L’impact d’un campus clinique régional en milieu urbain : les perceptions des parties prenantes de la collectivité

Background: Regional medical campuses (RMC) have shown promise in addressing physician shortages. RMCs have been positively evaluated in rural/remote communities, however, it is unclear whether this model will be as beneficial in underserved urban areas. This study evaluated the impact of a RMC on a midsized urban city (Windsor, Ontario). We compare our results with a similar study conducted in a remote community in British Columbia (BC). Methods: A broad array of community stakeholders representing different sectors were consulted using a semi-structured interview format replicated from the BC Northern Medical Program (NMP) study. Thematic analysis based on the resulting rich data was conducted within a grounded theory context. Results: Twenty-three participants (52% male) representing healthcare, education, business, community and government/politico sectors were consulted. Their views regarding the Windsor Regional Medical Campus (WRMC) aligned around several themes: improved healthcare, enhanced community reputation, stimulated economic/community development, expanded training opportunities and an engaged community regarding the WRMC. These results were compared to the main findings of the NMP study with both similarities (e.g. increased community pride) and differences (e.g. resource concerns) discussed. Conclusion: Community stakeholders provided strong support for the WRMC through their perceptions of its positive impact on this urban region. These findings are consistent with similar RMC studies in rural/remote areas. Those interested in developing a RMC might benefit from considering these findings.Contexte : Les campus cliniques régionaux (CCR) se sont révélés prometteurs pour remédier à la pénurie de médecins. Les CCR ont été évalués positivement dans les collectivités rurales/éloignées, mais il n’est pas certain que ce modèle soit aussi bénéfique dans les zones urbaines mal desservies. La présente étude évalue l’impact d’un CCR dans une ville de taille moyenne (Windsor, Ontario). Nous comparons nos résultats avec ceux d’une étude similaire menée dans une collectivité éloignée en Colombie-Britannique (BC). Méthode : Un large éventail de parties prenantes de la collectivité représentant différents secteurs a été consulté par le biais d’entrevues semi-structurées calquées sur celles de l’étude du BC Northern Medical Program (NMP). L’analyse thématique des riches données obtenues a été faite selon l’approche de la Grounded Theory (théorie ancrée). Résultats : Vingt-trois participants (52 % d’hommes) des secteurs de la santé, de l’éducation, des affaires, de la vie communautaire, du gouvernement ou encore du monde politique ont été consultés. Leurs opinions concernant le campus clinique régional de Windsor (WRMC) s’articulaient autour de plusieurs thèmes : l’amélioration des soins de santé, le renforcement de la réputation de la collectivité, la stimulation du développement économique et communautaire, l’élargissement des possibilités de formation et l’engagement de la communauté envers le WRMC. Les résultats ont été comparés aux principales conclusions de l’étude du NMP, en analysant aussi bien les similitudes (par exemple, fierté accrue de la collectivité) que les différences (par exemple, les préoccupations en matière de ressources). Conclusion : Percevant l’impact positif qu’a eu le WRMC dans la région urbaine, les acteurs de la collectivité témoignent d’un ferme appui à son égard. Ces résultats sont conformes aux études similaires portant sur des CCR dans les zones rurales/éloignées. Les résultats de l’étude seraient utiles à tous ceux qui souhaitant mettre sur pied un CCR

A global research priority agenda to advance public health responses to fatty liver disease

