Patient perceptions of anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation according to region and age : an exploratory analysis from the RE-SONANCE study

Funding Information: The authors thank all the patients who participated in this study. Medical writing support was provided by Parexel, with funding from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Funding Information: Dragos Vinereanu received grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. Dmitry Napalkov received research grants and has participated in scientific advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and has received speaker’s honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Takeda. Bela Benczur received speaker’s/consultancy fees from Bayer, Berlin-Chemie/Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Krka Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Martin Ciernik, Alexey Medvedchikov, and Wenbo Tang are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. Pentti Põder received educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. Maria Trusz-Gluza received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim (null during the conduct of the study), personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, and personal fees from Bayer outside the submitted work. Jiří Vesely received personal fees and non-financial support from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, MSD, and PRO.MED.CS outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).Background: The oral anticoagulant dabigatran offers an effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), yet patient preference data are limited. The prospective observational RE-SONANCE study demonstrated that patients with AF, newly initiated on dabigatran, or switching to dabigatran from long-term VKA therapy, reported improved treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKA therapy. This pre-specified sub-study aimed to assess the impact of country and age on patients’ perceptions of dabigatran or VKA therapy in AF. Methods: RE-SONANCE was an observational, prospective, multi-national study (NCT02684981) that assessed treatment satisfaction and convenience in patients switching from VKAs to dabigatran (Cohort A), or newly diagnosed with AF receiving dabigatran or VKAs (Cohort B), using the PACT-Q questionnaire. Pre-specified exploratory outcomes: variation in PACT-Q2 scores by country and age (< 65, 65 to < 75, ≥ 75 years) (both cohorts); variation in PACT-Q1 responses at baseline by country and age (Cohort B). Results: Patients from 12 countries (Europe/Israel) were enrolled in Cohort A (n = 4103) or B (n = 5369). In Cohort A, mean (standard deviation) PACT-Q2 score increase was highest in Romania (convenience: 29.6 [23.6]) and Hungary (satisfaction: 26.0 [21.4]) (p < 0.001). In Cohort B, mean (standard error) increase in PACT-Q2 scores between dabigatran and VKAs was highest in Romania (visit 3: 29.0 [1.3]; 24.5 [0.9], p < 0.001). Mean PACT-Q2 score increase by age (all p < 0.001) was similar across ages. PACT-Q1 responses revealed lowest expectations of treatment success in Romania and greatest concerns about payment in Estonia, Latvia, and Romania, but were similar across ages. Conclusions: Treatment satisfaction and convenience tended to favor dabigatran over VKAs. Regional differences in treatment expectations exist across Europe. Trial and clinical registry: Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02684981. Trial registration date: February 18, 2016.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology

BACKGROUND: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. ----- METHODS: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. ----- RESULTS: A total of 2846 (46%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60%, respectively. A blood pressure target of 9.0% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (≈40 %) and only 27% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. ----- CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease

Primary prevention efforts are poorly developed in people at high cardiovascular risk: A report from the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme EUROASPIRE V survey in 16 European countries

Background: European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) V in primary care was carried out by the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme in 2016–2018. The main objective was to determine whether the 2016 Joint European Societies’ guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in people at high cardiovascular risk have been implemented in clinical practice. Methods: The method used was a cross-sectional survey in 78 centres from 16 European countries. Patients without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease either started on blood pressure and/or lipid and/or glucose lowering treatments were identified and interviewed 6 months after the start of medication. Results: A total of 3562 medical records were reviewed and 2759 patients (57.6% women; mean age 59.0 11.6 years) interviewed (interview rate 70.0%). The risk factor control was poor with 18.1% of patients being smokers, 43.5% obese (body mass index 30 kg/m2 ) and 63.8% centrally obese (waist circumference 88 cm for women, 102 cm for men). Of patients on blood pressure lowering medication 47.0% reached the target of <140/90 mm Hg (<140/85 mm Hg in people with diabetes). Among treated dyslipidaemic patients only 46.9% attained low density lipoprotein-cholesterol target of <2.6 mmol/l. Among people treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 65.2% achieved the HbA1c target of <7.0%. Conclusion: The primary care arm of the EUROASPIRE V survey revealed that large proportions of people at high cardiovascular disease risk have unhealthy lifestyles and inadequate control of blood pressure, lipids and diabetes. Thus, the potential to reduce the risk of future cardiovascular disease throughout Europe by improved preventive cardiology programmes is substantial

Left ventricular function, congestion, and effect of empagliflozin on heart failure risk after myocardial infarction

