Landspreading with co-digested cattle slurry, with or without pasteurisation, as a mitigation strategy against pathogen, nutrient and metal contamination associated with untreated slurry

peer-reviewedNorth Atlantic European grassland systems have a low nutrient use efficiency and high rainfall. This grassland is typically amended with unprocessed slurry, which counteracts soil organic matter depletion and provides essential plant micronutrients but can be mobilised during rainfall events thereby contributing to pathogen, nutrient and metal incidental losses. Co-digesting slurry with waste from food processing mitigates agriculture-associated environmental impacts but may alter microbial, nutrient and metal profiles and their transmission to watercourses, and/or soil persistence, grass yield and uptake. The impact of EU and alternative pasteurisation regimes on transmission potential of these various pollutants is not clearly understood, particularly in pasture-based agricultural systems. This study utilized simulated rainfall (Amsterdam drip-type) at a high intensity indicative of a worst-case scenario of ~11 mm hr−1 applied to plots 1, 2, 15 and 30 days after grassland application of slurry, unpasteurised digestate, pasteurised digestate (two conditions) and untreated controls. Runoff and soil samples were collected and analysed for a suite of potential pollutants including bacteria, nutrients and metals following rainfall simulation. Grass samples were collected for three months following application to assess yield as well as nutrient and metal uptake. For each environmental parameter tested: microbial, nutrient and metal runoff losses; accumulation in soil and uptake in grass, digestate from anaerobic co-digestion of slurry with food processing waste resulted in lower pollution potential than traditional landspreading of slurry without treatment. Reduced microbial runoff from digestate was the most prominent advantage of digestate application. Pasteurisation of the digestate further augmented those environmental benefits, without impacting grass output. Anaerobic co-digestion of slurry is therefore a multi-beneficial circular approach to reducing impacts of livestock production on the environment.Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Irelan

Arsenic contaminated groundwater and its treatment options in Bangladesh

Arsenic (As) causes health concerns due to its significant toxicity and worldwide presence in drinking water and groundwater. The major sources of As pollution may be natural process such as dissolution of As-containing minerals and anthropogenic activities such as percolation of water from mines, etc. The maximum contaminant level for total As in potable water has been established as 10 µg/L. Among the countries facing As contamination problems, Bangladesh is the most affected. Up to 77 million people in Bangladesh have been exposed to toxic levels of arsenic from drinking water. Therefore, it has become an urgent need to provide As-free drinking water in rural households throughout Bangladesh. This paper provides a comprehensive overview on the recent data on arsenic contamination status, its sources and reasons of mobilization and the exposure pathways in Bangladesh. Very little literature has focused on the removal of As from groundwaters in developing countries and thus this paper aims to review the As removal technologies and be a useful resource for researchers or policy makers to help identify and investigate useful treatment options. While a number of technological developments in arsenic removal have taken place, we must consider variations in sources and quality characteristics of As polluted water and differences in the socio-economic and literacy conditions of people, and then aim at improving effectiveness in arsenic removal, reducing the cost of the system, making the technology user friendly, overcoming maintenance problems and resolving sludge management issues

Differing phosphorus crop availability of aluminium and calcium precipitated dairy processing sludge potential recycled alternatives to mineral phosphorus fertiliser

