7 research outputs found

    High-latitude ionospheric irregularities during the 25-26 August 2018 geomagnetic storm as seen by ground-based and space-borne instruments

    No full text
    International audienceIn this work, we analyze the occurrence of ionospheric irregularities during the 25-26 August 2018 geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of-206 nT, this storm is the third largest in the solar cycle 24. It produced strong effects in the ionosphere, especially in the American and Pacific longitudinal sectors. Here we use a combination of ground-based (GNSS) and spaceborne (Swarm and CSES) instruments in order to detect the occurrence of intensive ionospheric irregularities. We show that the most significant impact was done at highlatitudes. In the North American region, the area with irregularities descended to 42-45N. The location of the observed irregularities corresponded, most likely, to the auroral oval region. The use of satellite measurements added more information on the spatial distribution of the irregularities, which is especially important in areas with limited coverage by ground-based GNSS stations

    The 6 February 2023 TĂŒrkiye Earthquake Sequence as Detected in the Ionosphere

    No full text
    International audienceOn 6 February 2023, a series of large earthquakes struck Turkey and Northern Syria. The main earthquake of Mw 7.8 occurred at 01:17:34 UTC and was followed by the three notable (Mw > 5.5) aftershocks within the next 18 min. Then, ∌9 hr later, the biggest aftershock with magnitude Mw 7.5 and a Mw 6.0 earthquake occurred to the north‐east from the first main earthquake. In this work, we use data of ground‐based Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers in Turkey, Israel and Cyprus to analyze the ionospheric response to this series of earthquakes. We separate these events in two groups: the first sequence of earthquakes (at 01–02 UTC) and the second sequence (at 10–11 UTC). For the first sequence, we observe a clear N‐shaped total electron content (TEC) response after the Mw 7.8 mainshock earthquake and Mw 6.7 aftershock, and a smaller TEC disturbance that is, most likely, caused by the Mw 5.6 earthquake. The latter is now the smallest earthquake detected by using ionospheric GNSS data. The co‐seismic ionospheric disturbances (CSID) propagated from the epicentral area in the south‐west direction with velocities of about 750–830 m/s. For the second sequence, we observed the response to the Mw 7.5 aftershock earthquake and the Mw 6.0 aftershock. The CSID propagated both to the south‐west and the north‐west to the epicentral area, with velocities of about 950–1,100 m/s

    Ionospheric Disturbances and Irregularities During the 25-26 August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

    No full text
    International audienceWe use ground-based (GNSS, SuperDARN, and ionosondes) and space-borne (Swarm, CSES, and DMSP) instruments to study ionospheric disturbances due to the 25-26 August 2018 geomagnetic storm. The strongest large-scale storm-time enhancements were detected over the Asian and Pacific regions during the main and early recovery phases of the storm. In the American sector, there occurred the most complex effects caused by the action of multiple drivers. At the beginning of the storm, a large positive disturbance occurred over North America at low and high latitudes, driven by the storm-time reinforcement of the equatorial ionization anomaly (at low latitudes) and by particle precipitation (at high latitudes). During local nighttime hours, we observed numerous medium-scale positive and negative ionospheric disturbances at middle and high latitudes that were attributed to a storm-enhanced density (SED)-plume, mid-latitude ionospheric trough, and particle precipitation in the auroral zone. In South America, total electron content (TEC) maps clearly showed the presence of the equatorial plasma bubbles, that, however, were not seen in data of Rate-of-TEC-change index (ROTI). Global ROTI maps revealed intensive small-scale irregularities at high latitudes in both hemispheres within the auroral region. In general, the ROTI disturbance "imaged" quite well the auroral oval boundaries. The most intensive ionospheric fluctuations were observed at low and mid-latitudes over the Pacific Ocean. The storm also affected the positioning accuracy by GPS receivers: during the main phase of the storm, the precise point positioning error exceeded 0.5 m, which is more than five times greater as compared to quiet days

    The 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga Eruption History as Inferred From Ionospheric Observations

