25 research outputs found
Innovative forms of citizen participation at the fringe of the formal planning system
In the Nordic countries, we are witnessing a proliferation of novel and more experimental ways of citizen and authority interaction within the field of urban planning and governance. These formats are seen in urban regeneration projects and planning experiments that endorse more inclusive interactions between public authorities and local actors than in the traditional formal hearings. The intention of this article is to explore the potential of these forms of participation in contributing to social innovation particularly related to including citizens that are difficult to reach, and in creating new arenas for interaction and collaboration. Theoretically, the article is inspired by the concepts of social innovation, planning as experimentation (Hillier, 2007; Nyseth, Pløger, & Holm, 2010), and co-creation (Voorberg, Bekkers, & Tummers, 2013). Empirically, the article draws on three different cases from Norway and Denmark which entailed some novel ways of involving local citizens in urban planning. Finally, the article discusses how formal planning procedures can gain inspiration from such initiatives
The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development
This issue discusses the concept of social innovation (SI) as a potentially transformative factor in urban planning and local development. SI represents an alternative to economic and technology-oriented approaches to urban development, such as that of ‘smart cities’, ‘creative cities’, etc. This is thanks to the emphasis SI puts on human agency and the empowerment of local communities and citizens to be actively involved in transforming their urban environments. Urban planning could benefit greatly from devoting more attention to SI when addressing the diverse urban problems of today, such as social exclusion, urban segregation, citizen participation and integration, or environmental protection, many of them addressed in the articles gathered in this volume
Participation according to the law? The research-based knowledge on citizen participation in Norwegian municipal planning
Source at http://doi.org/10.30689/EJSD2018:67.1650-9544. Citizen participation is enshrined in the Norwegian Planning and Building Act
(PBA) 1985 and accentuated by the 2008 revision of the PBA. In this article,
we ask if the research on participation in municipal planning is sufficient to
draw conclusions on whether the Act is effective with regard to both the
spirit and the letter of the law. The guiding framework for the analysis is
based on the concepts of input and output legitimacy and the distinction
between ‘tidy’ and ‘untidy’ participation. The analysis is based on scientific
publications published after the 2008 revision of the PBA. We find that the
majority of the research concentrates on zoning plans and municipalityinitiated ‘tidy’ participation. As a result, there are gaps in the research with
regard to both the planning context and the interconnectedness of different
forms of participation. Therefore, the research reviewed can only partially
inform the law-makers on the functioning of the Act
Participation according to the law? The research-based knowledge on citizen participation in Norwegian municipal planning
Citizen participation is enshrined in the Norwegian Planning and Building Act (PBA) 1985 and accentuated by the 2008 revision of the PBA. In this article, we ask if the research on participation in municipal planning is sufficient to draw conclusions on whether the Act is effective with regard to both the spirit and the letter of the law. The guiding framework for the analysis is based on the concepts of input and output legitimacy and the distinction between ‘tidy’ and ‘untidy’ participation. The analysis is based on scientific publications published after the 2008 revision of the PBA. We find that the majority of the research concentrates on zoning plans and municipalityinitiated ‘tidy’ participation. As a result, there are gaps in the research with regard to both the planning context and the interconnectedness of different forms of participation. Therefore, the research reviewed can only partially inform the law-makers on the functioning of the Act
Participation according to the law? The research-based knowledge on citizen participation in Norwegian municipal planning
Citizen participation is enshrined in the Norwegian Planning and Building Act
(PBA) 1985 and accentuated by the 2008 revision of the PBA. In this article,
we ask if the research on participation in municipal planning is sufficient to
draw conclusions on whether the Act is effective with regard to both the
spirit and the letter of the law. The guiding framework for the analysis is
based on the concepts of input and output legitimacy and the distinction
between ‘tidy’ and ‘untidy’ participation. The analysis is based on scientific
publications published after the 2008 revision of the PBA. We find that the
majority of the research concentrates on zoning plans and municipalityinitiated ‘tidy’ participation. As a result, there are gaps in the research with
regard to both the planning context and the interconnectedness of different
forms of participation. Therefore, the research reviewed can only partially
inform the law-makers on the functioning of the Act.publishedVersio
The population's use and satisfaction with municipal services, 2000
The purpose was to examine the public's perception of service and availability of corporate offices in Torsken municipality
Diversity Policies as Tools to Increase Participation and Encounters.
Informed by the concept of diversity, this article discusses the issue of municipalities’ facilitation of ethnic diversity and integration in two cities in northern Norway. Municipalities are in a position to accommodate ethnic diversity in more pragmatic ways than the nation-state through local policies. We explore diversity policies in three different areas: democratic participation, urban planning, and cultural policies. The study finds ambivalences in the involvement of immigrants in urban planning processes and to some degree indifference in planning for diversity but also real attempts at recognition by giving immigrants a voice in local politics
Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
This article engages with knowledge management in governing vulnerable polar areas and
tourism. Since the 1870’s Svalbard has been a cruise tourism destination. Due to less ice
during the summer period, the number of tourists visiting the remote northeast corner of the
archipelago has increased significantly and the potential negative impact on this vulnerable
natural environment has become an issue. The standard modes of managing these areas have
either been to apply the precautionary principle or measures based on scientific evidence. As
management models, both principles are however, for a number of reasons contested. This
paper argues for a third model, partly practiced based on a form of monitoring knowledge
circulating in 'communities of practice' developed over time. This form of knowledge
constitute viable expertise for governing and management of the environment-tourism nexus
in the areas but needs to be acknowledged as a complementary management platform. The
article demonstrates how such monitoring can be done, and suggests some principles for
developing monitoring knowledge for administrative and management puposes