Distinguishing personal belief from scientific knowledge for the betterment of killer whale welfare – a commentary

We contest publication of Marino et al. regarding captive killer whale (Orcinus orca) welfare because of misrepresentations of available data and the use of citations that do not support assertions. Marino et al. misrepresent stress response concepts and erroneously cite studies, which appear to support Marino et al.’s philosophical beliefs regarding the cetacean hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. To be clear, these misrepresentations are not differences of scientific opinion, as the authors’ conclusions lack any scientific basis. More extensive review of Marino et al.’s citations reveal a dearth of empirical evidence to support their assertions. Further, Marino et al.’s approach to animal welfare is not consistent with conventional veterinary approaches to animal welfare, including their apparent opposition to use of preventative and therapeutic veterinary interventions. While Marino et al. argue that killer whales’ cognitive and spatial needs preclude management of this species under human care, misrepresentation of the citations used to support this opinion invalidates their arguments. Misleading interpretations of data relative to killer whales’ cognitive and emotional needs and specious and unsubstantiated comparisons with states experienced by humans with posttraumatic stress disorder and other conditions, represent a number of strategies used to misrepresent knowledge regarding killer whale welfare. These misrepresentations and fallacies are inconsistent with scientific ethical standards for credible, peer-reviewed journals (ICMJE, 2018), and are barriers to rigorous discourse and identification of strategies for optimizing killer whale welfare. Assertions in the paper amount to nothing more than a compilation of conclusory, philosophical statements. We would also like to mention that manuscripts such as Marino et al.’s do great damage to the fields of comparative psychology and to behavioral science as a whole

Expanding access to administrative data: the case of tax authorities in Finland and the UK

We discuss typical issues in getting access to and using high-quality administrative tax data for research purposes. We discuss research involving both quasi- and field experiments implemented together with the tax authority. We reflect on practical solutions that promote co-creation of knowledge and reduce information asymmetries between researchers and practitioners, based on our experiences of working with the tax authorities in Finland and the UK. We provide examples of how to improve the overall research environment focusing on two successful case studies: the HMRC Datalab in the UK and the remote access to data from Statistics Finland. We propose two key arguments to persuade policymakers elsewhere to follow similar practices: improved data security and equality of access across researchers.</p

Distinguishing personal belief from scientific knowledge for the betterment of killer whale welfare \u2013 a commentary

We contest publication of Marino et al. regarding captive killer whale (Orcinus orca) welfare because of misrepresentations of available data and the use of citations that do not support assertions. Marino et al. misrepresent stress response concepts and erroneously cite studies, which appear to support Marino et al.\u2019s philosophical beliefs regarding the cetacean hypothalamic\u2013pituitary\u2013adrenal axis. To be clear, these misrepresentations are not differences of scientific opinion, as the authors\u2019 conclusions lack any scientific basis. More extensive review of Marino et al.\u2019s citations reveal a dearth of empirical evidence to support their assertions. Further, Marino et al.\u2019s approach to animal welfare is not consistent with conventional veterinary approaches to animal welfare, including their apparent opposition to use of preventative and therapeutic veterinary interventions. While Marino et al. argue that killer whales\u2019 cognitive and spatial needs preclude management of this species under human care, misrepresentation of the citations used to support this opinion invalidates their arguments. Misleading interpretations of data relative to killer whales\u2019 cognitive and emotional needs and specious and unsubstantiated comparisons with states experienced by humans with posttraumatic stress disorder and other conditions, represent a number of strategies used to misrepresent knowledge regarding killer whale welfare. These misrepresentations and fallacies are inconsistent with scientific ethical standards for credible, peer-reviewed journals (ICMJE, 2018), and are barriers to rigorous discourse and identification of strategies for optimizing killer whale welfare. Assertions in the paper amount to nothing more than a compilation of conclusory, philosophical statements. We would also like to mention that manuscripts such as Marino et al.\u2019s do great damage to the fields of comparative psychology and to behavioral science as a whole

The 1930s as black mirror: Visions of historical repetition in the global financial press, 2007-2009

Media coverage of the recent financial crisis has referred extensively to various past crises, and in particular to the events of the 1930s. This article suggests that the idea of the Great Depression has effectively come to function as a kind of historical ‘black mirror’ – a quasi-object within which conjuncture and historical representation interact to produce an image of capitalist history itself. Focusing on the journalistic output of four key financial publications, I trace how portrayals of the 1930s have evolved over the course of the crisis. I find that while the 1930s are frequently and consistently invoked in ways that purport to reveal the historicity of the crisis, these representations produce an oscillation between different visions of historical repetition, which in turn underpin competing interpretations of the crisis as it unfolds. In so doing, I argue, appeals to the 1930s have simultaneously served to conceal and disclose the constitutive relation of historical imagination to historical process – a double move that has had the paradoxical effect of both securing and undermining the reproduction of finance capitalism as we have come to know it

