The association between the type, context, and levels of physical activity amongst adolescents

Background: Little is known about how the type and context of physical activity behaviors varies among adolescents with differing activity levels. The aim of this study was to assess differences in the type and context of physical activity behaviors in adolescents by level of objectively measured physical activity. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2728 adolescents (1299 males, 1429 females) participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). The mean (SD) age was 13.8 (+0.1) years. Physical activity was measured using an Actigraph over 7 days. Adolescents were categorized into tertiles of activity (less, moderately, highly active) using counts/min and min/d of moderate-to-vigorous activity (MVPA). Activity type was reported using the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR). Differences in the type and context of activity by activity level were analyzed using Chi squared. Results: Highly active boys reported more job, outside, and sports activities on school days (P\u3c.05), and more sports activities on nonschool days (P\u3c.05). Highly active girls reported more outside activities on school days (P\u3c.05). Conclusions: Identifying the type and context of physical activity behaviors associated with more active adolescents, can help inform policy and physical activity interventions aimed at increasing activity levels in adolescents

A standardized framework for the validation and verification of clinical molecular genetic tests

The validation and verification of laboratory methods and procedures before their use in clinical testing is essential for providing a safe and useful service to clinicians and patients. This paper outlines the principles of validation and verification in the context of clinical human molecular genetic testing. We describe implementation processes, types of tests and their key validation components, and suggest some relevant statistical approaches that can be used by individual laboratories to ensure that tests are conducted to defined standards

Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin. Between March 9 and June 17, 2020, 614 adult patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized within at least 1 domain following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory or cardiovascular organ support at 121 sites in 8 countries. Of these, 403 were randomized to open-label interventions within the corticosteroid domain. The domain was halted after results from another trial were released. Follow-up ended August 12, 2020. Interventions: The corticosteroid domain randomized participants to a fixed 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours) (n = 143), a shock-dependent course (50 mg every 6 hours when shock was clinically evident) (n = 152), or no hydrocortisone (n = 108). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of ICU-based respiratory or cardiovascular support) within 21 days, where patients who died were assigned -1 day. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model that included all patients enrolled with severe COVID-19, adjusting for age, sex, site, region, time, assignment to interventions within other domains, and domain and intervention eligibility. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Results: After excluding 19 participants who withdrew consent, there were 384 patients (mean age, 60 years; 29% female) randomized to the fixed-dose (n = 137), shock-dependent (n = 146), and no (n = 101) hydrocortisone groups; 379 (99%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean age for the 3 groups ranged between 59.5 and 60.4 years; most patients were male (range, 70.6%-71.5%); mean body mass index ranged between 29.7 and 30.9; and patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged between 50.0% and 63.5%. For the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively, the median organ support-free days were 0 (IQR, -1 to 15), 0 (IQR, -1 to 13), and 0 (-1 to 11) days (composed of 30%, 26%, and 33% mortality rates and 11.5, 9.5, and 6 median organ support-free days among survivors). The median adjusted odds ratio and bayesian probability of superiority were 1.43 (95% credible interval, 0.91-2.27) and 93% for fixed-dose hydrocortisone, respectively, and were 1.22 (95% credible interval, 0.76-1.94) and 80% for shock-dependent hydrocortisone compared with no hydrocortisone. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 (3%), 5 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days. However, the trial was stopped early and no treatment strategy met prespecified criteria for statistical superiority, precluding definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707

Dissecting the Shared Genetic Architecture of Suicide Attempt, Psychiatric Disorders, and Known Risk Factors

