Rituximab and hypogammaglobulinemia

El rituximab (RTX), un anticuerpo quimérico anti-CD20 que induce la depleción de linfocitos B, es utilizado para el tratamiento de enfermedades linfoproliferativas y autoinmunes. La inmunodeficiencia humoral relacionada al tratamiento con RTX comenzó a ser un motivo de derivación a nuestro Servicio, por lo que decidimos analizar a los pacientes con el antecedente de haber sido tratados con RTX que consultaron por hipogammaglobulinemia o infecciones recurrentes desde noviembre de 2010 hasta diciembre de 2014. Evaluamos a ocho pacientes, siete mujeres y un varón. El tiempo promedio de seguimiento fue de 19.3 ± 18.8 meses, rango 1 a 54, con una mediana de 13. Tres tenían proteinogramas normales previo a la administración de RTX, tres hipogammaglobulinemia, y de dos no hay datos. A ninguno se le realizó una determinación cuantitativa de inmunoglobulinas previa al tratamiento. Cuatro recibieron RTX por linfoma B no Hodgkin, dos por leucemia linfocítica crónica, uno por púrpura trombocitopénica autoinmune y otro por poliangeítis microscópica. A seis se les diagnosticó hipogammaglobulinemia y a uno deficiencia de IgM, IgA e IgG2. Cinco presentaron infecciones, cuatro con buena respuesta al tratamiento de reemplazo con gammaglobulina. La inmunodeficiencia humoral relacionada a RTX es una causa de consulta cada vez más frecuente. Resulta fundamental disponer de los niveles de inmunoglobulinas previo al inicio de su administración para poder establecer una relación etiológica y durante el seguimiento, para disminuir el retraso diagnóstico. El tratamiento con gammaglobulina en dosis sustitutivas parece ser de utilidad en pacientes con infecciones graves o recurrentes.Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20, induces the depletion of B lymphocytes. It is used for the treatment of lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases. Antibody immunodeficiency associated to RTX treatment is a new motif for consultation to our service. We decided to study those patients that having been treated with RTX, consulted for hypogammaglobulinemia or recurrent infections between November 2010 and December 2014. We evaluated eight patients, seven female and one male. The average follow up time was 19.3 ± 18.8 months, range 1 to 54, median 13. Three had a normal electrophoretic proteinogram before receiving RTX, three had hypogammaglobulinemia and in two data was not available. None of them had a quantitative determination of immunoglobulins before receiving RTX. Four received RTX as a treatment of non Hodking lymphoma, two as a treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, one for immune thrombocytopenic purpura and other for microscopic polyangiitis. Six were diagnosed with hypogammaglobulinemia and one with combined IgM, IgA and IgG2 deficiency. Five presented infections, four of them with good response to intravenous immunoglobulin. RTX related antibody deficiency consultations are increasing. It is important to determine the immunoglobulin levels previously to RTX use in order to establish an etiologic relationship with RTX and a quick diagnosis of antibody deficiency. The substitutive treatment with gammaglobulin seems to be useful in patients with severe or recurrent infections.Fil: Fernández Romero, Diego S.. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Torre, María Gabriela. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Larrauri, Blas J.. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Malbran, Eloisa. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Juri, María Cristina. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; ArgentinaFil: Malbrán, Alejandro. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires. Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Unidad de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin

Acquired angioedema

Acquired angioedema (AAE) is characterized by acquired deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), hyperactivation of the classical pathway of human complement and angioedema symptoms mediated by bradykinin released by inappropriate activation of the contact-kinin system. Angioedema recurs at unpredictable intervals, lasts from two to five days and presents with edema of the skin (face, limbs, genitals), severe abdominal pain with edema of the gastrointestinal mucosa, life-threateing edema of the upper respiratory tract and edema of the oral mucosa and of the tongue. AAE recurs in association with various conditions and particularly with different forms of lymphoproliferative disorders. Neutralizing autoantibodies to C1-INH are present in the majority of patients. The therapeutic approach to a patient with AAE should first be aimed to avoid fatalities due to angioedema and then to avoid the disability caused be angioedema recurrences. Acute attacks can be treated with plasma-derived C1-INH, but some patients become non-responsive and in these patients the kallikrein inhibitor ecallantide and the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant can be effective. Angioedema prophylaxis is performed using antifibrinolytic agents and attenuated androgens with antifibrinolytic agents providing somewhat better results. Treatment of the associated disease can resolve AAE in some patients

A Core Outcome Set for Efficacy of Acute Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants. OBJECTIVE: To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. METHODS: We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internetbased survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9 -point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2. RESULTS: A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The fi rst round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of fi ve key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of fi ve key outcomes. Crown Copyright (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2024;12:1614-21

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema - The 2021 revision and update.

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: 1) How should HAE be diagnosed? 2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? 3) What are the goals of treatment? 4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast feeding women? 5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema—The 2021 revision and update

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1 inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1 inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: (1) How should HAE be diagnosed? (2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? (3) What are the goals of treatment? (4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast-feeding women? and (5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients