Sirolimus use in patients with subglottic stenosis in the context of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), suspected GPA, and immunoglobulin G4-related disease

OBJECTIVE: Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is a severe, life-threatening disease found in immune-mediated diseases such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and in rare cases of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease. It can result in persistent airway compromise due to the fibrotic response following inflammation. Standard management involves repeated endoscopic interventions to dilate the airway, and tracheostomy is occasionally required. In addition, immunosuppression remains a cornerstone of therapy aimed at controlling the underlying inflammatory disease; however, cumulative dosing leads to significant adverse effects. We present five cases of predominantly anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-negative GPA and a case of IgG4-related disease with SGS, in whom we evaluated the long-term utility of sirolimus, which has beneficial anti-proliferative and fibrotic effects, in the management of their disease. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of a cohort of patients with SGS at a tertiary vasculitis unit. These patients were treated with sirolimus, in addition to conventional medical and endoscopic treatment. Clinical symptoms, frequency and time to endoscopic intervention pre- and post-treatment, additional rescue therapy, and any adverse effects were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Six patients were treated with sirolimus and followed for up to 9 years; two discontinued the drug owing to adverse effects, early on. In the remaining four patients, glucocorticoids were withdrawn, and the frequency of endoscopic intervention was reduced. One patient on sirolimus required rituximab therapy for disease flare. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus may be a therapeutic option for some patients with severe SGS, allowing steroid withdrawal and resulting in a positive adverse effect profile

In vitro and in vivo study of commercial calcium phosphate cement HydroSet (TM)

Queen Mary Innovation (QMi

The clinical significance of duration of untreated psychosis: an umbrella review and random‐effects meta‐analysis

The idea that a longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) leads to poorer outcomes has contributed to extensive changes in mental health ser­vices worldwide and has attracted considerable research interest over the past 30 years. However, the strength of the evidence underlying this notion is unclear. To address this issue, we conducted an umbrella review of available meta-analyses and performed a random-effects meta-analysis of primary studies. MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched from inception to September 3, 2020 to identify relevant meta-analyses of studies including patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, first-episode psychosis, or affective and non-affective psychosis. Thirteen meta-analyses were included, corresponding to 129 individual studies with a total sample size of 25,657 patients. We detected potential violations of statistical assumptions in some of these meta-analyses. We therefore conducted a new random-effects meta-analysis of primary studies. The association between DUP and each outcome was graded according to a standardized classification into convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or non-significant. At first presentation, there was suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and more severe negative symptoms (beta=–0.07, p=3.6×10–5) and higher chance of previous self-harm (odds ratio, OR=1.89, p=1.1×10–5). At follow-up, there was highly suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and more severe positive symptoms (beta=–0.16, p=4.5×10–8), more severe negative symptoms (beta=–0.11, p=3.5×10–10) and lower chance of remission (OR=2.16, p=3.0×10–10), and suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and poorer overall functioning (beta=–0.11, p=2.2×10–6) and more severe global psychopathology (beta=–0.16, p=4.7×10–6). Results were unchanged when analysis was restricted to prospective studies. These effect sizes are clinically meaningful, with a DUP of four weeks predicting >20% more severe symptoms at follow-up relative to a DUP of one week. We conclude that DUP is an important prognostic factor at first presentation and predicts clinically relevant outcomes over the course of illness. We discuss conceptual issues in DUP research and methodological limitations of current evidence, and provide recommendations for future research

Synaptic density marker SV2A is reduced in schizophrenia patients and unaffected by antipsychotics in rats

Synaptic dysfunction is hypothesised to play a key role in schizophrenia pathogenesis, but this has not been tested directly in vivo. Here, we investigated synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) levels and their relationship to symptoms and structural brain measures using [ 11 C]UCB-J positron emission tomography in 18 patients with schizophrenia and 18 controls. We found significant group and group-by-region interaction effects on volume of distribution (VT). [11 C]UCB-J VT was significantly lower in the frontal and anterior cingulate cortices in schizophrenia with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 0.8-0.9), but there was no significant difference in the hippocampus. We also investigated the effects of antipsychotic drug administration on SV2A levels in Sprague-Dawley rats using western blotting, [3 H]UCB-J autoradiography and immunostaining with confocal microscopy, finding no significant effects on any measure. These findings indicate that there are lower synaptic terminal protein levels in schizophrenia in vivo and that antipsychotic drug exposure is unlikely to account for them

Adolescent Neurodevelopment and Vulnerability to Psychosis

Adolescence is characterized by significant changes in several domains, including brain structure and function, puberty, and social and environmental factors. Some of these changes serve to increase the likelihood of psychosis onset during this period, while others may buffer this risk. This review characterizes our current knowledge regarding the unique aspects of adolescence that may serve as risk factors for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In addition, we provide potential future directions for research into adolescent specific developmental mechanisms that impart vulnerability to psychosis as well as the possibility of interventions that capitalize on adolescents’ unique characteristics. Specifically, we explore the ways in which grey and white matter develop throughout adolescence in typically developing youth as well as those with psychosis spectrum disorders. We also discuss current views on the function that social support and demands, as well as role expectations, play in risk for psychosis. We further highlight the importance of considering biological factors such as puberty and hormonal changes as areas of unique vulnerability for adolescents. Finally, we discuss cannabis use as a factor that may have a unique impact during adolescent neurodevelopment, and subsequently potentially impact psychosis onset. Throughout, we include discussion of resilience factors that may provide unique opportunities for intervention during this dynamic life stage