54 research outputs found

    On-farm weather risk management in suckler cow farms: A recursive discrete stochastic programming approach

    Get PDF
    Currently France wants to introduce a weather risk management framework into its agricultural policy for livestock farming. The aim of this paper is to better understand how on-farm risk reducing strategies modify the production system and profit distribution of French suckler cow enterprises. We present in this paper an original bioeconomic model that takes into account both risk anticipation and risk adjustments and that details biotechnical relationships between the different components of the beef cattle production system and their dynamics. On-farm risk management strategies are endogeneized under weather uncertainty and tested on real observed weather sequences. We simulate four scenarios characterized by different risk aversions and feed prices. Results emphasized that production adjustments, particularly the adjustments of area of grassland harvested and the possibility to purchase substitutes to on-farm forage production, improve farmers profit under weather variability. However, limiting the amplitude of these adjustments helps decreasing profit variability. All simulated long term decisions associated to risk reducing strategies encompass a reduction of long term stocking rate and the constitution of feed stocks. The impact of hay feed price on the market has similar effects on the long term strategy.Livestock Production/Industries, Risk and Uncertainty,

    ASSESSING ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL IMPACTS OF NON EXPECTED WEATHER EVENTS ON FRENCH SUCKLER COW FARMS DYNAMICS: A DYNAMIC RECURSIVE FARM MODEL

    Get PDF
    Weather variability can threaten French suckler cow farms which rely on rather extensive forage production. However, flexibility of the production system can help farmer to face crop production shocks. This study aims at assessing how crop yield shocks impact on farms outcomes when adaptive capacity is taken into account. Our objectives are to develop a dynamic model which enables us 1) to predict the optimal mix of production adjustments to face crop yield shocks, 2) to quantify how far the system moves from the equilibrium and how long it takes to return and 3) to measure impact of shocks on economic results when adaptive capacity is taken into account. An original dynamic recursive bio-economic farm model integrating detailed technical and biological constraints and coupled with biological sub-models has been built and calibrated to represent an average farm producing charolais finished animals. Crop yield shocks of intensities ranging between -60% and +60% of their average values are simulated in between average years. A preference for maintaining animal sales and animal live weight at the expense of crop products trade balance is found. Thought, when intensities of shocks get higher, forced sales and important variations of the area of pasture cut are observed. Essential of loss (or gain) of net profit is felt the year of the shock but can be remnant for several years. In addition, gains for good years do not totally compensate loss of symmetric bad ones. Consequently, farms capacity to face risk could be weaken over time. Minimum consumption needs, probability distribution of shocks and successions or combinations of shocks would have thought to be taken into account to assess real capacity of farms to maintain over time.livestock farm model, dynamic recursive model, crop yield variability, Livestock Production/Industries,

    Estimating a production function under production and price risks: An application to the suckler cow farms in the French charolais production area

    Get PDF
    Suckler cow production in France relies mainly on a relatively extensive management of forage, implying that production risk may be enhanced by the sensitivity of those crops to weather variability. However risk exposure is supposed to be mitigated either through ex-ante decisions concerning pasture area management or through ex-post decisions concerning the purchase of feeds. This paper aims at assessing weather impacts on cattle production level decisions. Since farmers' decisions depend on farmers' behaviour regarding risks, which are namely production and price risks, we test constant absolute risk aversion, constant relative risk aversion and risk neutrality assumptions. We develop an econometric model encompassing an auto-regressive price function and a production function which allow inputs to affect independently mean and variance of the production. Weather indicators embodied by average regional forage production for current and past years are explicitely introduced as non controllable inputs. The estimation framework consist in conditions on the first and second moment of output production, output price and profit. Following, ISIK (2003), additional condition on each of both allocable inputs enable us to take into account risk aversion and both price and production risks in parameters estimation. We use the Generalized Method of Moments in order to make minimum assumptions regarding variable exogeneity and error distribution. We apply the model to an original panel dataset containing 65 individual yearly observations recorded over the period 1987-2005 on French suckler cow farms of the north of Massif Central. Because of the difficulties to find a relevant set of instruments, these preliminary results do not analyse weather impact on production mean. However we can advance that production decisions depend on price and production risks as farmers are found to be risk averse. Weather variability of the current year increase production risk whereas fertilizer level application slightly increased it. However we did not highlight that weather impact depend on production level.Production function estimation, GMM, weather impact, price and production risks, risk aversion, suckler cow farms, French charolais production area, Livestock Production/Industries, Production Economics,

