9 research outputs found

    VIP induces the decidualization program and conditions the immunoregulation of the implantation process

    Get PDF
    The decidualization process involves phenotype and functional changes on endometrial cells and the modulation of mediators with immunoregulatory properties as the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). We investigate VIP contribution to the decidualization program and to immunoregulation throughout the human embryo implantation process. The decidualization of Human endometrial stromal cell line (HESC) with Medroxyprogesterone-dibutyryl-cAMP increased VIP/VPAC-receptors system. In fact, VIP could induce decidualization increasing differentiation markers (IGFBP1, PRL, KLF13/KLF9 ratio, CXCL12, CXCL8 and CCL2) and allowing Blastocyst-like spheroids (BLS) invasion in an in vitro model of embryo implantation. Focus on the tolerogenic effects, decidualized cells induced a semi-mature profile on maternal dendritic cells; restrained CD4+ cells recruitment while increased regulatory T-cells recruitment. Interestingly, the human blastocyst conditioned media from developmentally impaired embryos diminished the invasion and T-regulatory cells recruitment in these settings. These evidences suggest that VIP contributes to the implantation process inducing decidualization, allowing BLS invasion and favoring a tolerogenic micro-environment.Fil: Grasso, Esteban Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Gori, María Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Paparini, Daniel Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Soczewski, Elizabeth Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Laura del Carmen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Gallino, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Salamone, Gabriela Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Medicina Experimental. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Martinez, Gustavo. Instituto de Fertilidad; ArgentinaFil: Irigoyen, Marcela. Instituto de Fertilidad; ArgentinaFil: Ruhlmann, Claudio. Instituto de Fertilidad; ArgentinaFil: Perez Leiros, Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Ramhorst, Rosanna Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentin

    Comparative analysis between slow freezing and ultra-rapid freezing for human sperm cryopreservation

    Get PDF
    Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa is fundamental in assisted reproductive technology. At present, slow freezing techniques are widely used for sperm cryopreservation. Recently, sperm vitrification has been proposed as an alternative to slow freezing. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of slow versus ultra-rapid freezing after thawing and to determine the level of DNA fragmentation in post-thaw normal human semen samples processed through each of the cryopreservation techniques.Fil: Riva, Natalí. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Ruhlmann, Claudio. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Iaizzo, Rocío S.. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Marcial López, Carla Agustina. Fertilidad San Isidro; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Martínez, Alejandro Gustavo. Fertilidad San Isidro; Argentin

    Análisis comparativo del congelamiento lento y la vitrificación para la criopreservación de espermatozoides

    Get PDF
    El congelamiento lento es la técnica más empleada para la criopreservación de espermatozoides, pero recientemente ha comenzado a utilizarse la vitrificación como alternativa obteniéndose resultados dispares. Por otra parte, muchos estudios reportan que el daño en el ADN del espermatozoide se correlaciona con un pobre desarrollo embrionario, falla en la implantación, aborto espontáneo y defectos congénitos en la descendencia. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo comparar la eficiencia del congelamiento lento y la vitrificación de espermatozoides, estableciendo además los niveles de fragmentación de ADN luego de ambas técnicas de criopreservación. En el experimento 1 se emplearon 6 muestras de semen para comparar la recuperación espermática luego del congelamiento lento y la vitrificación de espermatozoides.En el experimento 2 se emplearon 10 muestras de semen para comparar la fragmentación de ADN espermático causada por ambos métodos de criopreservación. El análisis estadístico fue realizado mediante un test de Kruskal-Wallis. En el experimento 1 no se encontraron diferencias significativas en la concentración espermática recuperada, pero la vitrificación presentó mayor cantidad de espermatozoides móviles grado A y grado B (5,7 ± 2,3 vs 12,2 ± 3,4; 13,7 ± 7,8 vs 24,8 ± 11,7) y menorcantidad de espermatozoides inmóviles (68,8 ± 13,7 vs 54,5 ± 12,2) que el congelamiento lento. En el experimento 2 la movilidad presentó diferencias significativas en favor de las muestras inicial y post-desvitrificación para los valores de movilidad grado A y grado B (9,2 ± 6,3 vs 4,5 ± 1,8 vs 13,9 ± 6,6; 33,2 ± 11,0 vs 14,8 ± 3,9 vs 23,4 ± 8,1) e inmóviles (46,3 ± 13,7 vs 70,8 ± 6,6 vs 54,2 ± 10,0). La fragmentación de ADN espermático fue significativamente mayor en la muestra post-congelamiento lento en comparación con los de la muestra post-gradientey post-desvitrificación (9,8 ± 4,7 vs 44,7 ± 11,7 vs 15,9 ± 6,0). Nuestros resultados muestran que la vitrificación de espermatozoides es una técnica que puede llevarse a cabo con buenos resultados y que provoca menor daño al ADN espermático.Fil: Riva, Natalí S.. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Marcial López, Carla Agustina. Fertilidad San Isidro; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Martínez, Gustavo. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Iaizzo, Rocío S.. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Artola, Mariana. Fertilidad San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Ruhlmann, Claudio. Fertilidad San Isidro; Argentin

