HCV epidemiology in high-risk groups and the risk of reinfection

Injecting risk behaviours among people who inject drugs (PWID) and high-risk sexual practices among men who have sex with men (MSM) are important routes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. Current direct-acting antiviral treatment offers unique opportunities for reductions in HCV-related liver disease burden and epidemic control in high-risk groups, but these prospects could be counteracted by HCV reinfection due to on-going risk behaviours after successful treatment. Based on existing data from small and heterogeneous studies of interferon-based treatment, the incidence of reinfection after sustained virological response range from 2-6/100 person years among PWID to 10-15/100 person years among human immunodeficiency virus-infected MSM. These differences mainly reflect heterogeneity in study populations with regards to risk behaviours, but also reflect variations in study designs and applied virological methods. Increasing levels of reinfection are to be expected as we enter the interferon-free treatment era. Individual- and population-level efforts to address and prevent reinfection should therefore be undertaken when providing HCV care for people with on-going risk behaviour. Constructive strategies include acknowledgement, education and counselling, harm reduction optimization, scaled-up treatment including treatment of injecting networks, post-treatment screening, and rapid retreatment of reinfections

Peer support in small towns: A decentralized mobile Hepatitis C virus clinic for people who inject drugs

Background & aims: New models of HCV care are needed to reach people who inject drugs (PWID). The primary aim was to evaluate HCV treatment uptake among HCV RNA positive individuals identified by point-of-care (POC) testing and liver disease assessment in a peer-driven decentralized mobile clinic. Methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients assessed in a mobile clinic visiting 32 small towns in Southern Norway from November 2019 to November 2020. The clinic was staffed by a bus driver and a social educator offering POC HCV RNA testing (GeneXpert®), liver disease staging (FibroScan® 402) and peer support. Viremic individuals were offered prompt pan-genotypic treatment prescribed by local hospital-employed specialists following a brief telephone assessment. Results: Among 296 tested individuals, 102 (34%) were HCV RNA positive (median age 51 years, 77% male, 24% advanced liver fibrosis/cirrhosis). All participants had a history of injecting drug use, 71% reported past 3 months injecting, and 37% received opioid agonist treatment. Treatment uptake within 6 months following enrolment was achieved in 88%. Treatment uptake was negatively associated with recent injecting (aHR 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-0.98), harmful alcohol consumption (aHR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.99), and advanced liver fibrosis/cirrhosis (aHR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25-0.80). HCV RNA prevalence increased with age (OR 1.81 per 10-year increase; 95% 1.41-2.32), ranging from 3% among those <30 years to 55% among those ≥60 years. Conclusions: A peer-driven mobile HCV clinic is an effective and feasible model of care that should be considered for broader implementation to reach PWID outside the urban centres. Keywords: hepatitis C virus; peer support; people who inject drugs; point of care; treatment. © 2022 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.publishedVersio

Hepatitis C treatment uptake among people who inject drugs in Oslo, Norway: A registry-based study

Background Improving HCV treatment uptake among people who inject drugs (PWID) is crucial to achieving the WHO elimination targets. The aims were to evaluate HCV treatment uptake and HCV RNA prevalence in a large cohort of PWID in Norway. Methods Registry-based observational study where all users of the City of Oslo's low-threshold social and health services for PWID between 2010–2016 ( n = 5330) were linked to HCV notifications (1990–2019) and dispensions of HCV treatment, opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and benzodiazepines (2004–2019). Cases were weighted to account for spontaneous HCV clearance. Treatment rates were calculated using person-time of observation, and factors associated with treatment uptake were analysed using logistic regression. HCV RNA prevalence was estimated among individuals alive by the end of 2019. Results Among 2436 participants with chronic HCV infection (mean age 46.8 years, 30.7% female, 73.3% OAT), 1118 (45.9%) had received HCV treatment between 2010–2019 (88.7% DAA-based). Treatment rates increased from 1.4/100 PY (95% CI 1.1–1.8) in the pre-DAA period (2010–2013) to 3.5/100 PY (95% CI 3.0–4.0) in the early DAA period (2014–2016; fibrosis restrictions) and 18.4/100 PY (95% CI 17.2–19.7) in the late DAA period (2017–2019; no restrictions). Treatment rates for 2018 and 2019 exceeded a previously modelled elimination threshold of 50/1000 PWID. Treatment uptake was less likely among women (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62–0.89) and those aged 40–49 years (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56–0.97), and more likely among participants with current OAT (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01–1.45). The estimated HCV RNA prevalence by the end of 2019 was 23.6% (95% CI 22.3–24.9). Conclusion Although HCV treatment uptake among PWID increased, strategies to improve treatment among women and individuals not engaged in OAT should be addressed.This research received funding from the following sources. KM receives research grants from the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority , grant number: 2020011 . The funding sponsor has not been involved in study design, collection of data, analysis/interpretation of data, in the writing of the article, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.publishedVersio

