Center

No abstract provided by author

Reclaiming Abandoned Properties: Using Public Nuisance Suits and Land Banks to Pursue Economic Redevelopment

The dangers posed by abandoned and vacant properties present a matter of primary concern for municipalities, especially in older, industrial cities. Addressing these issues requires innovative methods and long-term planning. This Note examines the methods of attacking abandonment. Part II, describes the problems presented by abandoned and vacant housing. Part III examines the effectiveness of code enforcement and traditional tax foreclosure. Part IV analyzes privatized nuisance abatement suits and receiverships. Part V discusses land banks. Part VI argues that using broadly empowered privatized nuisance abatement suits for individual parcels and land banks for mass acquisitions is the most effective means of addressing abandoned property, and Part VII concludes with a brief review of the overall abandonment discussion

Assessment of a satellite power system and six alternative technologies

The satellite power system is assessed in comparison to six alternative technologies. The alternatives are: central-station terrestrial photovoltaic systems, conventional coal-fired power plants, coal-gasification/combined-cycle power plants, light water reactor power plants, liquid-metal fast-breeder reactors, and fusion. The comparison is made regarding issues of cost and performance, health and safety, environmental effects, resources, socio-economic factors, and institutional issues. The criteria for selecting the issues and the alternative technologies are given, and the methodology of the comparison is discussed. Brief descriptions of each of the technologies considered are included

Combining Information From Multiple Data Sources to Create Multivariable Risk Models: Illustration and Preliminary Assessment of a New Method

A common practice of metanalysis is combining the results of numerous studies on the effects of a risk factor on a disease outcome. If several of these composite relative risks are estimated from the medical literature for a specific disease, they cannot be combined in a multivariate risk model, as is often done in individual studies, because methods are not available to overcome the issues of risk factor colinearity and heterogeneity of the different cohorts. We propose a solution to these problems for general linear regression of continuous outcomes using a simple example of combining two independent variables from two sources in estimating a joint outcome. We demonstrate that when explicitly modifying the underlying data characteristics (correlation coefficients, standard deviations, and univariate betas) over a wide range, the predicted outcomes remain reasonable estimates of empirically derived outcomes (gold standard). This method shows the most promise in situations where the primary interest is in generating predicted values as when identifying a high-risk group of individuals. The resulting partial regression coefficients are less robust than the predicted values

The impact assessment of thermal pollution on subtidal sessile assemblages: a case study from Mediterranean rocky reefs

Coastal power plants generally use seawater as cooling fluid, discharging heated waters into the sea after the cooling process. The ensuing increase in seawater temperature could affect the marine biota in the nearby areas, causing alterations at different level of biological organization, from individuals to populations and assemblages. In the Mediterranean Sea, few attempts have been made to assess the effects of this point sources of thermal pollution, especially on rocky habitats. Here, we investigated the putative impact of a thermal effluent from one of the largest European coal-fired coastal power plants on sessile assemblages of subtidal rocky reefs. Sessile assemblages on rocky substrates were photographically sampled at one location near the effluent (I), and at two control locations (Cs) virtually unaffected by thermal discharge. An asymmetrical after-control impact experimental design was employed to test the hypothesis that the thermal discharge significantly modified sessile assemblages at I if compared to Cs. We detected significant differences in assemblages at I versus Cs, indicating a clear effect of the effluent on assemblage structure. Such differences were mostly due to shift in dominance among macroalgae between I and Cs, which likely depended on different tolerance limits of species to increased seawater temperature and other sources of disturbance associated to the effluent, such as increased sedimentation rates and water turbidity. Our findings stressed the need for further investigations of the impact of thermal effluents on marine communities, considering the potential synergistic effects of climate change especially in the Mediterranean Sea

A view from the Bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health utilities Index

BACKGROUND: The SF-6D is a new health state classification and utility scoring system based on 6 dimensions (‘6D’) of the Short Form 36, and permits a ‘‘bridging’’ transformation between SF-36 responses and utilities. The Health Utilities Index, mark 3 (HUI3) is a valid and reliable multi-attribute health utility scale that is widely used. We assessed within-subject agreement between SF-6D utilities and those from HUI3. METHODS: Patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death and participating in a randomized trial of implantable defibrillator therapy completed both instruments at baseline. Score distributions were inspected by scatterplot and histogram and mean score differences compared by paired t-test. Pearson correlation was computed between instrument scores and also between dimension scores within instruments. Between-instrument agreement was by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: SF-6D and HUI3 forms were available from 246 patients. Mean scores for HUI3 and SF-6D were 0.61 (95% CI 0.60–0.63) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.54–0.62) respectively; a difference of 0.03 (p50.03). Score intervals for HUI3 and SF-6D were (-0.21 to 1.0) and (0.30–0.95). Correlation between the instrument scores was 0.58 (95% CI 0.48–0.68) and agreement by ICC was 0.42 (95% CI 0.31–0.52). Correlations between dimensions of SF-6D were higher than for HUI3. CONCLUSIONS: Our study casts doubt on the whether utilities and QALYs estimated via SF-6D are comparable with those from HUI3. Utility differences may be due to differences in underlying concepts of health being measured, or different measurement approaches, or both. No gold standard exists for utility measurement and the SF-6D is a valuable addition that permits SF-36 data to be transformed into utilities to estimate QALYs. The challenge is developing a better understanding as to why these classification-based utility instruments differ so markedly in their distributions and point estimates of derived utilities