Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Benefits and Role of Carbon Dioxide Angiography in Case of Misalignment Between Fenestration and Target Vessel During Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To report the benefits and the role of carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography in case of misalignment between fenestration and target vessel during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR). Technique: During F-EVAR, misalignment between fenestration and target vessel is a potentially catastrophic complication. In 2 patients, we experienced that one of the target vessels were not visible during standard angiography in different projections after positioning a fenestrated graft and even after cannulation of the corresponding fenestration. In both cases, the graft was sealed to the aortic wall but not in the predictable position. Consequently, acute occlusion of the target vessel was hypothesized. However, CO2 angiography was useful to evaluate patency of the target vessel clarifying the relative position of the fenestration versus the target vessel. Rescue maneuvers were feasible under the guidance of CO2 angiography in order to obtain the cannulation of both renal arteries. In both cases, the procedure was successfully accomplished. Conclusion: In case of misalignment of a fenestration during F-EVAR and non-visualization of the target vessel with standard angiography, CO2 angiography could have the unique and complementary role of clarifying the patency and position of the target vessel. In addition, CO2 could guide the rescue maneuvers

Staged in situ aorto-iliac hybrid technique: an original technique to treat complex juxtarenal and iliac aneurysms

Background: To report a novel staged hybrid technique to treat complex juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) associated with at least one iliac artery aneurysm (IA) with no adequate distal fixation zone. Methods: The novel technique herein described has two main “staged” steps. The first step consists in creating an adequate distal fixation zone by endovascular means; after hypogastric embolization an iliac stent-graft has placed from 5 mm above the aortic bifurcation to the external iliac artery. The second step is the surgical resection of the JAAA and graft placement sutured distally to the stent-graft which was always performed the day after. Results: The five cases included (mean age 74 years), were rejected for fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair or iliac branch devices. Four tube grafts and one aorto-bi-iliac graft were sutured to one stent-graft (N.=3), two stent-grafts in iliac kissing configuration (N.=1) and to a main body of a bifurcated stent-graft (N.=1). Mean follow-up duration was 14 (4-27) months with no mortality. Technical success was obtained in all cases (2 suprarenal clamping). Postoperative complications included two pleural effusions, two transient gluteal intermittent claudications, and one renal failure. Conclusions: The technique herein described seems to be a feasible and cost-effective alternative treatment for selected concomitant complex JAAAs and IAs unsuitable for totally endovascular treatment

Endovascular Treatment with Primary Stenting of Acutely Thrombosed Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

Only anecdotal cases concerning primary stenting of thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) without a preoperative intra-arterial thrombolysis are reported. We report our series of 6 patients treated with this technique

Bilateral Use of Iliac Branch Devices for Aortoiliac Aneurysms Is Safe and Feasible, and Procedural Volume Does Not Seem to Affect Technical or Clinical Effectiveness: Early and Midterm Results From the pELVIS International Multicentric Registry

