The role of the pod in seed development: strategies for manipulating yield

Pods play a key role in encapsulating the developing seeds and protecting them from pests and pathogens. In addition to this protective function, it has been shown that the photosynthetically active pod wall contributes assimilates and nutrients to fuel seed growth. Recent work has revealed that signals originating from the pod may also act to coordinate grain filling and regulate the reallocation of reserves from damaged seeds to those that have retained viability. In this review we consider the evidence that pods can regulate seed growth and maturation, particularly in members of the Brassicaceae family, and explore how the timing and duration of pod development might be manipulated to enhance either the quantity of crop yield or its nutritional properties

CD19-Loss with Preservation of Other B Cell Lineage Features in Patients with Large B Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed Post-Axi-Cel

Background: Axi-cel is the first, personalized autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies (YESCARTA. Prescribing Information. 2017). With a median follow-up of 27.1 months in ZUMA-1, the overall response rate was 83%, and 39% of the treated patients had ongoing response (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). To gain insights into the mechanism of secondary treatment failure post-axi-cel, as well as define alternative targets and product optimization approaches, we analyzed tumor biopsies obtained prior to axi-cel therapy and at relapse. Methods: Tumor tissue samples from patients in Cohorts 1 and 2 of ZUMA-1 who had responded and subsequently relapsed were assessed in a post-hoc analysis for protein expression of B cell linage markers (CD19, CD20, PAX5, CD79a, and CD22) by multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining and confocal microscopy in representative cases. Pretreatment tissue samples were available from 96 patients, and 21 were available post-relapse. Paired pretreatment and post-relapse samples were available for 16 patients. CD19 and CD20 H-scores were derived based on proportion and intensity of antigen expression. Scores of 0 - 5 were considered negative, and scores of 6 - 300 were considered positive. CD19 splice variants were assessed by RNA sequencing. Results: Among all patients with available post-relapse samples, 7/21 (33%) showed loss of CD19 expression. Analysis of the 16 paired pretreatment and post-treatment samples showed loss of CD19 expression in 4 patients (25%) who relapsed post-axi-cel (Figure). Nineteen post-relapse tumor samples were evaluable for other B cell lineage markers and showed preservation of CD20, CD22 and CD79a, and the B cell lineage transcription factor PAX5, even in samples with loss or substantial reduction of CD19 expression. Multiplex IF showed that CD19 and CD20 were expressed on the cell membrane, and analysis uncovered the presence of malignant cells with different relative expression levels of these two antigens within a given biopsy. Interestingly, among the 96 pretreatment tumor samples, IHC analysis demonstrated that CD20 was robustly expressed in nearly all samples, alongside CD19, despite all patients having previously relapsed after receiving rituximab-based regimens. The CD19 and CD20 expression levels in these tumor biopsies obtained pre-axi-cel did not correlate with each other. RNA sequencing showed alternative splicing of CD19 with loss of exon 2 and/or exons 5/6 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma tumors at baseline and/or relapse, similar to what has been described previously in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Sotillo et al. Cancer Discov. 2015). In addition, several novel splice junctions have been identified. Data on the correlation between H-scores and CD19 splice forms and clinical outcomes, including response and progression-free survival, will be presented. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients relapsing after axi-cel, loss of CD19 expression was common by IHC as compared to pretreatment, likely due to alternative splicing and selection of variants devoid of target epitope. Additionally, the data showed that expression of alternate B cell lineage antigens was largely preserved. In particular, CD20 cell surface expression was strong in most tumors despite prior rituximab-based treatments. Altogether, these data point to strategies to improve efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR T cell products through co-targeting or sequential targeting of alternate B cell antigens. Disclosures Neelapu: Novartis: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rossi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Jacobson:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses. Locke:Novartis: Other: Scientific Advisor; Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Scientific Advisor. Miklos:AlloGene: Consultancy; Celgene-Juno: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Becton Dickinson: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy. Reagan:Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Rodig:Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Affirmed: Research Funding. Flinn:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding. Milletti:Gilead: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel Expenses, Patents & Royalties; Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel Expenses, Patents & Royalties; Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Chang:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xue:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Plaks:Gilead: Equity Ownership. Kim:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Bot:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment, Equity Ownership

