A new set of ESTs and cDNA clones from full-length and normalized libraries for gene discovery and functional characterization in citrus

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Interpretation of ever-increasing raw sequence information generated by modern genome sequencing technologies faces multiple challenges, such as gene function analysis and genome annotation. Indeed, nearly 40% of genes in plants encode proteins of unknown function. Functional characterization of these genes is one of the main challenges in modern biology. In this regard, the availability of full-length cDNA clones may fill in the gap created between sequence information and biological knowledge. Full-length cDNA clones facilitate functional analysis of the corresponding genes enabling manipulation of their expression in heterologous systems and the generation of a variety of tagged versions of the native protein. In addition, the development of full-length cDNA sequences has the power to improve the quality of genome annotation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We developed an integrated method to generate a new normalized EST collection enriched in full-length and rare transcripts of different citrus species from multiple tissues and developmental stages. We constructed a total of 15 cDNA libraries, from which we isolated 10,898 high-quality ESTs representing 6142 different genes. Percentages of redundancy and proportion of full-length clones range from 8 to 33, and 67 to 85, respectively, indicating good efficiency of the approach employed. The new EST collection adds 2113 new citrus ESTs, representing 1831 unigenes, to the collection of citrus genes available in the public databases. To facilitate functional analysis, cDNAs were introduced in a Gateway-based cloning vector for high-throughput functional analysis of genes <it>in planta</it>. Herein, we describe the technical methods used in the library construction, sequence analysis of clones and the overexpression of <it>CitrSEP</it>, a citrus homolog to the Arabidopsis <it>SEP3 </it>gene, in Arabidopsis as an example of a practical application of the engineered Gateway vector for functional analysis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The new EST collection denotes an important step towards the identification of all genes in the citrus genome. Furthermore, public availability of the cDNA clones generated in this study, and not only their sequence, enables testing of the biological function of the genes represented in the collection. Expression of the citrus <it>SEP3 </it>homologue, <it>CitrSEP</it>, in Arabidopsis results in early flowering, along with other phenotypes resembling the over-expression of the Arabidopsis <it>SEPALLATA </it>genes. Our findings suggest that the members of the <it>SEP </it>gene family play similar roles in these quite distant plant species.</p

The programming of sequences of saccades

Saccadic eye movements move the high-resolution fovea to point at regions of interest. Saccades can only be generated serially (i.e., one at a time). However, what remains unclear is the extent to which saccades are programmed in parallel (i.e., a series of such moments can be planned together) and how far ahead such planning occurs. In the current experiment, we investigate this issue with a saccade contingent preview paradigm. Participants were asked to execute saccadic eye movements in response to seven small circles presented on a screen. The extent to which participants were given prior information about target locations was varied on a trial-by-trial basis: participants were aware of the location of the next target only, the next three, five, or all seven targets. The addition of new targets to the display was made during the saccade to the next target in the sequence. The overall time taken to complete the sequence was decreased as more targets were available up to all seven targets. This was a result of a reduction in the number of saccades being executed and a reduction in their saccade latencies. Surprisingly, these results suggest that, when faced with a demand to saccade to a large number of target locations, saccade preparation about all target locations is carried out in paralle

Systems analysis of auxin transport in the Arabidopsis root apex

Auxin is a key regulator of plant growth and development. Within the root tip, auxin distribution plays a crucial role specifying developmental zones and coordinating tropic responses. Determining how the organ-scale auxin pattern is regulated at the cellular scale is essential to understanding how these processes are controlled. In this study, we developed an auxin transport model based on actual root cell geometries and carrier subcellular localizations. We tested model predictions using the DII-VENUS auxin sensor in conjunction with state-of-the-art segmentation tools. Our study revealed that auxin efflux carriers alone cannot create the pattern of auxin distribution at the root tip and that AUX1/LAX influx carriers are also required. We observed that AUX1 in lateral root cap (LRC) and elongating epidermal cells greatly enhance auxin’s shootward flux, with this flux being predominantly through the LRC, entering the epidermal cells only as they enter the elongation zone. We conclude that the nonpolar AUX1/LAX influx carriers control which tissues have high auxin levels, whereas the polar PIN carriers control the direction of auxin transport within these tissues

