Digital Transformation Strategy Framework

This chapter presents the construction of a Strategic Digital Transformation operational framework, necessary and adaptable to any type of company and sector of activity. Therefore, the strategic framework suggested includes the patterns, actions, approaches and several measures as follows: a pattern for preparing Internal Training Plan adapted to Digital Strategy, a Tool for diagnosing the level of digital maturity and a Scorecard tool for the assessment and actions associated with the scope of the optimum degree of digital maturity), a Digital Transformation Strategic Framework (elements and phases), a Digital Transformation Strategy Plan (phases and actions) and a Digital Transformation Strategy’s Balance Scorecard.2019-2

Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

Background: Due to the chronic disease burden on society, there is a need for preventive public health interventions to stimulate society towards a healthier lifestyle. To deal with the complex variability between individual lifestyles and settings, collaborating with end-users to develop interventions tailored to their unique circumstances has been suggested as a potential way to improve effectiveness and adherence. Co-creation of public health interventions using participatory methodologies has shown promise but lacks a framework to make this process systematic. The aim of this paper was to identify and set key principles and recommendations for systematically applying participatory methodologies to co-create and evaluate public health interventions. Methods: These principles and recommendations were derived using an iterative reflection process, combining key learning from published literature in addition to critical reflection on three case studies conducted by research groups in three European institutions, all of whom have expertise in co-creating public health interventions using different participatory methodologies. Results: Key principles and recommendations for using participatory methodologies in public health intervention co-creation are presented for the stages of: Planning (framing the aim of the study and identifying the appropriate sampling strategy); Conducting (defining the procedure, in addition to manifesting ownership); Evaluating (the process and the effectiveness) and Reporting (providing guidelines to report the findings). Three scaling models are proposed to demonstrate how to scale locally developed interventions to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to facilitate public health intervention co-creation and evaluation utilising participatory methodologies by ensuring the process is systematic and reproducible

Integrated information base for sustainable water resources management

Water resources management has to be based on "informed" decision making, where information in three dimensions, namely economic, social and environmental, is required to identify "indicators" for sustainability. Such identification is realized by the use of Decision Support Systems (DSS) comprising the integrated tools of databases, models, GIS, and expert systems. The success of DSS applications is closely related to the quantity and quality of available information on economic, social and environmental aspects of water resources. In that regard, information may even be considered as the fourth pillar of sustainability. The proposed paper intends to focus on information requirements for sound water resources management, the use of DSS, and the identification of indicators for sustainability. The basic issues discussed will further be demonstrated on a case study from Turkey

Assessment of Informativeness of Groundwater Monitoring in Developing Regions (Gaza Strip Case Study)

Groundwater resource management and planning requires appropriate and accurate data. These data, which can be collected by monitoring networks, may contain too little, enough or redundant information. This study aims to evaluate the monitoring cycle in the Gaza Strip (a developing region) using the entropy theory. The approach employed in this study involves gathering data needs for groundwater resource management and planning in the Gaza Strip) through a questionnaire (survey). The questionnaire outlined the groundwater management and planning objectives, tasks and the data which had to be collected through monitoring activities in the Gaza Strip (monitoring cycle). This article also proposes a flowchart, which is used to evaluate the relation between the objectives, the tasks, the data and the monitoring activities using the entropy theory. The evaluation affirms the informativeness of the collected data when they contain enough, too little or redundant information. From this study it can be concluded that in the Gaza Strip the institutional set-up of the water sector needs to be strengthened, and more data should be collected and the existing monitoring networks should be redesigned for the informativeness of the data

Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: a case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey

In this study, a water resource management model that facilitates indicator-based decisions, with respect to environmental, social and economic dimensions in a multiple criteria perspective, is developed for the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. The basic input of the proposed model is the quantity of surface water that is mainly allocated to irrigation purposes. The model has been applied under 3 different hydro-meteorological scenarios that reflect baseline as well as better and worse conditions of water supply and demand, not only to reach a comprehensive assessment of the water budget in the Gediz Basin, but also to evaluate the impacts of proposed management alternatives under different conditions. The Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) software is used as a simulation and evaluation tool to assess the performance of possible management alternatives; performance is measured by 9 indicators representing economic, social and environmental sustainability. The study has delineated the best management alternative on the basis of 3 different multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, including simple additive weighting (SAW), compromise programming (CP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Each method is also applied with 7 different sets of criteria weights that represent objective judgements as well as subjective preferences of decision makers. The results of the study indicate that the decision on the best alternative is basically independent of the MCDM method used, but slightly sensitive to the weights assigned to the criteria as well as the data used in the analyses.Keywords: MCDM, water resource management, WEAP, Gediz River Basi