How uncertain are precipitation and peak flow estimates for the July 2021 flooding event?

The disastrous July 2021 flooding event made us question the ability of current hydrometeorological tools in providing timely and reliable flood forecasts for unprecedented events. This is an urgent concern since extreme events are increasing due to global warming, and existing methods are usually limited to more frequently observed events with the usual flood generation processes. For the July 2021 event, we simulated the hourly streamflows of seven catchments located in western Germany by combining seven partly polarimetric, radar-based quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) with two hydrological models: a conceptual lumped model (GR4H) and a physically based, 3D distributed model (ParFlowCLM). GR4H parameters were calibrated with an emphasis on high flows using historical discharge observations, whereas ParFlowCLM parameters were estimated based on landscape and soil properties. The key results are as follows. (1) With no correction of the vertical profiles of radar variables, radar-based QPE products underestimated the total precipitation depth relative to rain gauges due to intense collision–coalescence processes near the surface, i.e., below the height levels monitored by the radars. (2) Correcting the vertical profiles of radar variables led to substantial improvements. (3) The probability of exceeding the highest measured peak flow before July 2021 was highly impacted by the QPE product, and this impact depended on the catchment for both models. (4) The estimation of model parameters had a larger impact than the choice of QPE product, but simulated peak flows of ParFlowCLM agreed with those of GR4H for five of the seven catchments. This study highlights the need for the correction of vertical profiles of reflectivity and other polarimetric variables near the surface to improve radar-based QPEs for extreme flooding events. It also underlines the large uncertainty in peak flow estimates due to model parameter estimation.</p

Near-realtime quantitative precipitation estimation and prediction (RealPEP)

Flash floods in small- to medium-sized catchments and intense precipitation over cities caused by severe local storms pose increasing threats to our society. For the timely prediction of such events, the value of high-resolution and high-quality QPE and corresponding forecasts cannot be overrated. Seamless predictions harmonizing nowcasting and numerical weather prediction (NWP) across forecast lead times from minutes to days would greatly help to improve the value and efficiency of warnings. Organized by the Research Unit on Near-Realtime Precipitation Estimation and Prediction (RealPEP, www2.meteo.uni-bonn.de/realpep) and supported by the Project on Seamless Integrated Forecasting System (SINFONY, www.dwd .de/DE/forschung/forschungsprogramme/sinfony_iafe/sinfony_node.html) of the German Meteorological Service (DWD), an international 3-day online conference was held from 5 to 7 October 2020, dedicated to Precipitation and Flash-Flood Predictions from Minutes to Days (https://indico .scc.kit.edu/event/883/). Most speakers agreed to have their presentations recorded, which we uploaded to YouTube for further distribution (see, e.g., on the conference homepage, https:// indico.scc.kit.edu/event/883/page/588-recorded-talks). The speakers were both invited experts in the respective research fields and researchers from the RealPEP and SINFONY projects. Talks and discussions could be followed on video stream. Interaction between the about 250 participants was enabled by entering written questions and comments via a dedicated tool, which allowed for voting and thus also ranking questions. Registered participants could enter chat rooms from where they could be moved to the speaker room for posing the questions directly to the speakers and the auditorium. On the last day of the conference podium discussions with selected speakers summarized talks and discussions and elaborated on overarching problems, ideas, and developments in the fields of quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE), quantitative precipitation nowcasting (QPN), quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF), flash-flood prediction (FFP), and their organization into seamless prediction systems, which also constituted the topics of the five sessions during the conference. We report here in particular on the outcomes of the panel discussions

Contribution du dépôt sec atmosphérique à la pollution en métaux d’un petit bassin versant urbain (Nantes, France)

Colloque avec actes et comité de lecture. Internationale.International audienc

Impact of groundwater representation on heat events in regional climate simulations over Europe

The representation of groundwater is simplified in most regional climate models (RCMs), potentially leading to biases in the simulations. This study introduces a unique dataset from the regional Terrestrial Systems Modelling Platform (TSMP) driven by the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model at Low Resolution (MPI-ESM-LR) boundary conditions in the context of dynamical downscaling of global climate models (GCMs) for climate change studies. TSMP explicitly simulates full 3D soil and groundwater dynamics together with overland flow, including complete water and energy cycles from the bedrock to the top of the atmosphere. By comparing the statistics of heat events, i.e., a series of consecutive days with a near-surface temperature exceeding the 90th percentile of the reference period, from TSMP and those from GCM–RCM simulations with simplified groundwater dynamics from the COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX) for the European domain, we aim to improve the understanding of how groundwater representation affects heat events in Europe. The analysis was carried out using RCM outputs for the summer seasons of 1976–2005 relative to the reference period of 1961–1990. While our results show that TSMP simulates heat events consistently with the CORDEX ensemble, there are some systematic differences that we attribute to the more realistic representation of groundwater in TSMP. Compared to the CORDEX ensemble, TSMP simulates fewer hot days (i.e., days with a near-surface temperature exceeding the 90th percentile of the reference period) and lower interannual variability and decadal change in the number of hot days on average over Europe. TSMP systematically simulates fewer heat waves (i.e., heat events lasting 6 d or more) compared to the CORDEX ensemble; moreover, they are shorter and less intense. The Iberian Peninsula is particularly sensitive with respect to groundwater. Therefore, incorporating an explicit 3D groundwater representation in RCMs may be a key in reducing biases in simulated duration, intensity, and frequency of heat waves in Europe. The results highlight the importance of hydrological processes for the long-term regional climate simulations and provide indications of possible potential implications for climate change projections.</p

Groundwater Model Impacts Multiannual Simulations of Heat Waves

Climate change increases the frequency and intensity of heat waves, bringing along multiple adverse impacts on ecosystems, human health, societies, and the economy. Groundwater influences the near surface air temperature evolution through land–atmosphere interactions. Using simplified and shallow groundwater representations, reproducing heat waves in a regional climate model (RCM) is challenging. Currently, RCMs applied over Europe exhibit a warm bias. This study analyzes heat waves over a 13-year evaluation period, comparing the terrestrial systems modeling platform (TSMP) with an explicit groundwater representation to a EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, the ERA5 reanalysis, and observations. The TSMP multiannual heat wave statistics are consistent with observations and reanalysis data. We attribute the lower absolute deviations of heat wave metrics simulated by TSMP to the improved hydrology including 3D groundwater flow. The findings emphasize the importance of hydrological process representation in RCMs

Near-field krypton-85 measurements in stable meteorological conditions around the AREVA NC La Hague reprocessing plant Estimation of atmospheric transfer coefficients

International audienceThe aim of this work was to study the near-field dispersion of 85Kr around the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at La Hague (AREVA NC La Hague - France) under stable meteorological conditions. Twenty-two 85Kr night-time experimental campaigns were carried out at distances of up to 4km from the release source. Although the operational Gaussian models predict for these meteorological conditions a distance to plume touchdown of several kilometers, we almost systematically observed a marked ground signal at distances of 0.5-4km. The calculated atmospheric transfer coefficients (ATC) show values (1) higher than those observed under neutral conditions, (2) much higher than those proposed by the operational models, and (3) higher than those used in the impact assessments. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd