Rates and Predictors of Treatment Failure in Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint Infections According to Different Management Strategies: A Multinational Cohort Study—The ARTHR-IS Study Group

Introduction: Guidelines have improved the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, it is necessary to reassess the incidence and risk factors for treatment failure (TF) of Staphylococcus aureus PJI (SA-PJI) including functional loss, which has so far been neglected as an outcome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of SA-PJI was performed in 19 European hospitals between 2014 and 2016. The outcome variable was TF, including related mortality, clinical failure and functional loss both after the initial surgical procedure and after all procedures at 18 months. Predictors of TF were identified by logistic regression. Landmark analysis was used to avoid immortal time bias with rifampicin when debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) was performed. Results: One hundred twenty cases of SA-PJI were included. TF rates after the first and all surgical procedures performed were 32.8% and 24.2%, respectively. After all procedures, functional loss was 6.0% for DAIR and 17.2% for prosthesis removal. Variables independently associated with TF for the first procedure were Charlson >= 2, haemoglobin 30 kg/m(2) and delay of DAIR, while rifampicin use was protective. For all procedures, the variables associated with TF were haemoglobin < 10 g/dL, hip fracture and additional joint surgery not related to persistent infection. Conclusions: TF remains common in SA-PJI. Functional loss accounted for a substantial proportion of treatment failures, particularly after prosthesis removal. Use of rifampicin after DAIR was associated with a protective effect. Among the risk factors identified, anaemia and obesity have not frequently been reported in previous studies. [GRAPHICS]

Role of IP-10 to Predict Clinical Progression and Response to IL-6 Blockade With Sarilumab in Early COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Subanalysis of the SARICOR Clinical Trial

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected][Background] The Clinical Trial of Sarilumab in Adults With COVID-19 (SARICOR) showed that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6 might benefit from blockade of the IL-6 pathway. However, the benefit from this intervention might not be uniform. In this subanalysis, we sought to determine if other immunoactivation markers, besides IL-6, could identify which subgroup of patients benefit most from this intervention.[Methods] The SARICOR trial was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial (July 2020–March 2021) in which patients were randomized to receive usual care (UC; control group), UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). Patients who had baseline serum samples for cytokine determination (IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein–1, interferon-inducible protein [IP]-10) were included in this secondary analysis. Progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to cytokine levels and treatment received was evaluated.[Results] One hundred one (88%) of 115 patients enrolled in the SARICOR trial had serum samples (control group: n = 33; sarilumab-200: n = 33; sarilumab-400: n = 35). Among all evaluated biomarkers, IP-10 showed the strongest association with treatment outcome. Patients with IP-10 ≥2500 pg/mL treated with sarilumab-400 had a lower probability of progression (13%) compared with the control group (58%; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04–0.90; P = .04). Conversely, patients with IP-10 40 pg/mL. Importantly, IP-10 value <2500 pg/mL might discriminate those individuals who might not benefit from sarilumab therapy among those with high IL-6 levels.This work was supported by the Consejeria de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucia, Spain (COVID-19 Research Program, project code COVID-0013-2020). B.G.G. and J.T.C. are supported by General Sub-Directorate of Networks and Cooperative Research Centers, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001, RD16/0016/0008)—co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, “A Way to Achieve Europe, Operational Program Smart Growth 2014–2020.” J.C.G. is supported by SCReN (Spanish Clinical Research Network) funded by the ISCIII-Sub-Directorate General for Research Assessment and Promotion through projects PT17/0017/0032 and PT20/0039. R.L.L., C.D.L.F., J.T.-C., and B.G.-G. are supported by the Center of Biomedical Investigation Network for Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC) funded by ISCIII through projects CB21/13/00049 and CB21/13/00012.Peer reviewe

Treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids for COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammatory state: a multicentre cohort study (SAM-COVID-19)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between tocilizumab or corticosteroids and the risk of intubation or death in patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) with a hyperinflammatory state according to clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A cohort study was performed in 60 Spanish hospitals including 778 patients with COVID-19 and clinical and laboratory data indicative of a hyperinflammatory state. Treatment was mainly with tocilizumab, an intermediate-high dose of corticosteroids (IHDC), a pulse dose of corticosteroids (PDC), combination therapy, or no treatment. Primary outcome was intubation or death; follow-up was 21 days. Propensity score-adjusted estimations using Cox regression (logistic regression if needed) were calculated. Propensity scores were used as confounders, matching variables and for the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Results: In all, 88, 117, 78 and 151 patients treated with tocilizumab, IHDC, PDC, and combination therapy, respectively, were compared with 344 untreated patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 10 (11.4%), 27 (23.1%), 12 (15.4%), 40 (25.6%) and 69 (21.1%), respectively. The IPTW-based hazard ratios (odds ratio for combination therapy) for the primary endpoint were 0.32 (95%CI 0.22-0.47; p < 0.001) for tocilizumab, 0.82 (0.71-1.30; p 0.82) for IHDC, 0.61 (0.43-0.86; p 0.006) for PDC, and 1.17 (0.86-1.58; p 0.30) for combination therapy. Other applications of the propensity score provided similar results, but were not significant for PDC. Tocilizumab was also associated with lower hazard of death alone in IPTW analysis (0.07; 0.02-0.17; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tocilizumab might be useful in COVID-19 patients with a hyperinflammatory state and should be prioritized for randomized trials in this situatio

Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil: setting the baseline knowledge on the animal diversity in Brazil

The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others

High Incidence of Asymptomatic Phase I IgG Seroconversion After an Acute Q Fever Episode: Implications for Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis

[Background] The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of acute Q fever, including its clinical and serological evolution and progression to chronic Q fever.[Methods] Observational cohort study (January 2011–September 2020) performed at Valme University Hospital (Seville, Spain). Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged ≥18 years; (2) acute Q fever diagnosis, defined as suggestive symptoms in the presence of phase II immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer >1:256; (3) at least 6 months’ follow-up after the acute Q fever episode. The incidence of seroconversion to a chronic Q fever serological pattern, defined as phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis, was assessed.[Results] During the study period, 117 patients were included. Thirty-four (29%) patients showed phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis. All patients with classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis remained asymptomatic despite no specific treatment, with a median (quartile 1–quartile 3 [Q1–Q3]) follow-up of 26.5 (14–44) months in this subgroup. No cases of Q fever endocarditis nor other persistent focalized infection forms were observed during the study period.[Conclusions] A significant proportion of acute Q fever patients develop classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis in the absence of additional data of chronic Q fever. Consequently, phase I IgG cutoff titers >1:800 should not be used as a criterion to consider such a diagnosis. The incidence of persistent focalized infection forms after acute Q fever is extremely low and does not justify the use of prophylaxis strategies.Peer reviewe

High Incidence of Asymptomatic Phase I IgG Seroconversion After an Acute Q Fever Episode: Implications for Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this study was to describe the natural history of acute Q fever, including its clinical and serological evolution and progression to chronic Q fever.MethodsObservational cohort study (January 2011–September 2020) performed at Valme University Hospital (Seville, Spain). Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged ≥18 years; (2) acute Q fever diagnosis, defined as suggestive symptoms in the presence of phase II immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer &amp;gt;1:256; (3) at least 6 months’ follow-up after the acute Q fever episode. The incidence of seroconversion to a chronic Q fever serological pattern, defined as phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis, was assessed.ResultsDuring the study period, 117 patients were included. Thirty-four (29%) patients showed phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis. All patients with classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis remained asymptomatic despite no specific treatment, with a median (quartile 1–quartile 3 [Q1–Q3]) follow-up of 26.5 (14–44) months in this subgroup. No cases of Q fever endocarditis nor other persistent focalized infection forms were observed during the study period.ConclusionsA significant proportion of acute Q fever patients develop classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis in the absence of additional data of chronic Q fever. Consequently, phase I IgG cutoff titers &amp;gt;1:800 should not be used as a criterion to consider such a diagnosis. The incidence of persistent focalized infection forms after acute Q fever is extremely low and does not justify the use of prophylaxis strategies.</jats:sec

Role of rectal colonization by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales on the risk of surgical site infection after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery

