14 research outputs found
Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas sp. and transformed E. coli
Our previous studies showed that the biodegradation of petroleum oil by a i>pseudomonas isolated from a petroleum-contaminated soil was instable. In this work, t is shown that when the isolates are immobilized on Perlite, they are more stable for oil egradation. Although the isolate did not have any chemotaxis to octadecane, dodecane and ctane but utilize octadecane and dodecane better than octane and it did not utilized exane, benzene, kerosene, pentane, heptane or thiophenol. The generation time for degradation of petroleum oil, dodecane and octadecane was 20, 22, and 25 h respectively. This phenotype was not transformed to Pseudomonas by conjugation even with lysozyme treatment, however the petroleum oil and octadecane utilization were transformed to E. coli by lysozyme treatment. The transformed E. coli lost the ability to use octadecane after three subcultures on nutrient broth and 34 generations.African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 4 (2), pp. 172-176, 200
Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction -a systematic review
Aim: The aim of this literature study was to systematically review the scientific evidence on the most effective donor sites and/or bone substitute material for secondary alveolar cleft grafting in alveolar cleft patients. Material and method: In order to acquire a systematic and transparent reporting this literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was performed in the following four databases; PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus.The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB 2 tool). Result: The search identified 4754 studies. Five RCT studies was included in this systematic review and assessed different donor site or bone substitute materials. Two studies showed low risk of bias and three moderate risk of bias. Only one study showed a statistically significant difference when comparing iliac bone to substitute material however all studies presented substitute materials with satisfactory results. Conclusion: According to the data from this systematic review no clear conclusion can be drawn regarding what the most effective bone donor site and/or tissue engineered bone substitute material to use in secondary bone grafts. Based on the available evidence iliac bone could still be regarded as a benchmark, but more research and RCT’s of high quality are required, especially for artificial bone substitute materials.Syfte: Syftet med denna litteraturstudie var att systematiskt granska den vetenskapliga evidensen gällande det mest effektiva bentagningsstället och/eller bensubstitutmaterialet vid sekundär bentransplantation hos patienter med käkspalt. Material och metod: För att uppnå en systematisk och transparent rapportering av denna litteraturstudie följdes PRISMA statement. Litteratursökningen gjordes i följande fyra databaser; PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science och Scopus. Kvaliteten av inkluderade studier granskades med hjälp av Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (Rob 2 tool). Resultat: Sökningen identifierade 4754 studier. Fem RCT studier inkluderades i denna systematiska översikt vilka värderade olika bentagningsställen eller bensubstitut. Två studier bedömdes ha låg risk för bias och tre artiklar måttlig risk för bias. Endast en studie visade på en statistiskt signifikant skillnad vid jämförelse av höftben med bensubstitut däremot presenterade samtliga studier substitutmaterial med tillfredsställande resultat. Konklusion: Denna systematiska översikt visade att ingen klar slutsats kan dras gällande vilken det mest effektiva bentagningsstället eller bensubstitutsmaterialet är för sekundär bentransplantation hos patienter med käkspalt. Baserat på tillgänglig evidens kan transplantat från höftbenet fortfarande anses vara bäst lämpat men mer forskning samt RCT studier av hög kvalité erfordras, särskilt för artificiella bensubstitutmaterial
Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction -a systematic review
Aim: The aim of this literature study was to systematically review the scientific evidence on the most effective donor sites and/or bone substitute material for secondary alveolar cleft grafting in alveolar cleft patients. Material and method: In order to acquire a systematic and transparent reporting this literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was performed in the following four databases; PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus.The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB 2 tool). Result: The search identified 4754 studies. Five RCT studies was included in this systematic review and assessed different donor site or bone substitute materials. Two studies showed low risk of bias and three moderate risk of bias. Only one study showed a statistically significant difference when comparing iliac bone to substitute material however all studies presented substitute materials with satisfactory results. Conclusion: According to the data from this systematic review no clear conclusion can be drawn regarding what the most effective bone donor site and/or tissue engineered bone substitute material to use in secondary bone grafts. Based on the available evidence iliac bone could still be regarded as a benchmark, but more research and RCT’s of high quality are required, especially for artificial bone substitute materials.Syfte: Syftet med denna litteraturstudie var att systematiskt granska den vetenskapliga evidensen gällande det mest effektiva bentagningsstället och/eller bensubstitutmaterialet vid sekundär bentransplantation hos patienter med käkspalt. Material och metod: För att uppnå en systematisk och transparent rapportering av denna litteraturstudie följdes PRISMA statement. Litteratursökningen gjordes i följande fyra databaser; PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science och Scopus. Kvaliteten av inkluderade studier granskades med hjälp av Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (Rob 2 tool). Resultat: Sökningen identifierade 4754 studier. Fem RCT studier inkluderades i denna systematiska översikt vilka värderade olika bentagningsställen eller bensubstitut. Två studier bedömdes ha låg risk för bias och tre artiklar måttlig risk för bias. Endast en studie visade på en statistiskt signifikant skillnad vid jämförelse av höftben med bensubstitut däremot presenterade samtliga studier substitutmaterial med tillfredsställande resultat. Konklusion: Denna systematiska översikt visade att ingen klar slutsats kan dras gällande vilken det mest effektiva bentagningsstället eller bensubstitutsmaterialet är för sekundär bentransplantation hos patienter med käkspalt. Baserat på tillgänglig evidens kan transplantat från höftbenet fortfarande anses vara bäst lämpat men mer forskning samt RCT studier av hög kvalité erfordras, särskilt för artificiella bensubstitutmaterial
Full Length Research Paper - Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas sp. and transformed Escherichia coli
Our previous studies showed that the biodegradation of petroleum oil by
a pseudomonas isolated from a petroleum-contaminated soil was instable.
In this work, it is shown that when the isolates are immobilized on
Perlite, they are more stable for oil degradation. Although the isolate
did not have any chemotaxis to octadecane, dodecane and octane but
utilize octadecane and dodecane better than octane and it did not
utilized hexane, benzene, kerosene, pentane, heptane or thiophenol. The
generation time for degradation of petroleum oil, dodecane and
octadecane was 20, 22, and 25 h respectively. This phenotype was not
transformed to Pseudomonas by conjugation even with lysozyme
treatment, however the petroleum oil and octadecane utilization were
transformed to Escherichia coli by lysozyme treatment. The
transformed E. coli lost the ability to use octadecane after three
subcultures on nutrient broth and 34 generations