10 research outputs found

    Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Paramedics are frequently required to perform tracheal intubation, a potentially life-saving manoeuvre in severely ill patients, in the prehospital setting. However, direct laryngoscopy is often more difficult in this environment, and failed tracheal intubation constitutes an important cause of morbidity. Novel indirect laryngoscopes, such as the Airtraq<sup>® </sup>and Truview<sup>® </sup>laryngoscopes may reduce this risk.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We compared the efficacy of these devices to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by 21 Paramedics proficient in direct laryngoscopy, in a randomized, controlled, manikin study. Following brief didactic instruction with the Airtraq<sup>® </sup>and Truview<sup>® </sup>laryngoscopes, each participant took turns performing laryngoscopy and intubation with each device, in an easy intubation scenario and following placement of a hard cervical collar, in a SimMan<sup>® </sup>manikin.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Airtraq<sup>® </sup>reduced the number of optimization manoeuvres and reduced the potential for dental trauma when compared to the Macintosh, in both the normal and simulated difficult intubation scenarios. In contrast, the Truview<sup>® </sup>increased the duration of intubation attempts, and required a greater number of optimization manoeuvres, compared to both the Macintosh and Airtraq<sup>® </sup>devices.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Airtraq<sup>® </sup>laryngoscope performed more favourably than the Macintosh and Truview<sup>® </sup>devices when used by Paramedics in this manikin study. Further studies are required to extend these findings to the clinical setting.</p

    Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Paramedics are frequently required to perform tracheal intubation, a potentially life-saving manoeuvre in severely ill patients, in the prehospital setting. However, direct laryngoscopy is often more difficult in this environment, and failed tracheal intubation constitutes an important cause of morbidity. Novel indirect laryngoscopes, such as the Airtraq<sup>® </sup>and Truview<sup>® </sup>laryngoscopes may reduce this risk.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We compared the efficacy of these devices to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by 21 Paramedics proficient in direct laryngoscopy, in a randomized, controlled, manikin study. Following brief didactic instruction with the Airtraq<sup>® </sup>and Truview<sup>® </sup>laryngoscopes, each participant took turns performing laryngoscopy and intubation with each device, in an easy intubation scenario and following placement of a hard cervical collar, in a SimMan<sup>® </sup>manikin.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Airtraq<sup>® </sup>reduced the number of optimization manoeuvres and reduced the potential for dental trauma when compared to the Macintosh, in both the normal and simulated difficult intubation scenarios. In contrast, the Truview<sup>® </sup>increased the duration of intubation attempts, and required a greater number of optimization manoeuvres, compared to both the Macintosh and Airtraq<sup>® </sup>devices.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Airtraq<sup>® </sup>laryngoscope performed more favourably than the Macintosh and Truview<sup>® </sup>devices when used by Paramedics in this manikin study. Further studies are required to extend these findings to the clinical setting.</p

    Expanding ART for Treatment and Prevention of HIV in South Africa: Estimated Cost and Cost-Effectiveness 2011-2050

    Get PDF
    Background: Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) significantly reduces HIV transmission. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the impact of expanded ART in South Africa. Methods: We model a best case scenario of 90% annual HIV testing coverage in adults 15-49 years old and four ART eligibility scenarios: CD4 count <200 cells/mm3(current practice), CD4 count <350, CD4 count <500, all CD4 levels. 2011-2050 outcomes include deaths, disability adjusted life years (DALYs), HIV infections, cost, and cost per DALY averted. Service and ART costs reflect South African data and international generic prices. ART reduces transmission by 92%. We conducted sensitivity analyses. Results: Expanding ART to CD4 count <350 cells/mm3prevents an estimated 265,000 (17%) and 1.3 million (15%) new HIV infections over 5 and 40 years, respectively. Cumulative deaths decline 15%, from 12.5 to 10.6 million; DALYs by 14% from 109 to 93 million over 40 years. Costs drop 504millionover5yearsand504 million over 5 years and 3.9 billion over 40 years with breakeven by 2013. Compared with the current scenario, expanding to <500 prevents an additional 585,000 and 3 million new HIV infections over 5 and 40 years, respectively. Expanding to all CD4 levels decreases HIV infections by 3.3 million (45%) and costs by 10billionover40years,withbreakevenby2023.By2050,usinghigherARTandmonitoringcosts,allCD4levelssaves10 billion over 40 years, with breakeven by 2023. By 2050, using higher ART and monitoring costs, all CD4 levels saves 0.6 billion versus current; other ART scenarios cost 9194perDALYaverted.IfARTreducestransmissionby999-194 per DALY averted. If ART reduces transmission by 99%, savings from all CD4 levels reach 17.5 billion. Sensitivity analyses suggest that poor retention and predominant acute phase transmission reduce DALYs averted by 26% and savings by 7%. Conclusion: Increasing the provision of ART to <350 cells/mm3 may significantly reduce costs while reducing the HIV burden. Feasibility including HIV testing and ART uptake, retention, and adherence should be evaluated

    Maternal deprivation induces alterations in cognitive and cortical function in adulthood

    No full text
    Early life trauma is a risk factor for a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (SZ). The current study assessed how an early life traumatic event, maternal deprivation (MD), alters cognition and brain function in rodents. Rats were maternally deprived in the early postnatal period and then recognition memory (RM) was tested in adulthood using the novel object recognition task. The expression of catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD67) were quantified in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), ventral striatum, and temporal cortex (TC). In addition, depth EEG recordings were obtained from the mPFC, vertex, and TC during a paired-click paradigm to assess the effects of MD on sensory gating. MD animals exhibited impaired RM, lower expression of COMT in the mPFC and TC, and lower expression of GAD67 in the TC. Increased bioelectric noise was observed at each recording site of MD animals. MD animals also exhibited altered information theoretic measures of stimulus encoding. These data indicate that a neurodevelopmental perturbation yields persistent alterations in cognition and brain function, and are consistent with human studies that identified relationships between allelic differences in COMT and GAD67 and bioelectric noise. These changes evoked by MD also lead to alterations in shared information between cognitive and primary sensory processing areas, which provides insight into how early life trauma confers a risk for neurodevelopmental disorders, such as SZ, later in life