    No full text
    International audienceOn 15 January 2022, the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai submarine volcano erupted violently and triggered a giant atmospheric shock wave and tsunami. The exact mechanism of this extraordinary eruptive event, its size and magnitude are not well understood yet. In this work, we analyze data from the nearest ground-based receivers of Global Navigation Satellite System to explore the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) response to this event. We show that the ionospheric response consists of a giant TEC increase followed by a strong long-lasting depletion. We observe that the explosive event of 15 January 2022 began at 04:05:54UT and consisted of at least five explosions. Based on the ionospheric TEC data, we estimate the energy released during the main major explosion to be between 9 and 37 Megatons in trinitrotoluene equivalent. This is the first detailed analysis of the eruption sequence scenario and the timeline from ionospheric TEC observations

    L'éruption du volcan Hunga Tonga -Hunga Ha'apai le 15 janvier 2022 : un ébranlement du systÚme Terre à l'échelle planétaire

    No full text
    L'Ă©ruption explosive du volcan Hunga Tonga - Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH), le 15 janvier 2022, a produit la plus puissante explosion enregistrĂ©e depuis les explosions du Krakatau et du Tambora dans les annĂ©es 1800, libĂ©rant une Ă©nergie Ă©quivalente Ă  110 mĂ©gatonnes de TNT. Les ondes gĂ©nĂ©rĂ©es sesont propagĂ©es dans le sol, et dans l’atmosphĂšre jusqu’à l’ionosphĂšre. L'onde atmosphĂ©rique la plus Ă©nergĂ©tique observĂ©e sur les baromĂštres correspond au mode de Lamb. De pĂ©riode supĂ©rieure Ă  2000 s, son amplitude est comparable Ă  celle observĂ©e lors de l’éruption du Krakatau en 1883. L’empreinte des perturbations atmosphĂ©riques a Ă©tĂ© caractĂ©risĂ©e Ă  l’échelle planĂ©taire par des rĂ©seaux de mesures au sol, Ă  bord de satellites ou de plateformes aĂ©roportĂ©es. L’analyse combinĂ©e de ces observations a permis d’évaluer les consĂ©quences Ă  court terme de l'Ă©ruption du HTHH. Les mĂ©thodes d'investigation gĂ©ophysiques prĂ©sentĂ©es dans cette note montrent l’apport d’analyses interdisciplinaires pour caractĂ©riser la rĂ©ponse impulsionnelle des enveloppes fluides planĂ©taires (atmosphĂšre, ocĂ©ans et mers) Ă  une Ă©ruption d’une intensitĂ© exceptionnelle

    L'éruption du volcan Hunga Tonga -Hunga Ha'apai le 15 janvier 2022 : un ébranlement du systÚme Terre à l'échelle planétaire

    No full text
    L'Ă©ruption explosive du volcan Hunga Tonga - Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH), le 15 janvier 2022, a produit la plus puissante explosion enregistrĂ©e depuis les explosions du Krakatau et du Tambora dans les annĂ©es 1800, libĂ©rant une Ă©nergie Ă©quivalente Ă  110 mĂ©gatonnes de TNT. Les ondes gĂ©nĂ©rĂ©es sesont propagĂ©es dans le sol, et dans l’atmosphĂšre jusqu’à l’ionosphĂšre. L'onde atmosphĂ©rique la plus Ă©nergĂ©tique observĂ©e sur les baromĂštres correspond au mode de Lamb. De pĂ©riode supĂ©rieure Ă  2000 s, son amplitude est comparable Ă  celle observĂ©e lors de l’éruption du Krakatau en 1883. L’empreinte des perturbations atmosphĂ©riques a Ă©tĂ© caractĂ©risĂ©e Ă  l’échelle planĂ©taire par des rĂ©seaux de mesures au sol, Ă  bord de satellites ou de plateformes aĂ©roportĂ©es. L’analyse combinĂ©e de ces observations a permis d’évaluer les consĂ©quences Ă  court terme de l'Ă©ruption du HTHH. Les mĂ©thodes d'investigation gĂ©ophysiques prĂ©sentĂ©es dans cette note montrent l’apport d’analyses interdisciplinaires pour caractĂ©riser la rĂ©ponse impulsionnelle des enveloppes fluides planĂ©taires (atmosphĂšre, ocĂ©ans et mers) Ă  une Ă©ruption d’une intensitĂ© exceptionnelle
    corecore