The European dairy industry generates large volumes of wastewater from milk and dairy food processing. Removal of phosphorus (P) by complexing with metal (e.g., aluminium, calcium) cations in P rich sludge is a potential P source for agricultural reuse and P recycling. However, there is a significant knowledge gap concerning the plant availability of this complexed P in comparison to conventional mineral P fertiliser. The current absence of information on plant P bioavailability of dairy processing sludge (DPS) limits the ability of farmers and nutrient management advisors to incorporate it correctly into fertiliser programmes. The present study examined the most common types of dairy sludge-(1) aluminium-precipitated sludge ("Al-DPS") and (2) calcium-precipitated lime-stabilised sludge ("Ca-DPS") at field scale to assess P availability in grassland versus mineral P fertiliser over a growing season. The experimental design was a randomised complete block with five replications. Crop yield and P uptake were assessed for 4 harvests. The initial soil test P was at a low level and the experimental treatments were super phosphate at 15, 30, 40, 50 and 60 kg P ha(-1), two dairy sludge applied at 40 kg P ha(-1) (comparison was made with mineral P at same application rate) and a zero P control applied in a single application at the beginning of the growing season. Results showed a significant positive slope in the relationship between P uptake response and mineral P application rate indicating the suitability of the experimental site for P availability assessment. The P bioavailability of Al- and Ca-DPS varied greatly between treatments. The P fertiliser replacement value based on the 1st harvest was 50 and 16% increased to 109 and 31% cumulatively over the four harvests for Al- and Ca-DPS, respectively. The Al concentration in Al-DPS did not limit P bioavailability, but low P bioavailability from Ca-DPS can be associated with its high Ca content that can lead to formation of low soluble Ca-P compounds at alkaline pH conditions with a high Ca/P ratio. These findings show that P availability from dairy sludge can be quite different depending on treatment process. Consequently, it is critical to have P availability information as well as total P content available to ensure the application rate meets crop requirements without creating environmental risk by over application

Mineral fertiliser equivalent value of dairy processing sludge and derived biochar using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)

As supply chains of chemical fertilisers become more precarious, raw or derived bio-based fertilisers (herein referred to as bio-fertilisers) from the dairy processing industry could be good alternatives. However, their agronomic performance is relatively unknown, and where documented, the method to estimate this value is rarely presented. This pot study investigated aluminium-precipitated and calcium-precipitated dairy processing sludges (Al and Ca-DPS) and DPS-derived biochar as potential bio-fertilisers to grow ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). The study aims were to examine how (1) application rate (optimal versus high) and (2) calculation methods (with and without chemical fertiliser response curves) can affect estimates of nitrogen and phosphorus mineral fertiliser equivalence value (N- and P-MFE) and associated agronomic advice. The results from both crops showed that for nitrogen application rates (125 or 160 kg ha-1 for ryegrass and 160 or 240 kg ha-1 for spring wheat) estimates of N-MFE increased for both Al-DPS and Ca-DPS as application rate increased. Dry matter yield response curves produced highest the % N-MFE results (e.g., ryegrass ~50% and 70% for Al-DPS and Ca-DPS) with other calculation methods producing all similar results (e.g., ryegrass ~20% for Al-DPS and Ca-DPS). For phosphorus application rates (40 or 80 kg ha-1 for ryegrass and 50 or 80 kg ha-1 for spring wheat), estimates of P-MFE did not increase with application rate. Negative P-MFE values obtained for Ca-DPS and DPS-biochar when growing ryegrass and spring wheat grain, respectively, indicated low plant available phosphorus. Overall, Al-DPS had better performance as a bio-fertiliser when compared to the other products tested. There was no significant difference between the two calculation methods of MFE, which suggests that the determination of MFE could be simplified by using one application as opposed to numerous application rates of fertilisers. Future work should focus on elucidating the N- and P-MFE of a wider range of DPS and STRUBIAS bio-fertilisers, and alternative methods should be investigated that enable a comparison across all bio-fertiliser types.This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 814258.peer-reviewed2024-08-2

Phosphorus fertiliser equivalent value of dairy processing sludge-derived STRUBIAS products using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Struvite, biochar and ash products (collectively known as STRUBIAS) products derived from different waste streams are used as fertilisers in agriculture. Raw dairy processing sludge (DPS) shows promise as bio-based fertilisers, but their secondary STRUBIAS-derived products need testing as fertilisers. The objective of this ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) pot trial was to calculate their phosphorus mineral fertiliser equivalency (P-MFE) using the apparent P method for Fe-DPS and DPS-derived struvites (Struvite 1 ¿ 4), hydrochars (HC1 ¿ 3) and ash. Results showed that the products can be divided into two groups: (1) a range of products that can (i.e., Struvite 1 ¿ 3) and (2) cannot (i.e., Struvite 4, HC1 ¿ 3, ash and Fe-DPS) be considered as fertilisers. In the first group, the P-MFE ranged from 66.8 to 76.7% for ryegrass and from 77.9 to 93.5% for spring wheat grain. In the second group, the P-MFE ranged from 7.8 to 58.3% for ryegrass and from -34.5 to -151.3% for spring wheat grain. Processing solutions could overcome problems. These may include the avoidance of Fe dosing salts (in the case of struvite) by using biological methods of P removal or the utilisation of oxalic acid during struvite precipitation, which removes Fe from the process chain and produces higher yields. Future policy and research must be aware that not all STRUBIAS products are suitable as fertilisers and therefore need to be tested individually.This project (REFLOW) has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 814258. Open access funding provided by IReL.peer-reviewe