Risikofaktorer for hepatitt C-smitte blant sprøytemisbrukere

Hepatitt C-virusinfeksjon er vanlig blant injiserende stoffmisbrukere. Målet med denne studien var å undersøke forekomst av risikoatferd blant injiserende stoffmisbrukere i Oslo og deres assosiasjon med hepatitt C-smitte. Materiale og metode. Dette er en tverrsnittsundersøkelse, der 327 brukere av sprøytebussen i Oslo valgte å delta. Det ble foretatt et strukturert intervju som fokuserte på type rusmisbruk og risikoatferd med tanke på smitte. Blodprøver ble undersøkt for anti-hepatitt C-virus (anti-HCV) (EIA-3) og HCV-RNA (internt utført PCR). Resultater: Prevalensen av HCV-RNA var 51 %, og 81% var anti-HCV-positive (anti-HCV+). I en multivariatanalyse var anti-HCV+ assosiert med debutalder for sprøytemisbruk 34 år, deling av sprøyter, sprøytemisbruk i fengsel, deling av dose fra felles sprøyte og heroinbruk. En av fem med anti-HCV+ oppga aldri å ha delt sprøyter, men anti-HCV+ var ikke assosiert med deling av annet brukerutstyr enn sprøyter. Målt i de siste fire ukene før intervjuet var deling av sprøyter vanligere blant gifte/samboende enn aleneboende. Fortolkning: De fleste sprøytemisbrukere i Oslo er blitt eksponert for hepatitt C (anti HCV+), og halvparten har utviklet kronisk infeksjon (HCV-RNA+). Hepatitt C-smitte var blant annet assosiert med deling av dose fra felles sprøyte og deling av sprøyter, særlig i fengsel. Deling av annet utstyr enn sprøyter var ikke assosiert med smitte

Impact of liver fibrosis and clinical characteristics on dose-adjusted serum methadone concentrations

Background There is limited knowledge on the causes of large variations in serum methadone concentrations and dose requirements. Objectives We investigated the impact of the degree of liver fibrosis on dose-adjusted steady-state serum methadone concentrations. Methods We assessed the clinical and laboratory data of 155 Norwegian patients with opioid use disorder undergoing methadone maintenance treatment in outpatient clinics in the period 2016–2020. A possible association between the degree of liver fibrosis and dose-adjusted serum methadone concentration was explored using a linear mixed-model analysis. Results When adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, and genotypes of CYP2B6 and CYP3A5, the concentration-to-dose ratio of methadone did not increase among the participants with liver fibrosis (Coefficient: 0.70; 95% CI: −2.16, 3.57; P: 0.631), even among those with advanced cirrhosis (−0.50; −4.59, 3.59; 0.810). Conclusions Although no correlation was found between the degree of liver stiffness and dose-adjusted serum methadone concentration, close clinical monitoring should be considered, especially among patients with advanced cirrhosis. Still, serum methadone measurements can be considered a supplement to clinical assessments, taking into account intra-individual variations.publishedVersio

Recommendations for the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs

In the developed world, the majority of new and existing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections occur among people who inject drugs (PWID). The burden of HCV-related liver disease in this group is increasing, but treatment uptake among PWID remains low. Among PWID, there are a number of barriers to care that should be considered and systematically addressed, but these barriers should not exclude PWID from HCV treatment. Furthermore, it has been clearly demonstrated that HCV treatment is safe and effective across a broad range of multidisciplinary healthcare settings. Given the burden of HCV-related disease among PWID, strategies to enhance HCV assessment and treatment in this group are urgently needed. These recommendations demonstrate that treatment among PWID is feasible and provides a framework for HCV assessment, management, and treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate strategies to enhance assessment, adherence, and SVR among PWID, particularly as new treatments for HCV infection become availabl