Background Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide, and nonfatal suicide attempts, which occur far more frequently, are a major source of disability and social and economic burden. Both have substantial genetic etiology, which is partially shared and partially distinct from that of related psychiatric disorders. Methods We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 29,782 suicide attempt (SA) cases and 519,961 controls in the International Suicide Genetics Consortium (ISGC). The GWAS of SA was conditioned on psychiatric disorders using GWAS summary statistics via multitrait-based conditional and joint analysis, to remove genetic effects on SA mediated by psychiatric disorders. We investigated the shared and divergent genetic architectures of SA, psychiatric disorders, and other known risk factors. Results Two loci reached genome-wide significance for SA: the major histocompatibility complex and an intergenic locus on chromosome 7, the latter of which remained associated with SA after conditioning on psychiatric disorders and replicated in an independent cohort from the Million Veteran Program. This locus has been implicated in risk-taking behavior, smoking, and insomnia. SA showed strong genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, particularly major depression, and also with smoking, pain, risk-taking behavior, sleep disturbances, lower educational attainment, reproductive traits, lower socioeconomic status, and poorer general health. After conditioning on psychiatric disorders, the genetic correlations between SA and psychiatric disorders decreased, whereas those with nonpsychiatric traits remained largely unchanged. Conclusions Our results identify a risk locus that contributes more strongly to SA than other phenotypes and suggest a shared underlying biology between SA and known risk factors that is not mediated by psychiatric disorders.Peer reviewe

Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics

Next generation sequencing has disrupted genetic testing, allowing far more scope in the tests applied. The appropriate sections of the genome to be tested can now be readily selected, from single mutations to whole-genome sequencing. One product offering within this spectrum are focused exomes, targeting ~5,000 genes know to be implicated in human disease. These are designed to offer a flexible platform offering high diagnostic yield with a reduction in sequencing requirement compared to whole exome sequencing. Here, we have undertaken sequencing of control DNA samples and compare two kits, the Illumina TruSight One and the Agilent SureSelect Focused Exome. Characteristics of the kits are comprehensively evaluated. Despite the larger design region of the Agilent kit, we find that the Illumina kit performs better in terms of gene coverage, as well as coverage of clinically relevant loci. We provide exhaustive coverage statistics for each kit to aid the assessment of their suitability and provide read data for control DNA samples to allow for bioinformatic benchmarking by users developing pipelines for these data

Comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits using NA12878 trio DNA

A technical comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits, by triplicate sequencing of the cell line DNA of NA12878, NA12891, NA12892 and NIST RM8395</span

A SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies

Whole-exome sequencing provides a cost-effective means to sequence protein coding regions within the genome, which are significantly enriched for etiological variants. We describe a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to facilitate the validation of data provenance in whole-exome sequencing studies. This is particularly significant where multiple processing steps necessitate transfer of sample custody between clinical, laboratory and bioinformatics facilities. SNPs captured by all commonly used exome enrichment kits were identified, and filtered for possible confounding properties. The optimised panel provides a simple, yet powerful, method for the assignment of intrinsic, highly discriminatory identifiers to genetic sample

Erratum to: a SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies

This is an Erratum to Genome Medicine 2013, 5:89, highlighting an error in Table 1 of the original article. Please see related article: http://genomemedicine.com/content/5/9/89

Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting

BACKGROUND: The past 10 years have seen an improvement in sequence data quality due to the introduction of capillary sequencers and new sequencing chemistries. In parallel, new software programs for automated mutation detection have been developed. We evaluated the sensitivity of semiautomated unidirectional sequence analysis for the detection of heterozygous base substitutions using the Mutation Surveyor software package.METHODS: Detection rates for heterozygous base substitutions in 29 genes by automated and visual inspection were compared. Examples of heterozygous bases not detected in one direction during bidirectional analysis were also sought through a national survey of United Kingdom (UK) genetics laboratories. Sequence quality was assessed in a consecutive cohort of 50 patients for whom the 39 exons of the ABCC8 gene had been sequenced in one direction.RESULTS: A total of 701 different heterozygous base substitutions were detected by the software with no false negatives (sensitivity &gt;or=99.57%). Four examples of heterozygous bases missed in one direction during bidirectional analysis were reported. Two were detected using unidirectional analysis settings, and the other two bases had low-quality scores. Of the 1950 amplicons examined, 97.2% had a quality score &gt;or=30 and an average PHRED-like score &gt;or=50 for the defined region of interest, and 98.1% of the 323,650 bases had a PHRED score &gt;40.CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a requirement for bidirectional sequencing. Semiautomated analysis of good quality unidirectional sequence data has high sensitivity and is suitable for heterozygote mutation scanning in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Further work is required to determine minimum quality parameters for semiautomated analysis.<br/