Conserved Genetic Interactions between Ciliopathy Complexes Cooperatively Support Ciliogenesis and Ciliary Signaling

Mutations in genes encoding cilia proteins cause human ciliopathies, diverse disorders affecting many tissues. Individual genes can be linked to ciliopathies with dramatically different phenotypes, suggesting that genetic modifiers may participate in their pathogenesis. The ciliary transition zone contains two protein complexes affected in the ciliopathies Meckel syndrome (MKS) and nephronophthisis (NPHP). The BBSome is a third protein complex, affected in the ciliopathy Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). We tested whether mutations in MKS, NPHP and BBS complex genes modify the phenotypic consequences of one another in both C. elegans and mice. To this end, we identified TCTN-1, the C. elegans ortholog of vertebrate MKS complex components called Tectonics, as an evolutionarily conserved transition zone protein. Neither disruption of TCTN-1 alone or together with MKS complex components abrogated ciliary structure in C. elegans. In contrast, disruption of TCTN-1 together with either of two NPHP complex components, NPHP-1 or NPHP-4, compromised ciliary structure. Similarly, disruption of an NPHP complex component and the BBS complex component BBS-5 individually did not compromise ciliary structure, but together did. As in nematodes, disrupting two components of the mouse MKS complex did not cause additive phenotypes compared to single mutants. However, disrupting both Tctn1 and either Nphp1 or Nphp4 exacerbated defects in ciliogenesis and cilia-associated developmental signaling, as did disrupting both Tctn1 and the BBSome component Bbs1. Thus, we demonstrate that ciliary complexes act in parallel to support ciliary function and suggest that human ciliopathy phenotypes are altered by genetic interactions between different ciliary biochemical complexes

A Novel Assay to Trace Proliferation History In Vivo Reveals that Enhanced Divisional Kinetics Accompany Loss of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self-Renewal

BACKGROUND: The maintenance of lifelong blood cell production ultimately rests on rare hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that reside in the bone marrow microenvironment. HSCs are traditionally viewed as mitotically quiescent relative to their committed progeny. However, traditional techniques for assessing proliferation activity in vivo, such as measurement of BrdU uptake, are incompatible with preservation of cellular viability. Previous studies of HSC proliferation kinetics in vivo have therefore precluded direct functional evaluation of multi-potency and self-renewal, the hallmark properties of HSCs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We developed a non-invasive labeling technique that allowed us to identify and isolate candidate HSCs and early hematopoietic progenitor cells based on their differential in vivo proliferation kinetics. Such cells were functionally evaluated for their abilities to multi-lineage reconstitute myeloablated hosts. CONCLUSIONS: Although at least a few HSC divisions per se did not influence HSC function, enhanced kinetics of divisional activity in steady state preceded the phenotypic changes that accompanied loss of HSC self-renewal. Therefore, mitotic quiescence of HSCs, relative to their committed progeny, is key to maintain the unique functional and molecular properties of HSCs

Discovery of a Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) Activity Signature Using Selective GR Antagonism in ER-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose: Although high glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression in early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer is associated with shortened relapse-free survival (RFS), how associated GR transcriptional activity contributes to aggressive breast cancer behavior is not well understood. Using potent GR antagonists and primary tumor gene expression data, we sought to identify a tumor-relevant gene signature based on GR activity that would be more predictive than GR expression alone. Experimental Design: Global gene expression and GR ChIP-sequencing were performed to identify GR-regulated genes inhibited by two chemically distinct GR antagonists, mifepristone and CORT108297. Differentially expressed genes from MDA-MB-231 cells were cross-evaluated with significantly expressed genes in GR-high versus GR-low ER-negative primary breast cancers. The resulting subset of GR-targeted genes was analyzed in two independent ER-negative breast cancer cohorts to derive and then validate the GR activity signature (GRsig). Results: Gene expression pathway analysis of glucocorticoid-regulated genes (inhibited by GR antagonism) revealed cell survival and invasion functions. GR ChIP-seq analysis demonstrated that GR antagonists decreased GR chromatin association for a subset of genes. A GRsig that comprised n = 74 GR activation-associated genes (also reversed by GR antagonists) was derived from an adjuvant chemotherapy-treated Discovery cohort and found to predict probability of relapse in a separate Validation cohort (HR = 1.9; P = 0.012). Conclusions: The GRsig discovered herein identifies highrisk ER-negative/GR-positive breast cancers most likely to relapse despite administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because GR antagonism can reverse expression of these genes, we propose that addition of a GR antagonist to chemotherapy may improve outcome for these high-risk patients. (C) 2018 AACR