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Growth rate of structure measurement from anisotropic clustering analysis in configuration space between redshift 0.6 and 1.1 for the Emission Line Galaxy sample

    No full text
    A summary of all SDSS BAO and RSD measurements with accompanying legacy figures can be found here: https://www.sdss.org/science/final-bao-and-rsd-measurements/ . The full cosmological interpretation of these measurements can be found here: https://www.sdss.org/science/cosmology-results-from-eboss/;doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3050International audienceWe present the anisotropic clustering of emission line galaxies (ELGs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 (DR16). Our sample is composed of 173 736 ELGs covering an area of 1170 deg2^2 over the redshift range 0.6z1.10.6 \leq z \leq 1.1. We use the convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory in addition to the Gaussian Streaming Redshift-Space Distortions to model the Legendre multipoles of the anisotropic correlation function. We show that the eBOSS ELG correlation function measurement is affected by the contribution of a radial integral constraint that needs to be modelled to avoid biased results. To mitigate the effect from unknown angular systematics, we adopt a modified correlation function estimator that cancels out the angular modes from the clustering. At the effective redshift, zeff=0.85z_{\rm eff}=0.85, including statistical and systematical uncertainties, we measure the linear growth rate of structure fσ8(zeff)=0.35±0.10f\sigma_8(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.35\pm0.10, the Hubble distance DH(zeff)/rdrag=19.12.1+1.9D_H(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.1^{+1.9}_{-2.1} and the comoving angular diameter distance DM(zeff)/rdrag=19.9±1.0D_M(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.9\pm1.0. These results are in agreement with the Fourier space analysis, leading to consensus values of: fσ8(zeff)=0.315±0.095f\sigma_8(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.315\pm0.095, DH(zeff)/rdrag=19.62.1+2.2D_H(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.6^{+2.2}_{-2.1} and DM(zeff)/rdrag=19.5±1.0D_M(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.5\pm1.0, consistent with Λ\LambdaCDM model predictions with Planck parameters

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the emission line galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshift 0.6 and 1.1

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe analyse the large-scale clustering in Fourier space of emission line galaxies (ELG) from the Data Release 16 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey. The ELG sample contains 173 736 galaxies covering 1170 deg^2 in the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1.1. We perform a BAO measurement from the post-reconstruction power spectrum monopole, and study redshift space distortions (RSD) in the first three even multipoles. Photometric variations yield fluctuations of both the angular and radial survey selection functions. Those are directly inferred from data, imposing integral constraints which we model consistently. The full data set has only a weak preference for a BAO feature (1.4σ). At the effective redshift z_eff = 0.845 we measure |DV(zeff)/rdrag=18.330.62+0.57D_{\rm V}(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 18.33_{-0.62}^{+0.57}|⁠, with D_V the volume-averaged distance and r_drag the comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch. In combination with the RSD measurement, at z_eff = 0.85 we find |fσ8(zeff)=0.2890.096+0.085f\sigma _8(z_{\rm eff}) = 0.289_{-0.096}^{+0.085}|⁠, with f the growth rate of structure and σ_8 the normalization of the linear power spectrum, |DH(zeff)/rdrag=20.02.2+2.4D_{\rm H}(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 20.0_{-2.2}^{+2.4}| and D_M(z_eff)/r_drag = 19.17 ± 0.99 with D_H and D_M the Hubble and comoving angular distances, respectively. These results are in agreement with those obtained in configuration space, thus allowing a consensus measurement of fσ_8(z_eff) = 0.315 ± 0.095, |DH(zeff)/rdrag=19.62.1+2.2D_{\rm H}(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.6_{-2.1}^{+2.2}| and D_M(z_eff)/r_drag = 19.5 ± 1.0. This measurement is consistent with a flat ΛCDM model with Planck parameters

