A joint replenishment policy with individual control and constant size orders

We consider inventory systems with multiple items under stochastic demand and jointly incurred order setup costs. The problem is to determine the replenishment policy that minimises the total expected ordering, inventory holding, and backordering costs-the so-called stochastic joint replenishment problem. In particular, we study the settings in which order setup costs reflect the transportation costs and have a step-wise cost structure, each step corresponding to an additional transportation vehicle. For this setting, we propose a new policy that we call the (s, Q) policy, under which a replenishment order of constant size Q is triggered whenever the inventory position of one of the items drops to its reorder point s. The replenishment order is allocated to multiple items so that the inventory positions are equalised as much as possible. The policy is designed for settings in which backorder and setup costs are high, as it allows the items to independently trigger replenishment orders and fully exploits the economies of scale by consistently ordering the same quantity. A numerical study is conducted to show that the proposed (s, Q) policy outperforms the well-known (Q, S) policy when backorder costs are high and lead times are small. © 2010 Taylor & Francis

Controlling lead times and minor ordering costs in the joint replenishment problem with stochastic demands under the class of cyclic policies

In this paper, we consider the periodic review joint replenishment problem under the class of cyclic policies. For each item, the demand in the protection interval is assumed stochastic. Moreover, a fraction of shortage is lost, while the other quota is backordered. We suppose that lead times and minor ordering costs are controllable. The problem concerns determining the cyclic replenishment policy, the lead times, and the minor ordering costs in order to minimize the long‐run expected total cost per time unit. We established several properties of the cost function, which permit us to derive a heuristic algorithm. A lower bound on the minimum cost is obtained, which helps us to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed heuristic. The heuristic is also compared with a hybrid genetic algorithm that is specifically developed for benchmarking purposes. Numerical experiments have been carried out to investigate the performance of the heuristic