904 research outputs found
Automated calibration of a flight particle spectrometer
A system for calibrating both electron and ion imaging particle spectrometers was devised to calibrate flight instruments in a large vacuum facility in the Space Science Laboratory at the Marshall Space Flight Center. An IBM-compatible computer was used to control, via an IEEE 488 buss protocol, a two-axis gimbled table, constructed to fit inside the tank. Test settings of various diagnostic voltages were also acquired via the buss. These spectrometers constructed by the author at UCSD were calibrated in an automatic procedure programmed on the small computer. Data was up-loaded to the SSL VAX where a program was developed to plot the results
International Solar-Terrestrial Program Data Processing Consortium
The present conception of the data processing scheme is described including the Main Processing Units (MPU) and Satellite Processing Units (SPU) which will acquire the data for the instruments presently planned in the International Solar Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) Project
Numerical Algorithm for Detecting Ion Diffusion Regions in the Geomagnetic Tail with Applications to MMS Tail Season May 1 -- September 30, 2017
We present a numerical algorithm aimed at identifying ion diffusion regions
(IDRs) in the geomagnetic tail, and test its applicability. We use 5 criteria
applied in three stages. (i) Correlated reversals (within 90 s) of Vx and Bz
(at least 2 nT about zero; GSM coordinates); (ii) Detection of Hall electric
and magnetic field signatures; and (iii) strong (>10 mV/m) electric fields.
While no criterion alone is necessary and sufficient, the approach does provide
a robust, if conservative, list of IDRs. We use data from the Magnetospheric
Multiscale Mission (MMS) spacecraft during a 5-month period (May 1 to September
30, 2017) of near-tail orbits during the declining phase of the solar cycle. We
find 148 events satisfying step 1, 37 satisfying steps 1 and 2, and 17
satisfying all three, of which 12 are confirmed as IDRs. All IDRs were within
the X-range [-24, -15] RE mainly on the dusk sector and the majority occurred
during traversals of a tailward-moving X-line. 11 of 12 IDRs were on the
dusk-side despite approximately equal residence time in both the pre- and
post-midnight sectors (56.5% dusk vs 43.5% dawn). MMS could identify signatures
of 4 quadrants of the Hall B-structure in 3 events and 3 quadrants in 7 of the
remaining 12 confirmed IDRs identified. The events we report commonly display
Vx reversals greater than 400 km/s in magnitude, normal magnetic field
reversals often >10 nT in magnitude, maximum DC |E| which are often well in
excess of the threshold for stage 3. Our results are then compared with the set
of IDRs identified by visual examination from Cluster in the years 2000-2005.Comment: In Submission at JGR:Space Physic
Anomalously high potentials observed on ISEE
Data from two electric field experiments and from the plasma composition experiment on ISEE-1 are used to show that the spacecraft charged to close to -70 V in sunlight at 0700 UT on March 17, 1978. Data from the electron spectrometer experiment show that there was a potential barrier of -10 to -20 V about the spacecraft during this event. The potential barrier was effective in turning back emitted photoelectrons to the spacecraft. The stringent electrostatic cleanliness specifications imposed on ISEE make the presence of differential charging unlikely. Modeling of this event is required to determine if the barrier was produced by the presence of space charge
The collective gyration of a heavy ion cloud in a magnetized plasma
In both the ionospheric barium injection experiments CRIT 1 and CRIT 2, a long duration oscillation was seen with a frequency close to the gyro frequency of barium and a time duration of about one second. A model for the phenomena which was proposed for the CRIT 1 experiment is compared to the results from CRIT 2 which made a much more complete set of measurements. The model follows the motion of a low Beta ion cloud through a larger ambient plasma. The internal field of the model is close to antiparallel to the injection direction v sub i but slightly tilted towards the self polarization direction E sub p = -V sub i by B. As the ions move across the magnetic field, the space charge is continuously neutralized by magnetic field aligned electron currents from the ambient ionosphere, drawn by the divergence in the perpendicular electric field. These currents give a perturbation of the magnetic field related to the electric field perturbation by Delta E/Delta B approximately equal to V sub A. The model predictions agree quite well with the observed vector directions, field strengths, and decay times of the electric and magnetic fields in CRIT 2. The possibility to extend the model to the active region, where the ions are produces in this type of self-ionizing injection experiments, is discussed
Recommended from our members
How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E M for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E M can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E M that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E M. We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E M = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA-v e), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD-B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle-in-cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA-v e and MDD-B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA-v e when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD-B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD-B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify E M from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%
- …