Monarchism and Liberalism in Mexico's Nineteenth Century

N/

Cuando la ley fundamental desbarata: Los conservadores y la constitución de 1857

In the aftermath of the instability that characterized Mexican national politics in the decades after independence and after ten years of war, the 1857 constitution became a stable juridical framework. This article analyzes the arguments of its Conservative critics, who condemned it as anarchic and incompatible with the character of a Catholic people. It also examines the legal proposals for centralization and administrative consolidation they made for the military and monarchical regimes that governed from Mexico City between 1858-1860 and 1863-1867.In the aftermath of the instability that characterized Mexican national politics in the decades after independence and after ten years of war, the 1857 constitution became a stable juridical framework. This article analyzes the arguments of its Conservative critics, who condemned it as anarchic and incompatible with the character of a Catholic people. It also examines the legal proposals for centralization and administrative consolidation they made for the military and monarchical regimes that governed from Mexico City between 1858-1860 and 1863-1867.En el marco de la inestabilidad que caracterizó a la política nacional mexicana en las décadas que siguieron a la independencia, la constitución de 1857 se consolidó, después de diez años de guerra, en un marco jurídico estable. Este texto analiza las críticas que formularon en contra de su supuesto carácter desorganizador e incompatible con la naturaleza de un pueblo católico los políticos y juristas conservadores. Revisa también las propuestas centralizadoras y administrativas que formularon para los regímenes militar y monárquico que gobernaron desde la ciudad de México entre 1858-1860 y 1863-1867

De laboratorios y política: sobre Hilda Sabato, Repúblicas del Nuevo Mundo. El experimento político latinoamericano del siglo XIX, Buenos Aires: Penguin Random House, 2021.

This short review describes the contributions that Hilda Sabato makes to the historiographical conversation in this suggestive synthesis of the innovative work on Latin American politics produced during the last few decades. It also points to some issues and problems that deserve to be analyzed and discussed with greater depth.Esta breve reseña describe las aportaciones que hace a la conversación historiográfica el libro de Hilda Sabato, sugerente síntesis de los innovadores trabajos que, en las últimas décadas, se han hecho sobre la política latinoamericana durante las primeras décadas de vida independiente. Se apuntan algunos temas y problemas que merecen discutirse y profundizarse

Hacer propio lo que es ajeno. Políticas de naturalización en América del Norte. Estados Unidos y México, siglo XIX

This article explores, within a comparative framework, the evolution of naturalizaton law in two «new» North American countries, from independence to the early XX century, when the «Open Door Era» of immigration policy, which generally welcomed those coming from abroad, came to an end. It hopes to show how naturalization policies became spaces, on the one hand, for the expression of republican ideals of membership and, on the other, for the intervention of political authority –first at the state, then at the federal level– in order to regulate the political community.Este artículo hace un análisis comparativo de la evolución de las leyes de naturalización en dos naciones «nuevas» de América del norte, desde la independencia y hasta principios del siglo XX, cuando se pone fin a la «Era de puertas abiertas» durante la cual las políticas migratorias habían sido favorables a quienes venían de fuera. Revela cómo las políticas de naturalización se erigieron como espacios para la expresión, por un lado, los ideales republicanos de pertenencia, y, por el otro para la regulación, por parte de la autoridad, primero estatal, después federal, de la comunidad política

De coyotes y gallinas: Hispanidad, identidad nacional y comunidad política durante la expulsión de españoles

This article explores one of the most contentious moments in the struggle to redefine political community during the early independence period in Mexico: the 1827 expulsion of Spaniards, through the analysis of parliamentary debates and pamphleteer literature. It tries to uncover the borders that, according to the contenders, were to define the new national community, and the place within it of the «gachupines», now considered by some to be strangers.Este artículo explora uno de los momentos más candentes de las pugnas por redefinir la comunidad política durante los primeros años del México independiente: la expulsión de españoles de 1827, a partir del análisis de los discursos parlamentario y panfletario en la ciudad de México. Se trata de descubrir las fronteras que, según los contendientes, debían contener a la nueva comunidad nacional, y el lugar que, dentro de ésta, debían tener los «gachupines», ahora considerados, por algunos, como extraños

ON MARKOVIAN SEMIGROUPS OF LÉVY DRIVEN SDES, SYMBOLS AND PSEUDO–DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS

We analyse analytic properties of nonlocal transition semigroups associated with a class of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) in R^d driven by pure jump–type Lévy processes. First, we will show under which conditions the semigroup will be analytic on the Besov space B^m_(R^d) with 1 ≤ p, q (R^d). The choice of Besov spaces is twofold. First, observe that Besov spaces can be defined via the Fourier transform and the partition of unity. Secondly, the space of continuous functions can be characterised by Besov spaces

Renal Function Outcomes in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Chemotherapy or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Unexpected Scenario

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) are effective therapeutic agents for the palliative treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); the aim of our study was to investigate the acute and chronic renal toxicities in this setting. We collected data on 292 patients who received cisplatin (35%), carboplatin-based regimens (25%), or ICI monotherapy (40%). The primary and secondary outcomes were compared to the acute kidney injury (AKI) rate and the mean estimated GFR (eGFR) decay between groups, respectively, over a mean follow-up duration of 15 weeks. We observed 26 AKI events (8.9%), mostly stage I AKI (80.7%); 15% were stage II AKI, 3.8% were stage III, and none required renal replacement therapy or ICU admission. The AKI rates were 10.9%, 6.8%, and 8.9% for the cisplatin, carboplatin, and ICI groups, respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups (p = 0.3). A global mean eGFR decay of 2.2 mL/min was observed, while for the cisplatin, carboplatin, and ICI groups, the eGFR decay values were 2.3 mL/min, 1.1 mL/min, and 3.5 mL/min, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Cisplatin/carboplatin-based CT and ICIs resulted in a similar incidence of AKI and eGFR decay, suggesting the safety of their cautious use, even in CKD patients