    Pre-Attentive Auditory Processing in Ultra-High-Risk for Schizophrenia with Magnetoencephalography

    No full text
    Background: It is uncertain whether the neurobiological abnormalities in schizophrenia emerge at the first episode of the disorder or are present during the prodromal phase. Recent neuroimaging studies indicate that some brain abnormalities are present in subjects at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for schizophrenia. Pre-attentive auditory deficits, which represent a core feature of schizophrenia, were investigated in individuals at UHR for schizophrenia. Methods: We assessed early auditory processing indexed by the magnetoencephalographic mismatch negativity magnetic counterpart (MMNm) component elicited during a passive oddball paradigm in UHR individuals. Sixteen individuals at UHR for schizophrenia on the basis of clinical criteria and 18 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, and education participated. A duration-deviant oddball paradigm was used to obtain MMNm dipole moment, which was measured with cortical source modeling. Results: The UHR group showed a smaller right MMNm dipole moment than those of the control group. Group difference was observed in MMNm dipole latency, suggestive of slowed processing. The left MMNm dipole moment was negatively correlated with clinical symptoms measured by the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States positive symptom score. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that deficits in the early stage of auditory processing in individuals at UHR for schizophrenia exist before the onset of psychosis. The MMNm dipole moment might reflect the functional decline at the prodromal stage of schizophrenia.Chung YS, 2008, SCHIZOPHR RES, V99, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.012Naatanen R, 2007, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V118, P2544, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026Light GA, 2007, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V19, P1624Kiang M, 2007, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V13, P653, DOI 10.1017/S1355617707070816Korostenskaja M, 2007, BRAIN RES BULL, V72, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.007Salisbury DF, 2007, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V64, P521Simon AE, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P761, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm018Yung AR, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P673, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm015Morrison AP, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P682, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbl042Turetsky BI, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P69, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbl060Shalgi S, 2007, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V45, P1878, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.023Kawakubo Y, 2006, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V30, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.03.003Ahveninen J, 2006, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V60, P612, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.015Price GW, 2006, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V60, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.010Niendam TA, 2006, SCHIZOPHR RES, V84, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2006.02.005Yung AR, 2006, SCHIZOPHR RES, V84, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2006.03.014Amminger GP, 2006, SCHIZOPHR RES, V84, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2006.02.018Umbricht DSG, 2006, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V59, P762, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.030Taulu S, 2006, PHYS MED BIOL, V51, P1759, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008Honea R, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P2233Yung AR, 2005, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V39, P964van der Stelt O, 2005, SCHIZOPHR RES, V77, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2005.04.024Light GA, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P1741Umbricht D, 2005, SCHIZOPHR RES, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.002Oknina LB, 2005, SCHIZOPHR RES, V76, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2004.10.003Morey RA, 2005, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V62, P254Brockhaus-Dumke A, 2005, SCHIZOPHR RES, V73, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.016Light GA, 2005, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V62, P127Berganza CE, 2005, PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, V38, P166, DOI 10.1159/000086084DEOUELL LY, 2005, NEUROBIOLOGY ATTENTI, P339Yung AR, 2004, SCHIZOPHR RES, V67, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00192-0Hawkins KA, 2004, SCHIZOPHR RES, V67, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2003.08.007Bramon E, 2004, SCHIZOPHR RES, V67, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00132-4Kircher TTJ, 2004, AM J PSYCHIAT, V161, P294Kasai K, 2003, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V60, P766Umbricht D, 2003, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V53, P1120, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01642-6Yucel M, 2003, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V182, P518Gottesman II, 2003, AM J PSYCHIAT, V160, P636Yung AR, 2003, SCHIZOPHR RES, V60, P21Kasai K, 2003, SCHIZOPHR RES, V59, P159Youn T, 2003, SCHIZOPHR RES, V59, P253Pantelis C, 2003, LANCET, V361, P281Wood SJ, 2003, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V29, P831Phillips LJ, 2002, SCHIZOPHR RES, V58, P145Park HJ, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V17, P168, DOI 10.1002/hbm.10059Michie PT, 2002, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V52, P749Salisbury DF, 2002, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V59, P686Jessen F, 2001, NEUROSCI LETT, V309, P185Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, 2001, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V12, P109Wible CG, 2001, AM J PSYCHIAT, V158, P938Rabinowicz EF, 2000, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V57, P1149Oranje B, 2000, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V22, P293Shelley AM, 1999, SCHIZOPHR RES, V37, P65Goff DC, 1997, SCHIZOPHR RES, V27, P157Javitt DC, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P11962FIRST MB, 1996, STRUCTURED CLIN INTEOLNEY JW, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P998CATTS SV, 1995, AM J PSYCHIAT, V152, P213HAMALAINEN M, 1993, REV MOD PHYS, V65, P413JAVITT DC, 1993, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V33, P513MAXWELL ME, 1992, MANUAL FIGSNAATANEN R, 1992, ATTENTION BRAIN FUNCSHELLEY AM, 1991, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V30, P1059GOODMAN WK, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P1006TALAIRACH J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXICKAY SR, 1987, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V13, P261LUKOFF D, 1986, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V12, P578HAMILTON M, 1967, BRIT J SOC CLIN PSYC, V6, P278HAMILTON M, 1959, BRIT J MED PSYCHOL, V32, P501
    corecore