Sofosbuvir based treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infections-A Scandinavian real-life study

Background and aims Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection with advanced liver disease has emerged as the most challenging to treat. We retrospectively assessed the treatment outcome of sofosbuvir (SOF) based regimes for treatment of HCV genotype 3 infections in a real life setting in Scandinavia. Methods Consecutive patients with chronic HCV genotype 3 infection were enrolled at 16 treatment centers in Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. Patients who had received a SOF containing regimen were included. The fibrosis stage was evaluated by liver biopsy or transient liver elastography. The following treatments were given according availability and local guidelines: 1) SOF + ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks, 2) SOF + daclatasvir (DCV) +/-RBV for 12-24 weeks, 3) SOF + pegylated interferon alpha (peg-IFN-a) + RBV for 12 weeks or 4) SOF/ledipasvir (LDV) + RBV for 12-16 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) assessed at week 12 (SVR12) after end of treatment. Results We included 316 patients with a mean age of 55 years (range 24-79), 70% men, 49% treatment experienced, 58% with compensated cirrhosis and 12% with decompensated cirrhosis. In the modified intention to treat (mITT) population SVR12 was achieved in 284/311 91%) patients. Among 26 treatment failures, five had non-response, 3 breakthrough and 18 relapse. Five patients were not included in the mITT population. Three patients died from reasons unrelated to treatment and two were lost to follow-up. The SVR12 rate was similar for all treatment regimens, but lower in men (p = 0.042), and in patients with decompensated liver disease (p = 0.004). Conclusion We found that sofosbuvir based treatment in a real-life setting could offer SVR rates exceeding 90% in patients with HCV genotype 3 infection and advanced liver disease.Peer reviewe

The Consensus Hepatitis C Cascade of Care:standardized reporting to monitor progress toward elimination

Cascade-of-care (CoC) monitoring is an important component of the response to the global hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic. CoC metrics can be used to communicate, in simple terms, the extent to which national and subnational governments are advancing on key targets, and CoC findings can inform strategic decision-making regarding how to maximize the progression of individuals with HCV to diagnosis, treatment, and cure. The value of reporting would be enhanced if a standardized approach were used for generating CoCs. We have described the Consensus HCV CoC that we developed to address this need and have presented findings from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, where it was piloted. We encourage the uptake of the Consensus HCV CoC as a global instrument for facilitating clear and consistent reporting via the World Health Organization (WHO) viral hepatitis monitoring platform and for ensuring accurate monitoring of progress toward WHO's 2030 hepatitis C elimination targets.</p

Adherence to once-daily and twice-daily direct acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection among people with recent injection drug use or current opioid agonist therapy

BACKGROUND This study investigated adherence and associated factors among people with recent injection drug use (IDU) or current opioid agonist therapy (OAT) and compared once-daily to twice-daily hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. METHODS SIMPLIFY and D3FEAT are international, multicenter studies that recruited participants with recent IDU (previous 6 months; SIMPLIFY, D3FEAT) or current OAT (D3FEAT) between March 2016 and February 2017 in 8 countries. Participants received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (once daily; SIMPLIFY) or paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, dasabuvir (twice daily) ± ribavirin (D3FEAT) for 12 weeks administered in electronic blister packs. We evaluated overall adherence (proportion of prescribed doses taken) and nonadherence (<90% adherent) between dosing patterns. RESULTS Of 190 participants, 184 (97%) completed treatment. Median adherence was 92%, with higher adherence among those receiving once-daily vs twice-daily therapy (94% vs 87%, P = .005). Overall, 40% of participants (n = 76) were nonadherent (<90% adherent). Recent stimulant injecting (odds ratio [OR], 2.48 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.28-4.82]), unstable housing (OR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.01-4.70]), and twice-daily dosing (OR, 2.81 [95% CI, 1.47-5.36]) were associated with nonadherence. Adherence decreased during therapy. Sustained virologic response was high in nonadherent (89%) and adherent populations (95%, P = .174), with no difference in SVR between those who did and did not miss 7 consecutive doses (92% vs 93%, P = .897). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated high adherence to once- and twice-daily DAA therapy among people with recent IDU or currently receiving OAT. Nonadherence described did not impact treatment outcomes, suggesting forgiveness to nonadherence