Objective: To evaluate early and follow-up outcomes following bilateral use of iliac branch devices (IBD) for aortoiliac endografting and assess the impact of center volume. We used data from the pELVIS international multicentric registry. Methods: For the purpose of this study, only those patients receiving concomitant bilateral IBD implantation were analyzed. To assess the impact that procedural volume of bilateral IBD implantation could have on early and follow-up outcomes, participating institutions were classified as Site(s) A if they had performed >10 and/or >20% concomitant bilateral IBD procedure, otherwise they were classified as Site(s) B. Endpoints of the analysis included early (ie, 30-day) mortality and morbidity, as well as all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality during follow-up. Additional endpoints that were evaluated included IBD-related reinterventions, IBD occlusion or stenosis requiring reintervention (ie, loss of primary patency), and IBD-related type I endoleak. Results: Overall, 96 patients received bilateral IBD implantation (out of 910 procedures collected in the whole pELVIS cohort), of whom 65 were treated at Site A (ie, Group A) and 31 were treated at Site(s) B (ie, Group B). In total, only 1 death occurred within 30 days from bilateral IBD implantation, and 9 patients experienced at least 1 major complication without any significant difference between subjects in Group A versus those in Group B (10.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.714). In the overall cohort, the 2-year freedom from IBD-related type I endoleaks and IBD primary patency were 96% and 92%, respectively; no significant differences were seen in those rates between Group A or Group B (95% vs 100%, p=0.335; 93% vs 88%, p=0.470). Freedom from any IBD-related reinterventions was 83% at 2 years, with similar rates between study groups (85% vs 83%, p=0.904). Conclusions: Within the pELVIS registry, concomitant bilateral IBD implantation is a safe and feasible technique for management of aortoiliac aneurysms in patients with suitable anatomy. Despite increased technical complexity, effectiveness of the repair is satisfactory with low rates of IBD-related adverse events at mid-term follow-up. Procedural volume does not seem to affect technical or clinical outcomes after bilateral use of IBD, which remains a favorable treatment option in selected patients

A Matched Case-Control Study on Open and Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

To compare early and late results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysm in a retrospective single-center matched case-control study Methods: From 1981 to 2015, 309 consecutive interventions for popliteal artery aneurysm were performed in our institution, in 59 cases with endovascular repair and in 250 cases with open repair. Endovascular repair was preferred in older asymptomatic patients, while open repair was offered more frequently to patients with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm and a poor run-off status. A one-to-one coarsened exact matching on the basis of the baseline demographic, clinical, and anatomical covariates significantly different between the two treatment options was performed and two equivalent groups of 56 endovascular repairs and open repairs were generated. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative results with χ2test and of follow-up outcomes with the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test

Prevention of type II endoleaks: results of a study including 1000 patients

Aim: The incidence for type II endoleaks (T2E) reported in literature varies between 10% and 20% but their natural history is still unclear. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate our single centre experience of approximately 1000 patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to determine the role of T2Es in mid and long term failure and to optimize their management. Methods: Baseline characteristics, operative and follow-up data of consecutive patients undergoing EVAR at our Institution were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Patients with a demonstrated type II endoleak at the followup were divided in two groups depending on the spontaneous regression of the endoleak. We compared baseline characteristics, mortality, relation to aneurysm sac evolution, association with type I or III endoleaks and reintervention. The incidence of recurrent T2Es (defined as newly onset endoleaks after a surgical, trans-lumbar or trans-arterial treatment) was also evaluated to define a proper management of these complications. Results: From March 1999 to May 2014, 943 consecutive patients with an aortic or aorto-iliac aneurysms were treated with EVAR. During the follow-up 260 patients had a T2E. Out of these 260 patients, 99 had a spontaneous regression of the endoleak (38.1%) and were defined as Group 1 while 161 had a persistent-T2E (61.9%) and were defined as Group 2. The mean regression time of T2Es was 26.8 months (±21.8) with a median value of 18 months (12-36). During follow-up, an aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm was found in 10 patients (10.4%) in Group 1 compared with 37 (25.2%) in Group 2 (P<0.001) with a consequent increase in the rate of reinterventions (18.2% vs. 30.4%) for the second group (P<0.001). Adjusted analysis showed an increase risk of persistent-T2Es for age over 80 years (OR, 1.5: CI, 1.0-2.2; P=0.028), hypertension (OR, 1.5: CI, 1.0-2.3; P=0.043), ASA HI and TV (OR, 1.8: CI, 1.3-2.5; P<0.001) and presence of T2E at the completion angiography (OR, 1.5: CI, 1-2.2; P=0.031). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant decrease in the overall survival rate for patients presenting a persistent T2E (P=0.041). Conclusion: Persistent T2Es are related with higher mortality, sac enlargement and reinterventions rates. As their treatment appears to be often unsuccessful, the identification of subclasses of patients at risk may alter the treatment option