Background & aims An estimated 38% of adults worldwide have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). From individual impacts to widespread public health and economic consequences, the implications of this disease are profound. This study aimed to develop an aligned, prioritised fatty liver disease research agenda for the global health community. Methods Nine co-chairs drafted initial research priorities, subsequently reviewed by 40 core authors and debated during a three-day in-person meeting. Following a Delphi methodology, over two rounds, a large panel (R1 n = 344, R2 n = 288) reviewed the priorities, via Qualtrics XM, indicating agreement using a four-point Likert-scale and providing written feedback. The core group revised the draft priorities between rounds. In R2, panellists also ranked the priorities within six domains: epidemiology, models of care, treatment and care, education and awareness, patient and community perspectives, and leadership and public health policy. Results The consensus-built fatty liver disease research agenda encompasses 28 priorities. The mean percentage of ‘agree’ responses increased from 78.3 in R1 to 81.1 in R2. Five priorities received unanimous combined agreement (‘agree’ + ‘somewhat agree’); the remaining 23 priorities had >90% combined agreement. While all but one of the priorities exhibited at least a super-majority of agreement (>66.7% ‘agree’), 13 priorities had 90% combined agreement. Conclusions Adopting this multidisciplinary consensus-built research priorities agenda can deliver a step-change in addressing fatty liver disease, mitigating against its individual and societal harms and proactively altering its natural history through prevention, identification, treatment, and care. This agenda should catalyse the global health community’s efforts to advance and accelerate responses to this widespread and fast-growing public health threat. Impact and implications An estimated 38% of adults and 13% of children and adolescents worldwide have fatty liver disease, making it the most prevalent liver disease in history. Despite substantial scientific progress in the past three decades, the burden continues to grow, with an urgent need to advance understanding of how to prevent, manage, and treat the disease. Through a global consensus process, a multidisciplinary group agreed on 28 research priorities covering a broad range of themes, from disease burden, treatment, and health system responses to awareness and policy. The findings have relevance for clinical and non-clinical researchers as well as funders working on fatty liver disease and non-communicable diseases more broadly, setting out a prioritised, ranked research agenda for turning the tide on this fast-growing public health threat

Community Perceptions of a Regional Medical Campus

Abstract Background/Purpose: Access to high-quality medical care in underserved locations has traditionally been a major issue across Canada. In 2008, Western University’s Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry opened a regional medical campus in the City of Windsor (roughly 200 km’s south of the main campus in London, Ontario). Since its inception, no empirical support has been established which evaluates the impact of the medical campus on the community. This study investigated the socio-economic impact of the Windsor Campus on the surrounding community. Methods: Data was collected using a semi-structured interview administered to a broad array of key community stakeholders in Windsor-Essex, Ontario. Participant’s perceptions regarding the effects of having a medical campus in the community were elicited. In total, 22 interviews were completed, transcribed, and analyzed for key themes. Results: Participants reported their perspectives on the historical, current, and anticipated impact of the regional medical campus across health, education, economic, political, and community sectors. Perceptions were overwhelmingly positive (e.g. physician retention/recruitment) and also identified areas for improvement (e.g. community outreach). Key themes identified include: “Improved Healthcare,” “Improved Community Reputation,” “Catalyst for Community Development,” “Partnerships in Interprofessional Education,” and “Awareness of the Windsor Campus.” Conclusion: Participants reported far-reaching community impacts as a result of the implementation of the regional medical campus. These effects resonated beyond the expected domains of healthcare and education. This study adds to and expands the growing body of evidence supporting the value of regional medical campuses to medically underserved communities

Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders

Background: Regional medical campuses (RMC) have shown promise in addressing physician shortages. RMCs have been positively evaluated in rural/remote communities, however, it is unclear whether this model will be as beneficial in underserved urban areas. This study evaluated the impact of a RMC on a midsized urban city (Windsor, Ontario). We compare our results with a similar study conducted in a remote community in British Columbia (BC).Methods: A broad array of community stakeholders representing different sectors were consulted using a semi-structured interview format replicated from the BC Northern Medical Program (NMP) study. Thematic analysis based on the resulting rich data was conducted within a grounded theory context.Results: Twenty-three participants (52% male) representing healthcare, education, business, community and government/politico sectors were consulted. Their views regarding the Windsor Regional Medical Campus (WRMC) aligned around several themes: improved healthcare, enhanced community reputation, stimulated economic/community development, expanded training opportunities and an engaged community regarding the WRMC. These results were compared to the main findings of the NMP study with both similarities (e.g. increased community pride) and differences (e.g. resource concerns) discussed.Conclusion: Community stakeholders provided strong support for the WRMC through their perceptions of its positive impact on this urban region. These findings are consistent with similar RMC studies in rural/remote areas. Those interested in developing a RMC might benefit from considering these findings.Contexte : Les campus cliniques régionaux (CCR) se sont révélés prometteurs pour remédier à la pénurie de médecins. Les CCR ont été évalués positivement dans les collectivités rurales/éloignées, mais il n’est pas certain que ce modèle soit aussi bénéfique dans les zones urbaines mal desservies. La présente étude évalue l’impact d’un CCR dans une ville de taille moyenne (Windsor, Ontario). Nous comparons nos résultats avec ceux d’une étude similaire menée dans une collectivité éloignée en Colombie-Britannique (BC).Méthode : Un large éventail de parties prenantes de la collectivité représentant différents secteurs a été consulté par le biais d’entrevues semi-structurées calquées sur celles de l’étude du BC Northern Medical Program (NMP). L’analyse thématique des riches données obtenues a été faite selon l’approche de la Grounded Theory (théorie ancrée).Résultats : Vingt-trois participants (52 % d’hommes) des secteurs de la santé, de l’éducation, des affaires, de la vie communautaire, du gouvernement ou encore du monde politique ont été consultés. Leurs opinions concernant le campus clinique régional de Windsor (WRMC) s’articulaient autour de plusieurs thèmes : l’amélioration des soins de santé, le renforcement de la réputation de la collectivité, la stimulation du développement économique et communautaire, l’élargissement des possibilités de formation et l’engagement de la communauté envers le WRMC. Les résultats ont été comparés aux principales conclusions de l’étude du NMP, en analysant aussi bien les similitudes (par exemple, fierté accrue de la collectivité) que les différences (par exemple, les préoccupations en matière de ressources).Conclusion : Percevant l’impact positif qu’a eu le WRMC dans la région urbaine, les acteurs de la collectivité témoignent d’un ferme appui à son égard. Ces résultats sont conformes aux études similaires portant sur des CCR dans les zones rurales/éloignées. Les résultats de l’étude seraient utiles à tous ceux qui souhaitant mettre sur pied un CCR

The global NAFLD policy review and preparedness index: Are countries ready to address this silent public health challenge?

Background & aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent, yet largely underappreciated liver condition which is closely associated with obesity and metabolic disease. Despite affecting an estimated 1 in 4 adults globally, NAFLD is largely absent on national and global health agendas. Methods: We collected data from 102 countries, accounting for 86% of the world population, on NAFLD policies, guidelines, civil society engagement, clinical management, and epidemiologic data. A preparedness index was developed by coding questions into 6 domains (policies, guidelines, civil awareness, epidemiology and data, NAFLD detection, and NAFLD care management) and categorising the responses as high, medium, and low; a multiple correspondence analysis was then applied. Results: The highest scoring countries were India (42.7) and the United Kingdom (40.0), with 32 countries (31%) scoring zero out of 100. For 5 of the domains a minority of countries were categorised as high-level while the majority were categorised as low-level. No country had a national or sub-national strategy for NAFLD and <2% of the different strategies for related conditions included any mention of NAFLD. National NAFLD clinical guidelines were present in only 32 countries. Conclusions: Although NAFLD is a pressing public health problem, no country was found to be well prepared to address it. There is a pressing need for strategies to address NAFLD at national and global levels. Lay summary: Around a third of the countries scored a zero on the NAFLD policy preparedness index, with no country scoring over 50/100. Although NAFLD is a pressing public health problem, a comprehensive public health response is lacking in all 102 countries. Policies and strategies to address NAFLD at the national and global levels are urgently needed

Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement

© Springer Nature Limited 2021, corrected publication 2021Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a potentially serious liver disease that affects approximately one-quarter of the global adult population, causing a substantial burden of ill health with wide-ranging social and economic implications. It is a multisystem disease and is considered the hepatic component of metabolic syndrome. Unlike other highly prevalent conditions, NAFLD has received little attention from the global public health community. Health system and public health responses to NAFLD have been weak and fragmented, and, despite its pervasiveness, NAFLD is largely unknown outside hepatology and gastroenterology. There is only a nascent global public health movement addressing NAFLD, and the disease is absent from nearly all national and international strategies and policies for non-communicable diseases, including obesity. In this global Delphi study, a multidisciplinary group of experts developed consensus statements and recommendations, which a larger group of collaborators reviewed over three rounds until consensus was achieved. The resulting consensus statements and recommendations address a broad range of topics - from epidemiology, awareness, care and treatment to public health policies and leadership - that have general relevance for policy-makers, health-care practitioners, civil society groups, research institutions and affected populations. These recommendations should provide a strong foundation for a comprehensive public health response to NAFLD.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio