Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Head and Neck With Dual-Energy CT: Ready for Clinical Use?

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT`) to identify bone marrow edema (BME) in the head and neck region in comparison with MRI as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 33 patients who underwent imaging between February 2016 and February 2018 were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent both DECT and MRI for head and neck abnormalities. Two radiologists independently visually assessed virtual noncalcium (VNCa) reconstructions with color-coded maps for the presence of BME. STIR or T2-weighted MRI reconstructions with fat suppression were used as the standard of reference for BME. Subjective quality assessment and severity of metal artifacts were scored on both imaging modalities. RESULTS. BME was detected in 18 patients on DECT compared with 20 patients on MRI. Most BME seen on DECT was located in the mandible. VNCa DECT images had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for BME of 85%, 92%, 94%, and 80% respectively, using MRI as the reference. The quality of the images was rated as excellent to moderate in 94% of the patients for VNCa DECT compared with 82% of the patients for MRI, but this difference was not statistically significant. Significantly more metal artifacts were scored on the mixed DECT images than on the MR images, but these artifacts did not interfere with diagnosis. CONCLUSION. BME detection in the head and neck region seems possible with VNCa DECT images and has the potential to provide an alternative for MRI in clinical practice

Electronic monitoring of symptoms and lung function to assess asthma control in children

Background: Asthma remains poorly controlled in children. Home monitoring of asthma control may help to improve the level of asthma control. Objectives: To compare 2 methods to assess asthma control: (1) prospective home monitoring, based on daily assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and electronic symptom score, and (2) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) with retrospective assessment of symptoms and FEV1. Methods: Ninety-six children with asthma were prospectively followed up during 1 year. Asthma control was assessed by home monitoring, including an electronic symptom score based on Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria and FEV1 measurements. In the hospital, the ACQ was completed and FEV1 was measured. Kappa analysis was performed to assess levels of agreement between the 2 methods. Results: Agreement between the 2 methods was low (k coefficient of 0.393). In 29 children (37%), prospective home monitoring was less optimistic than the retrospective assessment of asthma control by the ACQ. Conclusion: This study found low agreement between asthma control based on GINA criteria by means of prospective home monitoring and the hospital ACQ. The prospective home monitor detected more cases of less well-controlled asthma than the ACQ. However, optimization of adherence to home monitor use is necessary

Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Head and Neck With Dual-Energy CT:Ready for Clinical Use?

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT`) to identify bone marrow edema (BME) in the head and neck region in comparison with MRI as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 33 patients who underwent imaging between February 2016 and February 2018 were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent both DECT and MRI for head and neck abnormalities. Two radiologists independently visually assessed virtual noncalcium (VNCa) reconstructions with color-coded maps for the presence of BME. STIR or T2-weighted MRI reconstructions with fat suppression were used as the standard of reference for BME. Subjective quality assessment and severity of metal artifacts were scored on both imaging modalities. RESULTS. BME was detected in 18 patients on DECT compared with 20 patients on MRI. Most BME seen on DECT was located in the mandible. VNCa DECT images had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for BME of 85%, 92%, 94%, and 80% respectively, using MRI as the reference. The quality of the images was rated as excellent to moderate in 94% of the patients for VNCa DECT compared with 82% of the patients for MRI, but this difference was not statistically significant. Significantly more metal artifacts were scored on the mixed DECT images than on the MR images, but these artifacts did not interfere with diagnosis. CONCLUSION. BME detection in the head and neck region seems possible with VNCa DECT images and has the potential to provide an alternative for MRI in clinical practice