Why Are Outcomes Different for Registry Patients Enrolled Prospectively and Retrospectively? Insights from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF).

Background: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result. Methods and Results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≥1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either retrospectively (n = 5069) or prospectively (n = 5501) from 19 countries and then followed prospectively. The retrospectively enrolled cohort comprised patients with established AF (for a least 6, and up to 24 months before enrolment), who were identified retrospectively (and baseline and partial follow-up data were collected from the emedical records) and then followed prospectively between 0-18 months (such that the total time of follow-up was 24 months; data collection Dec-2009 and Oct-2010). In the prospectively enrolled cohort, patients with newly diagnosed AF (≤6 weeks after diagnosis) were recruited between Mar-2010 and Oct-2011 and were followed for 24 months after enrolment. Differences between the cohorts were observed in clinical characteristics, including type of AF, stroke prevention strategies, and event rates. More patients in the retrospectively identified cohort received vitamin K antagonists (62.1% vs. 53.2%) and fewer received non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (1.8% vs . 4.2%). All-cause mortality rates per 100 person-years during the prospective follow-up (starting the first study visit up to 1 year) were significantly lower in the retrospective than prospectively identified cohort (3.04 [95% CI 2.51 to 3.67] vs . 4.05 [95% CI 3.53 to 4.63]; p = 0.016). Conclusions: Interpretations of data from registries that aim to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AF must take account of differences in registry design and the impact of recall bias and survivorship bias that is incurred with retrospective enrolment. Clinical Trial Registration: - URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362)

Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an accurate, web-based tool for stratifying patients with atrial fibrillation to facilitate decisions on the potential benefits/risks of anticoagulation, based on mortality, stroke and bleeding risks. DESIGN: The new tool was developed, using stepwise regression, for all and then applied to lower risk patients. C-statistics were compared with CHA2DS2-VASc using 30-fold cross-validation to control for overfitting. External validation was undertaken in an independent dataset, Outcome Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). PARTICIPANTS: Data from 39 898 patients enrolled in the prospective GARFIELD-AF registry provided the basis for deriving and validating an integrated risk tool to predict stroke risk, mortality and bleeding risk. RESULTS: The discriminatory value of the GARFIELD-AF risk model was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for patients with or without anticoagulation. C-statistics (95% CI) for all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and haemorrhagic stroke/major bleeding (treated patients) were: 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78), 0.69 (0.67 to 0.71) and 0.66 (0.62 to 0.69), respectively, for the GARFIELD-AF risk models, and 0.66 (0.64-0.67), 0.64 (0.61-0.66) and 0.64 (0.61-0.68), respectively, for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). In very low to low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)), the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (for bleeding) scores offered weak discriminatory value for mortality, stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. C-statistics for the GARFIELD-AF risk tool were 0.69 (0.64 to 0.75), 0.65 (0.56 to 0.73) and 0.60 (0.47 to 0.73) for each end point, respectively, versus 0.50 (0.45 to 0.55), 0.59 (0.50 to 0.67) and 0.55 (0.53 to 0.56) for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). Upon validation in the ORBIT-AF population, C-statistics showed that the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was effective for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality using the full and simplified model for all-cause mortality: C-statistics 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77) and 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77), respectively, and for predicting for any stroke or systemic embolism over 1 year, C-statistics 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting stroke and mortality and superior to HAS-BLED for bleeding, overall and in lower risk patients. The GARFIELD-AF tool has the potential for incorporation in routine electronic systems, and for the first time, permits simultaneous evaluation of ischaemic stroke, mortality and bleeding risks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362) and for ORBIT-AF (NCT01165710)

Two-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF.

AIMS: The relationship between outcomes and time after diagnosis for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is poorly defined, especially beyond the first year. METHODS AND RESULTS: GARFIELD-AF is an ongoing, global observational study of adults with newly diagnosed NVAF. Two-year outcomes of 17 162 patients prospectively enrolled in GARFIELD-AF were analysed in light of baseline characteristics, risk profiles for stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and antithrombotic therapy. The mean (standard deviation) age was 69.8 (11.4) years, 43.8% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 (1.6); 60.8% of patients were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with/without antiplatelet (AP) therapy, 27.4% AP monotherapy, and 11.8% no antithrombotic therapy. At 2-year follow-up, all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding had occurred at a rate (95% confidence interval) of 3.83 (3.62; 4.05), 1.25 (1.13; 1.38), and 0.70 (0.62; 0.81) per 100 person-years, respectively. Rates for all three major events were highest during the first 4 months. Congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, sudden/unwitnessed death, malignancy, respiratory failure, and infection/sepsis accounted for 65% of all known causes of death and strokes for <10%. Anticoagulant treatment was associated with a 35% lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: The most frequent of the three major outcome measures was death, whose most common causes are not known to be significantly influenced by anticoagulation. This suggests that a more comprehensive approach to the management of NVAF may be needed to improve outcome. This could include, in addition to anticoagulation, interventions targeting modifiable, cause-specific risk factors for death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012-2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3-2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8-2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32-9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16-4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Standards for the installation of automatic sprinkler systems - the comparison of the general parameters

Prawidłowe zaprojektowanie instalacji tryskaczowych w obiekcie stanowi jedną z najważniejszych rzeczy wpływających na wysoką skuteczność tych urządzeń. Aby tego dokonać należy przed przystąpieniem do procesu projektowania wybrać standard projektowania najbardziej odpowiadający zabezpieczeniu danej przestrzeni. W artykule przedstawiono porównanie najpopularniejszych standardów projektowania urządzeń gaśniczych tryskaczowych spotykanych w Polsce. Omówiono klasę zagrożenia pożarowego jako element wyjściowy do doboru parametrów instalacji tryskaczowej, porównano definicje, jak również przedstawiono w formie tabelarycznej podział na trzy podstawowe klasy zagrożenia pożarowego: małe, średnie i duże zagrożenie. Następnie omówiono podstawowe parametry instalacji tryskaczowej: intensywność zraszania, powierzchnię działania, minimalny czas działania oraz maksymalną powierzchnię chronioną przez jeden tryskacz. W przypadku każdego z parametrów przedstawiono ich definicje, funkcję i znaczenie w procesie projektowania instalacji. Dokonano zestawienia w formie tabelarycznej wartości z poszczególnych norm. Pozwala to na bezpośrednie porównanie standardów i ocenę różnic w nich występujących, w zakresie analizowanych parametrów. W podsumowaniu przedstawiono ogólne porównanie mocnych i słabych stron analizowanych standardów projektowania.The right design of a sprinkler installation in an object comprises one of the most significant things which plays a role in the effectiveness of these devices. In order to accomplish this the standard for the installation which is the most appropriate for a space assuring should be chosen before starting a design process. In this article the comparison of the most popular design standards of the automatic sprinkler systems in Poland has been presented. The article analyses the classification of occupancies as a basic element to the selection of sprinkler installation parameters. There is not only a comparison of definitions, but also the division into the three basic classes: light, ordinary and high hazard in a tabular form. The next discussed problem deals with the basic sprinkler installation parameters: density, area of sprinkler operation, water supply duration and protection area per sprinkler. The definitions, functions and importance in the process of an installation design of every discussed parameter are included. There are also some speculations concerning a juxtaposition of particular norm values in a tabular form. It lets to their direct comparison, as well as an evaluation of the parameter standards differences. In conclusion, a general comparison of fortes and drawbacks of standards for the installation are under discussion in this article

Application of CAT scanning in non-destructive testing of welded t-joints

W pracy przedstawiono wyniki badań nieniszczących z wykorzystaniem tomografu komputerowego Somaton Definition AS firmy Siemens. Próbkami były złącza teowe wykonane w pozycji podolnej PA. Jako materiał próbek zastosowano stal węglową konstrukcyjną C45. Spoiny wykonano dla poziomu jakości C (wymagania średnie).The article presents the results of a non-destructive conducted with the aid of computer tomograph Somaton Definition AS (Siemens). The samples were welded T-joints made in the downhand position. The material used for probes was steel C45. The joints were made on the Level C quality (medium requirements)

Law requirements of explosion proof protection at working with chemical substances

Magazynowanie, przetwarzanie oraz wykorzystanie w przemysłowym procesie produkcyjnym niebezpiecznych substancji chemicznych wymusza na pracodawcach oraz zarządcach obiektów budowlanych przestrzeganie szeregu szczególnych wymagań techniczno – budowlanych oraz regulacji w zakresie bezpieczeństwa i ochrony zdrowia zatrudnionych pracowników. Niedostosowanie budynków do wymagań oraz niezachowanie szczególnej ostrożności przy pracy z substancjami chemicznymi może prowadzić do realnego zagrożenia wybuchowego, a w konsekwencji zagrożenia życia ludzi oraz środowiska. Pierwszym etapem identyfikacji zagrożeń jest przeprowadzenie oceny zagrożenia wybuchem, której efektem jest wdrożenie przeciwwybuchowych środków technicznych oraz organizacyjnych, dostosowanych do poziomu zagrożenia. W pracy przedstawiono praktyczne aspekty zabezpieczenia obiektów budowlanych oraz procesów pracy na podstawie przepisów prawnych dotyczących ochrony przeciwwybuchowej.Storage, processing and using of dangerous chemicals substances in the industrial production process requires from employers and buildings managers to compliance with a number of specific technical and building requirements as well as regulations regarding the safety and health protection of employees. Maladjustment of buildings to law requirements and lack of particular caution during work with chemicals substances may lead to a real explosive threat and as a consequence to exposure of human life and the environment. The first stage of the threats identifying is to carry out an explosion risk assessment, which of effect is the implementation of technical and organizational explosion-proofs, adjusted to the level of dangers. In the paper practical aspects of securing buildings and working processes based on the law requirements concerning of explosion protection are presented

Diagnostic contribution of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with acute coronary syndrome and culprit-free angiograms.

BACKGROUND: In spite of robust knowledge about underlying ischemic myocardial damage, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with culprit-free angiograms raise diagnostic concerns. The present study aimed to evaluate the additional value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) over commonly available non-CMR standard tests, for the differentiation of myocardial injury in patients with ACS and non-obstructed coronary arteries. MATERIAL/METHODS: Patients with ACS, elevated hs-TnT, and a culprit-free angiogram were prospectively enrolled into the study between January 2009 and July 2013. After initial evaluation with standard tests (ECG, echocardiography, hs-TnT) and provisional exclusion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in coronary angiogram, patients were referred for CMR with the suspicion of myocarditis or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC). According to the result of CMR, patients were reclassified as having myocarditis, AMI, TTC, or non-injured myocardium as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: Out of 5110 patients admitted with ACS, 75 had normal coronary angiograms and entered the study; 69 of them (92%) were suspected for myocarditis and 6 (8%) for TTC. After CMR, 49 patients were finally diagnosed with myocarditis (65%), 3 with TTC (4%), 7 with AMI (9%), and 16 (21%) with non-injured myocardium. The provisional diagnosis was changed or excluded in 23 patients (31%), with a 9% rate of unrecognized AMI. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that the evaluation of patients with ACS and culprit-free angiogram should be complemented by a CMR examination, if available, because the initial work-up with non-CMR tests leads to a significant proportion of misdiagnosed AMI