Trends in health outcomes for family caregivers of hip‐fractured elders during the first 12 months after discharge

Aim.  This article reports on trends in health outcomes for family caregivers of hip‐fractured patients and the effects of social support on these outcomes. Background.  Little is known about the impact of caregiving on the health outcomes of family caregivers of patients with hip fracture. Method.  For this prospective, correlational study, data were collected from 135 family caregivers of hip‐fractured elders (2001–2005). Data on health‐related quality of life and social support were collected from family caregivers at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge of the older hip‐fractured patient. Findings.  During the 12 months after the patients’ discharge, family caregivers’ scores improved significantly in role performance‐related scales, including bodily pain, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems and role limitations due to physical problems. However, caregivers’ scores for general health and mental health were significantly lower at 12 months [59·91 ( sd  = 24·54) and 65·91 ( sd  = 14·36) respectively] than at 1 month after discharge [64·35 ( sd  = 23·29) and 67·94 ( sd  = 18·47) respectively]. The trends for most subscale scores for health‐related quality of life were positively related to perceived availability of social support. Conclusions.  Caring for a hip‐fractured older family member over a sustained period may enhance family caregivers’ role performance, but have a negative impact on their perceived general health and mental health. These results suggest that home care nurses should develop interventions early after discharge to assess and improve family caregivers’ health perception, mental health and social support.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90349/1/j.1365-2648.2011.05778.x.pd

The synergistic effect of cigarette taxes on the consumption of cigarettes, alcohol and betel nuts

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Consumption of cigarettes and alcoholic beverages creates serious health consequences for individuals and overwhelming financial burdens for governments around the world. In Asia, a third stimulant – betel nuts – increases this burden exponentially. For example, individuals who simultaneously smoke, chew betel nuts and drink alcohol are approximately 123 times more likely to develop oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer than are those who do not.</p> <p>To discourage consumption of cigarettes, the government of Taiwan has imposed three taxes over the last two decades. It now wishes to lower consumption of betel nuts. To assist in this effort, our study poses two questions: 1) Will the imposition of an NT$10 Health Tax on cigarettes effectively reduce cigarette consumption? and 2) Will this cigarette tax also reduce consumption of alcoholic beverages and betel nuts? To answer these questions, we analyze the effect of the NT$10 tax on overall cigarette consumption as well as the cross price elasticities of cigarettes, betel nuts, and alcoholic beverages.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To establish the Central Bureau of Statistics demand function, we used cigarette, betel nut, and alcoholic beverage price and sales volume data for the years 1972–2002. To estimate the overall demand price elasticity of cigarettes, betel nuts, and alcoholic beverages, we used a seemingly unrelated regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We find that the NT$10 health tax on cigarettes will reduce cigarette consumption by a significant 27.22$10 health tax on cigarettes will reduce betel nut consumption by 20.07% and alcohol consumption by 7.5%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The assessment of a health tax on cigarettes as a smoking control policy tool yields a win-win outcome for both government and consumers because it not only reduces cigarette consumption, but it also reduces betel nut and alcoholic beverage consumption due to a synergistic relationship. Revenues generated by the tax can be used to fund city and county smoking control programs as well as to meet the health insurance system's current financial shortfall.</p