Data_Sheet_1_Risk Assessment of E. coli Survival Up to the Grazing Exclusion Period After Dairy Slurry, Cattle Dung, and Biosolids Application to Grassland.docx

<p>Grassland application of dairy slurry, cattle dung, and biosolids offers an opportunity to recycle valuable nutrients (N, P, and K), which may all introduce pathogens to the soil environment. Herein, a temporal risk assessment of the survival of Escherichia coli (E. coli) up to 40 days in line with the legislated grazing exclusion time points after application was examined across six scenarios: (1) soil and biosolids mixture, (2) biosolids amended soil, (3) dairy slurry application, (4) cattle dung on pasture, (5) comparison of scenario 2, 3, and 4, and (6) maximum legal vs. excess rate of application for scenario 2 and 3. The risk model input parameters were taken or derived from regressions within the literature and an uncertainty analysis (n = 1,000 trials for each scenario) was conducted. Scenario 1 results showed that E. coli survival was higher in the soil/biosolids mixture for higher biosolids portion, resulting in the highest 20 day value of residual E. coli concentration (i.e., C₂₀, log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ dw) of 1.0 in 100% biosolids or inoculated soil and the lowest C₂₀ of 0.098 in 75/25 soil/biosolids ratio, respectively, in comparison to an average initial value of ~6.4 log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ dw. The E. coli survival across scenario 2, 3, and 4 showed that the C₂₀ value of biosolids (0.57 log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ dw) and dairy slurry (0.74 log₁₀ CFU ml⁻¹) was 2.9–3.7 times smaller than that of cattle dung (2.12 log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ dw). The C₂₀ values of biosolids and dairy slurry associated with legal and excess application rates ranged from 1.14 to 1.71 log₁₀ CFU ha⁻¹, which is a significant reduction from the initial concentration range (12.99 to 14.83 log₁₀ CFU ha⁻¹). The E. coli survival in un-amended soil was linear with a very low decay rate resulting in a higher C₂₀ value than that of biosolids or dairy slurry. The risk assessment and uncertainly analysis showed that the residual concentrations in biosolids/dairy slurry applied soil after 20 days would be 45–57% lower than that of the background soil E. coli concentration. This means the current practice of grazing exclusion times is safe to reduce the risk of E. coli transmission into the soil environment.</p

Phosphorus fertiliser equivalent value of dairy processing sludge-derived STRUBIAS products using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Background: Struvite, biochar and ash products (collectively known as STRUBIAS) derived from different waste streams are used as fertilisers in agriculture. Raw dairy processing sludge (DPS) shows promise as bio-based fertilisers, but secondary STRUBIAS-derived products need further testing as fertilisers.Aims: The objective of this study was to calculate the phosphorus mineral fertiliser equivalency (P-MFE) for some STRUBIAS products derived from DPS.Methods:Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) pot trials were used to determine the P-MFE using the apparent P recovery (APR) method for Fe-DPS and DPS-derived struvites (Struvite 1–4), hydrochars (HC1–3) and ash.Results: The tested STRUBIAS products can be divided into two groups: (1) a range of products that can (i.e. Struvite 1–3) and (2) cannot (i.e. Struvite 4, HC1–3, ash and Fe-DPS) be considered fertilisers. In the first group, the P-MFE ranged from 66.8% to 76.7% for ryegrass and from 77.9% to 93.5% for spring wheat grain. In the second group, the P-MFE ranged from 7.8% to 58.3% for ryegrass and from −34.5% to −151.3% for spring wheat grain. The negative agronomic effects of some products for wheat grain (struvite and HC) in this study were mainly caused by high Fe content, which could be overcome by improved treatment processes.Conclusions: Future policy and research must be aware that not all the DPS-derived STRUBIAS products are suitable as fertilisers and therefore need to be tested individually.</p