30 research outputs found

    Dual Invasive Infection with Phaeoacremonium parasiticum and Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides in a Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Comprehensive Review of the Literature of Phaeoacremonium Phaeohyphomycosis

    No full text
    International audienceDespite increasing reports of human infection, data about the optimal care of Phaeoacremonium infections are missing. We report a case of an infection due to Phaeoacremonium parasiticum and Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides, initially localized to skin and soft tissue, in a kidney transplant patient. Despite surgical drainage and excision of the lesion and combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and liposomal amphotericin B, a disseminated infection involving the lungs and brain developed and led to death. We performed a systematic literature review to assess the general features and outcome of human infections due to Phaeoacremonium species. Thirty-six articles were selected, and 42 patients, including ours, were reviewed. Thirty-one patients (74%) were immunocompromised because of organ or bone marrow transplantation (n = 17), diabetes or glucose intolerance (n = 10), rheumatoid arthritis or Still's disease (n = 4), chronic hematological diseases (n = 3), or chronic granulomatous disease (n = 3). Ten patients (24%) reported initial cutaneous trauma. Skin and soft tissue infections represented 57% of infections (n = 24), and disseminated infections, all occurring in immunocompromised patients, represented 14% of infections (n = 6). The main antifungal drugs used were azoles (n = 41) and amphotericin B (n = 16). Surgical excision or drainage was performed in 64% of cases (n = 27). The cure rate was 67% (n = 28). There were 10% cases of treatment failure or partial response (n = 4), 19% relapses (n = 8), and 7% losses to follow-up (n = 3). The death rate was 19% (n = 8). Management of Phaeoacremonium infections is complex because of slow laboratory identification and limited clinical data, and treatment relies on a combination of surgery and systemic antifungal therapy

    New Short Tandem Repeat-Based Molecular Typing Method for Pneumocystis jirovecii Reveals Intrahospital Transmission between Patients from Different Wards.

    No full text
    Pneumocystis pneumonia is a severe opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients caused by the unusual fungus Pneumocystis jirovecii. Transmission is airborne, with both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals acting as a reservoir for the fungus. Numerous reports of outbreaks in renal transplant units demonstrate the need for valid genotyping methods to detect transmission of a given genotype. Here, we developed a short tandem repeat (STR)-based molecular typing method for P. jirovecii. We analyzed the P. jirovecii genome and selected six genomic STR markers located on different contigs of the genome. We then tested these markers in 106 P. jirovecii PCR-positive respiratory samples collected between October 2010 and November 2013 from 91 patients with various underlying medical conditions. Unique (one allele per marker) and multiple (more than one allele per marker) genotypes were observed in 34 (32%) and 72 (68%) samples, respectively. A genotype could be assigned to 55 samples (54 patients) and 61 different genotypes were identified in total with a discriminatory power of 0.992. Analysis of the allelic distribution of the six markers and minimum spanning tree analysis of the 61 genotypes identified a specific genotype (Gt21) in our hospital, which may have been transmitted between 10 patients including six renal transplant recipients. Our STR-based molecular typing method is a quick, cheap and reliable approach to genotype Pneumocystis jirovecii in hospital settings and is sensitive enough to detect minor genotypes, thus enabling the study of the transmission and pathophysiology of Pneumocystis pneumonia

    Conversion to belatacept after lung transplantation: Report of 10 cases

    No full text
    Background Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remain the cornerstone of maintenance immunosuppression (IS) after lung transplantation (LTx), although CNI-related life-threatening toxic effects may occur. Belatacept, a novel immunosuppressant that blocks a T-cell co-stimulation pathway, is a non-nephrotoxic drug indicated as an alternative to CNIs in kidney Tx. In LTx, there are only a few reports of belatacept conversion as a CNI-free or CNI-sparing IS treatment. Methods We reviewed a series of 10 LTx recipients with conversion to a CNI-free belatacept IS regimen within the first year post-LTx (n = 7) or a belatacept/low-dose CNI combination after the first year (n = 3). Results Use of belatacept was triggered by severe renal failure in 9 patients and under-IS with previous other IS-related toxicities in 1 patient. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate after starting belatacept significantly improved at 6 months after initiation and at the last-follow-up (p = 0.006, and p = 0.002 respectively). The incidence of recurrent and/or severe acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes was high in patients with CNI-free belatacept-based IS (n = 4/7). Chronic graft allograft dysfunction developed in 2 of 9 recipients under belatacept IS. Belatacept was stopped in 6 patients because of recurrent/severe ACR (n = 3), recurrent opportunistic infections (n = 1), center modified policy (n = 1), or other cause (n = 1). Conclusion Early conversion to CNI-free belatacept-based IS improved renal function in this series but was counterbalanced by a high incidence of recurrent ACR, including life-threatening episodes. Other studies are needed to better determine the indications for its use after LTx, possibly with lower immunological risk IS regimens, such as CNI-sparing belatacept

    Transmission map of the 10 patients in whom the <i>P</i>. <i>jirovecii</i> genotype 21 was detected.

    No full text
    <p>The date corresponds to the time at which the patient was present in the hospital and is delineated as a circle. Colored circles show <i>P</i>. <i>jirovecii</i> exposure of a given patient on a given day. Color coding distinguishes the different groups of patients (purple for patients 01–03, blue for patients 04–06 and turquoise for patients 07–10). The red bar corresponds to transmission between two groups of patients. Colored bars show the transmission routes.</p
    corecore