The Effectiveness of Glutathione Redox Status as a Possible Tumor Marker in Colorectal Cancer

[EN] The role of oxidative stress (OS) in cancer is a matter of great interest due to the implication of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and their oxidation products in the initiation of tumorigenesis, its progression, and metastatic dissemination. Great efforts have been made to identify the mechanisms of ROS-induced carcinogenesis; however, the validation of OS byproducts as potential tumor markers (TMs) remains to be established. This interventional study included a total of 80 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and 60 controls. By measuring reduced glutathione (GSH), its oxidized form (GSSG), and the glutathione redox state in terms of the GSSG/GSH ratio in the serum of CRC patients, we identified significant changes as compared to healthy subjects. These findings are compatible with the effectiveness of glutathione as a TM. The thiol redox state showed a significant increase towards oxidation in the CRC group and correlated significantly with both the tumor state and the clinical evolution. The sensitivity and specificity of serum glutathione levels are far above those of the classical TMs CEA and CA19.9. We conclude that the GSSG/GSH ratio is a simple assay which could be validated as a novel clinical TM for the diagnosis and monitoring of CRC.This work was partially supported by grants GST, UGP-19-037 FISABIO, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia-the Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset POLISABIO collaboration program (UPV-FISABIO) NanOdGSens-2, the Spanish Government project RTI2018-100910-B-C41 (MCUI/AEI/FEDER, UE), the Generalitat Valenciana project PROMETEO/2018/024 and PI18/00932 by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF "A way to build Europe"). C.B. is a recipient of a Miguel Servet contract (CP19/00077) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.Acevedo-León, D.; Monzó-Beltrán, L.; Gómez-Abril, SÁ.; Estañ-Capel, N.; Camarasa-Lillo, N.; Pérez-Ebri, ML.; Escandón-Álvarez, J.... (2021). The Effectiveness of Glutathione Redox Status as a Possible Tumor Marker in Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(12):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126183115221

Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues

Aging, often considered a result of random cellular damage, can be accurately estimated using DNA methylation profiles, the foundation of pan-tissue epigenetic clocks. Here, we demonstrate the development of universal pan-mammalian clocks, using 11,754 methylation arrays from our Mammalian Methylation Consortium, which encompass 59 tissue types across 185 mammalian species. These predictive models estimate mammalian tissue age with high accuracy (r > 0.96). Age deviations correlate with human mortality risk, mouse somatotropic axis mutations and caloric restriction. We identified specific cytosines with methylation levels that change with age across numerous species. These sites, highly enriched in polycomb repressive complex 2-binding locations, are near genes implicated in mammalian development, cancer, obesity and longevity. Our findings offer new evidence suggesting that aging is evolutionarily conserved and intertwined with developmental processes across all mammals

Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis

[EN] Ovule development is essential for plant survival, as it allows correct embryo and seed development upon fertilization. The female gametophyte is formed in the central area of the nucellus during ovule development, in a complex developmental programme that involves key regulatory genes and the plant hormones auxins and brassinosteroids. Here we provide novel evidence of the role of gibberellins (GAs) in the control of megagametogenesis and embryo sac development, via the GA-dependent degradation of RGA-LIKE1 (RGL1) in the ovule primordia. YPet-rgl1.17 plants, which express a dominant version of RGL1, showed reduced fertility, mainly due to altered embryo sac formation that varied from partial to total ablation. YPet-rgl1.17 ovules followed normal development of the megaspore mother cell, meiosis, and formation of the functional megaspore, but YPet-rgl1.17 plants had impaired mitotic divisions of the functional megaspore. This phenotype is RGL1-specific, as it is not observed in any other dominant mutants of the DELLA proteins. Expression analysis of YPet-rgl1.17 coupled to in situ localization of bioactive GAs in ovule primordia led us to propose a mechanism of GA-mediated RGL1 degradation that allows proper embryo sac development. Taken together, our data unravel a novel specific role of GAs in the control of female gametophyte development.We wish to thank the IBMCP microscopy facility, and Ms J. Yun for technical assistance. We also thank Jennifer Nemhauser (University of Washington, USA) for the HACR sensor. Cambridge proofreading (https://proofreading.org/order/) provided proofreading and editing of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation-FEDER [BIO2017-83138R] to MAP-A and National Science Foundation [MCB-0923727] to JMA. MAP-A received a fellowship of the `Salvador de Madariaga' program from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).Gomez, MD.; Barro-Trastoy, D.; Fuster Almunia, C.; Tornero Feliciano, P.; Alonso, JM.; Perez Amador, MA. (2020). Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 71(22):7059-7072. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa395S705970727122Bai, M.-Y., Shang, J.-X., Oh, E., Fan, M., Bai, Y., Zentella, R., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2012). Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nature Cell Biology, 14(8), 810-817. doi:10.1038/ncb2546Battaglia, R., Brambilla, V., & Colombo, L. (2008). Morphological analysis of female gametophyte development in thebel1 stk shp1 shp2mutant. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 142(3), 643-649. doi:10.1080/11263500802411098Beeckman, T., De Rycke, R., Viane, R., & Inzé, D. (2000). Histological Study of Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Research, 113(2), 139-148. doi:10.1007/pl00013924Bencivenga, S., Simonini, S., Benková, E., & Colombo, L. (2012). The Transcription Factors BEL1 and SPL Are Required for Cytokinin and Auxin Signaling During Ovule Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 24(7), 2886-2897. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.100164Brumos, J., Zhao, C., Gong, Y., Soriano, D., Patel, A. P., Perez-Amador, M. A., … Alonso, J. M. (2019). An Improved Recombineering Toolset for Plants. The Plant Cell, 32(1), 100-122. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00431Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xCoen, O., Lu, J., Xu, W., De Vos, D., Péchoux, C., Domergue, F., … Magnani, E. (2019). Deposition of a cutin apoplastic barrier separating seed maternal and zygotic tissues. BMC Plant Biology, 19(1). doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1877-9Cucinotta, M., Di Marzo, M., Guazzotti, A., de Folter, S., Kater, M. M., & Colombo, L. (2020). Gynoecium size and ovule number are interconnected traits that impact seed yield. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(9), 2479-2489. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa050Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2013). Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development, 140(6), 1147-1151. doi:10.1242/dev.087650Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2016). A Pivotal Role of DELLAs in Regulating Multiple Hormone Signals. Molecular Plant, 9(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.011Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Ferreira, L. G., de Alencar Dusi, D. M., Irsigler, A. S. T., Gomes, A. C. M. M., Mendes, M. A., Colombo, L., & de Campos Carneiro, V. T. (2017). GID1 expression is associated with ovule development of sexual and apomictic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 37(2), 293-306. doi:10.1007/s00299-017-2230-0Fleck, B., & Harberd, N. P. (2002). Evidence that theArabidopsisnuclear gibberellin signalling protein GAI is not destabilised by gibberellin. The Plant Journal, 32(6), 935-947. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01478.xGallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Grau-Enguix, F., Abbas, M., Locascio, A., Thomas, S. G., … Blazquez, M. A. (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(33), 13446-13451. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119992109Gallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Marin, J. A., Prat, S., Blazquez, M. A., & Alabadi, D. (2010). Transcriptional Diversification and Functional Conservation between DELLA Proteins in Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27(6), 1247-1256. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq012Gomez, M. D., Barro-Trastoy, D., Escoms, E., Saura-Sánchez, M., Sánchez, I., Briones-Moreno, A., … Perez-Amador, M. A. (2018). Gibberellins negatively modulate ovule number in plants. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.163865G�mez, M. D., Beltr�n, J.