Long-Term Survival and Gradual Recovery of B Cells in Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma Treated with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel)

Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. ZUMA-1 is the multicenter, single-arm, registrational Phase 1/2 study of axi-cel in pts with refractory LBCL. In a 2-year analysis of ZUMA-1 (median follow-up, 27.1 months; N=101), axi-cel demonstrated objective response, complete response (CR), and ongoing response rates of 83%, 58%, and 39%, respectively (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Here, we present additional survival follow up and recovery of normal, polyclonal B cells from ongoing responders in ZUMA-1. Methods: Eligible pts with refractory large B cell lymphoma (diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma) underwent leukapheresis at enrollment and subsequently received low-dose conditioning chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg (Neelapu et al. NEJM. 2017; NCT02348216). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the first response assessment was 4 weeks post infusion. Response assessments were performed per protocol up to 24 months or disease progression, whichever occurred first. For pts in ongoing response beyond Month 24, response assessments continued per institutional standard-of-care (SOC). Blood levels of CAR T cells were quantified using polymerase chain reaction and B cells were characterized using flow cytometry in pts with ongoing responses and evaluable samples. Results: A total of 111 pts were enrolled, and axi-cel was administered to 101 pts. As previously reported in the ZUMA-1 2-year analysis, among pts who received axi-cel, the median time from axi-cel infusion to both objective response and CR was 1.0 month (range, 1 - 12 months; Locke et al. Lancet Oncol 2019). When the entire enrolled population (N = 111) was included on an intent-to-treat basis, the median manufacturing time was 17 days (range, 14 - 51; n = 110 as manufacturing was not feasible for 1 pt). Additionally, among the 111 pts, the median time from enrollment/leukapheresis to objective response and CR was 1.7 months (range, 0.7 - 12.9) and 1.9 months (range, 0.7 - 13.3), respectively. Responses have been durable, and with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up (median, 39.1 months), the median overall survival (OS) was 25.8 months, and the 3-year OS rate was 47%. Importantly, no axi-cel-related secondary malignancies have been reported. As previously reported, pts in ongoing response after 2 years had significantly greater peak CAR T cell expansion in blood 7 - 14 days after axi-cel infusion than did those with relapse (P = 0.014) or no response (P = 0.0003; Locke et al. Lancet Oncol 2019). Blood samples from 22 pts in ongoing response (per institutional SOC) at ≥ 3 years were available for analysis of CAR T cells and evaluation of B cell recovery. All evaluable pts had detectable B cells in blood at 3 years post axi-cel. Notably, 91% of pts in ongoing response at 3-year follow-up demonstrated recovery of polyclonal B cells measured by presence of both kappa and lambda light chains on non-malignant CD19+CD20+ B cells. The median kappa-lambda ratio of 1.6 and relative levels of key B cell subsets, including memory and naive B cell immunophenotypes, suggested reconstitution of B cell repertoire, consistent with published data from healthy individuals (Deneys et al. J Immunol Methods 2001; Scott et al. J Clin Pathol 2018). Additionally, 15/22 (68%) had both minimal levels of detectable CAR gene-marked cells and detectable polyclonal B cells in blood. Altogether, these findings support the hypothesis that persistence of functional CAR T cells is not necessary for durable remissions of LBCL. Overall survival and translational findings with ≥ 4 years of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Axi-cel produced rapid responses and longterm disease control in pts with refractory LBCL. Most responses occurred by the first assessment, and the brief time elapsed between enrollment and response supports both the speed and success of manufacturing. Furthermore, axi-cel-treated pts with ongoing responses at ≥ 3 years showed evidence of restoration of a normal B cell compartment and clearance of functional CAR T cells, a critical component of the long-term safety of CD19-directed CAR T cell therapies. Disclosures Locke: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wugen: Consultancy; Calibr: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Other: Consultancy with grant options; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Ghobadi:Celegene: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA: Consultancy. Miklos:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Oluwole:Pfizer: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Lin:Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy. Hill:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Timmerman:Merck: Research Funding; Corvus: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Marker Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Immune Design: Honoraria; Celldex Therapeutics: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genmab: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Valor: Research Funding. Deol:Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Reagan:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Stiff:Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Atara: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Curio Science: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Calithera Biosciences: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Loxo: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Yingli Pharmaceuticals ≠: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Other; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vincera Pharma: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iksuda Therapeutics: Consultancy; Great Point Partners: Consultancy; Curis: Research Funding; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Triphase Research & Development Corp.: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding. Farooq:Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria. Goy:COTA: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: leadership role; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; CALBG: Research Funding; PracticeUpdate Oncology: Consultancy; RCCA/OMI: Current Employment; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Hackensack UMC and University of Nebraska: R

