Computational prediction and analysis of macromolecular interactions

Protein interactions regulate gene expression, cell signaling, catalysis, and many other functions across all of molecular biology. We must understand them quantitatively, and experimental methods have provided the data that form the basis of our current understanding. They remain our most accurate tools. However, their low efficiency and high cost leave room for predictive, computational approaches that can provide faster and more detailed answers to biological problems. A rigid-body simulation can quickly and effectively calculate the predicted interaction energy between two molecular structures in proximity. The fast Fourier-transform-based mapping algorithm FTMap predicts small molecule binding 'hot spots' on a protein's surface and can provide likely orientations of specific ligands of interest that may occupy those hot spots. This process now allows unique ligands to be used by this algorithm while permitting additional small molecular cofactors to remain in their bound conformation. By keeping the cofactors bound, FTMap can reduce false positives where the algorithm identifies a true, but incorrect, ligand pocket where the known cofactor already binds. A related algorithm, ClusPro, can evaluate interaction energies for billions of docked conformations of macromolecular structures. The work reported in this thesis can predict protein-polysaccharide interactions and the software now contains a publicly available feature for predicting protein-heparin interactions. In addition, a new approach for determining regions of predicted activity on a protein's surface allows prediction of a protein-protein interface. This new tool can also identify the interface in encounter complexes formed by the process of protein association—more closely resembling the biological nature of the interaction than the former, calculated, binary, bound and unbound states

Docking Server for the Identification of Heparin Binding Sites on Proteins

Many proteins of widely differing functionality and structure are capable of binding heparin and heparan sulfate. Since crystallizing protein–heparin complexes for structure determination is generally difficult, computational docking can be a useful approach for understanding specific interactions. Previous studies used programs originally developed for docking small molecules to well-defined pockets, rather than for docking polysaccharides to highly charged shallow crevices that usually bind heparin. We have extended the program PIPER and the automated protein–protein docking server ClusPro to heparin docking. Using a molecular mechanics energy function for scoring and the fast Fourier transform correlation approach, the method generates and evaluates close to a billion poses of a heparin tetrasaccharide probe. The docked structures are clustered using pairwise root-mean-square deviations as the distance measure. It was shown that clustering of heparin molecules close to each other but having different orientations and selecting the clusters with the highest protein–ligand contacts reliably predicts the heparin binding site. In addition, the centers of the five most populated clusters include structures close to the native orientation of the heparin. These structures can provide starting points for further refinement by methods that account for flexibility such as molecular dynamics. The heparin docking method is available as an advanced option of the ClusPro server at http://cluspro.bu.edu/

Protein–protein docking by fast generalized Fourier transforms on 5D rotational manifolds

International audienceEnergy evaluation using fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) enables sampling billions of putative complex structures and hence revolutionized rigid protein–protein docking. However, in current methods, efficient acceleration is achieved only in either the translational or the rotational subspace. Developing an efficient and accurate docking method that expands FFT-based sampling to five rotational coordinates is an extensively studied but still unsolved problem. The algorithm presented here retains the accuracy of earlier methods but yields at least 10-fold speedup. The improvement is due to two innovations. First, the search space is treated as the product manifold SO(3)×(SO(3)∖S1), where SO(3) is the rotation group representing the space of the rotating ligand, and (SO(3)∖S1) is the space spanned by the two Euler angles that define the orientation of the vector from the center of the fixed receptor toward the center of the ligand. This representation enables the use of efficient FFT methods developed for SO(3). Second, we select the centers of highly populated clusters of docked structures, rather than the lowest energy conformations, as predictions of the complex, and hence there is no need for very high accuracy in energy evaluation. Therefore, it is sufficient to use a limited number of spherical basis functions in the Fourier space, which increases the efficiency of sampling while retaining the accuracy of docking results. A major advantage of the method is that, in contrast to classical approaches, increasing the number of correlation function terms is computationally inexpensive, which enables using complex energy functions for scoring

Does Virtual Intimacy Exist? A Brief Exploration Into Reported Levels Of Intimacy In Online Relationships

This study examined the levels of intimacy reported by individuals in face-to-face and computer-mediated (or virtual ) romantic relationships. As suggested by the media and promised by online dating services, some degree of intimacy was reported in computer-mediated relationships, but stronger intimacy was reported in all participants\u27 face-to-face relationships. Results also indicated that individuals who had online, virtual relationships reported less intimacy in their own face-to-face relationships compared to individuals who had engaged exclusively in face-to-face relationships, suggesting that people may turn to virtual relating after challenges in their face-to-face experiences. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

Protein–protein docking by fast generalized Fourier transforms on 5D rotational manifolds

International audienceEnergy evaluation using fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) enables sampling billions of putative complex structures and hence revolutionized rigid protein–protein docking. However, in current methods, efficient acceleration is achieved only in either the translational or the rotational subspace. Developing an efficient and accurate docking method that expands FFT-based sampling to five rotational coordinates is an extensively studied but still unsolved problem. The algorithm presented here retains the accuracy of earlier methods but yields at least 10-fold speedup. The improvement is due to two innovations. First, the search space is treated as the product manifold SO(3)×(SO(3)∖S1), where SO(3) is the rotation group representing the space of the rotating ligand, and (SO(3)∖S1) is the space spanned by the two Euler angles that define the orientation of the vector from the center of the fixed receptor toward the center of the ligand. This representation enables the use of efficient FFT methods developed for SO(3). Second, we select the centers of highly populated clusters of docked structures, rather than the lowest energy conformations, as predictions of the complex, and hence there is no need for very high accuracy in energy evaluation. Therefore, it is sufficient to use a limited number of spherical basis functions in the Fourier space, which increases the efficiency of sampling while retaining the accuracy of docking results. A major advantage of the method is that, in contrast to classical approaches, increasing the number of correlation function terms is computationally inexpensive, which enables using complex energy functions for scoring

Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment

We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein-protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy

Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment

We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein–protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy.We are most grateful to the PDBe at the European Bioinformatics Institute in Hinxton, UK, for hosting the CAPRI website. Our deepest thanks go to all the structural biologists and to the following structural genomics initiatives: Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Joint Center for Structural Genomics, NatPro PSI:Biology, New York Structural Genomics Research Center, Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Structural Genomics Consortium, for contributing the targets for this joint CASP-CAPRI experiment. MFL acknowledges support from the FRABio FR3688 Research Federation “Structural & Functional Biochemistry of Biomolecular Assemblies.”Peer Reviewe