Second record of Pseudimares aphrodite H. Asp?ck et U. Asp?ck, 2009 (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae)

Some adults of Pseudimares aphrodite H. Asp?ck et U. Asp?ck, 2009 were observed and photographed while attracted by light in Southern Morocco, in August 2009 and 2011. Only the typus of this species, a male, was known previously from South Morocco too. Moreover the genus Pseudimares Kimmins, 1933 is perhaps the most enigmatic taxon among Neuroptera Myrmeleontidae. Its second species Pseudimares iris Kimmins, 1933 from Southern Iran is known also only in the type series, a male and a female. What little information we know about Pseudimares is reporte

Biallelic SQSTM1 mutations in early-onset, variably progressive neurodegeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinically and molecularly an early-onset, variably progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a cerebellar syndrome with severe ataxia, gaze palsy, dyskinesia, dystonia, and cognitive decline affecting 11 individuals from 3 consanguineous families. METHODS: We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) (families 1 and 2) and a combined approach based on homozygosity mapping and WES (family 3). We performed in vitro studies to explore the effect of the nontruncating SQSTM1 mutation on protein function and the effect of impaired SQSTM1 function on autophagy. We analyzed the consequences of sqstm1 down-modulation on the structural integrity of the cerebellum in vivo using zebrafish as a model. RESULTS: We identified 3 homozygous inactivating variants, including a splice site substitution (c.301+2T>A) causing aberrant transcript processing and accelerated degradation of a resulting protein lacking exon 2, as well as 2 truncating changes (c.875_876insT and c.934_936delinsTGA). We show that loss of SQSTM1 causes impaired production of ubiquitin-positive protein aggregates in response to misfolded protein stress and decelerated autophagic flux. The consequences of sqstm1 down-modulation on the structural integrity of the cerebellum in zebrafish documented a variable but reproducible phenotype characterized by cerebellum anomalies ranging from depletion of axonal connections to complete atrophy. We provide a detailed clinical characterization of the disorder; the natural history is reported for 2 siblings who have been followed up for >20 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers an accurate clinical characterization of this recently recognized neurodegenerative disorder caused by biallelic inactivating mutations in SQSTM1 and links this phenotype to defective selective autophagy

Abundance, movements and biodiversity of flying predatory insects in crop and non-crop agroecosystems

[EN] Predatory insects are key natural enemies that can highly reduce crops pest damage. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the movements of flying predatory insects in agroecosystems throughout the year. In particular, it is still unclear how these predators move from crop to non-crop habitats, which are the preferred habitats to overwinter and to spread during the spring and if these predators leave or stay after chemical treatments. Here, the Neuroptera, a generalist, highly mobile, flying predator order of insects, was selected as model. We studied the effects of farming management and the efficiency of edge shelterbelts, ground cover vegetation, and fruit trees canopy on holding flying predatory insects in Mediterranean traditional agroecosystems. Seasonal movements and winter effects were also assessed. We evaluated monthly nine fruit agroecosystems, six organic, and three pesticides sprayed, of 0.5-1 ha in eastern Spain during 3 years using two complementary methods, yellow sticky traps and aspirator. Results show surprisingly that the insect abundance was highest in pesticide sprayed systems, with 3.40 insects/sample versus 2.32 insects/sample in organic systems. The biodiversity indices were highest in agroecosystems conducted under organic management, with S of 4.68 and D of 2.34. Shelterbelts showed highest biodiversity indices, S of 3.27 and D of 1.93, among insect habitats. Insect species whose adults were active during the winter preferred fruit trees to spend all year round. However, numerous species moved from fruit trees to shelterbelts to overwinter and dispersed into the orchard during the following spring. The ground cover vegetation showed statistically much lower attractiveness for flying predatory insects than other habitats. Shelterbelts should therefore be the first option in terms of investment in ecological infrastructures enhancing flying predators.Sorribas Mellado, JJ.; González Cavero, S.; Domínguez Gento, A.; Vercher Aznar, R. (2016). Abundance, movements and biodiversity of flying predatory insects in crop and non-crop agroecosystems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 36(2). doi:10.1007/s13593-016-0360-3S362Altieri MA, Letourneau DK (1982) Vegetation management and biological control in agroecosystems. Crop Prot 1:405–430. doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(82)90023-0Altieri MA, Schmidt LL (1986) The dynamics of colonizing arthropod communities at the interface of abandoned, organic and commercial apple orchards and adjacent woodland habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 16:29–43. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(86)90073-3Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull A (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J App Ecol 42:261–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.xBianchi F, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B 273:1715–1727. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3530Chaplin-Kramer RM, Rourke E, Blitzer EJ, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14:922–932. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01642.xCrowder DW, Northfield TD, Strand MR, Snyder WE (2010) Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature 466:109–112. doi: 10.1038/nature09183Dogramaci M, DeBano SJ, Kimoto C, Wooster DE (2011) A backpack-mounted suction apparatus for collecting arthropods from various habitats and vegetation. Entomol Exp et Appl 139:86–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01099.xDuelli P, Studer M, Marchland I, Jakob S (1990) Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biol Conserv 54:193–207. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90051-PEilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C (2001) Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl 46:387–400. doi: 10.1023/A:1014193329979Forman RTT, Baudry J (1984) Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology. Environ Manage 8:495–510. doi: 10.1007/BF01871575Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Luna JM (2003) Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: pest management and other benefits. Basic Appl Ecol 4:107–116. doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00122Hole DG, Perkins AJ et al (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv 122:113–130. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175Long RF, Corbett A, Lamb C, Reberg-Horton C, Chandler J, Stimmann M (1998) Beneficial insects move from flowering plants to nearby crops. Calif Agr 52:23–26. doi: 10.3733/ca.v052n05p23Östman Ö, Ekbom B, Bengtsson J (2001) Landscape heterogeneity and farming practice influence biological control. Basic App Ecol 2:365–371. doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00072Pantaleoni RA, Ticchiati V (1988) I Neurotteri delle colture agrarie: osservazioni sulle fluttuazioni stagionali di populazione in frutteti. Boll dell’Ist di Entomol 43:43–57Panzer R, Schwartz MW (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conserv Biol 12:693–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97051.xParedes D, Cayuela L, Gurr G, Campos M (2013) Effect of non-crop vegetation types on conservation biological control of pests in olive groves. PeerJ 1:1–16. doi: 10.7717/peerj.116Pekar S, Michalko R, Loverre P, Líznarová E, Cernecká L (2015) Biological control in winter: novel evidence for the importance of generalist predators. J Appl Ecol 52:270–279. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12363Pollard KA, Holland JM (2006) Arthropods within the woody element of hedgerows and their distribution pattern. Agric Forest Entomol 8:203–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2006.00297.xRand TA, Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T (2006) Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol Lett 9:603–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00911.xSilva EB, Franco JC, Vasconcelos T, Branco M (2010) Effect of ground cover vegetation on the abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards. Bull Entomol Res 100:489–499. doi: 10.1017/S0007485309990526Smukler SM, Sánchez-Moreno S et al (2010) Biodiversity and multiple ecosystem functions in an organic farmscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:80–97. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.004Stelzl M, Devetak D (1999) Neuroptera in agricultural ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:305–321. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00040-7Straub CS, Finke DL, Snyder WE (2008) Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals? Biol Control 45:225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.013Thierry D, Deutsch B, Paulian M, Villenave J, Canard M (2005) Typifying ecosystems by using green lacewing assemblages. Agron Sustain Dev 25:473–479. doi: 10.1051/agro:2005047Thomas CFG, Parkinson L, Griffiths GJK, García AF, Marshall EJP (2001) Aggregation and temporal stability of carabid beetle distributions in field and hedgerow habitats. J App Ecol 38:100–116. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00574.xVillenave J, Thierry D, Mamun A, Lode T, Rat-Morris E (2005) The pollens consumed by common green lacewings Chrysoperla spp. in cabbage crop environment in western France. Eur J Entomol 02:547–552, 10.14411/eje.2005.078You M, Hou Y, Liu Y, Yang G, Li Z, Cai H (2004) Non-crop habitat manipulation and integrated pest management in agroecosystems. Acta Entomol Sinica 47:260–268 (http://www.insect.org.cn/EN/Y2004/V47/I2/260

