Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Spain: A Systematic Review

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Spain, according to data from the National Institute of Statistics, with the lack of control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) being the main contributing factor. The CVRFs of greatest clinical interest are high blood pressure (HBP), smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM2), overweight, obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, and sedentary lifestyle. The main objective of this review was to compare the prevalence of the different CVRFs according to population-based studies carried out in Spain. For this, a systematic review based on publications assessing CVRFs in the adult population and estimating their national prevalence was conducted. Pubmed and Dialnet databases were consulted, and the selected articles were analysed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español (CASPe) tool for cohort studies and the Berra et al. tool for cross-sectional studies. A total of 33 studies were obtained from the autonomous regions of Andalusia, the Canary Islands, Castilla-Leon, Castilla-La Mancha, Catalonia, Extremadura, the Balearic Islands, Madrid, Murcia, and Navarra. In all the population-based studies, there was a greater representation of women in the sample. The most prevalent CVRFs differed across the studies according to the autonomous region targeted, with dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolaemia, overweight, and obesity standing out. Numerous differences exist between the studies included in this review, such as the age range, the CVRFs analysed and their prevalence, and remarkable aspects such as the over-representation of the female sex in all cases. It can be concluded that, based on the presented results, the prevalence of CVRFs in Spain varies according to the autonomous region, the sex of the individual, and the studied age range

Validación española del functional health pattern assessment screening tool (fhpast) en atención primaria

Se presenta la validación española del Functional Health Pattern Assessment Screening Tool (FHPAST), instrumento basado en el marco de patrones de salud (PS) de Gordon. El estudio se llevó a cabo en Atención Primaria de Tenerife (Servicio Canario de la Salud). Las pruebas realizadas fueron traducción-retrotraducción del FHPAST; validación aparente y de contenido (con grupos de expertos); prueba piloto; validación de criterio y de constructo; y pruebas de fiabilidad. Tras los resultados obtenidos se comprueba que el FHPAST adaptado al español es un instrumento válido, fiable y sencillo de usar para evaluar la salud percibida.This study presents the Spanish validation of the Functional Health Pattern Assessment Screening Tool (FHPAST) questionnaire, based on Gordon’s health patterns frame-work. The adaptation was carried out in Primary Care of Tenerife (Canary IslandsPublic Health Service). The tests performed were: FHPAST translation-back translation; face and content validation (with groups of experts); pilot test; criterion and construct validation; and relia-bility tests. After the results obtained, it is confirmed that the FHPAST adapted to Spanish is a valid, reliable and easy-to-use instrument to assess perceived health

The evolution of the ventilatory ratio is a prognostic factor in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients

Background: Mortality due to COVID-19 is high, especially in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The purpose of the study is to investigate associations between mortality and variables measured during the first three days of mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 intubated at ICU admission. Methods: Multicenter, observational, cohort study includes consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to 44 Spanish ICUs between February 25 and July 31, 2020, who required intubation at ICU admission and mechanical ventilation for more than three days. We collected demographic and clinical data prior to admission; information about clinical evolution at days 1 and 3 of mechanical ventilation; and outcomes. Results: Of the 2,095 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, 1,118 (53.3%) were intubated at day 1 and remained under mechanical ventilation at day three. From days 1 to 3, PaO2/FiO2 increased from 115.6 [80.0-171.2] to 180.0 [135.4-227.9] mmHg and the ventilatory ratio from 1.73 [1.33-2.25] to 1.96 [1.61-2.40]. In-hospital mortality was 38.7%. A higher increase between ICU admission and day 3 in the ventilatory ratio (OR 1.04 [CI 1.01-1.07], p = 0.030) and creatinine levels (OR 1.05 [CI 1.01-1.09], p = 0.005) and a lower increase in platelet counts (OR 0.96 [CI 0.93-1.00], p = 0.037) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. No association between mortality and the PaO2/FiO2 variation was observed (OR 0.99 [CI 0.95 to 1.02], p = 0.47). Conclusions: Higher ventilatory ratio and its increase at day 3 is associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation at ICU admission. No association was found in the PaO2/FiO2 variation