Characterization of constricted fruit (ctf) Mutant Uncovers a Role for AtMYB117/LOF1 in Ovule and Fruit Development in Arabidopsis thaliana

Pistil and fruit morphogenesis is the result of a complex gene network that is not yet fully understood. A search for novel genes is needed to make a more comprehensive model of pistil and fruit development. Screening for mutants with alterations in fruit morphology generated by an activation tagging strategy resulted in the isolation of the ctf (constricted fruit) mutant. It is characterized by a) small and wrinkled fruits, with an enlarged replum, an amorphous structure of the septum and an irregular distribution of ovules and seeds; b) ectopic carpelloid structures in sepals bearing ovule-like structures and c) dwarf plants with curled rosette leaves. The overexpressed gene in ctf was AtMYB117, also named LOF1 (LATERAL ORGAN FUSION1). AtMYB117/LOF1 transcripts were localized in boundary regions of the vegetative shoot apical meristem and leaf primordia and in a group of cells in the adaxial base of petioles and bracts. Transcripts were also detected in the boundaries between each of the four floral whorls and during pistil development in the inner of the medial ridges, the placenta, the base of the ovule primordia, the epidermis of the developing septum and the outer cell layers of the ovule funiculi. Analysis of changes of expression of pistil-related genes in the ctf mutant showed an enhancement of SHATTERPROOF1 (SHP1) and SHP2 expression. All these results suggest that AtMYB117/LOF1 is recruited by a variety of developmental programs for the establishment of boundary regions, including the development of floral organs and the initiation of ovule outgrowth

The concurrent programming of saccades

Sequences of saccades have been shown to be prepared concurrently however it remains unclear exactly what aspects of those saccades are programmed in parallel. To examine this participants were asked to make one or two target-driven saccades: a reflexive saccade; a voluntary saccade; a reflexive then a voluntary saccade; or vice versa. During the first response the position of a second target was manipulated. The new location of the second saccade target was found to impact on second saccade latencies and second saccade accuracy showing that some aspects of the second saccade program are prepared in parallel with the first. However, differences were found in the specific pattern of effects for each sequence type. These differences fit well within a general framework for saccade control in which a common priority map for saccade control is computed and the influence of saccade programs on one another depends not so much on the types of saccade being produced but rather on the rate at which their programs develop

Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis

[EN] Ovule development is essential for plant survival, as it allows correct embryo and seed development upon fertilization. The female gametophyte is formed in the central area of the nucellus during ovule development, in a complex developmental programme that involves key regulatory genes and the plant hormones auxins and brassinosteroids. Here we provide novel evidence of the role of gibberellins (GAs) in the control of megagametogenesis and embryo sac development, via the GA-dependent degradation of RGA-LIKE1 (RGL1) in the ovule primordia. YPet-rgl1.17 plants, which express a dominant version of RGL1, showed reduced fertility, mainly due to altered embryo sac formation that varied from partial to total ablation. YPet-rgl1.17 ovules followed normal development of the megaspore mother cell, meiosis, and formation of the functional megaspore, but YPet-rgl1.17 plants had impaired mitotic divisions of the functional megaspore. This phenotype is RGL1-specific, as it is not observed in any other dominant mutants of the DELLA proteins. Expression analysis of YPet-rgl1.17 coupled to in situ localization of bioactive GAs in ovule primordia led us to propose a mechanism of GA-mediated RGL1 degradation that allows proper embryo sac development. Taken together, our data unravel a novel specific role of GAs in the control of female gametophyte development.We wish to thank the IBMCP microscopy facility, and Ms J. Yun for technical assistance. We also thank Jennifer Nemhauser (University of Washington, USA) for the HACR sensor. Cambridge proofreading (https://proofreading.org/order/) provided proofreading and editing of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation-FEDER [BIO2017-83138R] to MAP-A and National Science Foundation [MCB-0923727] to JMA. MAP-A received a fellowship of the `Salvador de Madariaga' program from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).Gomez, MD.; Barro-Trastoy, D.; Fuster Almunia, C.; Tornero Feliciano, P.; Alonso, JM.; Perez Amador, MA. (2020). Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 71(22):7059-7072. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa395S705970727122Bai, M.-Y., Shang, J.-X., Oh, E., Fan, M., Bai, Y., Zentella, R., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2012). Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nature Cell Biology, 14(8), 810-817. doi:10.1038/ncb2546Battaglia, R., Brambilla, V., & Colombo, L. (2008). Morphological analysis of female gametophyte development in thebel1 stk shp1 shp2mutant. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 142(3), 643-649. doi:10.1080/11263500802411098Beeckman, T., De Rycke, R., Viane, R., & Inzé, D. (2000). Histological Study of Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Research, 113(2), 139-148. doi:10.1007/pl00013924Bencivenga, S., Simonini, S., Benková, E., & Colombo, L. (2012). The Transcription Factors BEL1 and SPL Are Required for Cytokinin and Auxin Signaling During Ovule Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 24(7), 2886-2897. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.100164Brumos, J., Zhao, C., Gong, Y., Soriano, D., Patel, A. P., Perez-Amador, M. A., … Alonso, J. M. (2019). An Improved Recombineering Toolset for Plants. The Plant Cell, 32(1), 100-122. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00431Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xCoen, O., Lu, J., Xu, W., De Vos, D., Péchoux, C., Domergue, F., … Magnani, E. (2019). Deposition of a cutin apoplastic barrier separating seed maternal and zygotic tissues. BMC Plant Biology, 19(1). doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1877-9Cucinotta, M., Di Marzo, M., Guazzotti, A., de Folter, S., Kater, M. M., & Colombo, L. (2020). Gynoecium size and ovule number are interconnected traits that impact seed yield. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(9), 2479-2489. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa050Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2013). Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development, 140(6), 1147-1151. doi:10.1242/dev.087650Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2016). A Pivotal Role of DELLAs in Regulating Multiple Hormone Signals. Molecular Plant, 9(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.011Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Ferreira, L. G., de Alencar Dusi, D. M., Irsigler, A. S. T., Gomes, A. C. M. M., Mendes, M. A., Colombo, L., & de Campos Carneiro, V. T. (2017). GID1 expression is associated with ovule development of sexual and apomictic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 37(2), 293-306. doi:10.1007/s00299-017-2230-0Fleck, B., & Harberd, N. P. (2002). Evidence that theArabidopsisnuclear gibberellin signalling protein GAI is not destabilised by gibberellin. The Plant Journal, 32(6), 935-947. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01478.xGallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Grau-Enguix, F., Abbas, M., Locascio, A., Thomas, S. G., … Blazquez, M. A. (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(33), 13446-13451. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119992109Gallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Marin, J. A., Prat, S., Blazquez, M. A., & Alabadi, D. (2010). Transcriptional Diversification and Functional Conservation between DELLA Proteins in Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27(6), 1247-1256. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq012Gomez, M. D., Barro-Trastoy, D., Escoms, E., Saura-Sánchez, M., Sánchez, I., Briones-Moreno, A., … Perez-Amador, M. A. (2018). Gibberellins negatively modulate ovule number in plants. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.163865G�mez, M. D., Beltr�n, J.