    The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Large-scale Structure Catalogues and Measurement of the isotropic BAO between redshift 0.6 and 1.1 for the Emission Line Galaxy Sample

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe present the Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) sample of the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV Data Release 16. We describe the observations and redshift measurement for the 269 243 observed ELG spectra, and then present the large-scale structure catalogues, used for the cosmological analysis, and made of 173 736 reliable spectroscopic redshifts between 0.6 and 1.1. We perform a spherically averaged baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurement in configuration space, with density field reconstruction: the data two-point correlation function shows a feature consistent with that of the BAO, the BAO model being only weakly preferred over a model without BAO (Δχ^2 < 1). Fitting a model constrained to have a BAO feature provides a 3.2 per cent measurement of the spherically averaged BAO distance D_V(z_eff)/r_drag = 18.23 ± 0.58 at the effective redshift z_eff = 0.845

    The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey:large-scale structure catalogues and measurement of the isotropic BAO between redshift 0.6 and 1.1 for the Emission Line Galaxy Sample

    No full text
    We present the Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) sample of the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV Data Release 16. We describe the observations and redshift measurement for the 269 243 observed ELG spectra, and then present the large-scale structure catalogues, used for the cosmological analysis, and made of 173 736 reliable spectroscopic redshifts between 0.6 and 1.1. We perform a spherically averaged baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurement in configuration space, with density field reconstruction: the data two-point correlation function shows a feature consistent with that of the BAO, the BAO model being only weakly preferred over a model without BAO (Δχ2 &lt;1). Fitting a model constrained to have a BAO feature provides a 3.2 per cent measurement of the spherically averaged BAO distance DV(zeff)/rdrag = 18.23 ± 0.58 at the effective redshift zeff = 0.845.</p

    The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Growth rate of structure measurement from cosmic voids

    Get PDF
    17 pages, 8 figuresInternational audienceWe present a void clustering analysis in configuration-space using the completed Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) DR16 samples. These samples consist of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRG) combined with the high redshift tail of the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) DR12 CMASS galaxies (called as LRG+CMASS sample), Emission Line Galaxies (ELG) and quasars (QSO). We build void catalogues from the three eBOSS DR16 samples using a ZOBOV-based algorithm, providing 2,814 voids, 1,801 voids and 4,347 voids in the LRG+CMASS, ELG and QSO samples, respectively, spanning the redshift range 0.6<z<2.20.6<z<2.2. We measure the redshift space distortions (RSD) around voids using the anisotropic void-galaxy cross-correlation function and we extract the distortion parameter β\beta. We test the methodology on realistic simulations before applying it to the data, and we investigate all our systematic errors on these mocks. We find βLRG(z=0.74)=0.415±0.087\beta^{\rm LRG}(z=0.74)=0.415\pm0.087, βELG(z=0.85)=0.665±0.125\beta^{\rm ELG}(z=0.85)=0.665\pm0.125 and βQSO(z=1.48)=0.313±0.134\beta^{\rm QSO}(z=1.48)=0.313\pm0.134, for the LRG+CMASS, ELG and QSO sample, respectively. The quoted errors include systematic and statistical contributions. In order to convert our measurements in terms of the growth rate fσ8f\sigma_8, we use consensus values of linear bias from the eBOSS DR16 companion papers~\citep{eBOSScosmo}, resulting in the following constraints: fσ8(z=0.74)=0.50±0.11f\sigma_8(z=0.74)=0.50\pm0.11, fσ8(z=0.85)=0.52±0.10f\sigma_8(z=0.85)=0.52\pm0.10 and fσ8(z=1.48)=0.30±0.13f\sigma_8(z=1.48)=0.30\pm0.13. Our measurements are consistent with other measurements from eBOSS DR16 using conventional clustering techniques
    corecore