-P., & Ca�as, L. A. (2004). The pea END1 promoter drives anther-specific gene expression in different plant species. Planta, 219(6), 967-981. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1300-zGómez, M. D., Fuster-Almunia, C., Ocaña-Cuesta, J., Alonso, J. M., & Pérez-Amador, M. A. (2019). RGL2 controls flower development, ovule number and fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Science, 281, 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.014Gomez, M. D., Ventimilla, D., Sacristan, R., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2016). Gibberellins Regulate Ovule Integument Development by Interfering with the Transcription Factor ATS. Plant Physiology, 172(4), 2403-2415. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01231Hedden, P., & Sponsel, V. (2015). A Century of Gibberellin Research. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 34(4), 740-760. doi:10.1007/s00344-015-9546-1Khakhar, A., Leydon, A. R., Lemmex, A. C., Klavins, E., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2018). Synthetic hormone-responsive transcription factors can monitor and re-program plant development. eLife, 7. doi:10.7554/elife.34702Koorneef, M., Elgersma, A., Hanhart, C. J., Loenen-Martinet, E. P., Rijn, L., & Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1985). A gibberellin insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum, 65(1), 33-39. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02355.xKurihara, D., Mizuta, Y., Sato, Y., & Higashiyama, T. (2015). ClearSee: a rapid optical clearing reagent for whole-plant fluorescence imaging. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.127613Lee, S. (2002). Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis seed germination via RGL2, a GAI/RGA-like gene whose expression is up-regulated following imbibition. Genes & Development, 16(5), 646-658. doi:10.1101/gad.969002Li, Q.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, L., Li, S., Sun, S. S. M., & He, J.-X. (2012). An Interaction Between BZR1 and DELLAs Mediates Direct Signaling Crosstalk Between Brassinosteroids and Gibberellins in Arabidopsis. Science Signaling, 5(244). doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002908Lieber, D., Lora, J., Schrempp, S., Lenhard, M., & Laux, T. (2011). Arabidopsis WIH1 and WIH2 Genes Act in the Transition from Somatic to Reproductive Cell Fate. Current Biology, 21(12), 1009-1017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.015Lora, J., Herrero, M., Tucker, M. R., & Hormaza, J. I. (2016). The transition from somatic to germline identity shows conserved and specialized features during angiosperm evolution. New Phytologist, 216(2), 495-509. doi:10.1111/nph.14330Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xPeng, J., Carol, P., Richards, D. E., King, K. E., Cowling, R. J., Murphy, G. P., & Harberd, N. P. (1997). The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses . Genes & Development, 11(23), 3194-3205. doi:10.1101/gad.11.23.3194Pinto, S. C., Mendes, M. A., Coimbra, S., & Tucker, M. R. (2019). Revisiting the Female Germline and Its Expanding Toolbox. Trends in Plant Science, 24(5), 455-467. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.003Schneitz, K., Hulskamp, M., & Pruitt, R. E. (1995). Wild-type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a light microscope study of cleared whole-mount tissue. The Plant Journal, 7(5), 731-749. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07050731.xErbasol Serbes, I., Palovaara, J., & Groß-Hardt, R. (2019). Development and function of the flowering plant female gametophyte. Plant Development and Evolution, 401-434. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.11.016Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Tucker, M. R., Okada, T., Hu, Y., Scholefield, A., Taylor, J. M., & Koltunow, A. M. G. (2012). Somatic small RNA pathways promote the mitotic events of megagametogenesis during female reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Development, 139(8), 1399-1404. doi:10.1242/dev.075390Ursache, R., Andersen, T. G., Marhavý, P., & Geldner, N. (2018). A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. The Plant Journal, 93(2), 399-412. doi:10.1111/tpj.13784Villanueva, J. M., Broadhvest, J., Hauser, B. A., Meister, R. J., Schneitz, K., & Gasser, C. S. (1999). INNER NO OUTER regulates abaxial- adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes & Development, 13(23), 3160-3169. doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3160Wen, C.-K., & Chang, C. (2002). Arabidopsis RGL1 Encodes a Negative Regulator of Gibberellin Responses. The Plant Cell, 14(1), 87-100. doi:10.1105/tpc.010325Wu, J., Mohamed, D., Dowhanik, S., Petrella, R., Gregis, V., Li, J., … Gazzarrini, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal Restriction of FUSCA3 Expression by Class I BPCs Promotes Ovule Development and Coordinates Embryo and Endosperm Growth. The Plant Cell, 32(6), 1886-1904. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00764Yang, W.-C., Shi, D.-Q., & Chen, Y.-H. (2010). Female Gametophyte Development in Flowering Plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61(1), 89-108. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112203Yang, W.-C., Ye, D., Xu, J., & Sundaresan, V. (1999). The SPOROCYTELESS gene of Arabidopsis is required for initiation of sporogenesis and encodes a novel nuclear protein. Genes & Development, 13(16), 2108-2117. doi:10.1101/gad.13.16.2108Zhao, L., He, J., Cai, H., Lin, H., Li, Y., Liu, R., … Qin, Y. (2014). Comparative expression profiling reveals gene functions in female meiosis and gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 80(4), 615-628. doi:10.1111/tpj.12657Zhou, R., Benavente, L. M., Stepanova, A. N., & Alonso, J. M. (2011). A recombineering-based gene tagging system for Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 66(4), 712-723. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04524.