ABSTRACT The impact of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E) rectal colonization in the development of subsequent infection after surgery is controversial. In particular, there is a lack of data in the context of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of 3GCR-E intestinal carriage among patients undergoing elective HPB resection surgery and its impact on the incidence and etiology of surgical site infections (SSIs). This retrospective cohort study (January 2016–December 2022) was performed at Valme University Hospital (Seville, Spain). The inclusion criteria included (i) 18 years of age or older, (ii) undergoing elective HPB resection surgery, and (iii) availability of a periprocedural surveillance rectal swab culture to detect 3GCR-E. The prevalence of 3GCR-E intestinal carriage at elective HPB resection surgery was assessed, as well as SSI incidence at 30 days and possible associated factors. Two hundred nine patients were included. Eleven (5.3%) patients were colonized by 3GCR-E at baseline. According to 3GCR-E carriage status, 6 (55%) of the carriers developed SSI, whereas this occurred in 50 (25%) of non-carriers (P = 0.033). Likewise, the rates of SSI caused specifically by 3GCR-E were 83% (5 of 6) in 3GCR-E carriers and 6% (3 of 50) in non-carriers (P < 0.001). After multivariate analyses, 3GCR-E colonization at the time of surgery was identified as an independent predictor for developing SSI (adjusted odds ratio 4.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.177–18.232, P = 0.028). Despite a low prevalence of 3GCR-E intestinal carriage at surgery, 3GCR-E rectal colonization is associated with a higher risk of SSI among patients undergoing elective HPB resection surgery, with most SSIs being caused by the colonizing bacteria.IMPORTANCEIn this Spanish retrospective cohort study, previous 3GCR-E rectal colonization was associated with a higher risk of SSI after hepato-pancreato-biliary resection surgeries. Most of SSIs were caused by the colonizing bacteria, suggesting a rationale for adapted perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in known 3GCR-E colonized patients

Early Use of Sarilumab in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Features of Systemic Inflammation: the SARICOR Randomized Clinical Trial

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with sarilumab, added to standard of care (SOC), in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods included phase II, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥ 40 pg/mL and/or d-dimer &gt; 1,500 ng/mL.</jats:p

Early Use of Sarilumab in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Features of Systemic Inflammation: the SARICOR Randomized Clinical Trial.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with sarilumab, added to standard of care (SOC), in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods included phase II, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥ 40 pg/mL and/or d-dimer > 1,500 ng/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive SOC (control group), SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). The primary outcome variable was the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at day 28. One-hundred and 15 participants (control group, n = 39; sarilumab-200, n = 37; sarilumab-400, n = 39) were included. At randomization, 104 (90%) patients had supplemental oxygen and 103 (90%) received corticosteroids. Eleven (28%) patients in the control group, 10 (27%) in sarilumab-200, and five (13%) in sarilumab-400 developed the primary outcome (hazard ratio [95% CI] of sarilumab-400 vs control group: 0.41 [0.14, 1.18]; P = 0.09). Seven (6%) patients died: three in the control group and four in sarilumab-200. There were no deaths in sarilumab-400 (P = 0.079, log-rank test for comparisons with the control group). In patients recently hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and features of systemic inflammation, early IL-6 blockade with a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg was safe and associated with a trend for better outcomes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04357860.)

Role of IP-10 to predict clinical progression and response to IL-6 blockade with Sarilumab in early COVID-19 pneumonia. A subanalysis of the SARICOR clinical trial

Abstract Background Clinical Trial of Sarilumab in Adults With COVID-19 (SARICOR) showed that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6 might benefit from blockade of IL6-pathway. However, the benefit from this intervention might not be uniform. In this subanalysis, we sought to determine if other immunoactivation markers, besides IL-6, could identify which subgroup of patients benefit the most of this intervention. Methodology The SARICOR trial was a phase II, open-label, multicentre, controlled (July 2020-March 2021) in which patients were randomized to receive usual care (UC) (control group); UC plus single dose of Sarilumab 200 mg (Sarilumab-200 group) or UC plus single dose of Sarilumab 400 mg (Sarilumab-400 group). Patients who had baseline serum samples for cytokine determination (IL-8, IL-10, MCP-1, IP-10) were included in this secondary analysis. Progression to ARDS according to cytokine levels and treatment received was evaluated. Results 101 (88%) of 115 patients enrolled in the SARICOR trial had serum samples (control group: n=33; Sarilumab-200: n=33; Sarilumab-400 n=35). Among all evaluated biomarkers, IP-10 showed the strongest association with treatment outcome. Patients with IP-10 ≥ 2500 pg/ml treated with Sarilumab-400 had a lower probability of progression (13%) compared to the control group (58%) (HR 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-0.90; p=0.04). Conversely, patients with IP-10 &amp;lt; 2500 pg/ml did not show these differences. Conclusions IP-10 may predict progression to ARDS in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and IL-6 levels &amp;gt; 40 pg/ml. Importantly, IP-10 value &amp;lt; 2500 pg/ml might discriminate those individuals who might not benefit of Sarilumab therapy besides high IL-6 levels. </jats:sec