64 research outputs found

    Revisiting the association between altitude and mortality in dialysis patients.

    Get PDF
    It was recently reported that residential altitude is inversely associated with all-cause mortality among incident dialysis patients; however, no adjustment was made for key case-mix and laboratory variables. We re-examined this question in a contemporary patient database with comprehensive clinical and laboratory data. In a contemporary 8-year cohort of 144,892 maintenance dialysis patients from a large dialysis organization, we examined the relationship between residential altitude and all-cause mortality. Using data from the US Geological Survey, the average residential altitudes per approximately 43,000 US zip codes were compiled and linked to the residential zip codes of each patient. Mortality risks for these patients were estimated by Cox proportional hazard ratios. The study population's mean ± standard deviation age was 61 ± 15 years. Forty-five percent of patients were women, and 57% of patients had diabetes. In fully adjusted analysis, those residing in the highest altitude strata (≄ 6000 ft) had a lower all-cause mortality risk in fully adjusted analyses: death hazard ratio: 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99), as compared with patients in the reference group (<250 ft). Residential altitude is inversely associated in all-cause mortality risk in maintenance dialysis patients notwithstanding the unknown and unmeasured confounders

    A self-report comorbidity questionnaire for haemodialysis patients

    Get PDF
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise statedBackground: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have multiple comorbid conditions. Obtaining comorbidity data from medical records is cumbersome. A self-report comorbidity questionnaire is a useful alternative. Our aim in this study was to examine the predictive value of a self-report comorbidity questionnaire in terms of survival in ESRD patients. Methods. We studied a prospective cross-sectional cohort of 282 haemodialysis (HD) patients in a single centre. Participants were administered the self-report questionnaire during an HD session. Information on their comorbidities was subsequently obtained from an examination of the patient's medical records. Levels of agreement between parameters derived from the questionnaire, and from the medical records, were examined. Participants were followed-up for 18 months to collect survival data. The influence on survival of comorbidity scores derived from the self-report data (the Composite Self-report Comorbidity Score [CSCS]) and from medical records data - the Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] were compared. Results: The level of agreement between the self-report items and those obtained from medical records was almost perfect with respect the presence of diabetes (Kappa score Îș 0.97), substantial for heart disease and cancer (Îș 0.62 and Îș 0.72 respectively), moderate for liver disease (Îș 0.51), only fair for lung disease, arthritis, cerebrovascular disease, and depression (Îș 0.34, 0.35, 0.34 and 0.29 respectively). The CSCS was strongly predictive of survival in regression models (Nagelkerke R2value 0.202), with a predictive power similar to that of the CCI (Nagelkerke R2value 0.211). The influences of these two parameters were additive in the models - suggesting that these parameters make different contributions to the assessment of comorbidity. Conclusion: This self-report comorbidity questionnaire is a viable tool to collect comorbidity data and may have a role in the prediction of short-term survival in patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis. Further work is required in this setting to refine the tool and define its role.Peer reviewe

    Early treatment of Favipiravir in COVID-19 patients without pneumonia: a multicentre, open-labelled, randomized control study

    Get PDF
    We investigated Favipiravir (FPV) efficacy in mild cases of COVID-19 without pneumonia and its effects towards viral clearance, clinical condition, and risk of COVID-19 pneumonia development. PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients without pneumonia were enrolled (2:1) within 10 days of symptomatic onset into FPV and control arms. The former received 1800 mg FPV twice-daily (BID) on Day 1 and 800 mg BID 5-14 days thereafter until negative viral detection, while the latter received only supportive care. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, defined by a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of ≀1. 62 patients (41 female) comprised the FPV arm (median age: 32 years, median BMI: 22 kg/mÂČ) and 31 patients (19 female) comprised the control arm (median age: 28 years, median BMI: 22 kg/mÂČ). The median time to sustained clinical improvement, by NEWS, was 2 and 14 days for FPV and control arms, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.77, 95% CI 1.57-4.88, P P P = .316). All recovered well without complications. We can conclude that early treatment of FPV in symptomatic COVID-19 patients without pneumonia was associated with faster clinical improvement.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20200514001

    Charlson index scores from administrative data and case-note review compared favourably in a renal disease cohort

    Get PDF
    Background: The Charlson index is a widely used measure of comorbidity. The objective was to compare Charlson index scores calculated using administrative data to those calculated using case-note review (CNR) in relation to all-cause mortality and initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the Grampian Laboratory Outcomes Mortality and Morbidity Study (GLOMMS-1) chronic kidney disease cohort. Methods: Modified Charlson index scores were calculated using both data sources in the GLOMMS-1 cohort. Agreement between scores was assessed using the weighted Kappa. The association with outcomes was assessed using Poisson regression, and the performance of each was compared using net reclassification improvement. Results: Of 3382 individuals, median age 78.5 years, 56% female, there was moderate agreement between scores derived from the two data sources (weighted kappa 0.41). Both scores were associated with mortality independent of a number of confounding factors. Administrative data Charlson scores were more strongly associated with death than CNR scores using net reclassification improvement. Neither score was associated with commencing RRT. Conclusion: Despite only moderate agreement, modified Charlson index scores from both data sources were associated with mortality. Neither was associated with commencing RRT. Administrative data compared favourably and may be superior to CNR when used in the Charlson index to predict mortality

    VITAMIN D RECEPTOR ACTIVATION AND A NOVEL CLASSIFICATION OF CARDIO-RENAL SYNDROME

    No full text
    Due to increasing survival rate of cardiac and renal disease patients, Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), a combination of these two is becoming an important problem. Some classifications have been proposed for CRS but for clinical approach, it would be more appropriate to emphasize the pathophysiologic pathways to classify CRS into: 1\ hemodynamic, 2\ atherosclerotic, 3\ uremic, 4\ neurohumoral, 5\ anemic-hematologic, 6\ inflammatory-oxidative, 7\ vitamin D receptor (VDR) related, and 8\ multi-factorial CRS. Recently, it has been revealed that vitamin D and its receptor play an important role in the CRS. Decreased 1-α-hydroxylase activity, nutritional deficiency, decreased Megalin receptors, and increased 1-24-hydroxylase activity are major causes for vitamin D depletion in CKD. Decrease in GFR, renal mass and 1-α-hydroxylase expression along with phosphate retention, increased FGF-23, and loss of both 1-α-hydroxylase and 25(OH)vitamin D are important factors for decreased 1-α-hydroxylase activity. Suboptimal or defective VDR activation may play a role in causing or aggravating CRS. Newer VDR activators such as vitamin D mimetics (e.g. paricalcitol and maxacalcitol) are promising agents. Some studies have confirmed the survival advantages of D-mimetics as compared to non-selective VDR activators. Higher doses of D-mimetic per unit of PTH (paricalcitol to PTH ratio) are associated with greater survival, and the survival advantages of African American dialysis patients could be explained by higher received doses of paricalcitol. More studies are needed to verify these data and to explore additional avenues for CRS management via modulating VDR pathway
    • 

    corecore