8 research outputs found
A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services
Ā© 2011 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central LtdBackground In the UK there are almost three times as many beds in care homes as in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Care homes rely on primary health care for access to medical care and specialist services. Repeated policy documents and government reviews register concern about how health care works with independent providers, and the need to increase the equity, continuity and quality of medical care for care homes. Despite multiple initiatives, it is not known if some approaches to service delivery are more effective in promoting integrated working between the NHS and care homes. This study aims to evaluate the different integrated approaches to health care services supporting older people in care homes, and identify barriers and facilitators to integrated working. Methods A systematic review was conducted using Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, BNI, EMBASE, PsycInfo, DH Data, Kings Fund, Web of Science (WoS incl. SCI, SSCI, HCI) and the Cochrane Library incl. DARE. Studies were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of integrated working between primary health care professionals and care homes, or identified barriers and facilitators to integrated working. Studies were quality assessed; data was extracted on health, service use, cost and process related outcomes. A modified narrative synthesis approach was used to compare and contrast integration using the principles of framework analysis. Results Seventeen studies were included; 10 quantitative studies, two process evaluations, one mixed methods study and four qualitative. The majority were carried out in nursing homes. They were characterised by heterogeneity of topic, interventions, methodology and outcomes. Most quantitative studies reported limited effects of the intervention; there was insufficient information to evaluate cost. Facilitators to integrated working included care home managers' support and protected time for staff training. Studies with the potential for integrated working were longer in duration. Conclusions Despite evidence about what inhibits and facilitates integrated working there was limited evidence about what the outcomes of different approaches to integrated care between health service and care homes might be. The majority of studies only achieved integrated working at the patient level of care and the focus on health service defined problems and outcome measures did not incorporate the priorities of residents or acknowledge the skills of care home staff. There is a need for more research to understand how integrated working is achieved and to test the effect of different approaches on cost, staff satisfaction and resident outcomes
Advanced care planning: an exploratory study of community-based mental health practitionersā views and experiences of ACP in practice with people with dementia
Integrated working between residential care homes and primary care : a survey of care homes in England
Older people living in care homes in England have complex health needs due to a range of medical conditions, mental health needs and frailty. Despite an increasing policy expectation that professionals should operate in an integrated way across organisational boundaries, there is a lack of understanding between care homes and the National Health Service (NHS) about how the two sectors should work together, meaning that residents can experience a poor "fit" between their needs, and services they can access. This paper describes a survey to establish the current extent of integrated working that exists between care homes and primary and community health and social services.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Providing activity for people with dementia in care homes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Current status of clinical nursing specialists and the demands of osteoporosis specialized nurses in Mainland China
The 'Choice and Autonomy Framework' : implications for occupational therapy practice
Introduction
This paper presents findings from a PhD study exploring
autonomy of adults with physical disability. The plethora
of descriptions of autonomy in psychological, occupational
therapy and rehabilitation literature (e.g. Ryan and Deci 2000,
Rogers 1982, Cardol et al 2002) detracts from the centrality
of autonomy and results in difficulty incorporating it into
occupational therapy practice. This paper presents a framework
providing an integrated, clinically useful approach to autonomy.
Methods
Sixteen people were recruited, based on age, gender,
impairment and living circumstances (community/residential
settings). All have significant physical disability, use a wheelchair
and require personal assistance for some/all self-care activities.
Qualitative methods were used for data collection, including
life-history narrative, diary information and extensive interview.
An integrated method of analysis was used, including content
analysis and bracketing.
Results
The āChoice and Autonomy Frameworkā consists of five strands,
including:
ā¢ the meaning of autonomy
ā¢ whether or not autonomy is a goal or value
ā¢ the experience of autonomy
ā¢ personality factors that impact autonomy
ā¢ environmental features that enhance or negate autonomy.
This paper will describe each strand, as derived from the
research. The results suggest that, contrary to common wisdom (Hmel and Pincus 2002), autonomy is not necessarily a universal
goal for people with physical disability; an understanding of the
personās own perspective will enhance person-centred practice
and enable therapists to further recognise individuality of clients.
It will argue that the concept of autonomy needs to be further
understood and incorporated into occupational therapy practice