-P., & Ca�as, L. A. (2004). The pea END1 promoter drives anther-specific gene expression in different plant species. Planta, 219(6), 967-981. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1300-zGómez, M. D., Fuster-Almunia, C., Ocaña-Cuesta, J., Alonso, J. M., & Pérez-Amador, M. A. (2019). RGL2 controls flower development, ovule number and fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Science, 281, 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.014Gomez, M. D., Ventimilla, D., Sacristan, R., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2016). Gibberellins Regulate Ovule Integument Development by Interfering with the Transcription Factor ATS. Plant Physiology, 172(4), 2403-2415. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01231Hedden, P., & Sponsel, V. (2015). A Century of Gibberellin Research. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 34(4), 740-760. doi:10.1007/s00344-015-9546-1Khakhar, A., Leydon, A. R., Lemmex, A. C., Klavins, E., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2018). Synthetic hormone-responsive transcription factors can monitor and re-program plant development. eLife, 7. doi:10.7554/elife.34702Koorneef, M., Elgersma, A., Hanhart, C. J., Loenen-Martinet, E. P., Rijn, L., & Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1985). A gibberellin insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum, 65(1), 33-39. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02355.xKurihara, D., Mizuta, Y., Sato, Y., & Higashiyama, T. (2015). ClearSee: a rapid optical clearing reagent for whole-plant fluorescence imaging. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.127613Lee, S. (2002). Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis seed germination via RGL2, a GAI/RGA-like gene whose expression is up-regulated following imbibition. Genes & Development, 16(5), 646-658. doi:10.1101/gad.969002Li, Q.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, L., Li, S., Sun, S. S. M., & He, J.-X. (2012). An Interaction Between BZR1 and DELLAs Mediates Direct Signaling Crosstalk Between Brassinosteroids and Gibberellins in Arabidopsis. Science Signaling, 5(244). doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002908Lieber, D., Lora, J., Schrempp, S., Lenhard, M., & Laux, T. (2011). Arabidopsis WIH1 and WIH2 Genes Act in the Transition from Somatic to Reproductive Cell Fate. Current Biology, 21(12), 1009-1017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.015Lora, J., Herrero, M., Tucker, M. R., & Hormaza, J. I. (2016). The transition from somatic to germline identity shows conserved and specialized features during angiosperm evolution. New Phytologist, 216(2), 495-509. doi:10.1111/nph.14330Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xPeng, J., Carol, P., Richards, D. E., King, K. E., Cowling, R. J., Murphy, G. P., & Harberd, N. P. (1997). The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses . Genes & Development, 11(23), 3194-3205. doi:10.1101/gad.11.23.3194Pinto, S. C., Mendes, M. A., Coimbra, S., & Tucker, M. R. (2019). Revisiting the Female Germline and Its Expanding Toolbox. Trends in Plant Science, 24(5), 455-467. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.003Schneitz, K., Hulskamp, M., & Pruitt, R. E. (1995). Wild-type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a light microscope study of cleared whole-mount tissue. The Plant Journal, 7(5), 731-749. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07050731.xErbasol Serbes, I., Palovaara, J., & Groß-Hardt, R. (2019). Development and function of the flowering plant female gametophyte. Plant Development and Evolution, 401-434. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.11.016Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Tucker, M. R., Okada, T., Hu, Y., Scholefield, A., Taylor, J. M., & Koltunow, A. M. G. (2012). Somatic small RNA pathways promote the mitotic events of megagametogenesis during female reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Development, 139(8), 1399-1404. doi:10.1242/dev.075390Ursache, R., Andersen, T. G., Marhavý, P., & Geldner, N. (2018). A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. The Plant Journal, 93(2), 399-412. doi:10.1111/tpj.13784Villanueva, J. M., Broadhvest, J., Hauser, B. A., Meister, R. J., Schneitz, K., & Gasser, C. S. (1999). INNER NO OUTER regulates abaxial- adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes & Development, 13(23), 3160-3169. doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3160Wen, C.-K., & Chang, C. (2002). Arabidopsis RGL1 Encodes a Negative Regulator of Gibberellin Responses. The Plant Cell, 14(1), 87-100. doi:10.1105/tpc.010325Wu, J., Mohamed, D., Dowhanik, S., Petrella, R., Gregis, V., Li, J., … Gazzarrini, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal Restriction of FUSCA3 Expression by Class I BPCs Promotes Ovule Development and Coordinates Embryo and Endosperm Growth. The Plant Cell, 32(6), 1886-1904. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00764Yang, W.-C., Shi, D.-Q., & Chen, Y.-H. (2010). Female Gametophyte Development in Flowering Plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61(1), 89-108. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112203Yang, W.-C., Ye, D., Xu, J., & Sundaresan, V. (1999). The SPOROCYTELESS gene of Arabidopsis is required for initiation of sporogenesis and encodes a novel nuclear protein. Genes & Development, 13(16), 2108-2117. doi:10.1101/gad.13.16.2108Zhao, L., He, J., Cai, H., Lin, H., Li, Y., Liu, R., … Qin, Y. (2014). Comparative expression profiling reveals gene functions in female meiosis and gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 80(4), 615-628. doi:10.1111/tpj.12657Zhou, R., Benavente, L. M., Stepanova, A. N., & Alonso, J. M. (2011). A recombineering-based gene tagging system for Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 66(4), 712-723. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04524.