Validity and reliability of the emergency severity index in a Spanish hospital

Saturation in hospital emergency departments is one of the main safety problems for the patient, which can generate negative consequences for their health. In response to this issue, triage systems are developed to organize the flow of patients in order to allow the most urgent ones to be treated first. The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is the most used triage system in the USA and it has been implemented in the General Hospital of La Palma since 2010. The objective of this study is the validation of the ESI adapted to our hospital through the study of its degree of reliability, as well as the criterion validity. The sample consisted of 240 randomly selected cases, with proportional representation of emergencies attended in 2015 and their fraction of urgent ones (Levels 1 and 2). Criterion validity was estimated by sensitivity, specificity, and predictive result values. For reliability, the degree of agreement among the nurses was studied by means of the adapted kappa index kc2. Criterion validity showed a sensitivity of 89% (85–93%) and a specificity of 97% (94–99%), with a positive predictive value of 68% (62–74%) and a negative predictive value of 99% (98–100%) for the discrimination of urgent cases. The reliability analysis showed a kc2 = 0.94 (0.84–0.99) index, a very good agreement according to Landis-Koch criteria. The results of our study have shown adequate validity and reliability in the adaptation and implementation of an ESI triage system suited to the specific conditions of a hospital emergency service in Spain.Sin financiación2.849 JCR (2019) Q1, 32/171 Public, Environmental & Occupational Health0.739 SJR (2019) Q2, 47/135 Health, Toxicology and MutagenesisNo data IDR 2019UE

Methodology Proposal for the Management of Nursing Competencies towards a Strategic Training. A Theoretical Analysis

Professional and academic legislation relating to nursing skills reflects conceptual and professional developments. In this sense, conceptual and methodological analyses are required to describe the concept of nursing competencies, the individual or group self-perception of competencies, to identify training needs, and to specify the nursing professional profile within the health organization. A sequential mixed methodology was proposed combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative methodology involves the Focus Group and the Delphi technique. The quantitative methodology involves surveying and analyzing self-perception (descriptive and analytical in relation to personal and professional variables and levels of excellence). The methodology was piloted among primary care nurses. Competencies were analyzed and distributed across the training program. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods showed that obtaining a deep insight into the nurses’ competencies would be a good process. This proposal is applicable as an approach to global nursing competencies or to a particular specialty

Prevalencia y perfil de la persona frágil en la isla de La Palma

Introduction: Population ageing requires that health and social systems focus their attention on identifying frailty in the elderly. In the Canary Islands, there are no studies to determine the prevalence of frailty among its population. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and profile of frailty in the island of La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. Material and method: A cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and the profile of frailty. The sample were residents over 70 years old, valued by the Fried criteria, and taking into account other related factors. The prevalence is offered with a confidence interval of 95% and is compared with that of other Spanish populations. To determine the profile, a simple comparison of variables was made, followed by using them in logistic regression models. All the tests were bilateral at a P≤0.05 level. Results: The prevalence of frailty in people over 70 years was estimated at 20% (17-23%). This prevalence shows differences with those of other Spanish populations. The factors that showed a relationship with frailty were, being female, widowed, living alone, low physical activity, cognitive impairment, depression, polymedication, and adverse clinical history. Multivariate analysis identifies factors associated with the frailty variables related to marital status, co-existence, polypharmacy, depressive states, and lack of physical exercise. Conclusions: The elderly population of La Palma have greater frailty compared to that described in other regions of Spain, with their profile being that of a widowed person, with depression, polymedicated, living alone, and not exercising.Sin financiaciónNo data JCR 20190.190 SJR (2019) Q3, 1997/2754 Medicine (miscellaneous); Q4, 87/109 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 32/37 AgingNo data IDR 2019UE

Research, Reading, and Publication Habits of Nurses and Nursing Students Applied to Impact Journals: International Multicentre Study

Publishing in JCR and SJR journals has become crucial for curricular development. Results from nursing investigations “compete” for publication in journals which are not specific to the field of care, affecting the academic development of these investigators. This phenomenon may lead to an ongoing adverse effect on nursing researchers and academics engaged in research in nursing care. The aim of this study was to evaluate habits regarding scientific literature consulting, the transfer of published material, and the citation of nursing investigations. A cross-sectional descriptive study by means of questionnaires was carried out, focusing on both Spanish and Portuguese nurses. The findings of the study reveal the following reasons for reading the scientific literature: that the language was understood; for learning and applying what was learnt; that the journal was of open access; for elaborating protocols and work procedures; and that the journal was indexed in scientific databases and in nursing databases. The reasons for reading, using, and publishing in journals were related to knowledge of the language and the associated usefulness of learning and applying knowledge. Creating a specific index of research publications in nursing will have a positive effect on the scientific production of caring methodologies.This project was funded by the Fundación Canaria Instituto Sanitaria de Canarias through the “Call for grants for the financing of Nursing Research Projects corresponding to the year 2019” aid, Record 19/34