    Estimating a Production Function under Production and Output Price Risks: An Application to Beef Cattle in France

    Get PDF
    This paper addresses the issue of agricultural production under both output level and output price risks, in a context of random climatic conditions affecting forage used in beef production. It contributes to the empirical literature by applying the framework proposed by Isik (2002) to derive estimating equations from a structural production model with two sources of risks. Flexible functional forms for risk preferences and production technology allow us to identify attitudes toward risk and compute marginal effects of inputs and climate on expected output and production risk. The model is applied on a panel of French cattle farms and estimation results suggest that cattle farmer exhibit strong risk aversion of the CRRA form, and that climate has a significant impact on the performance of animal feeding strategies

    Estimating a Production Function under Production and Output Price Risks: An Application to Beef Cattle in France

    Get PDF
    This paper addresses the issue of agricultural production under both output level and output price risks, in a context of random climatic conditions affecting forage used in beef production. It contributes to the empirical literature by applying the framework proposed by Isik (2002) to derive estimating equations from a structural production model with two sources of risks. Flexible functional forms for risk preferences and production technology allow us to identify attitudes toward risk and compute marginal effects of inputs and climate on expected output and production risk. The model is applied on a panel of French cattle farms and estimation results suggest that cattle farmer exhibit strong risk aversion of the CRRA form, and that climate has a significant impact on the performance of animal feeding strategies

    Report of the NAMMCO-ICES Workshop on Seal Modelling (WKSEALS 2020)

    Get PDF
    To support sustainable management of apex predator populations, it is important to estimate population size and understand the drivers of population trends to anticipate the consequences of human decisions. Robust population models are needed, which must be based on realistic biological principles and validated with the best available data. A team of international experts reviewed age-structured models of North Atlantic pinniped populations, including Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), Harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus), and Hooded seal (Cystophora cristata). Statistical methods used to fit such models to data were compared and contrasted. Differences in biological assumptions and model equations were driven by the data available from separate studies, including observation methodology and pre-processing. Counts of pups during the breeding season were used in all models, with additional counts of adults and juveniles available in some. The regularity and frequency of data collection, including survey counts and vital rate estimates, varied. Important differences between the models concerned the nature and causes of variation in vital rates (age-dependent survival and fecundity). Parameterisation of age at maturity was detailed and time-dependent in some models and simplified in others. Methods for estimation of model parameters were reviewed and compared. They included Bayesian and maximum likelihood (ML) approaches, implemented via bespoke coding in C, C++, TMB or JAGS. Comparative model runs suggested that as expected, ML-based implementations were rapid and computationally efficient, while Bayesian approaches, which used MCMC or sequential importance sampling, required longer for inference. For grey seal populations in the Netherlands, where preliminary ML-based TMB results were compared with the outputs of a Bayesian JAGS implementation, some differences in parameter estimates were apparent. For these seal populations, further investigations are recommended to explore differences that might result from the modelling framework and model-fitting methodology, and their importance for inference and management advice. The group recommended building on the success of this workshop via continued collaboration with ICES and NAMMCO assessment groups, as well as other experts in the marine mammal modelling community. Specifically, for Northeast Atlantic harp and hooded seal populations, the workshop represents the initial step towards a full ICES benchmark process aimed at revising and evaluating new assessment models.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

    Utilisation du milieu boréal par l'ours noir et implications pour la conservation du caribou de la Gaspésie