Background Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations but not all-cause mortality when started within 14 days of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Objective To evaluate the association between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), congestion, or both on outcomes and the impact of empagliflozin in reducing HF risk post-MI. Methods In the EMPACT-MI trial, patients were randomized within 14 days of an AMI complicated by either newly reduced LVEF&lt;45%, congestion, or both to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 17.9 months. Results Among 6522 patients, the mean baseline LVEF was 41%+9%; 2648 patients (40.6%) presented with LVEF&lt;45% alone, 1483 (22.7%) presented with congestion alone, and 2181 (33.4%) presented with both. Among patients in the placebo arm, multivariable adjusted risk for each 10-point reduction in LVEF included all-cause death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.49; 95%CI, 1.31-1.69; P&lt;0.0001), first HF hospitalization (HR, 1.64; 95%CI, 1.37-1.96; P&lt;0.0001), and total HF hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR], 1.89; 95%CI, 1.51-2.36; P&lt;0.0001). Presence of congestion was also associated with a significantly higher risk for each of these outcomes (HR 1.52, 1.94, and RR 2.03, respectively). Empagliflozin reduced the risk for first (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.98) and total (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.50-0.89) HF hospitalization, irrespective of LVEF or congestion or both. The safety profile of empagliflozin was consistent across baseline LVEF and irrespective of congestion status. Conclusions In patients with AMI, severity of LV dysfunction and the presence of congestion was associated with worse outcomes. Empagliflozin reduced first and total HF hospitalizations across the range of LVEF with and without congestion

Effect of empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the EMPACT-MI trial

Background: Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, chronic kidney disease, and in those with prevalent heart failure irrespective of ejection fraction. While EMPACT-MI showed empagliflozin does not reduce the risk of the composite of hospitalization of heart failure and all-cause mortality, the impact of empagliflozin on first and recurrent heart failure events in patients after myocardial infarction is unknown. Methods: EMPACT-MI was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial that randomized 6522 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction at risk for heart failure based on newly developed left ventricular ejection fraction of &lt;45% and/or signs or symptoms of congestion to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo within 14 days of admission. In prespecified secondary analyses, treatment groups were analyzed for heart failure outcomes. Results: Over a median of follow-up of 17.9 months, the risk for first heart failure hospitalization and total heart failure hospitalizations was significantly lower in the empagliflozin compared with the placebo group (118 (3.6%) vs. 153 (4.7%) patients with events, HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.60, 0.98], P=0.031 for first heart failure hospitalization and 148 vs. 207 events, RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.51, 0.89], P=0.006 for total heart failure hospitalizations). Subgroup analysis showed consistency of empagliflozin benefit across clinically relevant patient subgroups for first and total heart failure hospitalizations. Post-discharge need for new use of diuretics, renin-angiotensin modulators, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were less in patients randomized to empagliflozin than placebo (all p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: In patients after acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin reduced the risk of heart failure

Acute myocardial infarction – a historical review

През последните повече от 120 години известни лекари и патолози посвещават своята медицинска дейност върху изучаването на патофизиологията, диагностиката и лечението на острия миокарден инфаркт (ОМИ). Съвременните лечебни алгоритми, базирани върху прецизни технологии, имат за своя главна цел бързата реперфузия и спасяване на застрашения миокард за постигане на успешно възстановяване на пациентите и респективно за постигане на намаление на смъртността. Въпреки продължителните и многобройни изследвания обаче все още съществуват непознати или спорни позиции/концепции, касаещи например реперфузионните увреждания, лево-камерното ремоделиране, проявите на ОМИ при пациенти с нормални коронарни съдове, идентификацията на виновни лезии или плаки, заплашени от руптура или фисуризиране. Краткият исторически преглед има за цел да напомни еволюцията в познанието в тази болест, да извади на повърхността някои забравени хипотези, които са актуални в момента, както и да очертае перспективата за бъдещи възможности в лечението ѝ. The last 120 years have witnessed famous physicians and pathologists connected their medical investigation to study pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Modern treatment algorithms based on precise and refi ned new technologies have as a main target to achieve rapid reperfusion and salvage threatened myocardium in order to enhance patients’ recovery and also to decrease mortality rate. Although long-lasting and multiple studies appeared to have impressive results, there still exist unknown or disputable viewpoints/concepts concerning for example the appearance of the reperfusion injuries, left ventricular remodeling, AMI in patients with normal coronary arteries, identifi cation of vulnerable lesions or plaques which are threatened by rupture or fi ssuring. This short historical review is aimed to remind us the evolution of the AMI knowledge and also to pull out some of the forgotten but relevant milestone hypothesis, as well as to help shaping the modern management of AMI

Project - Master Class for training of specialists and specialists in cardiology in the field of scientific publications - Critical Reading and Medical Writing

Project - Master Class for training of specialists and specialists in cardiology in the field of scientific publications - Critical Reading and Medical Writin