Long-Term (≥4 Year and ≥5 Year) Overall Survival (OS) By 12- and 24-Month Event-Free Survival (EFS): An Updated Analysis of ZUMA-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Abstract Background: Axi-cel, an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, is approved for the treatment of pts with relapsed/refractory LBCL with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In the 2-year analysis of ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216), the multicenter, single-arm phase 1/2 study evaluating axi-cel in pts with refractory LBCL, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83%, including a complete response (CR) rate of 58%; 39% of pts had ongoing response with a median follow-up of 27.1 months (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). EFS is emerging as a robust surrogate endpoint for OS in hematologic malignancies. A recent systematic analysis demonstrated a linear correlation between EFS and OS in pts with diffuse LBCL after first-line immunochemotherapy (Zhu et al. Leukemia. 2020). Here, we report updated survival findings from the phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1 after 4 years of follow-up, including an evaluation of the association of OS with EFS. Methods: Eligible pts had refractory LBCL (diffuse LBCL, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma). After leukapheresis at enrollment, pts received low-dose conditioning chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) followed by a target dose of 2×10 6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg (Neelapu et al. N Engl J Med. 2017). The primary endpoint was ORR, with the first response assessment occurring 4 weeks following infusion. Additional endpoints included safety and translational evaluations. An exploratory analysis of OS by EFS at 12 and 24 months was performed. EFS was defined as the time from axi-cel infusion until disease progression, initiation of new lymphoma therapy (excluding stem cell transplant), or death from any cause. Comparisons of OS by EFS outcomes were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: Of 111 enrolled pts, axi-cel was administered to 101 pts. As of August 11, 2020, median follow-up was 51.1 months. With over 4 years of follow-up, median OS was 25.8 months, and the 4-year OS rate was 44%. Median EFS in pts treated with axi-cel was 5.7 months, with a 12-month EFS rate of 43% (95% CI, 33-52) and a 24-month EFS rate of 38% (95% CI, 28-47). In pts with an EFS event by Month 12 (EFS12; n=57) vs those without EFS12 (n=44), 4-year OS rates were 7% (95% CI, 2-16) vs 91% (95% CI, 78-97), respectively. Among the 17 pts with EFS12 who were alive at Month 12, 13 (76%) died by Month 48, while among the 44 pts alive at Month 12 without EFS12, 4 (9%) died by Month 48. In pts with an EFS event by Month 24 (EFS24; n=62) vs those without EFS24 (n=39), 4-year OS rates were 13% (95% CI, 6-23) vs 92% (95% CI, 78-98), respectively. Among the 12 pts with EFS24 who were alive at Month 24, 4 (33%) died by Month 48, while among the 39 pts alive at Month 24 without EFS24, 3 (8%) died by Month 48. Since the 2-year analysis (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019), there have been no new safety signals reported, including no new serious adverse events, no axi-cel-related secondary malignancy, and no confirmed cases of replication-competent retrovirus. Overall, 26 pts received subsequent anti-cancer therapy; median time to next therapy was 8.7 months (range, 0.3 - 53.8). Immunoglobulin therapy was administered to 38 (38%) pts. Two pts in axi-cel-induced remission received allogeneic stem cell transplant; 1 pt was in CR and 1 pt was in partial response. Among treated pts, 58 (57%) have died, primarily due to progressive disease (46%; n=46), followed by other reasons (7%; n=7), adverse events (4%; n=4), and secondary malignancy (myelodysplastic syndrome, with onset on Day 574) unrelated to axi-cel (1%; n=1). Among pts without EFS12 and without EFS24, 1 pt each (2% and 3%, respectively) died due to disease progression >24 months following axi-cel infusion; >36 months, 2 pts each (5% for both) died due to disease progression (1 pt each [2% and 3%]) and other reasons (1 pt each [2% and 3%]. One pt (2%) without EFS12 died due to disease progression between 12 and 24 months. Updated findings with ≥5 years of follow-up, including translational correlations, will be presented. Conclusion: In this long-term survival analysis of ZUMA-1 with ≥4 years of follow-up, axi-cel demonstrated longer OS in pts without EFS events at Month 12 and Month 24 vs pts with events at these timepoints. These data support the use of EFS as a surrogate endpoint for long-term OS in refractory LBCL, and the relationship between EFS and 5-year OS will be presented. Disclosures Jacobson: Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Axis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Locke: Moffitt Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties: field of cellular immunotherapy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Gerson Lehrman Group: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Other; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Calibr: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Iovance Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Emerging Therapy Solutions: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other; Wugen: Consultancy, Other; EcoR1: Consultancy; Umoja: Consultancy, Other; Cowen: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding. Ghobadi: Atara: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wugen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Miklos: Pharmacyclics, Amgen, Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Roche, Genentech, Becton Dickinson, Isoplexis, Miltenyi, Juno-Celgene-Bristol Myers Squibb, Allogene, Precision Biosciences, Adicet, Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies, Novartis, Juno/Celgene-BMS, Kite, a Gilead Company, Pharmacyclics-AbbVie, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, AlloGene, Precision Bioscience, Miltenyi Biotech, Adicet, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Patents & Royalties; Kite, a Gilead Company, Amgen, Atara, Wugen, Celgene, Novartis, Juno-Celgene-Bristol Myers Squibb, Allogene, Precision Bioscience, Adicet, Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies and Miltenyi Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Oluwole: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Curio Science: Consultancy. Lin: Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill: Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Timmerman: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Marker Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Corvus: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genmab: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Reagan: Seagen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy. Stiff: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seagen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BioLineRX: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Flinn: Celgene: Other: All research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Other: All consultancy and research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Other: All consultancy and research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Other: All research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Research Funding; Loxo: Other: All research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Research Funding; Agios: Other: All research funding payments made to Sarah Cannon Research Inst

