A bi‐organellar phylogenomic study of Pandanales: inference of higher‐order relationships and unusual rate‐variation patterns

We used a bi‐organellar phylogenomic approach to address higher‐order relationships in Pandanales, including the first molecular phylogenetic study of the panama‐hat family, Cyclanthaceae. Our genus‐level study of plastid and mitochondrial gene sets includes a comprehensive sampling of photosynthetic lineages across the order, and provides a framework for investigating clade ages, biogeographic hypotheses and organellar molecular evolution. Using multiple inference methods and both organellar genomes, we recovered mostly congruent and strongly supported relationships within and between families, including the placement of fully mycoheterotrophic Triuridaceae. Cyclanthaceae and Pandanaceae plastomes have slow substitution rates, contributing to weakly supported plastid‐based relationships in Cyclanthaceae. While generally slowly evolving, mitochondrial genomes exhibit sporadic rate elevation across the order. However, we infer well‐supported relationships even for slower evolving mitochondrial lineages in Cyclanthaceae. Clade age estimates across photosynthetic lineages are largely consistent with previous studies, are well correlated between the two organellar genomes (with slightly younger inferences from mitochondrial data), and support several biogeographic hypotheses. We show that rapidly evolving non‐photosynthetic lineages may bias age estimates upwards at neighbouring photosynthetic nodes, even using a relaxed clock model. Finally, we uncovered new genome structural variants in photosynthetic taxa at plastid inverted repeat boundaries that show promise as interfamilial phylogenetic markers.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/33/cla12417-sup-0025-TableS1.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/32/cla12417-sup-0017-FigS17.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/31/cla12417-sup-0004-FigS4.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/30/cla12417-sup-0019-FigS19.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/29/cla12417-sup-0020-FigS20.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/28/cla12417_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/27/cla12417-sup-0005-FigS5.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/26/cla12417-sup-0012-FigS12.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/25/cla12417-sup-0007-FigS7.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/24/cla12417-sup-0022-FigS22.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/23/cla12417-sup-0029-TableS5.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/22/cla12417-sup-0010-FigS10.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/21/cla12417-sup-0011-FigS11.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/20/cla12417-sup-0014-FigS14.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/19/cla12417-sup-0002-FigS2.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/18/cla12417-sup-0001-FigS1.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/17/cla12417.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/16/cla12417-sup-0030-TableS6.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/15/cla12417-sup-0021-FigS21.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/14/cla12417-sup-0023-FigS23.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/13/cla12417-sup-0009-FigS9.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/12/cla12417-sup-0031-TableS7.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/11/cla12417-sup-0006-FigS6.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/10/cla12417-sup-0003-FigS3.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/9/cla12417-sup-0024-FigS24.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/8/cla12417-sup-0008-FigS8.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/7/cla12417-sup-0028-TableS4.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/6/cla12417-sup-0016-FigS16.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/5/cla12417-sup-0013-FigS13.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/4/cla12417-sup-0018-FigS18.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/3/cla12417-sup-0026-TableS2.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/2/cla12417-sup-0015-FigS15.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162810/1/cla12417-sup-0027-TableS3.pd

Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments

EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases, which may be present in different epidemiological study designs. It then describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. This includes brief explanations for measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inference, systematic error and effect modification. The guidance then describes the concept of external validity and the principles of appraising epidemiological studies. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained including tailoring of tools for assessing the risk of bias (RoB). Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a RoB tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. The latter part of this guidance focuses on different steps of evidence integration, first within and then across different streams of evidence. With respect to risk characterisation, the guidance considers how evidence from human epidemiological studies can be used in dose–response modelling with several different options being presented. Finally, the guidance addresses the application of uncertainty factors in risk characterisation when using evidence from human epidemiological studies

Flavouring Group Evaluation 76 Revision 2 (FGE.76Rev2): Consideration of sulfur-containing heterocyclic compounds, evaluated by JECFA, structurally related to thiazoles, thiophenes, thiazoline and thienyl derivatives from chemical group 29 and miscellaneous substances from chemical group 30 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.21Rev5

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to consider the JECFA evaluations of 28 flavouring substances in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 76 (FGE.76Rev2). Twenty-one of these substances have been considered in FGE.76Rev1. Seven substances could not be evaluated, because of concerns with respect to genotoxicity. New genotoxicity data have been provided for 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole [FL-no: 15.018] and 4,5-dimethyl-2-isobutyl-3-thiazoline [FL-no: 15.032], which are representative substances of [FL-no: 15.005] and [FL-no: 15.029, 15.030, 15.130 and 15.131], respectively. The Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity is ruled out for [FL-no: 15.018 and 15.005]. The concerns for gene mutations and clastogenicity are ruled out for [FL-no: 15.032, 15.029, 15.030, 15.130 and 15.131]. In vitro, [FL-no: 15.032] induced micronuclei through an aneugenic mode of action. The available in vivo micronucleus study was not adequate to rule out the concern for potential aneugenicity in vivo. The Panel compared the lowest concentration resulting in aneugenicity in vitro with the use levels reported for [FL-no: 15.032]. Based on this comparison, the Panel concluded that the use of [FL-no: 15.032] at the maximum reported use levels does not raise a concern for aneugenicity. Based on structural similarity, for the remaining four substances [FL-no: 15.029, 15.030, 15.130 and 15.131], an aneugenic potential may also be anticipated. Individual genotoxicity data are needed to establish whether they have aneugenic potential. The Panel agrees with JECFA conclusions for 24 flavouring substances 'No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances' when based on the MSDI approach. For six substances, more reliable information on uses and use levels are needed to refine the mTAMDI estimates. For 15 substances, use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDIs. For [FL-no: 15.109 and 15.113], information on the actual stereochemical composition is inadequate and the conclusion reached for the named substances cannot be applied to the materials of commerce

