Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Outcomes of dissolution therapy and monitoring for stone disease: should we do better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Surgical management is the cornerstone of urolithiasis treatment, but high recurrence rates and associated complications necessitate the existence of medical treatment options, aiming at dissolution of kidney stones and prevention of recurrence. The purpose of this review is to present the most recent knowledge existing in scientific literature, regarding dissolution therapy and ways of monitoring nephrolithiasis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of laboratory studies have been performed testing experimental treatments (tolvaptan, chlorthalidone, atorvastatin, a-lipoic acid, glucosaminoglycans, plant extracts), to reduce kidney stone formation and cellular damage and showed encouraging results. Uric acid stones is the main target of dissolution therapy, but until last years, existing level of evidence was low. A number of prospective and randomized studies, proved the efficacy and safety of oral chemolysis for radiolucent stones and associated prognostic features of success. Tolvaptan and a-Lipoic acid were also tested in patients with cystinuria and resulted in reduction of recurrence. Finally, some new diagnostic markers are suggested as tests for the monitoring of urolithiasis patients, with satisfying accuracy and discriminative ability. SUMMARY: Medical dissolution therapy for nephrolithiasis is an effective option, especially for patients with radiolucent/uric acid stones. In the future, we need clinical trials to confirm the encouraging results of pilot studies testing several agents for patients with cystinuria. Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

Complications after active stone removal

Purpose of reviewActive stone removal has been entirely revolutionized in the past decades. Smaller instruments, scope and laser technology advancements and novel lithotripter modalities have entirely changed the way urological surgeons treat stones. Nevertheless novel technologies may lead to different and difficult to manage complications. Accurate knowledge of indications, limitations and technical details of these novel modalities can significantly decrease complication rates. The purpose of this review is to provide the most recently acquired knowledge to decrease patient's morbidity after active stone removal.Recent findingsComplications of active stone removal are well known for many years, nevertheless novel technologies in stone management can substantially differentiate their rates. Minimal invasive techniques are becoming even more minimal which reflects on the complications.SummaryMastering the novel techniques in active stone removal and knowing their inherent limitations, in association with the recognition of predisposing factors and preventing measures have led to a highly acceptable low complication rate. Further refinements and technical improvement will reduce even more the complication incidence in the future. © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

Overview of Olaparib as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction: Men with prostate cancer undergoing castration will eventually progress. In addition to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (like abiraterone and enzalutamide) or chemotherapy (like docetaxel), exists olaparib, a relatively new drug that interferes with the base excision repair (BER) pathway mainly due to selective inhibition of Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2. Areas covered: Herein, the authors evaluate the basic characteristics of olaparib, including its pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile. The authors also provide their expert opinion and future perspectives for the place of this drug in the current treatment armamentarium. Expert opinion: Olaparib is the first drug to prove that genetic sequencing and precise medicine is a viable and important option for prostate cancer patients. In patients with deletions in preselected genes, its efficacy renders it as a viable option for second- or third-line management of metastatic castrate resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). This fact, along with its acceptable toxicity profile, provide physicians with a new weapon in their armamentarium against this extremely difficult to treat disease. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care for the Prevention of Stone Recurrence in Urolithiasis Patients: Improving Outcomes

Urolithiasis is a common clinical condition with frequent recurrences. Advances in knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms permit the categorization of patients to low and high risk for recurrence, with specific metabolic abnormalities diagnosed in the second category. Follow-up is essential for patients with urolithiasis and consists of both imaging and metabolic follow-up with urine studies. No formal guidelines or solid evidence currently exists regarding frequency and type of follow-up studies to be performed in each category. This review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding follow-up, in order to guide clinicians on how and when to follow-up urolithiasis patients according to existing clinical scenario. © 2022 Tzelves et al

The Role of PCA 3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Treated with Docetaxel

AIM: To investigate potential fluctuations in prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA 3) scores in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients treated with docetaxel and investigate the assay as a potential prognostic factor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria included patients on hormonal treatment who were recently diagnosed with CRPC. Exclusion criteria included patients previously having radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and patients who have completed the first cycle of chemotherapy. All urine samples were collected and analyzed using the Progensa(R) assay. Samples were collected before starting chemotherapy and at 12 months. A prospective database was created including routine blood tests, prostate staging and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels throughout the study period. The effects of chemotherapy were also recorded. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2013, 12 patients were included in the study out of an initial cohort of 23 patients with CRPC. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months. Mean age at CRPC diagnosis was 73.8 years (+/-3.6 SD). Mean Gleason score was 8, with PSA 84.23 ng/ml (+/-158 SD). Mean duration of androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) was 45.16 months (+/-34.9 SD). Mean time to castrate-resistant state was 46.58 months (+/-35.3 SD). All twelve (n=12, 100%) patients had non-assessable PCA 3 scores at baseline and at 12 months follow-up. As a direct consequence, statistical analysis was not performed as the anticipated change in PCA 3 scores was not identified and correlation between measurable differences was not possible. All patients tolerated chemotherapy and completed the scheduled cycles with no serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to demonstrate lack of expression of PCA3 in CRPC, with the result apparently not influenced by chemotherapy. There appears to be a strong association between hormonal treatment and lack of PCA 3 expression. It is still unknown whether disease progression per se affects PCA 3 scores. The gradual reduction and eventual complete non-expression of PCA 3 with ongoing treatment and disease progression provide an insight towards molecular pathways that may be connected to castration-resistant state