Identification and structural characterization of FYVE domain-containing proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>FYVE domains have emerged as membrane-targeting domains highly specific for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)<it>P</it>). They are predominantly found in proteins involved in various trafficking pathways. Although FYVE domains may function as individual modules, dimers or in partnership with other proteins, structurally, all FYVE domains share a fold comprising two small characteristic double-stranded β-sheets, and a C-terminal α-helix, which houses eight conserved Zn²⁺ion-binding cysteines. To date, the structural, biochemical, and biophysical mechanisms for subcellular targeting of FYVE domains for proteins from various model organisms have been worked out but plant FYVE domains remain noticeably under-investigated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We carried out an extensive examination of all <it>Arabidopsis </it>FYVE domains, including their identification, classification, molecular modeling and biophysical characterization using computational approaches. Our classification of fifteen <it>Arabidopsis </it>FYVE proteins at the outset reveals unique domain architectures for FYVE containing proteins, which are not paralleled in other organisms. Detailed sequence analysis and biophysical characterization of the structural models are used to predict membrane interaction mechanisms previously described for other FYVE domains and their subtle variations as well as novel mechanisms that seem to be specific to plants.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study contributes to the understanding of the molecular basis of FYVE-based membrane targeting in plants on a genomic scale. The results show that FYVE domain containing proteins in plants have evolved to incorporate significant differences from those in other organisms implying that they play a unique role in plant signaling pathways and/or play similar/parallel roles in signaling to other organisms but use different protein players/signaling mechanisms.</p

Endocytosis Genes Facilitate Protein and Membrane Transport in C. elegans Sensory Cilia

SummaryBackgroundMultiple intracellular transport pathways drive the formation, maintenance, and function of cilia, a compartmentalized organelle associated with motility, chemo-/mechano-/photosensation, and developmental signaling. These pathways include cilium-based intraflagellar transport (IFT) and poorly understood membrane trafficking events. Defects in ciliary transport contribute to the etiology of human ciliary disease such as Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). In this study, we employ the genetically tractable nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to investigate whether endocytosis genes function in cilium formation and/or the transport of ciliary membrane or ciliary proteins.ResultsHere we show that localization of the clathrin light chain, AP-2 clathrin adaptor, dynamin, and RAB-5 endocytic proteins overlaps with a morphologically discrete periciliary membrane compartment associated with sensory cilia. In addition, ciliary transmembrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors concentrate at periciliary membranes. Disruption of endocytic gene function causes expansion of ciliary and/or periciliary membranes as well as defects in the ciliary targeting and/or transport dynamics of ciliary transmembrane and IFT proteins. Finally, genetic analyses reveal that the ciliary membrane expansions in dynamin and AP-2 mutants require bbs-8 and rab-8 function and that sensory signaling and endocytic genes may function in a common pathway to regulate ciliary membrane volume.ConclusionsThese data implicate C. elegans endocytosis proteins localized at the ciliary base in regulating ciliary and periciliary membrane volume and suggest that membrane retrieval from these compartments is counterbalanced by BBS-8 and RAB-8-mediated membrane delivery

Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain

[EN] Freshwater quality is deteriorating worldwide. In populated areas, urban pollution is the main pressure on surface continental waters, but intensive wastewater treatment is costly. Setting standards for treatment of wastewater before discharge is a major policy instrument for water authorities, balancing environmental gains and operational costs. Discharge permits usually define concentration limits at the discharge point of the plant effluent. This approach, however, may not guarantee the good status of the receiving waters. Discharge permits should be directly linked to pollutant concentration in the river. Our paper develops an approach to adaptively adjust discharge permits and applies it to Madrid and the Manzanares river, a city of more than 3 million inhabitants discharging its treated wastewater to a stream having less than 2 m(3) s(-1) average flow. Stricter limits to 5-day biological oxygen demand (11 mg O-2 L-1), ammonium (0.5 mg N-NH4 L-1), nitrate (5.9 mg N-NO3 L-1), and phosphate (0.17 mg P-PO4 L-1) at plant effluent are required to meet the river environmental objectives. The results can be generalized to assess wastewater management decisions in other geographical areas.The authors wish to thank the Tagus River Basin Authority (Confederacion Hidrografica del Tajo) for their availability and readiness to share information, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments. This research was funded by the Botin Foundation, Spain.Bolinches, A.; De Stefano, L.; Paredes Arquiola, J. (2020). Adjusting wastewater treatment effluent standards to protect the receiving waters: the case of low flow rivers in central Spain. Environmental Earth Sciences. 79:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09184-zS11779AEMET (2018) Standard climate Values: Madrid, Retiro. https://www.aemet.es/en/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos?l=3195&k=mad. Accessed 25 June 2019Alexakis D, Kagalou I, Tsakiris G (2013) Assessment of pressures and impacts on surface water bodies of the Mediterranean. Case study: Pamvotis Lake, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 70:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2152-7Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2002) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25:704–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchís E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol 177:269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-XArora S, Keshari AK (2018) Estimation of re-aeration coefficient using MLR for modelling water quality of rivers in urban environment. Groundw Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.11.006Asad Ismaiel I, Bird G, McDonald MA et al (2018) Establishment of background water quality conditions in the Great Zab River catchment: influence of geogenic and anthropogenic controls on developing a baseline for water quality assessment and resource management. Environ Earth Sci 77:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7190-8Astaraie-Imani M, Kapelan Z, Fu G, Butler D (2012) Assessing the combined effects of urbanisation and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK. J Environ Manag 112:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.039Bahamonde PA, Fuzzen ML, Bennett CJ et al (2015) Whole organism responses and intersex severity in rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) following exposures to municipal wastewater in the Grand River basin, ON, Canada. Part A Aquat Toxicol 159:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUATOX.2014.11.023Bowie GL, Mills WB, Porcella DB et al (1985) Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AthensCarey RO, Migliaccio KW (2009) Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manag 44:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5Chang F-J, Tsai Y-H, Chen P-A et al (2015) Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors and data driven approaches. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.014Chapra SC (2008) Surface water-quality modeling. Waveland Press, Long GroveConfederación Hidrográfica del Tajo (2018) Resultados/informes: aguas superficiales—control fisicoquímico. https://www.chtajo.es/LaCuenca/CalidadAgua/Resultados_Informes/Paginas/RISupFisicoQuímico.aspx. Accessed 24 May 2018Corominas L, Acuña V, Ginebreda A, Poch M (2013) Integration of freshwater environmental policies and wastewater treatment plant management. Sci Total Environ 445–446:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2012.12.055Council of the European Communities (1991) Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC). OJCox BA, Whitehead PG (2009) Impacts of climate change scenarios on dissolved oxygen in the River Thames, UK. Hydrol Res 40:138–152. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2009.096Cubillo F, Rodriguez B, Barnwell TO (1992) A system for control of river water quality for the community of Madrid using QUAL2E. Water Sci Technol 26:1867–1873Dodds W, Smith V (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams. Inl Waters 6:155–164. https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909Dojlido J, Best GA (1993) Chemistry of water and water pollution. E. Horwood, ChichesterDonigian AS (2002) Watershed model calibration and validation: the HSPF experience. Proc Water Environ Fed 2002:44–73Duh JD, Shandas V, Chang H, George LA (2008) Rates of urbanisation and the resiliency of air and water quality. Sci Total Environ 400:238–256European Commission (2019) Report from the commission to the European Parliament and Council on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC). BrusselsEuropean Parliament and Council (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ 2014–7001Even S, Mouchel J-M, Servais P et al (2007) Modelling the impacts of combined sewer overflows on the river Seine water quality. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.007Fonseca A, Botelho C, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP (2014) Integrated hydrological and water quality model for river management: a case study on Lena River. Sci Total Environ 485–486:474–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.111Gallego Bernad MS, Sánchez Pérez MÁ (2006) La destrucción ambiental del río Tajo: orígenes, procesos y consecuencias. In: V congreso Ibérico sobre Gestión y Planificación del Agua, FaroGenkai-Kato M, Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86(1):210–219Google Earth (2018) Google Earth. https://earth.google.com/web/@40.4012607,-3.71553269,604.85487896a,8051.22382757d,35y,0h,0t,0r. Accessed 24 May 2018Griffiths JA, Ka F, Chan S et al (2017) Reach-scale variation surface water quality in a reticular canal system in the lower Yangtze River Delta region, China. J Environ Manag 196:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.079Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2011) Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes. Desalination 268:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2010.09.042Hutchins MG, Bowes MJ (2018) Balancing water demand needs with protection of river water quality by minimising stream residence time: an example from the Thames, UK. Water Resour Manag 32:2561–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1946-0IGN Instituto Geográfico Nacional (2018) Centro de Descargas del CNIG (IGN). https://centrodedescargas.cnig.es/CentroDescargas/index.jsp. Accessed 24 May 2018IGN Instituto Geográfico Nacional (2020) Atlas Nacional de España. https://atlasnacional.ign.es/. Accessed 19 May 2020INE (2018) Cifras oficiales de población resultantes de la revisión del Padrón municipal. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=2881&L=0. Accessed 7 Apr 2019INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2018) Survey on water supply and sewerage. https://www.ine.es/dynt3/inebase/index.htm?type=pcaxis&path=/t26/p069/p03/serie&file=pcaxis&L=1. Accessed 24 May 2018Jasinska EJ, Goss GG, Gillis PL et al (2015) Assessment of biomarkers for contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic organisms downstream of a municipal wastewater discharge. Sci Total Environ 530–531:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.05.080Jin L, Whitehead PG, Heppell CM et al (2016) Modelling flow and inorganic nitrogen dynamics on the Hampshire Avon: linking upstream processes to downstream water quality. Sci Total Environ 572:1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.156Kloas W, Urbatzka R, Opitz R et al (2009) Endocrine disruption in aquatic vertebrates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1163:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04453.xKottek M, Grieser J, Beck C et al (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Zeitschrift 15:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130Lastra A (2017) Minimizando el impacto de los vertidos en tiempo de lluvia. El caso de Madrid. In: V Jornadas de Ingeniería del Agua, p 2017Loos S, Middelkoop H, van der Perk M, van Beek R (2009) Large scale nutrient modelling using globally available datasets: a test for the Rhine basin. J Hydrol 369:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.019Madrid City Council (2017) Padrón Municipal de Habitantes Ciudad de Madrid, pp 1–45Madrid City Council (2018) Zonas Alcantarillado Municipio Madrid. https://www.madrid.es/UnidadesDescentralizadas/Agua/DeInformacionsobreAgua/SistemasDepuracion/2017ZonasAlcantarilladoMunicipioMadrid.pdf.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018Mapama M de AA y M ambiente (2011) Resolución de 30 de junio de 2011, de la Secretaría de Estado de Medio Rural y Agua, por la que se declaran las zonas sensibles en las cuencas intercomunitarias. Off Bull SpainMapama M de AA y M ambiente (2016) Real Decreto 1/2016, de 8 de enero, por el que se aprueba la revisión de los Planes Hidrológicos de las demarcaciones (...) y de la parte española de las demarcaciones hidrográficas del Cantábrico Oriental, Miño-Sil, Duero, Tajo, Guadiana y Ebro. Off Bull Spain 16, pp 2972–4301Mapama M de AA y M ambiente (2018) Redes de seguimiento. https://sig.mapama.gob.es/redes-seguimiento/. Accessed 26 June 2019McGrane SJ (2016) Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review. Hydrol Sci J 61:2295–2311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084Momblanch A, Paredes-Arquiola J, Munné A et al (2015) Managing water quality under drought conditions in the Llobregat River Basin. Sci Total Environ 503–504:300–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.069Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW et al (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153Morris L, Colombo V, Hassell K et al (2017) Municipal wastewater effluent licensing: a global perspective and recommendations for best practice. Sci Total Environ 580:1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.12.096Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6Ostace GS, Baeza JA, Guerrero J et al (2013) Development and economic assessment of different WWTP control strategies for optimal simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Comput Chem Eng 53:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCHEMENG.2013.03.007Paredes J, Andreu J, Solera A (2010) A decision support system for water quality issues in the Manzanares River (Madrid, Spain). Sci Total Environ 408:2576–2589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.037Paredes-Arquiola S (2013) Modelo gescal para la simulación de la calidad del agua en sistemas de recursos hídricosParedes-Arquiola J, Andreu-Álvarez J, Martín-Monerris M, Solera A (2010) Water quantity and quality models applied to the Jucar River Basin, Spain. Water Resour Manag 24:2759–2779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9578-zParedes-Arquiola J, Solera A, Martinez-Capel F et al (2014) Integrating water management, habitat modelling and water quality at the basin scale and environmental flow assessment: case study of the Tormes River, Spain. Hydrol Sci J 59:878–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.821573Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR et al (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.xSferratore A, Billen G, Garnier J, Théry S (2005) Modeling nutrient (N, P, Si) budget in the Seine watershed: application of the Riverstrahler model using data from local to global scale resolution. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002496Singh J, Knapp HV, Arnold JG, Demissie M (2005) Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41:343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.xSmith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3Soares Cruz MA, de Azevedo GA, de Aragão R et al (2019) Spatial and seasonal variability of the water quality characteristics of a river in Northeast Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 78:68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8087-5Soil Conservation Service (1972) SCS national engineering handbook, section 4: hydrologyThomann RV, Mueller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. HarperCollins, New YorkUnited Nations Environment Program (2015) Good practices for regulating wastewater treatment. Legislations, Policies and Standard