Celebrity chefs and the sustainable seafood movement : Smokescreen or a dish to savour?

Celebrity chefs are a major part of British media culture, with several highly prominent on television and able to amass formidable book sales. Sales of endorsed products often increase subsequent to the release of these cookery books. The ethical leanings of a chef may therefore impact behavioural trends of consumers. This study examined the books of ten celebrity chefs over three time periods; 2005-07, 2009-11 and 2012, with a view to establishing the sustainability of the seafood featured within them. The Marine Conservation Society’s Fishonline website (www.fishonline.org) was used to assess the sustainability of an average gram of seafood in each book. This was combined with a grading of the introduction, recipes and alternative suggested species in each book to produce an overall “sustainability” score. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s books achieved the highest ranking across all three time frames, with an average score of 87%. However, Delia Smith scored consistently low – between 17% and 22%. Raymond Blanc showed the greatest improvement, rising from 22% to 85%, reflecting a general improvement among most chefs over time. Continued promotion of sustainable seafood by celebrity chefs could help improve the management of marine resources, but uptake of the concept is still highly variable between individuals

Increasing frailty is associated with higher prevalence and reduced recognition of delirium in older hospitalised inpatients: results of a multi-centre study

Purpose: Delirium is a neuropsychiatric disorder delineated by an acute change in cognition, attention, and consciousness. It is common, particularly in older adults, but poorly recognised. Frailty is the accumulation of deficits conferring an increased risk of adverse outcomes. We set out to determine how severity of frailty, as measured using the CFS, affected delirium rates, and recognition in hospitalised older people in the United Kingdom. Methods: Adults over 65 years were included in an observational multi-centre audit across UK hospitals, two prospective rounds, and one retrospective note review. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), delirium status, and 30-day outcomes were recorded. Results: The overall prevalence of delirium was 16.3% (483). Patients with delirium were more frail than patients without delirium (median CFS 6 vs 4). The risk of delirium was greater with increasing frailty [OR 2.9 (1.8–4.6) in CFS 4 vs 1–3; OR 12.4 (6.2–24.5) in CFS 8 vs 1–3]. Higher CFS was associated with reduced recognition of delirium (OR of 0.7 (0.3–1.9) in CFS 4 compared to 0.2 (0.1–0.7) in CFS 8). These risks were both independent of age and dementia. Conclusion: We have demonstrated an incremental increase in risk of delirium with increasing frailty. This has important clinical implications, suggesting that frailty may provide a more nuanced measure of vulnerability to delirium and poor outcomes. However, the most frail patients are least likely to have their delirium diagnosed and there is a significant lack of research into the underlying pathophysiology of both of these common geriatric syndromes

Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised controlled, open-label, platform trial

SummaryBackground Azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatoryactions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods In this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospitalwith COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients wererandomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once perday by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatmentgroups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment andwere twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants andlocal study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to theoutcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treatpopulation. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.Findings Between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) wereeligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomlyallocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall,561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days(rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days(rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, nosignificant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilationor death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24).Interpretation In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or otherprespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restrictedto patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication

Nurses Alumni Association Bulletin, Fall 1989

Alumni Meeting Calendar Officers and Committee Chairmen The President\u27s Message Treasurer\u27s Report 1937 Nurses\u27 Alumnae Association Relief Fund AGREEMENT Decade Fund Rediscovery of a Rare Antiquity at Jefferson Looking Backward 50 Years \u22Jeff\u22 Memories When You\u27re the Patient Bee Happy Nursing on an Indian Reservation Supporting Parents With Mental Retardation News about Our Graduates Happy Birthday Fiftieth Anniversary Resume of Minutes of Alumni Association Meetings Bequests Alumni Office News Committee Reports Bulletin By-Laws Relief Fund Satellite Scholarship Social Finance For All Born Before 1940 Stress Diet \u26 Diet Rules In Memoriam, Names of Deceased Graduates Class News Luncheon Photos Take Time Is English Difficult? CAHS Alumni Directory The Jefferson Hospital School Of Nursing Roll Of Honor Change of Address Form Pins,Transcripts, Class Address List Relief Fund Application Scholarship Application The Jefferson Hospital School of Nursing Roll of Honor Nomination Application Membership Application Non-Graduate Scholarship Application Map The History of the Jefferson Ca

Assessment and determinants of whole blood and plasma fibrinolysis in patients with mild bleeding symptoms

Enhanced clot lysis is associated with bleeding, but assessment of lysis capacity remains difficult. The plasma turbidity lysis and whole blood tissue Plasminogen Activator-Rotational Thromboelastometry (tPA-ROTEM) assays estimate fibrinolysis under more physiological conditions than clinically used assays. We hypothesized that these assays could find signs of enhanced lysis capacity in patients who report bleeding symptoms, but are not diagnosed with bleeding disorders. We also aimed to gain insight in determinants of the results of these lysis assays. Data from 240 patients with and 95 patients without self-reported bleeding symptoms were obtained, who were included in a study that primarily aimed to assess prevalence of haemostaticabnormalities in preoperative patients. ROTEM and turbidity assays were performed with rtPA. Blood counts, fibrinolysis and coagulation factor activities were determined. Data were analysed using multivariable linear regression models. Remarkably, patients reporting bleeding symptoms showed signs of significantly impaired lysis capacity in the tPA-ROTEM, but not in the turbidity lysis assay. In these patients, the tPA-ROTEM results depended on FII, FXII, plasminogen, α2-antiplasmin, PAI-1 and TAFI levels. The turbidity lysis results were significantly influenced by fibrinogen, α2-antiplasmin, PAI-1 and TAFI. In conclusion, the tPA-ROTEM and the turbidity lysis assay could not detect enhanced fibrinolytic capacity in patients with bleeding symptoms. This suggests that these symptoms are not caused by enhanced fibrinolytic activity. As both assays were sensitive to important determinants of fibrinolysis they may be able to detect a fibrinolytic imbalance, but this needs to be validated in patients with known hypo- or hyperfibrinolytic disorders