Long-term effects of cranial irradiation and intrathecal chemotherapy in treatment of childhood leukemia: a MEG study of power spectrum and correlated cognitive dysfunction

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Prophylaxis to prevent relapses in the central nervous system after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) used to consist of both intrathecal chemotherapy (CT) and cranial irradiation (CRT). CRT was mostly abolished in the eighties because of its neurotoxicity, and replaced with more intensive intrathecal CT. In this study, a group of survivors treated with CRT before 1983 and another group treated without CRT thereafter are investigated 20–25 years later, giving a much stronger perspective on long-term quality of life than previous studies. The outcomes will help to better understand these groups’ current needs and will aid in anticipating late effects of prophylactic CRT that is currently applied for other diseases. This study evaluates oscillatory neuronal activity in these long-term survivors. Power spectrum deviations are hypothesized to correlate with cognitive dysfunction.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Resting state eyes-closed magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were obtained from 14 ALL survivors treated with CT + CRT, 18 treated with CT alone and 35 controls. Relative spectral power was calculated in the δ, θ, α1, α2, β and γ frequency bands. The Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks (ANT) program was used to assess cognition in the executive functions domain. MEG data and ANT scores were correlated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the CT + CRT group, relative θ power was slightly increased (p = 0.069) and α2 power was significantly decreased (p = 0.006). The CT + CRT group performed worse on various cognitive tests. A deficiency in visuomotor accuracy, especially of the right hand, could be clearly associated with the deviating regional θ and α2 powers (0.471 < r < 0.697). A significant association between decreased regional α2 power and less attentional fluctuations was found for CT + CRT patients as well as controls (0.078 < r < 0.666). Patients treated with CT alone displayed a power spectrum similar to controls, except for a significantly increased level of left frontal α2 power (p = 0.030).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The tendency towards global slowing of brain oscillatory activity, together with the fact that dementia has been reported as a late effect of CRT and the neuropsychological deficiencies currently present, suggest that the irradiated brain might be aging faster and could be at risk for early‐onset dementia. The CT group showed no signs of early aging.</p

Cognitive Control and Individual Differences in Economic Ultimatum Decision-Making

Much publicity has been given to the fact that people's economic decisions often deviate from the rational predictions of standard economic models. In the classic ultimatum game, for example, most people turn down financial gains by rejecting unequal monetary splits. The present study points to neglected individual differences in this debate. After participants played the ultimatum game we tested for individual differences in cognitive control capacity of the most and least economic responders. The key finding was that people who were higher in cognitive control, as measured by behavioral (Go/No-Go performance) and neural (No-Go N2 amplitude) markers, did tend to behave more in line with the standard models and showed increased acceptance of unequal splits. Hence, the cognitively highest scoring decision-makers were more likely to maximize their monetary payoffs and adhere to the standard economic predictions. Findings question popular claims with respect to the rejection of standard economic models and the irrationality of human economic decision-making

Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI

Given concerns about the reproducibility of scientific findings, neuroimaging must define best practices for data analysis, results reporting, and algorithm and data sharing to promote transparency, reliability and collaboration. We describe insights from developing a set of recommendations on behalf of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, and identify barriers that impede these practices, including how the discipline must change to fully exploit the potential of the world’s neuroimaging data

Scientific Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings to be used in or on foods

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA developed a new scientific guidance to assist applicants in the preparation of applications for the authorisation of flavourings to be used in or on foods. This guidance applies to applications for a new authorisation as well as for a modification of an existing authorisation of a food flavouring, submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008. It defines the scientific data required for the evaluation of those food flavourings for which an evaluation and approval is required according to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008. This applies to flavouring substances, flavouring preparations, thermal process flavourings, flavour precursors, other flavourings and source materials, as defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008. Information to be provided in all applications relates to: (a) the characterisation of the food flavouring, including the description of its identity, manufacturing process, chemical composition, specifications, stability and reaction and fate in foods; (b) the proposed uses and use levels and the assessment of the dietary exposure and (c) the safety data, including information on the genotoxic potential of the food flavouring, toxicological data other than genotoxicity and information on the safety for the environment. For the toxicological studies, a tiered approach is applied, for which the testing requirements, key issues and triggers are described. Applicants should generate the data requested in each section to support the safety assessment of the food flavouring. Based on the submitted data, EFSA will assess the safety of the food flavouring and conclude whether or not it presents risks to human health and to the environment, if applicable, under the proposed conditions of use

Brainhack: a collaborative workshop for the open neuroscience community

International audienceBrainhack events offer a novel workshop format with participant-generated content that caters to the rapidly growing open neuroscience community. Including components from hackathons and unconferences, as well as parallel educational sessions, Brainhack fosters novel collaborations around the interests of its attendees. Here we provide an overview of its structure, past events, and example projects. Additionally, we outline current innovations such as regional events and post-conference publications. Through introducing Brainhack to the wider neuroscience community, we hope to provide a unique conference format that promotes the features of collaborative, open science