157 research outputs found

    Understanding the patient journey: a mechanism to reduce staff burnout?

    Get PDF
    No abstract available

    Characterization of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures Among Workers from May 2020-June 2021

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To determine the relationship between early adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures (before vaccine availability) and later vaccination status (after vaccines were widely available) in the Southwest Indiana workforce population. Design: Retrospective analysis of existing longitudinal cohort from two surveys: a COVID-19 prevalence survey in May 2020 and a follow up survey in June 2021. Setting: This study focused on secondary analysis of existing data from two surveys of the same Southwest Indiana workforce population, spanning manufacturing, finance, healthcare, and service industries. Participants: The analysis included participants who completed the 2020 survey (845), 2021 survey (492), or both (343). Main Outcome Measures: Relationship of adherence to early mitigation measures on vaccine adoption. We also examined differences in demographic characteristics including age, rurality (rural, rural/mixed, or urban county based on zip code of residence), education level, gender, and workplace environment. Results: Significant differences in age (p=0.02) and education (p=0.01), but not rurality, were observed between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Furthermore, comparison of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups found significantly different responses to the degree of self-reported mitigation practices in early 2020. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, we found that demographic characteristics such as age and education may influence vaccination status. Furthermore, our data suggest an association between willingness to practice mitigation measures at the beginning of the pandemic and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. 

    Software Citation Implementation Challenges

    Get PDF
    The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group) was a paper on software citation principles (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibility, and specificity) and discussed how they could be used to implement software citation in the scholarly community. In a series of talks and other activities, we have promoted software citation using these increasingly accepted principles. At the time the initial paper was published, we also provided guidance and examples on how to make software citable, though we now realize there are unresolved problems with that guidance. The purpose of this document is to provide an explanation of current issues impacting scholarly attribution of research software, organize updated implementation guidance, and identify where best practices and solutions are still needed

    Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond

    Get PDF
    The issues facing academic mothers have been discussed for decades. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is further exposing these inequalities as womxn scientists who are parenting while also engaging in a combination of academic related duties are falling behind. These inequities can be solved by investing strategically in solutions. Here we describe strategies that would ensure a more equitable academy for working mothers now and in the future. While the data are clear that mothers are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, many groups could benefit from these strategies. Rather than rebuilding what we once knew, let us be the architects of a new world

    Software Citation Checklist for Developers

    Get PDF
    This document provides a minimal, generic checklist that developers of software (either open or closed source) used in research can use to ensure they are following good practice around software citation. This will help developers get credit for the software they create, and improve transparency, reproducibility, and reuse

    Nutrition and frailty:Opportunities for prevention and treatment

    Get PDF
    Frailty is a syndrome of growing importance given the global ageing population. While frailty is a multifactorial process, poor nutritional status is considered a key contributor to its pathophysiology. As nutrition is a modifiable risk factor for frailty, strategies to prevent and treat frailty should consider dietary change. Observational evidence linking nutrition with frailty appears most robust for dietary quality: for example, dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet appear to be protective. In addition, research on specific foods, such as a higher consumption of fruit and vegetables and lower consumption of ultra-processed foods are consistent, with healthier profiles linked to lower frailty risk. Few dietary intervention studies have been conducted to date, although a growing number of trials that combine supplementation with exercise training suggest a multi-domain approach may be more effective. This review is based on an interdisciplinary workshop, held in November 2020, and synthesises current understanding of dietary influences on frailty, focusing on opportunities for prevention and treatment. Longer term prospective studies and well-designed trials are needed to determine the causal effects of nutrition on frailty risk and progression and how dietary change can be used to prevent and/or treat frailty in the future
    corecore