The larvae of European Myrmeleontidae (Neuroptera)

The larvae of the European Myrmeleontidae are reviewed with the aim to ease their identification, covering 15 genera and 28 species. Diagnostic characters and illustrations are given for each taxon. Larvae of the genera Nemoleon and Macronemurus are described for the first time while Megistopus, Neuroleon and Myrmeleon are revised. The larvae of Dendroleon pantherinus (Fabricius), Macronemurus appendiculatus (Latreille), Megistopus lucasi (Navas), Nemoleon notatus (Rambur), Neuroleon arenarius (Navas), Neuroleon assimilis (Navas), Neuroleon nemausiensis (Borkhausen), Cueta lineosa( Rambur) and Myrmeleon gerlindae (Holzel) are described or accurately depicted for the first time

Myrmeleon almohadarum sp nov., from Spain and North Africa, with description of the larva (Neuroptera Myrmeleontidae)

A new antlion (Neuroptera Myrmeleontidae Myrmeleontini), Myrmeleon almohadarum sp. nov., is described from southern Spain and Tunisia. The new taxon is closely related to the mostly sympatric M. inconspicuus Rambur and M. mariaemathildae Pantaleoni, Cesaroni & Nicoli Aldini but differing in body pattern, wing venation and larval chaeto-taxy. The validity of the new species is also supported by a phylogenetic analysis based on COI sequences. The larva of this new species is described and compared with congeners. M. almohadarum appears to be associated with sandy environments

Sperm structure of some Neuroptera and phylogenetic considerations

Spermatozoa from members of Hemerobiidae, Chrysopidae and Mantispidae (Arthropoda; Hexapoda: Neuroptera) have been examined by electron microscopy. In all species examined, the nucleus is surrounded by a nuclear envelope that in its anterior domain, fans out laterally into one (Chrysopidae) or two wings (Hemerobiidae and Mantispidae). Furthermore, the anterior sperm region is surrounded by external dense material. In Mantispidae, sperm dimorphism with two types of spermatozoa is also confirmed: paraspermatozoa (not fertilizing), provided with giant axoneme and mitochondrial derivatives, and euspermatozoa (fertilizing). Spermatozoa of Chrysopidae and Mantispidae are characterized by the lack of an acrosome while sperm cells of Hemerobiidae are provided with a bilayered acrosome. Spermatozoa from all the investigated species have axonemes of the conventional insect type, with a 9+9+2 microtubular pattern and with accessory tubules provided with 16 protofilaments. In all the examined taxa the intertubular material has the same localization also observed in all other previously analysed Neuroptera. The mitochondrial derivatives and the accessory bodies in the three families are also described. Hemerobiidae are characterized by the presence of a large groove of the plasma membrane along the right side of the anterior sperm region, which results in an eccentric position of the axoneme. Chrysopidae have large mitochondrial derivatives, which encircle the axoneme. The peculiar feature regarding the nuclear envelope was not seen in other members of neuropteroid insects. These data are discussed in the light of the phylogenetic relationships of the taxa examined