    Get PDF
    Les modifications de l'habitat (perte et fragmentation) sont considĂ©rĂ©es comme la principale cause de perte de biodiversitĂ© Ă  l'Ă©chelle planĂ©taire. Ces changements peuvent bouleverser l' Ă©quilibre des Ă©cosystĂšmes prĂ©sents, contraignant certaines populations Ă  ne subsister que dans les habitats rĂ©siduels oĂč elles sont souvent isolĂ©es et limitĂ©es Ă  une petite taille. Inversement, les modifications de l'habitat peuvent favoriser d' autres espĂšces qui se trouvaient jusque lĂ  limitĂ©es par les conditions existantes. Une problĂ©matique importante survient quand les espĂšces favorisĂ©es sont susceptibles d' avoir un impact nĂ©gatif important sur une population dĂ©jĂ  fragilisĂ©e par les modifications de l'habitat. Une situation de ce type existe pour le caribou de la GaspĂ©sie, une population considĂ©rĂ©e « en voie de disparition» vivant principalement dans un parc de conservation, mais frĂ©quentant Ă©galement des secteurs oĂč les modifications d' habitats sont importantes en raison de la coupe forestiĂšre. En outre, ces derniĂšres sont susceptibles de favoriser les prĂ©dateurs de cette population de caribous, l'ours noir (Ursus americanus) et le coyote (Canis latrans). Deux sessions d'un programme de contrĂŽle des prĂ©dateurs rĂ©alisĂ©s entre 1990 et 1996 puis de façon rĂ©currente depuis 2001 avaient pour but de limiter les populations de ces prĂ©dateurs dans les secteurs utilisĂ©s par les caribous mais, afin d'assurer une protection Ă  long terme, d'autres connaissances Ă©taient nĂ©cessaires. Cette thĂšse de doctorat avait pour principal objectif d' accroĂźtre l' Ă©tat des connaissances sur l'utilisation de l' espace par l' ours noir et le coyote et de dĂ©tailler plus spĂ©cifiquement comment les caractĂ©ristiques d'un milieu borĂ©al et montagnard influencent la sĂ©lection de l'habitat par l'ours noir. À l' aide de ces donnĂ©es nous dĂ©sirions accroĂźtre l'information permettant d'identifier des mesures pour limiter les interactions de ces prĂ©dateurs avec les caribous de la GaspĂ©sie. Un suivi tĂ©lĂ©mĂ©trique rĂ©alisĂ© au cours de trois annĂ©es Guillet 2002 - novembre 2005) sur 24 ours noirs et 16 coyotes Ă©quipĂ©s de colliers GPS a servi de base Ă  ce projet. L'analyse des patrons d'utilisation de l'espace par ces deux espĂšces nous a permis de montrer que malgrĂ© une faible densitĂ© de leurs populations respectives, la taille et l' organisation spatiale de leurs domaines vitaux pouvaient leur permettre d' accĂ©der en grand nombre aux zones utilisĂ©es par les caribous. Les mouvements des prĂ©dateurs s'Ă©tendaient Ă  une Ă©chelle beaucoup plus grande que celle Ă  laquelle avait eu lieu les deux sessions du programme de contrĂŽle des prĂ©dateurs. Ces caractĂ©ristiques expliquaient probablement la durĂ©e limitĂ©e des effets positifs du contrĂŽle sur le recrutement du caribou aprĂšs l'arrĂȘt du premier programme de contrĂŽle. Les patrons d' utilisation de l'espace des prĂ©dateurs pouvaient expliquer Ă©galement le maintien du nombre de prĂ©dateurs capturĂ©s annuellement lors de la deuxiĂšme pĂ©riode de contrĂŽle, et ce, malgrĂ© une pression de piĂ©geage importante. Afin d'assurer la protection des caribous Ă  long terme, nos rĂ©sultats suggĂšrent Ă©galement l' importance d'amĂ©nager 1' habitat autour du parc de la GaspĂ©sie et d'y limiter les populations de proies alternatives comme les orignaux de façon Ă  ne pas favoriser les prĂ©dateurs. GrĂące aux donnĂ©es prĂ©cises obtenues avec les colliers GPS nous avons modĂ©lisĂ© la sĂ©lection de l' habitat par l'ours noir sous la forme d'une fonction de sĂ©lection des ressources (FSR). En incluant dans l'analyse plusieurs facteurs biotiques et abiotiques, nous avons mis en Ă©vidence diverses adaptations comportementales de l'ours noir Ă  la forĂȘt borĂ©ale. À l' aide d' une analyse du rĂ©gime alimentaire et d' un suivi de la phĂ©nologie des plantes, nous avons dĂ©tectĂ© des