2-Year Follow-up and High-Risk Subset Analysis of Zuma-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Background: Axi-cel is a US FDA-approved, autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. This report focuses on high-risk patient populations as well as long-term durability of response, and B cell recovery. Methods: In ZUMA-1, eligible patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma (diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma) underwent leukapheresis and received low-dose conditioning followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg (Neelapu and Locke et al. NEJM. 2017; NCT02348216). Outcomes in patients with double-expressor B cell lymphoma (MYC [≥ 40%] and BCL-2 [≥ 50%] protein expression by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) or high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBCL), defined as double- or triple-hit (MYC+ and BCL2+ and/or BCL6+ by fluorescence in situ hybridization) or not otherwise specified (MYC- and > 70% Ki67 by IHC) were examined by independent pathology review. Exploratory analyses, including normal B cell levels in peripheral blood over time and frequency of use of safety interventions of interest, were also performed. A long-term follow-up analysis will be conducted with a data cutoff of August 11, 2018 for all 108 patients, including the HGBCL subgroup. Results: As of August 11, 2017, all 108 patients had at least 1 year of follow-up, with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. The objective response rate (ORR) was 82% with a complete response (CR) rate or 58%. The CR rate was 53% (29/55) in patients with disease refractory to ≥ 2 consecutive prior lines of therapy and 72% (18/25) in patients who had relapsed within 12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation. High-risk genetics were assessed in the 47 evaluable pre-treatment tumor samples: 37 patients (79%) had HGBCL or double-expressor B cell lymphoma and had an ORR of 89% (33/37) including a CR rate of 68% (25/37). Forty-two percent of patients overall had ongoing responses with a median follow-up of 15.4 months including 49% (18/37) of patients with high-risk genetics. To investigate the relationship between B cell recovery and ongoing response, B cell levels were assessed over time. Overall, of the 87 evaluable patients, 47% had no detectable B cells at baseline, and the remainder had levels close to or below the lower level of quantification of the assay. In patients with ongoing responses at 12 months post axi-cel infusion, 19 of the 35 (54%) patients with evaluable samples had detectable B cells at 12 months. This suggests B cell recovery in some patients with ongoing response as only 6 of 40 (15%) patients with evaluable samples had detectable B cells at 3 months after axi-cel infusion. Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) were generally reversible and reported for 12% and 31% of patients, respectively. Tocilizumab (45%) and/or steroids (28%) were used for the management of CRS and NE. The use of vasopressors, dialysis, and intubation were minimal, used in only 17%, 3%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Thirty-four percent of patients (37/108) had either no CRS/NE (6%) or only Grade 1 CRS with (12%) or without (16%) Grade 1 NE. For these 37 patients, the median onset of CRS and NE was 2 and 7 days after infusion, respectively. Patients with Grade 0 - 1 CRS/NE had similar efficacy (ORR, 86%; CR, 65%) but lower peak/AUC CAR T cell levels vs the overall population. Updated safety and efficacy results will be presented with a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a median follow-up of 27.1 months. Conclusion: High rates of durable response were observed in patients with HGBCL and double-expressor B cell lymphoma, with approximately half of these patients (18/37) maintaining CR at ≥ 1 year. Efficacy in these high-risk populations was comparable to the overall patient population in ZUMA-1. At 12 months, B-cell recovery was observed in over half the patients with ongoing remission. About one-third of patients had only Grades 0 - 1 CRS/NE yet showed comparable efficacy with the overall patient population. High-grade CRS/NE were largely managed with tocilizumab and steroids with very low use of intensive or invasive interventions. Updated outcomes with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up will be presented. Disclosures Neelapu: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Unum Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Miklos:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics - Abbot: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite - Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol:Novartis: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Reagan:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Flinn:Agios: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. McSweeney:Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munoz:Alexion: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Siddiqi:Juno Therapeutics: Other: Steering committee. Herrera:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Merck, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; KiTE Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding. Xue:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Jiang:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Bot:KITE: Employment. Rossi:KITE: Employment. Kim:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Go:KITE: Employment. Locke:Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisor; Kite Pharma: Other: Scientific Advisor

2-Year Follow-up and High-Risk Subset Analysis of Zuma-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma

Axi-cel is a US FDA-approved, autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma with ≥2 prior systemic therapies. This report focuses on high-risk patient populations as well as long-term durability of response, and B cell recovery. In ZUMA-1, eligible patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma underwent leukapheresis and received low-dose conditioning followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg (Neelapu et al. NEJM. 2017; NCT02348216). Outcomes in patients with double-expressor B cell lymphoma (MYC [≥40%] and BCL-2 [≥50%] protein expression by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) or high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBCL), defined as double- or triple-hit (MYC+ and BCL2+ and/or BCL6+ by fluorescence in situ hybridization) or not otherwise specified (MYC– and >70% Ki67 by IHC) were examined by independent pathology review. The exploratory analysis of normal B cell levels in peripheral blood over time was also performed. A long-term follow-up analysis will be conducted with a data cutoff of August 11, 2018 for all 108 patients, including the HGBCL subgroup. As of August 11, 2017, all 108 patients had at least 1 year of follow-up, with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. The objective response rate (ORR) was 82% with a complete response (CR) rate or 58%. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) were generally reversible and reported for 12% and 31% of patients, respectively. High-risk genetics were assessed in the 47 evaluable pre-treatment tumor samples: 37 patients (79%) had HGBCL or double-expressor B cell lymphoma and had an ORR of 89% (33/37) including a CR rate of 68% (25/37). Forty-two percent of patients overall had ongoing responses with a median follow-up of 15.4 months including 49% (18/37) of patients with high-risk genetics. Overall, of the 87 evaluable patients, 47% had no detectable B cells at baseline, and the remainder had levels close to or below the lower level of quantification of the assay. In patients with ongoing responses at 12 months post axi-cel infusion, 19 of the 35 (54%) patients with evaluable samples had detectable B cells at 12 months. This suggests B cell recovery in some patients with ongoing response as only 6 of 40 (15%) patients with evaluable samples had detectable B cells at 3 months after axi-cel infusion. Patients with high-risk genetics had similar favorable outcomes as observed for the overall study population, with approximately half of these patients (18/37) maintaining CR at ≥ 1 year. At 12 months, B-cell recovery was observed in over half the patients with ongoing remission. Updated safety and efficacy results will be presented with a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a median follow-up of 27.1 months