Temporal evolution in quality of life following melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Background: recent studies have demonstrated a clear survival benefit of melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) for liver metastases from ocular melanoma (mUM). Importantly, the survival benefit relating to each treatment cycle must be carefully balanced with changes in patient Quality of Life. We contribute our single centre findings on the temporal change in the quality of life after M-PHP therapy. Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of the change in quality of life (QoL) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) with mUM patients receiving M‐PHP at our institutions (n = 13). The FACT-G score which comprises physical (PWB), social (SWB), emotional (EWB) and functional (FWB) wellbeing were measured pre-procedure and at day 1, day of discharge, 7, 14 and 28 days after M-PHP therapy. Paired t-test was used to assess for any significant change in each QoL domain. Results: the baseline FACT-G score was 93.4 out of 108 +/- 14.7 (mean +/- std). Quality of life scoring significantly decreased immediately after the procedure (day 1; 84.8 +/- 13.1, p = 0.01) and gradually improved over time, with no significant difference in total score by the day of discharge; 88.7 +/- 13.7, c.f baseline p = 0.22). By day 28, there was a trend for overall improved QoL (96.6 +/-9.3, p = 0.25). Sub-score analysis revealed that by day 28 there was a statistically significant improvement in EWB (p = 0.02), a trend towards improved scores in PWB and SWB domains. FWB was slightly below baseline by day 28 (23.8 vs 23.2). Conclusions: quality of life following M-PHP decreases immediately after therapy and is not significantly different from baseline by the day of discharge. By day 28 there is a trend towards improved overall quality of life. This study could provide the basis for determining the optimal time between treatment cycles

Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion of melphalan for metastatic uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma, the most common primary ocular malignancy in adults, carries a poor prognosis: 50% of patients develop the metastatic disease with a 10–25% 1-year survival and no established standard of care treatment. Prior studies of melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) have shown promise in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients with liver predominant disease but are limited by small sample sizes. We contribute our findings on the safety and efficacy of the procedure in the largest sample population to date. A retrospective analysis of outcome and safety data for all mUM patients receiving M-PHP was performed. Tumour response and treatment toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.03, respectively. 250 M-PHP procedures were performed in 81 patients (median of three per patient). The analysis demonstrated a hepatic disease control rate of 88.9% (72/81), a hepatic response rate of 66.7% (54/81), and an overall response rate of 60.5% (49/81). After a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median overall progression-free (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 8.4 and 14.9 months, respectively. There were no fatal treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). Forty-three grade 3 (29) or 4 (14) TRAE occurred in 23 (27.7%) patients with a significant reduction in such events between procedures performed in 2016–2020 vs. 2012–2016 (0.17 vs. 0.90 per patient, P < 0.001). M-PHP provides excellent response rates and PFS compared with other available treatments, with decreasing side effect profile with experience. Combination therapy with systemic agents may be viable to further advance OS

Quality of life after melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Background: recent studies indicate that melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) for liver metastases from ocular melanoma (mUM) improves survival. Importantly, this benefit must be carefully balanced with changes in a patient's quality of life (QoL). This study examines the QoL changes post-M-PHP.Methods: retrospective analysis of the change in QoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) with mUM patients receiving M-PHP ( n  = 20). The FACT-G scores, which comprise physical (PWB), social (SWB), emotional (EWB) and functional (FWB) wellbeing were measured pre-procedure and at day 1, day of discharge (mean = 2.4 days), 7, 14 and 28 days after M-PHP therapy. Wilcoxon signed-rank test gauged QoL domain changes.Results: baseline FACT-G median (IQR) scores were 101.8 (21.8). QoL scoring significantly decreased immediately after the procedure [day 1; 85 (27.5); P  = 0.002] and gradually improved over time. By day 28, QoL almost returned to pre-procedure levels [100.3 (13.8); P  = 0.31]. Subscore analysis revealed that the initial drop in QoL at day 1 post-procedure was attributable to the PWB (28 vs. 24; P  = 0.001) and FWB domains (26 vs. 18.5; P  &lt; 0.001). By day 28 there was a statistically significant improvement in EWB ( P  = 0.01).Conclusion: QoL following M-PHP decreases immediately after therapy and is not significantly different from baseline by the day of discharge. By day 28 there is improved emotional well-being. This study could help to optimize the time between treatment cycles when combined with toxicity data and blood count recovery.</p