modifications temporelles dans leur sĂ©lection de l' habitat en rĂ©ponse aux changements de la disponibilitĂ© des ressources alimentaires. Ainsi, les ours faisaient des mouvements altitudinaux saisonniers. Au printemps, ils utilisaient principalement les espĂšces graminoĂŻdes qu ' ils trouvaient sur les sommets des montagnes. En Ă©tĂ©, par contre, ils se nourrissaient de fruits mous (e.g. framboises, fruits d'aralie et de cornouiller stolonifĂšre) qu'ils recherchaient Ă  basse altitude dans les milieux perturbĂ©s issus d'Ă©pidĂ©mies d'insectes et de certains types de coupes forestiĂšres. Enfin, en automne, les ours se dĂ©plaçaient vers les moyennes altitudes et utilisaient des secteurs faiblement ensoleillĂ©s, recherchant probablement des milieux dans lesquels la phĂ©nologie des plantes Ă©tait retardĂ©e. Les fruits du sorbier (Sorbus americana) reprĂ©sentaient alors une trĂšs grande proportion de leur rĂ©gime alimentaire. Des rĂ©sultats de cette Ă©tude, nous proposons des amĂ©nagements de l' habitat, qui pourraient ĂȘtre mis en oeuvre pour limiter la prĂ©sence de l'ours noir Ă  proximitĂ© de la population de caribous de la GaspĂ©sie. Ainsi, les coupes forestiĂšres de type CPRS devraient ĂȘtre Ă©vitĂ©es car elles aboutissent Ă  la crĂ©ation de milieux riches en fruits qui sont particuliĂšrement recherchĂ©s par les ours. Les coupes partielles devraient par contre ĂȘtre privilĂ©giĂ©es car elles sont gĂ©nĂ©ralement peu utilisĂ©es, voir Ă©vitĂ©es. Comprendre comment les animaux rĂ©agissent Ă  l' hĂ©tĂ©rogĂ©nĂ©itĂ© de l'environnement est crucial si on veut comprendre l'impact des modifications de l'habitat. En nous basant sur la mĂ©thode des « temps de premier passage » (<< First-passage time »), nous avons pu montrer que les ours ne parcouraient pas le milieu alĂ©atoirement, mais qu ' ils regroupaient leurs activitĂ©s selon deux Ă©chelles spatiales. La taille des Ă©chelles spatiales utilisĂ©es par les ours variait au cours de l' annĂ©e, vraisemblablement en rĂ©ponse au changement de la disponibilitĂ© des ressources alimentaires. En considĂ©rant les Ă©chelles de sĂ©lection dĂ©tectĂ©es chez chacun des individus, nous avons pu montrer que les variations dans les patrons de dĂ©placements des ours noirs Ă©taient associĂ©es Ă  certaines variables comme la proportion de milieux perturbĂ©s ou dĂ©nudĂ©s, l'altitude et l' irradiation solaire, mais que l' effet de ces variables pouvaient changer au cours de l'annĂ©e. Les patrons de distribution des espĂšces sont trĂšs importants Ă  prendre en compte pour identifier les secteurs d'intĂ©rĂȘt dans une problĂ©matique de conservation. Ainsi , une connaissance dĂ©taillĂ©e de l'Ă©cologie de l'espĂšce Ă  protĂ©ger est essentielle pour rĂ©ussir un programme de rĂ©tablissement. Toutefois, lorsque cette espĂšce est menacĂ©e par la prĂ©dation, nos rĂ©sultats montre qu'il est Ă©galement indispensable de considĂ©rer l'utilisation de l'espace et la sĂ©lection de l'habitat des prĂ©dateurs afin de dĂ©finir les Ă©lĂ©ments du paysage et les Ă©chelles Ă  considĂ©rer pour rĂ©aliser des amĂ©nagements d'habitats qui favoriseront une protection durable pour les espĂšces menacĂ©es

    RĂ©silience des Ă©levages de bovins allaitants en prĂ©sence d’alĂ©as climatiques : un modĂšle bioĂ©conomique dynamique

    No full text
    National audienceLes Ă©leveurs de bovins allaitants sont confrontĂ©s Ă  des alĂ©as climatiques qui, en rĂ©duisant les ressources alimentaires disponibles pour le troupeau, menace la pĂ©rennitĂ© de leur exploitation. Afin d’ĂȘtre en mesure de leur proposer des conseils et des assurances efficaces, Ă©valuer la rĂ©silience de ces systĂšmes, c’est-Ă -dire leur capacitĂ© Ă  absorber ces chocs, est primordiale. Nous simulons dans cette Ă©tude une succession d’alĂ©as climatiques comprenant une succession d’annĂ©es dĂ©favorables et analysons leurs impacts sur la production et les revenus des exploitations
    • 

    corecore